ML19318A521
| ML19318A521 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Prairie Island  |
| Issue date: | 06/19/1980 |
| From: | Barth C NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Charnoff G SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006230266 | |
| Download: ML19318A521 (1) | |
Text
.
.p erru g.
.th UNIT ED STATES f
g, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS!ON 5
9j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 June 19,1980 Gerald Charnoff, 'Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge
'~
1800 M Street,' N.W.
Washington, D. C.
20036 In the Matter of NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY (Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit Nos.1 and 2)
Docket Hos. 50-282 and 50-306 (Spent Fuel Pool Modification)
Dear Mr. Charnoff:
This will confirm today's telephone conversation.
The State of Minnesota filed contentions on April 24, 1980, these were not received by NRC's Docketing and Service Branch aor by 0 ELD, nor do they have a certificate of service attached.
I am sending them to be docketed today.
The Licensing Board Chairman called to inform me that he contemplated setting a prehearing conference in St. Paul at the end of July. We will be' prepared to discuss a hearing schedule and the State's contentions at that time.
Sincerely, Charles A. Carth Counsel for NRC Staff cc w/ contentions: See Prairie Island Service List 80 062 3 01N h
1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of_
. DOCKET NOS. 50-282 s
50-306 NORTHERP STATES POWER COMPANY Prairie Island Nuclear STATE OF MINNESOTA'S Generating Plant, Units 1 SUPPLEMENT TO ITS and 2 PETITION TO INTERVENE (Spent Fuel Pool Modification)
On April 8, 1980, the State of Minnesota by its Attorney General, Warren Spannaus, and its Pollution Control Agency (hereinafter " State of Minnesota") filed a Request for Hearing and Petition for Leave to Intervene.
Pursuant to 10 C.F.R.
Section 2.714(b), the State of Minnesota hereby files this supplement to its petition setting forth its contentions and the bases therefor.
In setting forth the bases for its contentions the State of Minnesota does not intend to limit in any way its right to present additional evidence and argument in support of its contentions at an evidentiary hearing on this matter.
The purpose of this docu-ment is merely to summarize with reasonable specificity the bases for the contentions as required by 10 C.F.R. Section 2.714(b).
RESERVATIONS As these contentions are in part based upon documents which' may be superseded, modified, or supplemented before or during a_
MEE't*4 hearing on this matter, 3rves the right to modify, amer DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Entire document previously entered into system under:
ANO d
f bM No. of pages:
h[
7 gcos2Too 31