ML19317H013

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Amends Responding to NRC Re QA Program for Facility.Program Will Be Per WASH-1283,1309 & 1284,which Provide Guidance for QA Programs.Addl Clarification Required on QA Audit Program
ML19317H013
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 09/23/1976
From: Mattimoe J
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To: Reid R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8004020690
Download: ML19317H013 (3)


Text

_ _ - _

NRC

  • onu,195 O

U.S. NUCLE AH REGULANRY CI jlSSION DOCKET NUMUE It

n. ru v

50-312 NRC DISTRIBUTION FOn PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL To: R.W. REID FROM: SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL DIST.

DATE OF DOCUMENT SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 9-23-76 J.J. MATTIMOE DATE RECEIVED 10-1-76

@LC T TE R UNOTORIZED PROP INPUT FORM NUMBER OF COPICS RECEtVED O$ C RIGIN AL (3UNCLASSIFIE D.

OcOPY 1

DEECRIPTION E NCLOSU RE LTR. RE THEIR 7-22-76 LTR...

ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT CLARIFICATION ON THE

.D0 NOT EMOW QUALITY ASSURRNCE AUDIT PROGRAM....

( 1 SIGNED CY. REDEIVED)

ACKNOWLEDGED

( 2 PAGES)

PLANT NAME:

RANCHO SECO SAFETY FOR ACTION /INFORMATION ENVIRO D

.\\ds m e.u av:

AS_S,I_C."'D A_D:

_BM?iCH CH_IEF_:

REID W/4 BRANCH CMTEF-

/,

PROJECT MANAGER:

ROONEY W12 PROJECT MANAGER!

LIC, ASST.:

INGRAM LIC. ASST.!

INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION M EG FII D SYSTEMS SAFETY pLaur._ systems SITE _S_AF_CTY &

/ HRC PDR llEINEMAN TrnvnCn EUVJR0 ANA_I,ySIS

/.I & E (2)

SC11ROUDER BENAROYA DENT 0ti & MUT.T FR

/jll:LD (PATTON)

LAlgt.3

/ GOSSICK & STAFF ENGINEERING IPPOLITO ENVIRO TECH _

llIPC MACCARRY IGRig~.*00D ERNST 2 CASE KNIC11T

~~

BALLARD

!!ANAUER SIINEIL OPERATING REACTORS SIAUCLER 11AP(LESS PAWLICKI STELLO Z

DEY0uNG s1rt rtCit -

PR O.J ECT_,MMAGElfE_N_I, _

REACTOR SAFETY OPERATINQ_IECE.

CMDITLL

/ p_Ol D,_ __ _,..

_ROSS_

EISE!! HUT STEPP 1.% COLT. INS NOVAK SHA0

__lLULMAN 110HSTON ROSZTOCZY BAER j

PETERSON CllECK 7

BUTLFR SITg_ ANALYSIS

,MELTZ___

GRIUE.S VOLLMER

[

!!!'.LTI'.MES (2)

AT & I

/

SKOVil0I.T_

SAI.T7 MAN 13UNClf I

..J._COLLIUS_

/ THORNBERG Rl! THEL {G VRPCFP LXllillN AI. I)l3Till!!U IlON CONTitOL NiH.1l!Lil 2 IFDi6JiACRAMEHTQ _ CAL._.

NAT LAll:

Im00 MAW;1LIMT_LML.

./

~

[ TIC:

REG. VIE IILRIKs0N(oRNL) j'ACRS 16xyy. X)ocactx:/[ KNT,__,. __ _

8UO4 9957 i

'C.U)TANN.E

9 m s.d

$SMUD SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT O 6201 U Street, Box 15830, Sacramento. California 95813; (916) 452-3211 September 23, 1976 l

er a %

-Ec-3lg hp QOO h

Mr. Robert W. Reid, Chief jg I

Operating Reactors. Branch E1 CCT1 19'6m $

Division of Operating Re-s U. S. Nuclear Regulator mmisdon M

v.s, g us e o#

Washington, D. C.

205 Y

,Z j

t.

3' g

-It ')

, p<x

Dear Mr. Reid:

]

%/,

We are submittil an am ddmen our letter dated July 22, 1976 which was issued in e to orrespondence dated June 1, 1976. Clarification was re tain areas and this amendment will clarify our position.

Your June 1,1976 correspondence offered two alternatives regarding our quality assurance program:

(1) to include the guidance in the WASH documents No.1283,

" Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During Design and Procure-ment Phase of Nuclear Power Plants - Revision 1," dated May 24, 1974, No. 1309, " Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Con-struction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," dated May 10,1974, and No.

1284, " Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Operations Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," dated October 26, 1973.

or (2) be consistent with ANSI N18.7-1976 and the Regulatory Guides (Nos. 1.8, 1.30, 1.37, 1.38, 1.39, 1.54, 1.58, 1.64-Rev. 1, 1.74, 1.88, and 1.94) which endorse the ANSI standards referenced in N18.17-1976.

It is our election to comit to the former program and we so stated in our July 22, 1976 letter to the Commission.

Our QA program is an agreement with the " rainbow" series and we wish to take this opportunity to clearly state this position.

Additional clarification is needed on the quality assurance audit program. This program has been inaugurated by the Director of Quality Assurance to provide documentary evidence that all areas con-nected with operation of Rancho Seco are under surveillance by Quality Assurance who in turn reports their findings, including corrective actions to the Management Safety Review Committee (MSRC).

Quality 9957 AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM S E RVIN G MORE THAN 600,000 IN THE HEART OF O A LIF O R N I A

~

D D,

n/

s Mr. Robert W. Reid September 23, 1976 Assurance audits to ensure implementation of all the control documents used at Rancho Seco. Our previous letter lists seventeen separate categories of procedures, manuals and documents associated with the operating plant.

The MSRC also directs additional audits to be performed and in so doing assures themselves that the quality assurance requirements art. mean.ingful, properly complied with and are effective.- Their con-fidence level has also been substantiated by independent audits being performed by outside consulting firms retained expressly to audit quality assurance implementation. These audits are not cursory, but are detailed and definitive to the ANSI, 10CFR50, Appendix B and WASH 1284 require-ments.

It is our practice to continue to conduct these audits by independent consultants and feel their appraisal to be very valuable.

The success of any quality assurance program lies in its day-to-day operation as problems arise and how they are handled.

Our documentation, design reviews, inspections and testing are all performed by qualified people and performed in conformance to planned and approved procedures. Our program at Rancho Seco was devised and inaugurated under the auspices of a well thought out Quality Assurance Manual.

It is understood by our personnel and its constant modification and improve-ment attests to the viability of the program. As improvements are suggested, SMUD management reviews the applicable documents and enacts the changes if no conflicts are detected between the suggested practices, the applicable ANSI documents,10CFR50, Appendix B and the regulatory requirements unique to the situation.

We welcome your review of our quality assurance program and extend an invitation to review our implementation at Rancho Seco.

If any additional information is needed to explain our Quality Assurance Program, please feel free to contact us.

Sincerely yours,

'.h6

'0. J. Mattimoe Assistant General Manager and Chief Engineer