ML19312D048

Seventh Set of Interrogatories Directed to Houston Lighting & Power.Requests Info Re steam-driven Feedwater Pumps,Scram Discharge Vol Tank,Hydrogen Monitoring Sys & Nuclear Fission Generation of Electricity

ML19312D048
Person / Time
Site:	Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date:	02/12/1980
From:	Jeffrey Scott National Resources Defense Council
To:	HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 8002290378
Download: ML19312D048 (3)

Text

e f

g.p.t.nry LL,u ,.,c . 7.

n- .- >

q.. c , ....,

. : w. a ml f* V A.}.**m ft **ji?

n '"i,m.' ,

s ,. [ '. . i usi. ' T f {.s f

k OfC d'd2 [\[JTd C ' ' l !."[ '5 E.' dQ_AL$fD[ k/X! D.)

~

Jn the M;at er cf

) .

1 iOSJCd I2 *:Il'jhG /diD Nf.3R O).

) D dct ;50-(66

)

eum ccco vaa ;;n )

f.1 c.~f s if J t u f,c-, m .aC i 6 *-4. cr,f. (v;, 7,,..n,,

f .' L ! f.J .. l d f. , g

.  ! b, ) . 1:

,,c' e A '. ; 4 - l-} .l.,i u e b I n, . , -

4 f:r .42, (f.),

T M I C E , f.O i U t&CVi".1Cl* i U d a nbG. . !I . 'i D O'S :[, D1p Ud3 lbQ dtI:Odh G. $1{ 31 15ft of If 5.*.'; !*f0ff. LECT'.f W t0 LI:s t [,.Ii.t .ICP. ) 'I1 .!lii #

t r PD. O T O~ ME'y .

lppliemt J.9 rapritrd to pmv.bh reup. .si . n ' - oc a <d. i ' :ti:n ?.740b and 7.7/1. Of du' CTmiSOicti RU}.0", Of ID:itat s/:

1 i  ;  ! "> u it- < >

y .; Mi tu d .

.Ii ~ . , falt'. d I. [G.- '[i.C 2 U d j

l 1

$ h h , - .

i

.g 6 L &mA k g = . $., . . b~ ' I $ Y A tha l'clh:wLng by d@mit in the U.S. - " L co .

- U M, MCO:

.J. Ry clad, J. N.mm, E.L. Ch"ntm, 0, ' ' ' ' '.in nr.<cr, f D:a d.y , d. Lc 2n e ,

C, bC$Lbn*C1, O. Mdbri:le, C. Idndamtvin.

~ - . . ..

8002ggg59g N'

d

_ . .a 3 +

2 .  : , ,

y  :

7 hY. k{;g '

. ,: n ~;i-:

nm ',

s

+ y -

c - .-

,< " INTERROGATORIES TO . liL&P -

- ' ~ -

x__

~+

n r-

' ~

1. :Does;ACNGS!pinn's call: for a ateam driven - feedwater- purap(s) ?

' ^

m .

=

-;4 -

~

L5. JDoes' Applicant taken ths' postition its feedwater pumps ivould '

liabo 'no emotiva force' .n the-. eve:it of closure of MSIVG?~

N.Providereferencetodocumentation'oftheresponses-to'#2and 241Eabove. Produce thcae documents for inspection.

g.

s l 4. Docas the Applicant take thu position that its feedwater pumps

1. cannot~ operate under'any?circunctances when the unterLlevel is

~

hormal? If so, provido refer ances to any studies or tests that

- confirm that.bclief. :If not, explain those circumstances when it.can operatei

%:Will the' Applicant unc w.... float switches in the Scram -

< Discharge Volume Tank _(SDW)?

~6.L Does sp'plicant maintain that, -in the event of SDVT owitch failure and slowing.o_f tbe-CRD (Control Rod' Drive), it sill

.not be'clowed aufficiently to impair its-reactivity control

.+ . .. ,.

' function?; Produce: and -list by name all documente and otudies ittithin An HLSP's pooseccion:that- are relied upon in answering R [this[ interrogatory. . ,

7 'W111?the Applicant't"c the position that its hydrogen

-) monito. . ring- system:~ differs -:significantly- from < : THI'c?-

m* . If: so, Jthen. state in: whatsways 11trief difforent.

^ '

8l,i.Doesfhpplicant believeithat nocexplosloniof hydro 6en U e -

" occurred (inj:the -

+

(containment' b0ilding atiTMI 'in the Marc}i/ April,-

' j.

, f979;ac'cNant?L'Produceandiliot'theTnamaasof:alldocuments-

,m

_t m^

' ~

or) st' iidios[ :deliedyuponsiiliansweringithic' question .

l

=

1. .f,;,

s - )95 (Doesiipplicarit (planU_a eyctensfor i taking - primaryl coolant

• c]

. ll ,

_':r s

-_.a: i ,e.-

• . rj~ u ,. '. -

+  %

e i.

