ML19317H374
| ML19317H374 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom, Hope Creek, Sterling, Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/28/1980 |
| From: | Bishop C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | CITIZENS FOR SAFE ENVIRONMENT, METROPOLITAN EDISON CO., NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD), PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC, Public Service Enterprise Group, ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006020550 | |
| Download: ML19317H374 (2) | |
Text
-
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.[ U
!~
DCC& Gut T
USNF.C ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD f.
s-MAY 2 9880 >
3 Alan S. Rosenthal, Chairman Dr. John H. Buck Of5:s ofif:e SecrWay Due Dr. W.
Reed Johnson G
]gga 9
b\\ lY
)
In the Matters of
)
)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al. )
Docket Nos. 50-277
)
50-278 (Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,
)
Units 2 and 3)
)
)
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, e_t _a_l.
)
Docket No. 50-320
)
(Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,
)
Unit No. 2)
)
)
PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS CO.
)
Docket Nos. 50-354
)
50-355 (Hope Creek Generating Station,
)
Units 1 and 2)
)
)
ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC
)
Docket No. STN 50-485 CORPORATION, _et _al.
)
(Sterling Power Project, Nuclear
)
Unit 1)
)
)
ORDER May 28, 19d0 On the unopposed motion of the intervenors, York Committee for a Safe Environment and Citizens for a Safe Environment, the time for the filing of their proposed findings of fact.and con-clusions cf law (in the form of a post-hearing memorandum) is hereby extended to and including June 18, 1980.
By reason of this extension, the remainder of the schedule set forth in our March 7, 1980 order must be altered.
The staff's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law now become due on July 3, 1980.
The responses of the applicants and the inter-venors will be due on July 18, 1980. 1/
Although we recognize that the intervenors are also in-volved in other active licensing proceedings, as of June 18 more than three and a half months will have elapsed since the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing on February 28.
More-over, at that time the applicants' proposed findings will have been in intervenors' possession for approximately seven weeks.
For that reason, we will look with disfavor upon any applica-tion for a further extension of time unless accompanied by a convincing showing of extraordinary and unanticipatable interven-ing developments.
The press of other commitments will not be regarded as constituting sufficient cause.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD b.
MAb C. Je(p Bis fop T
Secretary to the Appeal Board 1/
These extensions apply equally to the submissions relating to the disposition of alleged deficiency 1.
See March 7 order at p. 2.
l