ML19317G038

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/71-05 on 711213-17
ML19317G038
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 01/19/1972
From: Spencer G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Henderson J
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML19317G034 List:
References
NUDOCS 8002210740
Download: ML19317G038 (2)


See also: IR 05000312/1971005

Text

- -

- - - - - - _ -

. _ _ ._

4

.

p ,.

_

  • ~

-

,

'

b

fh g s

UNITED STATES

<.

<

.

i

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

'

i .

g

olvisION OF COMPl.!ANCE

'

g

REGION V

-

  1. 14tts

2111 BANCROFT WAY

t

BERKELEY, CAI.!FoRNIA 94704

Tm.m.o

asi sizi

U

xxv.esi

January 19, 1972

J. B. Henderson, Chief

Reactor Construction Branch

Division of Compliance, Headquarters

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT (RANCHO SECO)

DOCKET No. 050-0312

The Rancho Seco construction site was visited on December 13-17, 1971 for

the purpose of conducting a routine construction inspection. A follow-up

interview was held with upper management on January 7,1972.

Several items

of noncompliance with the AEC QA criteria and the licensee's QA program were

identified.

D

Our findings presented in the report and the observations and discussions with

[j

\\

personnel at the construction site gave us the impression that the implementa-

tion of the QA-QC program for the project showed signs of deterioration as

indicated by the following items:

1.

Inspection planning, the heart of the QA program, had not been prepared

prior to the conunencement of construction activities on the field

erected tanks, 4160-volt switch gear and 125-volt D-C battery chargers.

2.

QA personnel were defending activities for construction of the field

erected tanks on the basis of "its covered somewhere" in the codes, the

SMUD QA manual, the Conseco QA or QC manuals, the Bechtel procedures or

the contract specifications. It was also clear in talking with personnel

performing inspection and production activities that they believed they

knew what was required to assure a quality product, notwithstanding their

lack of knowledge as to whether the activities were required by one or

more of the written' documents.

3.

Documentation for electrical components was lacking in the QA files and

may not have been checked to verify equipment conformance to design

specifications.

Upper management assured us during our discussion on January 7 that corrective

-

action was being implemented on all of the id1ntified deficiencies. Further,

the entire QA-QC program was being examined because of the potential generic

aspects of these deficiencies.

Mr. McMahon attributed the problems in the

.

C')

\\s. s '

8002 210 $

'

,

2 0087

.

_ _ _

e

.

.

2

(.n), -

.

-

hj

. -

-

.

lJ..B. Henderson.

-2-

January 19, 1972

'

QA-QC program to

several changes in Bechtel's management. The individual

assigned -as Project QA Engineer, af ter McMahon transferred from Bechtel to

SMUD, became' ill and had to be replaced with another individual (Mr. Walker,

current Project QA Engineer) who was not familiar with the program at Rancho

Seco. This probably resulted in a lack of attention to details on the part

,

of the QA Engineers.

In our opinion, Mr. Walker does not. appear to be a

strong supervisor. This has been recognized by Mr. McMahon. Therefore, he

plans to continuously scrutinize Bechtel's performance in this area to bring

the program back to its previous high standard. We plan to follow-up by

examining the implementation of the QA program in total during our next

inspection'at Rancho Seco.

.

With regard to the use of the unnormalized steel in the steam generator, SMUD

feels that they ,have gone as far as they can go in establishing the acceptability

of the material.- They have tested everything there is to be tested and the

tests have been performed in accordance with the applicable ASME codes.

It is

their opinion that the tests and analyses show that the material is acceptable

for its intended service. They have generated at least three complete sets of

data from several-different locations of the plate. They will not ask B & W

'

]

to perform any additional tests on material that is not of the same heat, nor

j

do they believe that one can technically justify additional t esting unless it

is solely for " political reasons".

The FSAR only discusses t.he material contained in the primary system and not.

the secondary side.(shell) of the steam generator.

Mr. Ross Brown, CO:I, has

told us (informally) that the documentation on the generator testing and

design change appear to be in order. The Chief Code Inspector of the State of

California has been kept fully informed. He has been advised that B & W's

Code Inspection Agency.(Hartford Insurance) has confirmed at headquarters level

that the vessel complies with the ASME Code and has signed off on the' Code

"

~ Data Report.

In view of this, it does not appear to us that Region V can

)

contribute to any' additional discussion with SMUD on this matter.

<

1

,

t

s h.b

64 b6 G Q

~ G.S. Spencer

Senior Reactor Inspector

Enclosure:

CO Rpt. No. 050-0312/71-05-

j

.by R. T.-Dodds

.

.

DISTRIBUTION:-

i

E. G.. Case,..DRS (3)

A. Giambusso, CO

l

)

R.' S. Boyd,=DRL (2)-

L. Kornblith, CO

I

V

R.-C.._DeYoung, DRL (2)

R. H. Engelken, CO

(

D. J. Skovholt, DRL (3)

CO Files.

H. R. Denton, DRL'(2)

DR Central Files'

.

J

+-

,

, - . ,

-

-, , . . . . .,

-

,

- , , , . <

-,

,ae-c

i

-ve

-

-