1 f. , 4

, f 1l * !

,..m

' i

~ f' w _ <' -

2..

~

rcamplec anich . doca :not ' 2.oquire entry . of any. personnel into -

4 h'

ithe containment bui.1 ding?-

w j ;_ - : 10.- Uhatiis the: normal operatinis .prtatico for personnel if the?

3.~~

Vater level indicator chow. " low"? L a

f

.11. Provide - the following ninfonnation on the P. A. Robinson and

- Cedar ?nayou Generating ' Plant: :

.(a) MUo. capa! city.

(bliAverage temperatura.of water at' plant dincharge outlet n

and;coolingccancl dit: charge point - for - (i) nummer and -(11) winter.-

~12. Providc.the following f.or tbn-W.'A. Parish Generating Plant:

Y

(a)-MNe capacity.

l (b) ~ Averago ter.peratura of ' cooling - lake for (i) - summer and (ii) Wintor.

(c) ~ Water 4losces in acqc M./ year.

13.: Is it EL&P's position that nuc1 cur fission generation'~of electricity

'ia environmentally- attporior to v.ataral gas genorntion? If so,1what.

H ,

icitho basioffor-the alleged superiority.

x n14.-Canfthe'P k.J Robinson, Cedar Bayou, or Nobster generating utations

~ be ' converted to nuclear power plantn,- under current licensing requiro"

,' i nents?;

15.cIo it7the position of-uLGP:that P.A.tRobinson, cedar.Dayou, or m .

SHebater generatingj stations Jcould ba donverted toicoal generation J' .Eursitul Onder)cxiiitinglair; quai.ityi regulations- and EPA non--attainmont -

m ..

d.ofignations?. Iff Yes , y e tat.alany: danusplionc;.ac Ltc meanu - of; controlling

.;. 4; -

. >. Lor (offsething1S0 2 i-NOx,;or(particulate 4emissionc.

(

.[A ?-  ; \; ,. , ,

y -

s

.r

, . , , ~ - ,- - - . . . - - . -

> - ~

w& . , y 5 . 5- ' ' -

% f. g

, dp -

~, m ., . _

i3.

~ -

[ ,

$16.sDoonHL&Pbeliovefit?icentitledtoanexemptionforthe

_ ?Puclitico Act of ~1978 fori t

3- .(a)':New naturaligan plants?-

. (b) 1990' retirement of c:cisting natural gas plants?

p. 33 il.7. Na'ao by title, and prodnce for 'inspectioni any document in IIL&P? u k possuasion which forecasts,. predicts, hypothenizen, or describes

ponsible offects of' EPA' regulahions'or non-attainment designationc an Jindustrial uiting or electrical demand in the HL&P servico ' area.

l.B.: ls it1HL&P's position _that the front-end fuel cycle for nuclears t

.: power' plants has less: environmental f.mpact than the analogous phase oflitatural gas. electricaligeneration? .If yes, stato the manner in

. which : tho nuclear cycle in auperior, . and any docaments relied upon

'in answering'the.interrogutory.

' - h 19%Describeiany expanoson'e electrical generating capacity involvintf natural gas an a fuol within the HLnP nystem during the . lant -five yearn. ;The term " expansion" i's nennt to include tho additdon of .

..e .,

gas 'ttirbine' reaking units.

. 20.Nnat. tas the- coot of each expatalon stated in response to #19

' abovo.

20. ;- Deacribe the Loxtent of- natural- gau~ exploration activity . undertaken by Houcton dndustries, Jinn.,.-or its.cnbcidiariea,.at the procent.tima.

~

Include: 1:the' current. numbers oC:wella. drilled dna producing'uc11a',-

" ~

o itihefyearlyj2 production'of. naturdi'Lgtu, fthe approximate numbe!c -of leasos Shdldt tna':amouif iof; acreage;)ald for -na tural gas exploration ' oither

~

<=-

} .

yr inow:orii~nithe future. . '

F

&s

'( g - 722fProvideliiny. estimatos? nade)by FMP. Ior :f'or iHL&P 'on Ltihel current y

, 4.,. p- -<

. ;; , a .: , x;. _

.- _ -. -. - . . - . . - - - . - - . - _ . - ~ - - . ~ - ~ - . - _ _ . . . - - . . - - -

v -

_.s ,

t T. l., .

,; N . -

-< : ( . ;

.t-l[- -

~4. ,

1 -

1. l i

andTfuturoscupply:of natural gau avd.lable in the intrastate and.

l

~ 11nterstate market.- - Make. all

'1uments related to this interrogatory I g,

available-forJinspection. ,

23. ..Han HLGP {c experienca indicated difficulty !in naintaining natural '{

~

[> . gas facility air'pollutanta attenvironnantally cafe levels? -If so,-

t g '; .

