ML19312D301
| ML19312D301 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 02/19/1980 |
| From: | Sauter G NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19312D302 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003240175 | |
| Download: ML19312D301 (1) | |
Text
_
~+
.c -
- +; w%*p. 9.
. Min ' #1,UOr UNITED STAT (ES -
1
. o -.
e.
v5 ?
f e
1 t
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W
WASMINGTON, D.C. 20555
. 4. -
...e f
February 19, 1980 OFFICE OF THE ~
.cHAmMAN DOCKET NUMBER *~ 2.g c.,
t.
J 7p.
. PROD.siUTIL F
=m
' ":. ' MEMORANDUM FOR:'
Public Document Room p
w S:
FROMb[
G'eorge D..:Sauter N
~ :4; r qq
-Technical ~ Assistant to Chairman Ahearne m
.= :
~
mh
~
ASNb SUBJECT $glmy;=3cc+tiI.i ~ MEETING ~ WITH PETER ANDERSON OF WISCO
'T
~
J rm??ggggg DECADE MN F. J20 + a.
4'A
( 'NNNbM'kkYNkk@ bk$h
~pp a m m; q
- . On January 2 1980, I was visited _ by Peter Anderson of Wisconsin's f *'yr matterstre'garding'.the4 team generators at Point Beach, the subject o
{
T T a public Connission me9fing later that morning.
Being unaware at'the time T
of the' potential ex parte question involved, I talked with (or rather, was talked to by).AndFson,~for. perhaps five minutes.
Because I have been j
informed there may be an ex parte consideration involved, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.780(c) I am writing this memorandum to sumarize M:. Anderson's' visit. %
,y r
. m,;
To thelbest of my-recollection, the conversation was very similar to the
~
one'sumarized by' William L. Clements in his January 16, 1980 memorandum to the Public Document Room (copy attached).
I suggested that Mr. Anderson put his ~ concerns in a' letter to the Commission.
I have neither seen such a letter nor talked further with Mr. Anderson.
.a
)
j Attachment m
cc:
Secy Parties to the Point Beach License Amendment Proceeding -
e S
~
n.
$b.
.U "
'C
- 4, b
9 N.,t i,
D\\-
@1 A Wi
.0
- f5l s
Do D
1 f 001,240 W w
Y
' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~"
'. ' h W
, ASHIN2 TON,0.C.20555 i
,}
January 16, 1980 CFFSCE OF TNE ^
- COMMISSIONER a
. MEMORANDUM FOR:
Public-Document Room
-FROM:-
~ Hilliam L. Clements H-Mu::. b;mwgmy.n.. =pecial Assistant to Commissioner Bradford
.a S
w.-. w SfWi.'SUBJECTI.$ 1%uMMEETI'G RITH PETER ANDERSON OF WISCONSIN'S ENVIRONMENTAL N
A f..u. l}"[.?lll-.??DECADEf='
~
L
~
~
y w.
.=.
.w
' ' '9~f
~
t
~
On aanuary 2 1980,' ~I'ine~t with Peter Anderson who represents Hisconsin's T Environmental (Decade to discuss the petition filed by the Decade pursuant'
-. O to 10 CFR 2.206 regarding the Point Beach facility.
At the time, I was unaware that a proceeding.had been commenced involving the Decade and Wisconsin Electric Power Company (MEPC0) arising from the confirmatory-
, order -issued-by the staff. effective November 30 modifying WEPCO's operating license for Point-Beach Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.
In light of this pending
. proceeding, pursua'nt to 10 CFR 2.780(c), I am hereby notifying the parties to the Point Beach License Amendment proceeding of my conversation with Mr. Anderson. '
Mr. Anderson and I discussed the desirability of a metallurgical analysis of the five tubes identified in the licensee's November 16 LER to determin' whether they were also subject to intergranular attack..
e
-Mr. Anderson suggested a blind test of the results of the eddy current testing for these five tubes in order to determine whether the defects ident{fied in the LER actually dated to pre-1975. Mr. Anderson indicated that the staff of the Wisconsin Public Service Commission had represented to him that information obtained from the licensee suggested that inter-granular attack proceeded slowly to.a level of 40% defective at which-time.it progressed rapidly to an 80% or 9Cf level. We also discussed briefly Mr._ Anderson's understanding of the circumstances surrounding the issuance of the licensee's November 16th LER.
Finally, Mr. Anderson suggested that, in some instances, the licensee's laboratory data frcs.~
eddy current testing do not agree wit' 'he results of metallurgical-
- ~ T tests performed on tubes removed fro.. ma steam generator.
I. suggested' a
.to." P,r. Anderson that he document his additional concerns in a letter
..dir.ected. to the. staff with copies forwarded to the Commission.
cci SEC'Y s$
4 Parties to _ Point Beach License Amendment Proceeding
//
" DOCKETED
,0 csw.:
W-t t. :.,; ; '. : :. >
-~
(r Off::s cf the Se: retry o
Dc:kdtt & Senice t
E..nd.
./
y/
8 003240 ( D
.