ML19312D563

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Topical Rept Evaluation of GAI-TR-106,Revision 2A, QA Program for Nuclear Power Plants. Rept Acceptable
ML19312D563
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/25/1980
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML19312D562 List:
References
NUDOCS 8003240630
Download: ML19312D563 (2)


Text

y

. (?

v TOPICAL REPORT EVALUATION

' Report Number: GAI-TR-106(Rev.2A), Nonproprietary Report

Title:

Quality Assurance' Program for Nuclear Power Plants Report Date: November 1979

' Originating Organization: Gilbert / Commonwealth Reviewed By: Quality Assurance Branch

SUMMARY

OF TOPICAL REPORT.

Topical Report GAI-TR-106 (Rev. 2A) describes the quality assurance (QA) program which Gilbert / Commonwealth applies to those design, procurement, and fabrication activities involving safety-related structures, systems, and compcnents of nuclear power plants within the Gilbert / Commonwealth scope of work. GAI-TR-106 (Rev. 2A) commits Gilbert / Commonwealth to comply with the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, with ANSI N45.2.'12 (April 1977), and with the regulatory position provided by the NRC in the following Regulatory Guides:

Regulatory Guide Date 1.28 February 1979 1.30 August 1972 1.37 March 1973 1.38 May 1971 1.39 September 1977 1.54 June 1973 1.58 August 1973 1.64 June 1976 1.74 February 1974 1.88 October 1976 1.94 April 1976 1.116 June 1976 1.123 July 1977 Gilbert /Comonwealth has provided for ou. evaluation a detailed description of organizations and groups involved in. implementing activities required by the QA program and a delineation of duties, responsibility, and authority of those organi-zational elements involved in the QA program. GAI-TR-106 (.Rev. 2A) contains a

' description of the measures used to carry out the Gilbert / Commonwealth QA program activities and describes how the applicable requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 will be satisfied by the administration and implementation of these measures.

SUMMARY

OF REGULATORY EVALUATION We have evaluated the QA program and the organizations responsible for QA functions as described in GAI-TR-106 (Rev. 2A). We f_ind that QA policy and direction originate

~

at an acceptably high management level and are effectively communicated to other parts of the organization. Those performing QA functions have responsibility and authority -

b

.8003240

4 a

+

y::C tv 2_-

/

-v__

c icoimensurate with their duties in:._ implementing the QA program. We also find that

~s

~

measures have'been established, to'be implemented by-written _ procedures and'instruc--

tions, which address each;of-the criteria.of Appendi_x B in'an acceptable manner.

= Based oniour review' and evaluation of GAI-TR-106L(Rev. 2A), we conclude that:

-V.

.l'.

The organizations -and persons performing 'QA functions-within Gilbert / Commonwealth

~

.-Jhave'the required independence and-authority to effectively _ implement the QA program.without: undue ' influence from those directly responsible fo'r costs and schedule's,~and

-2.

Th'e Gilbert / Commonwealth QA program contains the requirements and controls

~which..when properly implemented, comply with the requirements of Appendiv B to;10 CFR Part 50-and the. applicable regulatory guides and standards contained

'in -Chapter 17 of the NRC Standard Review P_lan.

k a

s x

L 2Y !

6 rv

^

. [

Ot

/

,E

  • Nr V

e