ML19319B391
| ML19319B391 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 02/28/1978 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319B387 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001150968 | |
| Download: ML19319B391 (3) | |
Text
_ _ _ _
0O SArTW C.V..A.LUATIGl.S.-Y TH.E OFF.IC.E..C.? !H.JC.L. CAR.R..".7C. O_R.R.EGULA.TIO!.J SURCRTIM A CE:f S72 !D. S '?O LICCJSE ;O. !TdF-3 TC.L.D. ~) E.DISQ3 C W PA:;Y N_.D.
CL.E. VE.I. AC ELE. CT.RIC I.LLLMMA.Tl?C CCi?M. Y DAVIS-3FSSE _tTJCLEAR PGiCR STATIC'i, Lt IT__1 D
D CJ O DOCIET A. 50-345 n
U I:triCLOCIIW Gy letter dated Cctober 31, 1977, tne roledo Ediscn Cc rany requested an a wit.ent to facility Operating License 110. iiPF-3.
The amenctnent woulu acdify the Tecnnical Specifications fcr tne Davis Ees00 ::uclaar 2cwer Station, Unit No. I to delete the requirement for an Annual Coerating
!<ccort in crJcr to be consistent witn ne recent Cc:.ciscion guidance.
3.CCWX. D After two years of experience witn the recorting recuirements for nuclear
- cwer reactors, we revir.eed the scoce of information licensees are recuired to sumit in the Licensee Event Report (LL't), Annuai 03 rating Report, Montaly Operating Re ort and the Startup nerx:rt. Scsed on our review of En's we develoced a cocified format fcr the LER to maxe tnic docu:.cnt more useful for evaluation purposes. By letters cent in July ard August 1977, we informd licensces of tne new L2R format and requested tnat they use it.
Frc:a cur review of all licensee reports we sister. tined that ruca of tnc information fcund in the Annual Coerating Recort either is adcressed in the ER's or Monthly Operating Reoorts, wnica are cuci:litted in a more ticely manner, or eculd be included in these reports with only a slight au@cntation of the inf0rnation alreacy supelled. Therefore we concluded that the Annual Coerating Report coulo ce deleted as a Technicel Specification requirement if certain additional infornation were provided in ene Monthly Coerating Reports. As a result we sent letters during Septeamer 1977 to licensees informing them that a revised and imroved format for Montnly Coerating Reports was availacle and requested tnat tney uce it. In aodition, licensees were informed tnat if they agreed to use the revised format they sculd subc:it a change request to delete the requirement for an Annual Operating Report except
)
tnat occupational exposure data sust ctill be snhmitted.
1 l
1 orrec a m i
evn=aus
- DAtt >
NRC PORM Jia (9 76 NRCM 0240 ft v. a. sovsamus=r peintime oar,cus sore - eas.esa
~
8 001150 %>
m van
~;
~j
- [-
g D f ? ]O b 1 JU EVAw;cIO.i geooreing Eeguire: rents
'Ito licensee's pecposal would delete all cut cne of the four crecified items in tne Annual Operating Reccrt. Ite report whien taculates occucational expcsure en an annual casis is needed and tnerefore, the requirements to sutnit this information has been retained. We nave determined that the failed fuel examinatien infor=ation does not need to ce sucolied routinely by licensees cecause these tyce of historical data can te cetained in a eccpiled form frca fuel vencors when needed.
Tne information ccccerning forced reductions in ocwer and outages will te sucplied in the revised Montnly Operating Papert rather tnan annually.
The licensee has comitted to use the revised Monthly Operating Rapcrt fermat beginning with their report for &nuary 1973 as requested.
We requested, and the licensee agreed to use.mcds consistent with tne Starriard Technical Specifications in Scecification t>.9.1.5.
Tnis r; reed to enange re:uired redifying the licensee's submittal by enant;ing cage 6-15.
