ML19318B278
| ML19318B278 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07100389 |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1980 |
| From: | Macdonald C NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Muse L GEORGIA, UNIV. OF, ATHENS, GA |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006250197 | |
| Download: ML19318B278 (2) | |
Text
s{ piu f[
{o,,
UNITED STATES y j p(
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- y%S ldf/
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 205C3 JUN 0 61980 FCTC: RHO 71-0389 The University of Georgia Public Safety Division ATTN: Lowell A. Muse Athens, GA 30602 Gentlemen:
This refers to your application dated May 12, 1980 requesting approval of your Quality Assurance (QA) program as meeting the QA program requirements of 10 CFR 571.51.
In connection with our review, we need the information identified in the enclosure to this letter. Please submit seven copies of your response to the enclosed request for additional information within 30 days following receipt of this letter.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact Mr. Jack Spraul at (301) 492-7741.
Sincerely, d
=
Charles E. MacDonald, Chief Transportation Certification Branch Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety, NMSS
Enclosure:
~
Request for Additional
--- - Information l
L 80062 5019$
g
- d., _
THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA Request for Additional Information 1.
The submittal of May 12, 1980 includes correspondence, newspaper articles, pro-cedures, etc. in addition to the description of the quality arsurance program.
While the background information is interesting and while procedures are required to carry out the quality assurance program, they shot'd not be submitted. The quality assurance program description should contain commitments which are met by following procedures which are documented elsewhere, such as in a QA Manual.
Therefore, please limit the resubmittal to the two pages headed "10 CFR Part 71 QA Program, University of Georgia" and the organization chart attached as Appendix A.
2.
Under part 2, " Quality Assurance Program," include a statement that the QA program will ensure that quality control procedures, engineering procedures, and specific provisions of the package design approval are satisfied.
3.
In the second paragraph under part 2, " Quality Assurance Program," change the effectivity of the connitment from "after the effective date of the QA Program" to "after January 1, 1979."
4.
In the first paragraph under part 4, " Handling, Storage, and Shipping," change
" trial inspections" to " final inspections."
5.
Under part 7, " Audits," include a cannitment that the annual audit will cover the entire QA Program. Also, we require that members of the audit team have no respon-sibility in the activity they audit. Since part 2 indicates that the RSC " establishes and implements" the QA program, it does not appear acceptable to have members of the audit team drawn from the RSC. Provide a commitment that members of the audit team shall have no responsibility in the activity they audit, and either justify having RSC members perform the audits or draw the audit team members from another (more nearly " independent"} source.
l
-,j
,