ML19319C468
| ML19319C468 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse, Perry  |
| Issue date: | 11/20/1975 |
| From: | Rigler D Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8002190918 | |
| Download: ML19319C468 (7) | |
Text
,.
~
r
~
9 u
%7.2 p
J:
5 NOV 201975 >
g:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c$,[7 E
0/
Before the Atomic Safety and Licehsing Board Y
s W,,
In the Matter of
)
)
THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY and
) Docket Nos. 50-346A-THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ~)
50-500A COMPANY
)
50-501A (Davie-Besse Nuclear Power Station, )
Units 1, 2 and 3)
)
)
THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING ) Docket Nos. 50-440A COMPANY, ET AL.
)
50.-441A (Perry Nuclear Power Plant,
)
Units 1 and 2)
)
AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF THE BOARD GRANTING MOTION OF CEI TO QUASH SUBPOENA On November 18, 1975, following a telephone conference call among affected parties, the Board issued its Memorandum and Order Granting the' Motion of Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
(CEI) to Quash a Subpoena issued by the Board at the behest of the Department of Justice (Justice).
In its Memorandum and Order, the Board granted Justice leave to apply for production of the subpoenaed documents under Section 2.741 of the Commission's Rules.
In ordinary circumstances, Section 2.741(d) would allow CEI 30 days within which to comply with the request or otherwise object.
Section 2.740(.f) then would permit the filing of a Motion to Compel Discovery within five days after the response date.
(
l 80021907/f
,<<%7
~
2.-
Pursuant to Section 2.718 and Section 2.730 of the
~
. Commission's Rules, we hereby direct Applicants to respond to the production request or objection no later than November 25, 1975.'
Because Applicants have set forth in substantial detail their~
position with respect to why the Board should deny any request for the production of these documents, it is rot necessary for Applicants to brief these questions further in connection with any objections or response pleadings to a Motion t, Compel Discovery which they may file.
The Board will accept the brief and memorandum filed in connection with the Motion to Quash Sub-poena as relevant to the issue of production of the same documents under Section 2.741.*
Because Applicants have made clear their position that delivery of these documents should not be ordered and since Appli-cants have indicated their intent not to produce the documents
~
except upon resolution of the issues posed in its opposition, we grant Justice authority to file a Motion to Compel Discovery for documents not produced by November 25, 1975 contemporaneously with its Motion for Production of Documents.
Because the Board has been appraised of the Justice position on the legal merits of this issue, it is not necessary for Justice to file additional briefs.
Applicants may have until December 2, 1975 to respond to the Justice Motion to Compel Production.
As indicated in our Memorandum and Order of November 18, we granted leave to either party to this dispute to file such addi-
.tional brief going to the merits of the controversy as may be desired, but we indicated that the Board would not withhold consideration of the issue in anticipation of r.eceiving additional briefs.
9
- f The schedule amendments Are being made so that we can resolve this controversy at the earliest opportunity.
Both parties have presented full argument to the Board with respect to the merits of the underlying issue.
Additionally, we note that in the. event production were to be ordered,* no burden.would be associated with physical production.
No file search would be involved since the documents have been listed and indeed already are segregated physically.
Justice is in a position to deliver the documents sought to Applicants for retransmittal to Justice in the event the Board decides production is appropriate.
Finally, with respect to any amendment of ordinary time schedules, we note that Applicants have been appris.ed of Justic'e's intent to obtain produc-tion of these documents, via subpoena or otherwise, for a period of several weeks.
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICESSING BOARD Dougla
. Rigle Chairman Dated at Bethesda, Maryland th'is 20th day of November 1975.
We express no position whatsoever with respect to the merits of the controversy or any ultimate decision of this Board.
.. ~.
,.?
UNITED STATES OF A!ERI,,CA.
NUCiJ.AR REGULATORY CC. fISS ION 0
In the Matter of
)
~
~
)
THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.)
Docket No. (s) 50-346A CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING )
50-440A COMPANY
)
50-441A
)
(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power
)
Station, Unit No. 1; Perry
)
Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1&2))
CERTIFICATE OF SER ICE I have this day served the foregoing document (s)Y' I hereby certify that upon cach persen designated on the of ficial service' list comptied by the Of fice of the Secretary of the Cc= mission in this proceeding in accordance uith the requirements of Section 2.712 of 10 CFR Part 2-Rules of Practice, of the Nuclear Regtilatory Cc=ission's Rules and
. Regulations.
Dated at Washingte., D C.
this 8
day o
,th2d 197 I I
h?ll-h
.; 1 iO&Y1s*(4 i Of fied 6f/ the Secretary of the Cgymission
%j-e I
g e
N j
~'
es
~
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLE.iR RECULATORY Com1ISSION In the Matter of
)
)
)
Docket No.(s) 50-346A (Davis'Besse Unit 1)
)
CLEVE' AND E'.ECTRIC ILL' MINATING
)
)
50-441A (Ferry Units 1 and 2)
)
TO'.EDO EDISCN CCM?ANY, ET AL.
