ML19318A741
| ML19318A741 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 05/21/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FRN-44FR75167, RULE-PR-50 NUREG-CP-0011, NUREG-CP-0011-ERR, NUREG-CP-11, NUREG-CP-11-ERR, NUDOCS 8006240099 | |
| Download: ML19318A741 (2) | |
Text
..
(Qy UNITED STATES f
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5
j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20S55
%,...../
MAY 2 1 1.','
l.
i.
ERRATA SHEET for PROCEEDINGS OF WORKSHOPS ON PROPOSED RULEMAKING ON EMERGENCY PLANNING FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NUREG/CP-0011 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Please r6 place page 45 with the revised attached version.
DIVISION OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENT CONTROL i
R
?
I a
t 4
scossociT
u-
- . e t
SAN FRANCISCO WORKSHOP STATE OF WASHINGTON: Gleo Hansen, Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, State of Washington
-i l
You have already mentioned the problems of the States with pre-emptive statutes. I would state that the State of Washington also prefers Plan A as representing a positive apprcach, and that the determination of shutting down a plant should be a rational and deliberate decision. I think it will allow for compensating measures to be incor-porated in the decision.
Perhaps there will be a case where reduced power might be an adequate answer, ratter than or as opposed to either full operation or full shutdown. I think there is some need for the NRC to be able to resolve problems of coopera-tion between contiguous States where, for instance, the Trojan plant is almost on the borderline with the State of Oregon. I think there should be some way of resolving any differences between the States of Oregon and Washing '
ton in the preparation of emergency response planning. I think that has to be discussed with the NRC. That would conclude the comments that I have to add at this time.
TEXAS: Clarence Born, Governor's Divison of Disaster Emergency Services, State of Texas I would like to say with regard to the proposed rules, we would favor something that gives a review of the site-specific 'onsiderations, rather than an automatic order to shut down in the event that concurrence is withdrawn from State and local plans. But, beyond that, and far more basic than that, the State of Texas - and, I am sure, every other State in the United States -- by constitution and by statute is charged with protecting and preserving the lives and property of its inhabitants, whether they be residents, visitors, or people flying through.
When we receive volumes, and I mean literally file cabinets full of regulations, hearings, rulings, discussions concerning incidents at nuclear facilities that were told by that same agency would happen once in 100,000 years, and that we are requested to spend man-weeks and man years to respond to those far out instancos, it takes away from the credibility nf the agency. Please, give all consideration to the effect and efficacy of the things you are requiring, before you put them in writing and before you make them mandatory to the State. Consider whether it is worth doing, and then consider whether it isn't already being adequately addressed by some other agency.
ORIGON: Don Godard, Oregon State Department of Energy We would like to express appreciation again for the NRC's cooperation and help in emergency planning in developing this, and we would like to cooperate with you in emergency planning and do everything we can to accomplish that.
I an%'t think we need a rule to do that, but if you think we need a rule, okay. In general, we like Rule A, rather than B, but we think the timetables are unrealistic. We don't know what your criteria are yet, and I am not sure you can review plans in that short of a time. I think if you oo have a requirement, that we enter into it with an MOU [ Memorandum of Understanding]; and I will elaborate on that in my written comments.
ej Concernteg who is making the decisions under the proposed rules, it appears that the NRC staff establishes the criteria and and the NRC staff then decides wnother or not a plan is concurred in, and then it is up to the e'
45 o
C_
>