ML19319C062
| ML19319C062 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 07/10/1973 |
| From: | Tedesco R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Deyoung R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001310441 | |
| Download: ML19319C062 (5) | |
Text
.
.o.c' Rio a I
l l
Cocket tio. 50-346 R. C. DeYoung, Assistant Director for Pressurized Water Reactors, L i
j REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: DAVIS-BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATIGN, GUALITY ASSURA!!CE 5
Plant Name:
Davis-Sesse :luclear Power Station Licensing Stage:
CL Docket Hu:ter:
50-346 Responsible 3 ranch &
Project Manager:
PWR #4, I. Peltier Requested Completion Date:
July 6,1973 Apolicants Response Date:
October 12, 1973 Description of Response:
FSAR Amendments Review Status:
Awaiting Infomation A request for additional infomation is enclosed relative to Quality Assurance for Operation for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station.
This request is based on our review of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (Davis-Besse) FSAR. We find that the applicant, Toledo Edison Company (TEC), has not adequately described its Quality Assurance t
Program for Operation relative to implementation of 10 CFR 50, i
Appendix "B" or Regulatory Safety Guide 1.33 for Davis-Besse.
We require TEC's response to this request for additional information by October 12, 1973 in order to maintain the pre. cent schedule.
- {% f };
f R
Robert L. TheWee, Assistant Director for Containment Safaty Directorate of Licensing l
Enclosure:
As stated cc: See Page 2 8001slofy[
-,-~..-n
,n.
1..
R. C. DeYoung -
& 101F1 cc: w/o enclosure I
A. Gianbusso W.. Mcdonald cc: w/ enclosure S. %
J. Glynn S. H. !!anauer J. M. !!endrie I. Peltier A. Schwencer R. Vollmer f
6 DISTRIBUTIO!!:
[
Docket File _.
4: Keading i
L: QA Reading R. Tedesco l
i i
i t
)
l i
l L ES..
/'
o,,.c e.
...L *....,..../...
I su.
ua.
SCununins;gmc
_...,_.Rtedesco._
h h6 07/09/73,,_,.
07/,09/73 _.
07//9 /73 o.t.
Form AECdl8 iRev. + 5J1 AECM 0240
m
~
_ DAVIS-LESSE tiUCLEAR POWER STATI0tl REQUEST FOR ADDITI0rlAL OUALITY ASSURAt CE IflFORftA QUALITY ASSURA!!CE PROGRN4 FOR OPERATI0fl The description of the Quality Assurance (QA) Program for the opera-tional phase of the Davis-Besse Iuclear Power Station (Davis-Besse) is not adequate.
Section 17.2 Ouality Assurance Proaram for Station Operation of the FSAR does not contairt complete organizational charts, an adequate description of a QA Program, and clear implementation descriptions for criteria three through eighteen of 10 CFR 50, Appendix "B".
The implementation of Safety Guide 1.33 is not described.
To complete our evaluation, we require Toledo Edison (TE) to provide the following information relative to their QA Program for Operations for Davis-Besse.
1.
Provide organizational charts and descriptions of the organizational structure which show the company and plant organizational positions, individuals, and groups responsible for performing the QA functions as defined in 10 CFR 50, Appendix'"B" for operation, maintenance, repair, modification, and fueling of the Davis-Besse Plant.
-2.
Provide a description of the responsibilities, authority and independence of those individual positions or groups within TE responsible for formulating, establishing, and implementing QA releted policies, procedures, and instructions for the operational phase.
Include the activities of operation, maintenance, repair, and modification.
Identify.the organizational positions responsible for originating, reviewing, and approving the OA program policies, procedures, and instructions.
,g 2
-2 3.
Define your qualification requirements necessary to fulfill positions that manage or supervise the offsite and onsite QA activities.
4 Describe the duties, authority, and independence for the organizational positions and groups which perform review, inspection, and auditing activities.
5.
Provide a description of the major attributes, including purpose and scope, of those QA procedures which assure that the activities of operating, maintaining, repairing, and nodifying the Davis-Besse fluelear Power Station comply with tne criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix ' 8".
Include a cross index chart or a listing which shows each QA Program procedure with the applicable criteria of 10 CFR 50, Appendix "B".
Identify the responsible individual or group who originates, who reviews, and who approves each procedure.
i 6.
Describe those provisions within the OA program which demonstrate compliance with the guidelines presented in Safety Guide 1.33,
" Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Operations".
Identify any exceptions and justify alternate proposals.
7.
Describe the f'ormal indoctrination and training program which has been or will be established for all those personnel performing QA related activities '.;hich will assure proficiency of imple-mentation of QA policies, procedures, and recuirements.
If the program does not already exist, provide a date for implementation.
S.
Identify those individual positions or aroups responsible for
-reviewing and approving the QA programs and QA manuals for contractors and vendors.
x _
^
j 3-9.
Describe.the administrative' controls which assure that the QA program policies, procedures, and instructions, including changes thereto, are distributed and-implemented in a timely
. manner by the responsible individuals or groups.
- 10..Briefly describe those procedures which identify ouality related records to be retained, the retention period, the storage location and the assigned responsibility.
- 11.
Identify and describe those audits performed by company management which confirm independent assurance and evaluation of the QA program policies, activities, and procedures. The purpose of these audits is to assure effective, meaningful compliance with company policy and 10 CFR 50, Appendix "B" on a periodic, scheduled basis.
Identify the organizational positions which will perform the audit,
' list report distribution, and state audit schedule.
12.
Identify and describe those independent, scheduled audits which provide a comprehensive verification and evaluation of all phases of the QA Progras activities and procedures te confirm on a continuous basis that a meaningful and effective QA Program is in effect. Identify the organizational positions which will perform the audit, state audit schedule, and list report distribution.
i
_ _ _. _ _