ML19318A289
| ML19318A289 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 06/05/1980 |
| From: | Kintner L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006190163 | |
| Download: ML19318A289 (4) | |
Text
~
YiC
/
),,
UNITED STATES g
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O
tj WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\\...../
Docket No. 50-364 MEMORANDUM FOR:
A. Schwencer, Chief, Licensing Branch No. 2, DL FROM:
L. Kintner, Project Manager, Licensing Branch No. 2 DL
SUBJECT:
FORTHCOMING MEETING WITH ALABAMA POWER COMPANY REGARDING REVIEW 0F FARLEY 2 OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION DATE & TIME:
June 16 through June 20, 1980 9:00 AM LOCATION:
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Dothan, Alabama PURPOSE:
Review Farley control room design with regard to consideration of human factors that have an impact on operator effectiveness.
(Seeenclosure).
PARTICIPANTS:
Alabama Power Company W. G. Hairston, et al.
Southern Company Services, Inc.
T. Milton, et al.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission D. Scaletti, D. Froelich, S. Saba S&w L. K ntner, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 2 Division.of Licensing
Enclosure:
As Stated cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
)
8006190/03
[
?
Mr. F. i. Clayton, Jr., Senior Vice President Alabama Power Company Post Office Box 2641 Birr.ingham, Alabama 35291 cc:
Mr. Alan R. Barton Executive Vice President Alabama Power Company Post Office Box 2641 Binningham, Alabama 35291 Mr. Ruble A. Thomas Vice President Southern Company Services Inc.
Post Office Box 2625 Birmingham, Alabama 35202 Mr. George F. Trowbridge
{
Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20036
?
Alabama Power Company Meeting -
With NRC - June 16-20, 1980 Farley Nuclear Plant The objective of this visit is to prepare a preliminary e* valuation of the Farley control room with regard to the following:
1.
The' adequacy of information presented to the operator to reflect plant status for normal operation, anticipated operational occurrences, and accident conditions:
2.
The grouping of displays and the layout of panels:
3.
Improvements in the safety monitoring and human factors enhancement of controls ano control displays; 4.
The communication from the control room to points outside the control room, such as the on-site Technical Support Center.
(This comunication link must also be coordinated with new requirements for transmission of plant systems data to NRC);
5.
The use of direct rather than derived signals for the presentation of process and safety information 6.
The operability of the plant from the control room with multiple failures of non-safety-grade and non-seismic systems and control room systems; 7.
The adequacy of operating procedures and operator training with respect to limitations of instrumentation displays in the control room; 8.
The categorization of alarms, with unique definition of safety alarms.
To assist the staff in its evaluation, your cooperation is requested in the following ways:
1.
Admittance for several people to the Unit 2 control room as needed for the duration of the visit; 2.
A qualified control room operator to assist the staff for the duration of the visit; 3.
Permission to use photographic equipment and video and audio recording equipment in the control room; 4.
Access to copies of all procedures used in control room operations; 5.
A briefing and debriefing with the plant manager.
i