ML19312D209

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Revised Response to Noncompliance Item 553/79-17-01 Re Containment Shell Welds Identified in NRC 800110 Ltr
ML19312D209
Person / Time
Site: Phipps Bend  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 03/14/1980
From: Mills L
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NUDOCS 8003210506
Download: ML19312D209 (3)


Text

-

~

~~. .g f A. '

.h

^

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUT'H'ORITY- 7 h;

' CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 374ot h

'400 Chestnu't: Street Tower II d March 14, 1980-i Mr. James P.10'Reilly, - Director.

~

0ffice of Inspection.and Enforcement

~. U.S.-; Nuclear Regulatory Commission ;

m. . Region II - Suite:3100:

101 Marietta : Street

' Atlanta, Georgia .30303 Dear Mr.-O'Reillyi_

hs requested ~by F.'W.1 Cantrell-of your staff on' March 7- 1980, enclosed'

~

, is'a revised response.to noncompliance item 553/79-17-01, identified H in l C. E. Murphy.'s letter dated January 10, 1980,- RII:BRC 50-553/79-17',

' 50-554/79-16.i This response supersed_es our' previous response dated

' February.1,:1980, for noncompliance: item 553/79-17-01.~ - If you have ~

any' questions.regarding.this subject,
please call Jim Domer at

~

FTS 854-2014'.'

Very truly:yours,.

p TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY IM ) M L. M. Mills, Manager-

' Nuclear _ Regulation and Safety Enclosure ^ . ,

cci LMr., Victor Stello, Director _(Enclosure).

Office'of Inspection and Enforcement

~

.U.'S.- Nuclear' Regulatory Commission"

. Washington,- DC. 20555. -

[ -

i . f s _

w v ,

4 -

C.-

. Bog

,  ; :- s .

^

^

} /.

. m- ,

~

! Ah Eq0slOpportunity Embloyer, 80082$0 6 6 k

, 3- ,

[~, .

7, ,

Nb ENCLOSUREL

- REVISED RESPONSE TOLNRC-0IE LETTER

- 1FROM C. E.; MURPHY TO H. G. PARRIS

. DATED JANUARY 10, 1930

(

REFERENCE:

RII:BRC- 50-553/79-17,L50-554/79-16) fThis~ report isia' revised response to'the Notice of Violation described inlAppendix'A, Item A, of the OIE Inspection Report referenced above, s 7This;is provided as? requested by Inspector lF.-W. Cantrell in our

~

' telephone conversation with him on March 7,1980~. This report supersedes

. our . previous report dated February ~1,1980, on Infraction 553/79-17-01.

-Our: response to; Infraction 553/79-17-02 is unchanged.

.Noncomplihnce' Item --Infraction 553/79-17-01

, A. -- As required l by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10CFh30,. and as

< implemented by paragraph 17.1A.S.of:the FSAR, " Activities affecting quality shall'be prescribed by documented instructions,

procedures, and drawings . . . and shall be accomplished in

. -accordanc~e with these instructions, procedures, and drawings."

. Paragraph-14.9 ofEprocess specification 1.M.1.2(b) of General Construction Specification G-29M, applicable to containment shell Twelding, limitsithe_ bead width resulting from weaving to 5/8-inch maximum for'the gas metal arc (including flux coced) process.

Contrary-to the above, on December 12, 1979, bead widths of 3/4-inch'to

  • .7/8-inch en containment shell' welds IT 2301629 and IT 2301631, welded

~

Twith the flux cored ~ process, were observed. Discussions with the inspection

' personnel revealed that weaving the full width' of the -joint until' the joint is.ful1~has been the-practice in the past. This results in a bead width of one ' inch or greater at the top of the joint.'

This:is an infraction.

o

REVISED RESPONSE s1. ' Corrective' Steps'Taken and'Results-Achieved

- AllLwork.-on the two containment shell Celds cited in the infraction was' stopped. LA quality control. investigation report (QCIR) was-written to: document and. follow this situation.: All gas metal' arc flux core welding:in:accordance with General: Construction lSpecificat' ion G-29M is now being accomplished with a 5/8-inch

~

l maximum weave 1 width.

.  : ' Disposition of theseitwo velds was predicated on the results of

, c  ; test. performed at'TVA's Singleton lbterials. Engineering Laboratories-.

0  ;(Singleton) to; determine.the effect of weave width 11arger than.5/S' inch.

~

n v

a r . . .

~

,/{

/

b i

- . - ' ,q

g7- >

p -r ~ - -

'=,

Vp ' ;va ~;y, t- 1r, g ,

' ..~

W' n

l-4 g , 77 ," e - .r, le M. * '" L. .

Mj:1

' . ~

X ^

" 9 n; y r i W, '

Rs -

/ ,

-Tho'. results Jofath~c; initial ' test"ati. Singleton on which(the

.> - -y - : February l1,!1980, response wasl based indicated that; the properties' .,

P- .

^ -fof the
veld' and f adjacentiheat-affected zone met . the ; applicable section Lof ? the . ASME Code, Sub.section KE, with the llarger weave width. However,

~

tlater test'resultsifailed:to %upportLthe originalsconclusion. As a

~

%%" 3 result of;these(1 ster.:'te't-findings, s NCR PBN-067.has=been deemed

%-4 ,

.  :!' reportable'Eunderjl0CFR50.55(e).- This condition was; reported to; fInspector R. W.1 Wright >on March 6,31980.- In NCR'PBN-067fR1,-

i' eTVA'hasirecommended:the. removal of--the) weld metal disposited in

  • - , x iexcess ;of the :5/8-inch maximum.we'a veiwidth requireme'nt. - However,.

' ' 2 the final decision 'on corrective actions- will be l determined by .thef

.t ,

. Technical? Engineer,-General Electric /C.2F. Braun;

[

n

[ -

(2.1 iActi$n TakenLto Prevent' Recurrence 2

)Craftisupervision andlqu'ality control inspectors were instructed

.E- fon Decemberil7; 1979, to conform.ito requirements of applicable 4

' specifications".and codes on;;all, work.

~

~ w ,

3.. IDate When Full <Comol ance Was icnieved.

[ Full compliance on thrwelds made with' excessive weave widEhs

~

.will not be attained.until:NCR PBN-067 Riiis dispositioned and

~

~

corrective actions'on lthose welds are~ accomplished. If:lC; F. Braun:

, accepts.; th'e .:TVA, recommendation,' the 7 work' is ' expected- to be , completed .

} by; September;30,;1980.s A lAll' gas: metal arc flux core-welding 1 performed'sub' sequent to-

-December:17,-1979,lhas been in full compliance with GenerallConstruction s

_ . S;iecification ,G 29M.

a Y

i '.

+ . .~>

es~ . , ' .-

y '; 4

-< 4 5

'5_

-g. , . - I a

> k s s 1 e 4

+

^l

, , s .

_t a 2 7 g

. _. ) '=#

I = ~

s

- o LE '. 4

+ .? , ,

4 -

k 'Mg %a

~

(, *

',T-'

+

) -

% ,* k, I * '

_y

.m,

,, se r ': y > nv, - , . - -

'~' ...g ,!, '

,l l j ,/ u_ . ,_ -

' ~-'

K

. i , :p ~ ,' -. . > . ,

w -h.. . i r5 -

a