-describe'the. nature of the difficulties.

l . . .

l p 124. Describe and provido r.ny internally generated;or consultant-genera- ..

j r- 1

[

lE' ted reporty or documento resulting from complaints of QC or QA engineers l 1

. (such .ac thoso complaints noted in FIRC inspection reportc. 78/14, j

l

-78/12, 79/09, ana 79/04).

I, l I

[: c25. Provido.cny interviews by H1sP (or nummaries of interviews) between j l .

1 ..>

7 ' HL3P and Albert Fralcy, Jr. , oi~ Brown & Rott Construction Co. , with .

L respect to.the{ firing-or other activities of Dan Swayze.

l p,

t 26 Hau 'HL&P .or .-its personnel ever contacted tha ~ owner or' any" stockholder {

l of H o.u.s.t.o.n.-.C.i..ty . Maga..zi._ne regarding an article- entitled " Einstein 's L 1 p

m -

O L

Ghoct) Trouble at Houston Lighting O Pownr's. Nuclear Project, 'or: any -

i other article .concerning -conntruction prob 3 cms at South Texas Project? I

~

l l

q Ifico,.;deceribe-the nature of thove contacta.

I, 27.cDoes HLGP have any, pcr.ition as to phother the firing of QC inspec-P  : ..

p ' tor- Dan Swayze was proper 'iutd juctiEied?~ -If so,. explain that position.

e.

)

' ~

b '

t e

_ , f

- i n '^ s s

l s

1 -

L

~

q

.L...- a

? 4 _ _

.am

, p h.

17 2. - " .

S . I .. r. . , h A _ M .il m -.-~dA-----

~

- - - - - ' " * - - - - - -- " - **'d

P s t

b.

~

y

'I.T ?.) D%m.i )g, sJ $

Q4 ., ~f *

m. r. :, .. l 4c .e s_q

'.o*.'",

.m }I Q , Y. i , . - p . . r.- -- +

4 m m

. s -

• s. m. s. m/4._. - em ]

I c

,?%,1 I p .(3 3 , gri e.< ly;-* . _ .y

[ .s1.g..e . , *1. i

,, C

• 3,.t,. . # -.

4 J1.'...7;- I,, g g v, ,. ;q,w,*odgm haa

• .s s_

7 1 --. . ,

r?

4 m< ., ,, ,

st,; %. .> f. .' '= {. :, L' p ..

,r' R,)

tj - u {. ? ,

C'. i

. , t.. , g n..,; J ' .t.f t.- . v+

m yt 'g .G , ,.- , ,. :

~ v~ y: .~3 , - ,;

s.,epn~e< s 3 ~e, >

n.<- n -

N . s ,: na ? ~r  !: Q SR 1y s i b'- a t s > g ,, n. '.* (.,;<,. g , ,e J t.m 4 P J $

C*Eol c * - (' A, L L = .* *. 'v .t.-/ n % A D 4 b

l #1  % ']gh tN;; ' ,m* *L*)*.-

• p 4 h 4 d* p' *U r,-

. . . J. gg as. f. a '( , i r,..i .+ . * *.#u- 5 ,y' e >

3

, .s

. A' '

$a .% ' * - . 5

n. . k .

b 3b d id,O E b OI} . D E, O1 $1

[.. ,d ,.

lb 's '.kl ). C k 3O [P .* C S l D 'd . VO , 25 IO '

,c, eyr s .% -, - V.s.i x g-v- rc. ww . c.qm

,+

• e],.1 ' ,

'ys (. --

f,

t. . q

• ~t.: < s e, gc T, Tan 'i T I.] .- . . 'm< ~L% Q..sp q tl%.. r-- .ej _st.~_s gy er

'"' ;p_= @_ o- /..- fy,_g}

,. , +. ~><'. ..' . ,k. ,

y . i, ;

• e.rL.i g, -s i.

• b_b,.

9. ; ps. 3 . ,n_ . . n,_

7

, , 7, , t o L 1

' ~ < -} g 5o./, Lt J , -v.,5 4. *r yais ..[.'t-N..p . > m 13 *J. .

s.c,- v ,2 0

. 3s A: ;am : p+ h. v ., ,

i N n. -

c. ,

.4

( i .. ,

4,r'g'.-

• i i

u -. (y

. .I L.~ y. C. fs

. s. 4 4

u 4 g - ii**

f I..d.% L i .

{ g A. F.'. V s a o9,m-Ti } }s v.YL '7

).% [ '. *. , .9- .

e s * , e

- ,h' 4 e, .', \ , y t .- b j 4  ; _

b 4

, t_ p 2 c >. r , ,

%,. m.

v yb.

..y

..p  !:r L-. ,, -,

s .

