ML19318B704

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Concurs W/Recommended Denial of Nrdc/Ucs 790302 Petition for Rulemaking to Amend Rulemaking Procedure.Pending Action Re Court Case Should Be Mentioned in Commission Paper
ML19318B704
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/02/1980
From: Minogue R
NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT
To: Shapar H
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
References
TASK-OS, TASK-RS-519-1 NUDOCS 8006270345
Download: ML19318B704 (1)


Text

.

l JUN 2 80 1

1 MEMOPANDUM FOR:

H. K. Shapar, Executive Legal Director FRC1:

R. B. Minogue, Director Office of Standards Development i

SUBJECT:

PETITION FOR RULEMAKING 2-8 TO AMEND THE RULEMAKING PROCEDURE i

The Office of Standards Development concurs with the recomended denial of the l

petition submitted by NRDC/UCS on March 2, 1979.

The Comission Paper does not mention the pending court case (80-1328 United j

states Court of Appeals for the District of Colunbia) that is related to the i

Commission action on the portion of the NRDC/UCS letter of March 2,1979 that j

requested 10 CFR Part 21 be amended.

It is recomended that the pending action j

be mentioned in the Comission Paper.

i l

Minor editorial and typographical coments have been submitted directly to the l

ELD point of contact.

l Sincerely, i

I Orfcinal signed bv n. G. Smith R. B. Minoque, Director a

Office of Standards Development yI j )

n cc:

J. M. Felton, ADM

p' l

bec:

R. B. Minogue RECORD NOTE: The editorial / typographical concerns are in i

R. G. Smith 3 areas.

The first is the use of the phrase " adopted in 1

G. A. Arlotto effective form by the Commission on October 19, 1980".

A. L. Eiss This phrase is used in the Comission Paper and the W. M. Morrison Federal Register Notice. Technically I think it is in-E. C. Wenzinger

accurate,

/he Commission adopted it at an earlier date W. E. Campbell and it was rjoficed in ' effective form on October 19, 1980.

I. B. Rothschild, 0GC The second comment is.use of the phrase "the Comission i

has.rarefully considered the 2 proposals".

This is appli-l Distribution:

cableYtheTederal Register notice in 2 locations on Central File page 3 and 7.

I consider this a very strong statement of i

SD ALPHA RD I

the Commission action in this matter. The third item is RSSB SUBJ.:

5018 the inconsistent use of the word " staff" and " Staff".

I i

RSSB RD WR believe in all cases intention is the EDO staff and not l

P the immediate Commission, staff..

-(..,

l g

... d,G 7 A c

.;; p "' -'Qg',..--

Task No.: 4 519-1 ct 5-29-80 a$A[. /..'.....

.S.D. <D..E

.S..D..: R.S..

.S..D..:

S.

4..D.:G. C S.D...

SD l

OF F f CE > &

eCA inn.r..

m&.<.6...

I M..

.aa...s.4.r.i...m.....di.n........

_-E,

.../:w.9.........s/At.8.9.........s!.s.a9.........ia.289....... s!..y.t89.........&..e.(.89....

mE.

NRC FORM 318 (6-7M

. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1977-237-025 80062703