Ne have concluded tnat all neWed infermtion vill be oroviced and deletion of the Annual Ccerating Facort is acceptable.
Environ. ental Consideration We nave determined tnat the amendaent does not authorite a enange in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in pcwer level and will not result in any significant environmental innact. daving made tais determination, we have further concluded that tne amrdent involves an action wnica is insicnificant frca the stand cint of enviran. rental i:mact statezent or negative declaration and environmental icoact appraical need not ce prepared in connecticn with the iscuance of bis a:nend ent.
Conclusicn We have concluded, based on tne considerations discussed above, that:
(1) because the acendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of accidents previously considered and does not involve a significant decrease in a safety margin, the amendment does not involve a significant hacards consideration, (2) there is reascnacle acsurance that the health and saiety of the public will not be endangered by cperation in tne proposed manner, and (3) sucn activities will be cen-ducted in cocpliance wiO tne Coamission's regulations and the issuance of tais amerriment will not be inimical to the comon defense and security or to tne healtn and safety of the public, cated:
FEB 2 81978 SEE PREVIOUS YELLOW FOR PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES LWR 1*
LWR 1 0 ELD
- Lg O,,.c..,
BScott red LEngle GFess JSto k
.u-....
2/14/
2/ /78 _._
2/24/7s gf7's NRC FORM 31O (946) NRCM 0240 W us s. eevs=NuaNT PmMTmG OFFTCEs 9 976 - 33Maa
(
3..
r
, LVMifATION fecorting recuirerents The ' licensee's-proposal would delete all but ene of the f0ur scocified iteac in the Annual Ccerating Ecocrt. The reocrt wnich tavalates occum tional exacsure on an annual casis is necced anc therefore, tne requ'irh.mnts to' sum.it this information has teen retained. m Mve uctermided that tne failed fuel exaraination information does not need to be strghlied routinely by licensees cecausa these type of historical data can ce\\petained in a cor. piled form frca fuel venders wnen needed.
The infermatgn ccncerning forced reductions in power and cutages w:11 te s g liec in
. revisec Menthly Operating Reocrt ratner taan annually.
The licensee ha f tted to use the revised ".cntnly Operating Report format ceginning ith their recert for J:nuary 1975 ac requ::ted.
- le requested, and the liccasce agreed to use words consistant with the 5ts,Jard TechnicahNecifications in Fxcification 6.3.1.5.
Tnis N
agreed to enange requirel modifying tne licensees cutaittal by enanging pa;e (.-15.
- e have conclhd that all necced information will be provided and deletion of tne Annual C. ' rating Ra;crt is
- cceptable.
Dwiccn ental Consideration de nave determined that the amendmenlbdoes not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an' increase in pcwr 1cvel and will not recult in any significant envircraaent%i:: pace. daving cr.ce tnis deter.aination, we have furtner ccncluded thats the auerdent inv0lves an action wnic. is insignificant frc43 the cradhpint of environcental ir.cact state.mnt or negative declaration and envitenmntal incact ancraical need not be prepared in connection witn tne iacuance of this aaenc ent.
N Conclusion c
We have concluded, based on the considerations uiccussed c e that:
(1) cecause the are. ent does not involve a significant incrh,ae in tne procability or cena2;uences of accidents previously cansidered
' does not involve a significant decreace in a safety. argin, the amenc. nt coes not involve a significant hazards consideration, (2) there is re e
assurance that the health and safety of the tublic will not be e ered by operation in the proposed manner, and (3) such activities will be ~en-ducted in cor.r11ance with the Cor. mission's regulations and the issu of this amend:nent will not be inimical to the coccon defense and security to the nealth and safety of tne public.
Dated:
[
p ascott/ red _. ung e c(c d, 12 -
2/N/78-._
2/6/78 2.61/18_.-
. 2[.8/Ja_
NRC FORM 318 0 76) NRCM 0240 p us s. eovsamuany omnviae orrice. novo -eam_, _
.