)
50-500A (Davis-3 esse Units 2 and 3)
)
50-501A SERVICE LIST Douglas Rigler, Esq., Chairman Joseph Rutherg, Esq.
Foley, Lardner, Hollabaugh & Jacobs Antitrust Counsel 815 Connecticut Avenue, N. W.
Counsel for NRC Staff Washington, D. C.
20006 U. S. Nucicar 3egulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20535 Ivan W. Smith, Esq.
Office of Antitrust & Inde=nity Atomic Safety and Licensing Scard Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission Washin; ton, D.
C.
20555 Washington, D. C.
20555 John M. Frysiak, Esc.
Benjamin H. Vogler, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Roy P. Lessy, Jr., Esq.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Co==ission Antitrust Counsel Washington, D. C.
20555 Counsel for NRC Staff U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cc= mission Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq., Chairman Washington, D. C.
20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Donald H. Hauser, Esq.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cocmission Victor F. Greenslade, Jr., Esq.
Washington, D. C.
20555 Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Mr. Michael C. Farrar P. O. Box 5000 Atoude Safety and Licensing Appeal Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Joseph J. Saunders, Esq., Chief Washington, D. C.
20555 Public Counsel and Legislative Section Richard R. Salzman, Esq.
Antitrust Division Atomic Safety ad Licensing Appeal U. S. Department of Justice Board Washington, D. C.
20530 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cocmission Washington, D. C.
20555
50-346A, -440A, -441A, -500A, -501A P3ga 2 Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Honorable Edward A. Matto Shaw, Pittman, Potts, Trowbridge Assistant Attorney General and Madden Chief, Antitrust Section 910 -17th Street, N._W.
30 East Broac Street, 15th Floor Washington, D. C.
20006 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Lee C. Howley, Esq., Vice President Honorable Deborah P. Highsmith and General Counsel Assistant Attorney General Cleveland Electric Illuminating Antitrust Section Company 30 East Broad Street, 15th Floor
-P. O. Box 5000 Columbus,0hio 43215 Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Honorable Christopher R. Schraff David C. Hjelmfelt, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General Michael 01dak, Esq.
Environmental Law Section 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.
351 East Broad Street Washington, D. C.
20006 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Reuben Goldberg, Esq.
Duncan, Brown, Weinberg & Palmer Arnold Field =an, Esq.
1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N W.
1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20006 Washington, D. C.
20006 John Lansdale. Jr., Esq.
Steven M. Charno, Esq.
Cox, Langford 6 Brown Melvin G. Berger, Esq.
21 Dupont Circle. N. W.
i Antitrust Division Washington, D. C.
20036 U. S. Department of Justice Washington, D. C.
20530 Leslie Henry, Esq.
W. Snyder, Esq.
Honorable Thomas E. Kauper Fuller, Henry, Hodge & Snyder Assistant Attorney General 300 Madison Avenue Antitrust Division Toledo, Ohio 43604 U. S. Depart =ent of Justice Washington, D. C.
20530 Mr. George B. Crosby Director of Utilities John C. Engle, President Piqua, Ohio 45350 AMP-0, Inc.
Municipal Building William M. Lewis, Jr.
20 High Street W. M. Lewis & Associates Hamilton, Ohio 45012 P. O. Box 1383 Portsmouth, Chio 45662 Honorable Richard M. Firestone Assistant Attorney General Robert D. Hart, Esq.
Antitrust Section Assistant Law Director 30 East Broad Street, 15th Floor City Hall Columbus, Ohio 43215 Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Honorable William J. Brown Anthony G. Aiuvalasit, Jr., Esq.
Attorney General Antitrust Division State of Ohio Department of Justice Columbus, Ohio 43215 P. O. Box 7513 Washington, D. C.
20044 i
50-346A, -440A,,-441A, -500A, -501A ec.
Pag 3 3 Susan B. Cyphert, Ecq.
Josepd A. Rieser, Jr., Esq.
Antitrust Division Lee A. Rau, Esq.
Department of Justice Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay 727 New Federal Building Madison Building, Suite 404 2140 East Ninth Street Washington, D. C.
20005 Cleveland, Ohio 44199 Terence H. Benbow, Esq.
David M. Olds, Esq.
A. Edward Grashof, Esq.
Reed, Smith, Shaw and McClay Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam P. O. Box 2009 and Roberts Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 40 Wall Street New York, New York 10005 Thomas A. Kayuha, Esq.
47 North Main Street Ruth G. Bell, Esq.
Akron, Ohio 44308 Janet R. Urban, Esq.
Antitrust Division Perry Public Library Department of Justice 3753 Main Street Washington, D. C.
20530 Perry, Ohio 44081 Director Ida Rupp Public Library 301 Madison Street Port Clinton, Ohio 43452 4
yg F L
,--4
-r av