ML19317H112

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to AEC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-313/72-04 & 50-368/72-03.Corrective Actions:Qa Program Reviewed & Audit Schedule Formulated to Establish Min Audit Procedure & Checklist Application
ML19317H112
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/14/1972
From: Phillips J
ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Jennifer Davis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19317H108 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004140590
Download: ML19317H112 (2)


Text

i

-o s

e

('h i

'il H ELPIN G BUILO J R KA N S A S

)

v' ARK ANS AS POWE A & LIGHT COMPANY STM & LOUISIANA STREETS UTTLE ROCK. AAKANSA3 72203 (5011372-4311 August-1hr 1972 s

Mr. John G. Davis, Director Rector. II Directorate of Regulatory Operations United States Atomic Energy Commission 230 Peachtree Street N.W. Suite 818 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

SUBJECT:

ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE-UNITS 1 & 2 IN REPLY TO: RO:II:VLB 1-313/72-4 50-368/72-3

Dear Mr. Davis:

[3 We have reviewed your letter dated July 27, 1972 concerning construction deficiencies at Arkansas Nuclear One. We submit the following information in answer to the questions raised concerning AP&L's quality surveillance program:

1.

Subsequent to the AEC inspection of June 6-9, 1972, an engineer-ing end design quality assurance audit was conducted at Com-bu' rion Engineering, Inc. in Windsor, Connecticut on June 26-28, 1972. Your inspector, Mr. Brownlee, observed AP&L during this audit. The audit covered organization, function responsibilities, and interfaces of project management, engineering and procurement; design control; dradng control; procurement document control; internal audits; identification of systems, structures, and com-ponents; handling of changes to codes, standards and regulations ;

and review of vendor QA programs. The report of this audit and documents initiating corrective action are available at the con-struction site. We have received a satisfactory response from CE dated August 4, 1972 indicating that corrective action has been taken.

2.

As a result of the subject AEC inspection, the AP&L site quality ersurance surveillance program was reviewed in detail with regard to frequency of audits, coverage of construction activities and the method of application. This revi.ev resulted. in the formulation n

}h Y

s' 9

9e e

s

,e

- n.

2-August 14, 1972 Mr. John G. Davis of an audit schedule to establish minimum application of the.

AP&L audit procedures and checklists. This plan has been submitted to and approved by the AP&L Quality Assurance Committee for the remainder of Calendar Year 1972 and all of Calendar Year 1973.

Very truly yours,

's ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY N

J d.D.Phillips

~

Vice Presicfent

& Chief Engineer JDP:WC:av O

O O

T4 I

i s

f r-r w

4

-n-

,w--

-+_-----m

,--,.-w

,w,,,-,,-