ML19312E452
| ML19312E452 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/04/1980 |
| From: | Cornell E NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Budnitz R, Donoghue D, Minogue R NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM), NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES), NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8006040430 | |
| Download: ML19312E452 (2) | |
Text
.
........-....-.-.-.n..
...,,.r.
'f h-
-f' l
L~
~
~
~
L April ~ 4,1980 q
t t
MEMORANDUM FOR: Robert J. Budnitz, Director, RES
~
Daniel _ J. Donoghue, Director, ADM
, Robert B. Minogue, Director, SD
'. Kevin Cornell, Deputy Executive
~
E FROM:
Director. for. Operations
~
~
.1
SUBJECT:
REP 90GRAMMING FOR'TMI ACTION PLAN
- (
y' '
The ED0iust' advise the Commission of specific impacts'on FY-1980 and 11 FY-1981 Operating Programs of reprograming to accomplish TMI tasks.
Your response to the EDO memorandum of March 12,1980 (Sub, ject: Management" Review of Draft 3 of TMI Action Plan) was not specific enough to allow this. Please use~ the attached fonnat to show specific programs. that have
>q been or will be reduced, deferred, or redirected to provide resources for
.I tasks you will accomplish in the Action Plan. Your response by c.o.b.
o April 7,1980, is essential for timely review and approval by the EDO prior.to forwarding of the final Action Plan to the Commission.
d'
~
g If you have any questfons, please contact Jim 'Blaha, X272Sl.
f i
' E. Kevin Cornell
~
Deputy Executive Director for Operations
Enclosure:
1 As stated cc: Steering Group.
Distribution.
l
. EKCornell JBl aha gI CON:R/R Jq 8086648 k s i
Wh im /
5 c
a Cd(
(h...........
.m...
J..B.1....'
h a...:.a..h.........
..f...
....r..n..e.l.k.......
......................l 47
...../.. (.
V./. 8. 0..'.........
- 4../ V'../. 8 0............
.....x...................
. = >
3SC 50RM 31s_ (p.74) NECM 0240,,j_
1,c gu.s. eevesmus'ajr pesanne opniess,s.,ve. se..re l
e
s
~
7 PROPOSED-NRR TMI ACTION PLAN REFROGRAMMING
SUMMARY
FYl980 FYI980 CPERATING PLAN (BUDGETED PANPOWER)
REPROGRAMMING CANDIDATES _(MANPOWER SAVED)
IMPLICATIONS Casework Defer work on all early site reviews. (S PMY)
May affect subsequent Carroll CP i siew
'.:ork on several in-house and one new Early schedule.
Site Reviews.(6 PMY) rTdvanced Reactors Eliminate all work on advanced reactors through Will impact input to semiannual report NASASidvanced reactor licensability studies 81 except on Ft. St. Vrain & FFTF. (2 PMY) to Congress on NASAP activities.
arj operating advanced plants. (7 PMY)
Casework Defer all standard plant reviews through 81.
FDA's which are referenced in OL's will Ek on 9 PDA and 2 FDA standard plant design have to be reviewed as part of OL.
reviews. (22 PMY)
(6 PMY)
Standards Assistance Stretch out time for NRR-related standards.
As~s~ist SD by feviewing regulations and guides.
Substantially reduce participation in reviews of Impact impossible to determine without regulations a guides through 81. (3 PMY) determining which standards will be delayed (S PMV)
NRR sees only minor problems.
' Provide assistance to NMSS and other offices.
Reduce support to other offices to minimum level NRR has already provided about 9 PMY's to Technical Projects NMSS.
through 81 (S PMY)
(16 PMY)
Casework Defer work on CP applications through 81 except All active reviews in-house have their SER S L on 6 CP reviews. (26 PMY) where SER is completed. (13 PMY) issued; reprogramming should not, in itself, impact PDD's.
Current FY80 resource expenditures are Technical Projects Substantially reduce effort on audit calculations negligible and this reduction will have Devefop models and perform independent audit through 81. (4 PNY) calculations of vendor and applicant analyses.
small impacts. Will use contractor support (7 PMY) for audit calculations as necessary.
.