ML19312E855

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Waste Packaging Insp Rept 80-06 on 800414-15.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Shipping Paper Requirements,Dot Placarding Requirements,Radiation Levels & Removable Contamination
ML19312E855
Person / Time
Site: 02700047, Brunswick
Issue date: 05/01/1980
From: Mcarthur T, Troup G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML19312E853 List:
References
15000039-80-06, 15000039-80-6, NUDOCS 8006180012
Download: ML19312E855 (5)


Text

- - -. _ _ _ _ - _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _

p *t:

!![ 3 f

UNITED STATES

'n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3

-E REGION il k

101 MARtETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 g*****

ATLANTA. G EGRGIA 30303 gay - 11912 l

Special Report: WASTE PACKAGING INSPECTIONS OF LICENSEE-SHIPPERS REPORT NO. 80-06

Reference:

TI 2840/1, (Rev. 1), " Waste Packaging Inspections", 10/10/79 Licensee-Shipper:

See Attachment A Disposal Site:

Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc.

P. O. Box 726, Barnwell, South Carolina 29812 Docket No. 15000039 Inspector:

M

((//Tro T. C. McArthur, Rdliation Specialist, REW Section Date Signed FF&MS Branch j

Approved by:

/

(/s/go w

G. L. Troup, Cliief, JtEW Section, FF&MS Branch Date Signed

SUMMARY

Inspection Dates: April 14-15, 1980, visit to Chem-Nuclear Waste disposal site, Barnwell, South Carolina for unannounced inspections of licensee-shippers.

Areas Reviewed: Each licensee-shipper vehicle was inspected for compliance with Department of Transportation (DOT) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regu-lations as follows: (1) shipping paper requirements; (2) DOT Placarding require-ments; (3) radiation levels; (4) removable contamination; (5) DOT marking and labeling requirements for packages; (6) DOT and NRC requirements for external package features, and (7) prohibited articles or contents.

Results: Of the six areas inspected involving 5 shipments, no items of noncom-pliance were identified.

P I

%e

  • ^

h 4

m

1 4

l DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted j

R. Sappington, South Carolina DHEC W. House, South Carolina, DHEC 2.

General The NRC inspection consisted of a review of the shipping papers, radiation j

survey of the vehicle, contamination surveys and radiation level surveys of

}

selected packages. General surveys and observations were conducted to deter-i mine if the vehicle had proper placards, proper seals, and if any obvious i

safety hazards existed. The contents of the vehicles were inspected for appropriate marking, labeling, tightness of ccols, integrity of package construction or any evidence of leakage.

Chem-Nuclear assigns a control number for each shipment upon arrival at the site. These numbers were called " shipment survey report numbers" (SSR No.)

and were used by the inspectors to identify licensee-shippers during this i

inspection.

J 3.

Shipments Inspecced

~l Five shipments were inspected during the period of April 14 and 15,1980.

A listing of the shippers inspected and their assigned number is included as Attachment A.

{

4.

Shipping Papers The shipping papers were reviewed for completeness and to ascertain if the contents of the shipment were properly identified, and if emergency notifi-cation procedures and instructions were included as required under 49 CFR 172, Subpart C.

Specific requirements for shipping papers were reviewed as follows:

Material shipping name 49 CFR 172.100/172.200/172.202 Material class 49 CFR 172.200/172.202 Name sequence 49 CFR 172.200/172.202 Total quantity (volume) 49 CFR 172.200/172.202 Limited quantity 49 CFR 172.200/172.203 Name of each radionuclide 49 CFR 172.203 Physical and chemical form 49 CFR 172.203 i

Activity in curies 49 CFR 172.203 l.

Category or label 49 CFR 172.203 4

Notation of NRC/ERDA 49 CFR 172.203 i

package approval Proper certification 49 CFR 172.204 5

l l

_ _ _. -,.--__ _,,___--.......,n 9

e

+

4 e.n

,n-

.m=

,,.., - -. - ~

. N In addit. ion to the above, 49 CFR 177.817 requires carriers to maintain the above shipping papers readily available for inspection and recognizable by authorities in case of an accident.

No items of noncompliance were identified.

5.

Each vehicle was inspected for conformance with DOT placarding requirements (49 CFR 172, Subpart F and 49 CFR 173.392)'.~ The 7thicles' were ~also~ inspected-for compliance with the following:

Maximum transportation index of 50 - (49 CFR 177.842)

Loaded so as to avoid spillage (49 CFR 177.842)

Properly blocked and braced (49 CFR 173.392/177.842)

LSA vehicle survey (49 CFR 177.843) f No items of noncompliance were identified.

6.

Maximum Radiation Levels Each truck was surveyed for maximum radiation levels in the normally occupied portions of the vehicle, in a plane at the edge of the flat bed or at the surface of the closed vehicles, in a vertical plane six feet from the sides of the vehicle where possible, and on the surface of a representative package. Shipping cask were surveyed at the surface.

No levels were in noncompliance with 49 CFR 173.393 limits.

7.

Contamination Smears Each vehicle and a representative sample package was surveyed for removable contamination by smearing over a 300 square centimeters area of the surface.

No more than two smears were taken from any package or vehicle.

Smears were taken from areas that would most likely be contaminated. The smears were checked for gross Beta gamma contamination at the site.

No smears were found to be contaminated in excess of 49 CFR 173.397 limits.

8.

Packaging A representative sampling of packages from each shipment was examined for conformance with DOT marking and labeling requirements. External features of the packages were examined for conformance with DOT and NRC requirments as noted below:

Low specific activity (LSA) packaging 49 CFR 173.392 Tight packages - Itd. Qty.,

49 CFR 173.391 or 173.392 No release of material 49 CFR 173.392/173.393 Radioactive material markings 49 CFR 172.310 Security seals 49 CFR 173.393 Gross weight requirements 49 CFR 172.310 Proper shipping name 49 CFR 172.100/172.300 LSA labeling 49 CFR 173.392 Cask design specifications 49 CFR 173.393a L

. 9 No items of noncompliance were identified.

9.

Verification of Package Contents Due to the lack of facilities for properly opening packages at the site, the criteria for opening packages was restricted to those packages containing solidified waste (to verify the absence of free-standing water) and/or where the re - wa s-evidence-of-leakage.

Eight packages were selected for opening. South Carolina officials were present and concurred in the opening of the packages.

No items of noncompliance were noted.

1

^

i 1

e v

1 4

---a..as m w s w m p m-e ss 'e-e- + w

    • m'-

v"'

4_

  • g

.MI

ATTACHMENT A NRC TRAILER SSR No.

REGION CARRIER No.

SHIPPER 019653 II CNSI 59510-040 Carolina Power and Light Company Atta:

J. A. Jones, Senior Executive Vice President 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, NC 27602 Brunswick Plant Docket Nos. 50-324 and 50-325 Report Nos. 80-13 and 80-16 019667 I

CNSI 27 Connecticut Edison Company of N Y Indian Point Station Buchanan, N Y 019670 I

Tri-State 128103 Jersey Central Power & Light Company Oyster Creek Reactor Toms River, N J 019671 I

CNSI 043 Neirbron Products, Inc.

22301 Mt. Ephram Road Dickerson, MD 21710 019657 II CNSI 1720 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Atta:

M. D'Amore, Manager Columbia Plant Nuclear Fuels Division Drawer R Columbia, SC Docket No. 70-1151 Report No. 80-13 s

+

s b

4.M's

&