ML19317E036

Reviews a Gehrs Proposal That Cooling Lake at Dresden Not Be Included in Indemnity Location.No Definite Conclusions Reached

ML19317E036
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden, Oconee, North Anna, Robinson, Quad Cities
Issue date:	05/05/1971
From:	Price E US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Saltzman J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7912110814
Download: ML19317E036 (2)

Text

r 9-

~ - ~ ~

t a..

1

.+,-..e.

I

.j -, :

t v-

+,

..)

l*

p. ) y/

I James R. Mason May L, 1971 2

Jerone Saltzuan QL*f

- 3 3 Ir C0 L".0?nlEALTl! EDIS0!! - URESDEt

-- 3 57 t STATIOil 2L/

Arthur Gehr's letter of Ap il Jr.ke, now under construction at Dr r

inde::.nity locatica as 13, 1971,

2. S'/

to me, propotes th reasons are nw described in the indcanitcsoen, not be (a

is on Edisit will simply be an extof cooling w:at th'.t the lake is i

no different from any other s. Gehr's y agreement.

e er or natural lake, anc that ensica of the Illinois River 2 the lake. on property; and (b) that ther ource

, in fact, Ven though it e will be no radioactivity in I have discussed Gehr's prc Boyd.

Jim llolloway and I have alposal with'Sud Schur, Jo the H impoun. D. Robinson faci.lity for unich th so looked at the ind snitynotts and Roge ded lake the Oconee Station.he licensee's propert on t e source of ulter posture of The Robinson Station is the VEPCO's !! orth Anna stati indemnity location does n t y.

Duke has a large lake atsupply is only cne of the t same treatnent will be accord d on will :tiso have a lake o

include the lake,hree in )peration the Dresden lake any diffIn reviewing Gehr's prop the lakes at Oconce and I;and I c tpect that e

The erently, for indernity purposal, it w we have done at the Robinson orta Anna, to I! orth Anna and Oconee plan cult to treat t

Schar, t and uill probably do w,ith resp ses In Knotts from what at Quad Citiesa discussion today with Cchr r and Boyd concur.

ect lake question a,ndI told him that ec had beegarding the ' storage had treated the lake at thprobicas with regard to his that I had not thus fa en looking at the Dresden ocation

. identified any particular that the final paragraph proposal I info e Robinson.

tiestern boundary of th Station.rned hin as to how we of his letter that he was really speakinge indemnified site whereas i of April 13 referred to theI pointe present location descriptionlie said that if we app of the south bcundary.t bppeared to us s proposal, the return only change in the1;e confirmed th i

Edison's futentioncanal northwest of the present iuould be cove the present se,curity f when the return ndemnity location. cop of the the U sanity location canal has been ccupleted fied locatido descriptio ence It is so as to include the loop withi I asked him to give us a d

, to n as he now n

envisions it.

raft of the codi-He agreed su to do r

t

-m

= ~ =....'...

= = = = = [

. - r '* m ' m - m n --

_b - -

'I

.. v..

~~

t

' On the Quad Citics' matter - I' told Gehr that DML understands' that

' Edison is planning to arrange a delivery schedule of cold fuel uith GE uhich uill preclude the necessity for any expansion of the' present fuel storage and handling area.. This being the case.

no amendr.ient to the present indemnity agreement would be required..

Gehr was apparently not aware of Edison's change in plans but agreed that on the basis of the information given.loe Delancy, the " storage only'~ 1ocation would 'not need to be redescribed.

4

" Signed" Euer R. Pn:e Eber R. Price Director Division of State and Licensee Relations 1

3

\\

i 1

i omet >.... 5L B.......

ERPrice:hkm-

..suume >

j lUI?k

_,73

_