ML19319C180
| ML19319C180 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 12/08/1970 |
| From: | Vetter W US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | James O'Reilly US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319C181 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001310535 | |
| Download: ML19319C180 (2) | |
Text
.
~
UNITED STATES
('
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION i
l DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE 7
REGION lil On 799 ROOSEVELT ROAD GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137 (3:2) ass.zeso December 8, 1970 J. P. O'Reilly, Chief, Reactor Inspection and Enforcement Branch Division of Compliance, Headquarters TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY (DAVIS-BESSE)
DOCKET NO. 50-346 The attached report of an inspection of the subject facility on November 5 and 6,1970, is transmitted for information. No items of nonconformance or significant safety problems were encountered during the inspection.
1 In keeping with a CO:HQ memorandum request, a summary of the attached report was transmitted by telephone to J. B. Henderson on November 23, 1970.
As we have previously informed you via telephone, the applicant does D
not intend to complete construction activities currently authorized in the form of a construction permit exemption. The expected delay in plant construction stems from the applicant's conclusion that awarding additional construction contracts at this time would be inprudent in view of significant, potential delays in the issuance of a construction permit which may be occasioned by the public hearing associated with the Davis-Besse application for a construction l
pernit.
In the past we have expressed concern, both in our reports and to the applictant, in that the applicant has been slow in staffing a QA organization. During the current inspection, we learned that one additional staff member is on duty and received firm commitments that the full staff would be on board in a timely manner, i.e., in keeping with the progression of construction activities.
~
O V
04767 8001310 $
l J. P. O'Reilly.
2 December 8,1970 A
It was our inspector's conclusion, and I concur, t'..at the applicant's QA program proved to be adequate for the work authorized by ths construction permit exemption and that the program has been ir.plemented in a satisfactory manner.
t/
i l
l Walter E. Vetter Senior Reactor Insoactor i
i
Attachment:
CO Rpt No. 346/70-4 by G. Gower j
and D. Hayes dtd 12-2 70 (2 cys) cc:
E. G. Case, DRO (3)
P. A. Morris, DRL i
R. S. Boyd, DRL (2) j j
R. C. DeYoung, DRL (2)
D. J. Skovholt, DRL (3)
P. Howe, DRL (2)
A. GiambuGoo, CO:EQ L. Kornblith, CO:HQ i
R. 3. Engelken, CO:EQ I
Regional Directors, CO REG. Files l
l l
4
.