./ . e8 ,,

4 t

_ ', s6 /

• k ' ' sk >  % e 4.

vi, .m s. .x - .,> u. r et. c,.h ,,. us m.g . sk . c ,,s t* % ,r

_ .e a >

tm.s y v .: '

r ' !x m. a g  : .'+ s . ~ , n.  :. -

f ,3L '

n

• 84 p

,_O 3'

%., *

• g } $ sp a o" eu e L,t ,T'<-) %. mt: Lg <.v.

r.q9*in .ur s J.4 , . h. . q.Ub g' .'

• J g

/ks s'sl J .a n' ,.t {.I .s b O .[0 .) O*.Ii,Hfj (j[.iM M G'. tgjO

~

e e

,.,.

• p4s gh 7 j ,_, y }{ }

I 4 U "EhG con Ur0I f )Oni a E ~ O (b ,

,s tsm ., ) en.:c.4m im,a w i., d G,_.oinu a a. ,_, -.s , m.o

e. .' ,. 1,s- e2.. x .1s: _o ~. u .. ! ,.,. , hijM. ,- t.,%, ,

hrO kllB "D.lE E 'Gy O]? t.ile NP . ., (n y,sQc d g, g.. Q g g ; *.gsg g

-hl g

~

. )] [ (' h I f $' .[ [' { ' A 'Q ' '{ G { {fg{' -

'p *

.{- e f;k y'

n.

- . ,h3a*a.? ' ** '

• p t- ".4.- g

_ae4 ,n,;.w-*;,jge

-!f I,, ).

i

(.., 3

' , 3 'b ' ,* i  %

3ObCZ"IbF1.f)My F s > ."m 5 ci g , ; - r=g y }g.~. gy;ggg gg 7 r -

A.

---

a,-----'__ - _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ , _ . , , _ . _ . _ _ _ , . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Y

= .

w

-(d) !tre Mr. provisionc for a back-up to the Central procccsing d

Unit (c)?. Doec une of the haci:-un capability reduce proccasing capability for lower "riority operatienc? In the back-up UFU of equal capability in tai renpcota to the unit it may replace?

(c) Doco HInp pl an to bn v contcaary cngineers on duty in the contral room for minun'rce, r.: pair, and procran alterations relevant to the data uracenaing equipnent? If not, how does HI&p plant to carry cui those functions?

(f) Uho will or hna jeepred the programs for use in the computer?

(g) t' hat standardc tra m1cd in preparing the . progrnm(c)?

(h) I& plain or deceribe hou quality assurance for the programa lu raintained during the pr M eat technical review of prograta utilined in the data proa aind equiptent.

(i) Hov in quality as m cence for program performance tnaintained during the-tecting et the nrogran utiliced in the data processing equipacnt? In particah r.

shat standarda uuqt he act during the tcat perios ? At e th- tosto designed or reviewed by in~

dopendent , . _ , _

c ven11 ants?

(j) Have the'prograra 4:er meaLed yet?

(k) How many computer ier-Inale vill thcro be in the control room?

(1) Will a printor te nLiliced during control room operations?

(m) If " yea" to 1., . ifuut in the line speed of tho. )rinter*?

e n L .J

p, , - -

_ c; -

m,, , _ ,

p gy 3 ; -

s -

U m tu .

,$3] Lict]i title,umxl produce,fewrj do:&dtuitMn the 1ccounsica of IIIAP f.

Mcd.ch relatesito the caputetplatte<l for th1 ccatrol recm.

^

j ,

x .s.6..J13 .?Listjr/jitle md peduce for inspectica evety docuntt IIIIP pl ms to une in

'rebuttir y _

f.(a) Icynkd ndditional'Cattmtim i 1 of TenPIRG.

i S q -

)(b) Acended Idditional Contcotica 2 of TccGII'S.

((c)[RHEEDlldditional Contentica 3'of TexPIFD.

c(d) Additional Contentien 15 of Ted1PS.

(c) Additional Cantentica 22 of Tc2IRGi ,

,., . (f) Ailiticnal Centention 32 of TedIPC.

~

f; [(g) AddOictrfCcntentions -34 and 43 of Taf1PD.

I

.'(h) Additiccal Cententica ~45 of. Tc;fLEG.

(1) Aklitirnal Centention 47.of TcWIEG.

L(j) 'AthildLmal Contymticn '49 'of Tc :PIRG.

1 .'

iTexas Public Interest Pesearth Growl Bar.?TI UC- Universicf of IIcuatcat"

[^ EIlouston, 3X 177004 :

m

!, 2e c -

l

[

4 5 (

1 ',. .

..s n'

I; p

~

s , ~+

h- ,

• ' ^

l fi . ,

lr

._0;; -

4.s m:

- - 1 ~ ,j 1

4C t.-

~

z r " -

i. ,

, ,;c 2.v , ,,

• ., , .) E 1

" $