ML19312A136

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 99900005/78-02 on 781002-06.Noncompliance Noted:Stainless Steel Welding Procedures Did Not Address All Requirements of Applicable Specification NPS 595215
ML19312A136
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/19/1978
From: Mcneill W, Whitesell D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML19269C532 List:
References
REF-QA-99900005 NUDOCS 7902050237
Download: ML19312A136 (7)


Text

.

VEllDOR IllSPECTION REPORT U. S. IlVCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report flo.

99900005/78-02 Program No.

44010 Company:

Westinghouse Electric Corporation Nuclear Fuel Division Box 355 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Inspection at:

Columbia, South Ca.olina Inspection Conducted:

October 2-6, 1978 Inspectors:

/[.

((

j&

/d//9/h/

W. M. McNeill, Contractor Inspector, Vendor Date Inspection Branch t/

A

/d-/9-)

Approved by: _DE E. Whitesell,Ehief, ComponentsSection I, Date Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on October 2-6, 1978 (99900005/78-02)

Areas Inspected:

Implementation of Topical Report and other applicable codes and standards, including:

document. control; material control; control of special processes and action on previous inspection findings.

The inspection involved thirty-two (32) inspector hours on site by one NRC inspector.

Results:

In the two (2) areas inspected, no apparent deviations or unresolved items were identified.

The following one (1) deviation was identified in the remaining area.

Deviations:

Control of Special Processes - the stainless steel welding procedures did not address all the requirements of the applicable specifi-cation NPS 595215.

(See Enclosure)

Unresolved Items:

None.

902050.239

. DETAILS SECTION A.

Persons Contacted J. R. Bond, Q. C. Engineer J. R. Bush, Q. C. Manager D. W. Campbell, Inspection Supervisor G. A. Corley, Inspection Supervisor

  • R. R. Cost, Operations Product Assurance Manager J. E. Craver, Q. C. Engineer R. Dereani, Manufacturing Supervisor
  • R. C. Drescher, Chemical Manufacturing Manager J. G. Higginbotham, Procurement Q. A. Manager
  • L. P. Kays, Plant Operations Product Assurance Manager
  • W. E. Kirby, Manufacturing Engineering Manager G. D. LaBruyere, Process Engineer H. K. Lembersky, Q. C. Engineer D. E. Matthews, Inspection Supervisor C. A. Mitchell, Q. C. Engineer S. S. Patrick, Q. C. Engineer S. L. Reese, Inspection Supervisor
  • L. H. Reiland, Q. C. Engineer B. R. Stamper, Drafting Manager B. D. Street, Manufacturing Supervisor W. L. Wall, Q. C. Records Manager R. J. Wiggins, Mechanical Manufacturing Manager
  • Denotes those attending the Exit Interview.

B.

Action on Previous Inspection Findings (Closed) Deviation (Report No.

77-04):

Lack of acceptance limits of test conditions in some Chem Lab Manual procedures.

All the necessary revisions to the Chem Lab Manual have been made in order to resolve this concern.

(Closed) Deviation (Report No.

77-04):

Measures did not provide for documentation that optical pyrometers and theromocouples have a known relationship to national standards. Quality Control Instruc-tion 000140 on Tool and Gage Control has been revised to prevent this problem. The particular instruments have been listed in the calibra-tion schedule.

(Closed) Unresolved Item (Report No.

77-04):

Quantification of the microfilm manufacturers storage recommendations. Westinghouse has reviewed its storage practices with its film manufacture and received assurance from the manufacture that the film storage is acceptable.

C.

Document Control 1.

Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:

a.

The fuel manufacturer's document control system for design, manufacturing, and quality assurance documents is consistent with Regulatory requirements.

b.

The document control system includes all drawings, specifi-cations, procedures, instructions, etc. which affect quality 2.

Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:

a.

Review of the Westinghouse it.F.D. Topical Report, WCAP-7800, Revision 4-A, dated March 1975, Section 6, and Policy and Procedure, Document Control, P-007, Revision 1, which established the general requirements for document control.

b.

Review of the Product Assurance Manual, Section 2.6.1, Revision 2, and the Quality Control Manual, Section 6.1, Revision 4 which established the specific requirements of document control.

c.

Review of the Quality Control Instructions (QCIs) Control and Distribution of Quality Control Instructions, 000105, Revision 8, Single Drawing Sub Verification, 000122, Revision 4, Specification Review and Approval, 000129, Revision 4, Engineering Change flotice (ECil) and Specifica-tion or Drawing Revision Sign-off, 000109, Revision 8, which established additional specific requirements of document control.

d.

Verified that a sample of three (3) drawings and three (3) specifications on four (4) recent projects were reviewed, approved and distributed in accordance with the procedures above.

e.

Verified that the above sample were legible, not improperly marked up, indexed, and the distribution documented in accordance with the procedures above.

f.

Verified that changes to the above samples were reviewed, approved and documented in accordance with the procedures above.

g.

Verified that a sample of ten (10) Q.C.I.'s were reviewed, approved and distributed in accordance with the procedures above.

3.

Findings a.

Deviations None.

b.

Unresolved Items None.

D.

Material Control 1.

Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:

a.

The system for identification and control of materials, parts, components and subassemblies during fabrication is sufficient to prevent the use of incorrect or defective materials, parts or components.

b.

A system is utilized which will insure that all manufacturing and inspections steps are accomplished in the prescribed sequence.

2.

Method of Accomplishment a.

Review of the Westinghouse N.F.D. Topical Report, WCAP-7800, Revision 4-A, dated March 1975, Section 8 which established the general requirements for material control.

b.

Review of the Quality Control Manual, Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components, Section.8.1, Revision 3, and Q.C.I.'s Issue and Disposition of Hold Tags by QC Personnel, 000103, Revision 4, Fuel Assembly Data Pack Overcheck for Certification, 000199, Revision 5,

. Component Traceability by Receiving Lot Number, 000127, Revision 2, Procedure for Q.C. Audit of Traceability Records for Fuel and Non-Fuel Contracts, 000130, Revision 6, which established the specific requirements of material control.

c.

Verified that a sample of three (3) assemblies, two (2) nonfuel and one (1) fuel and forty (40) components of these assemblies could be traced back to origin (heat number).

Verified that records and parts allowed for positive identification of the items in accordance with the above procedures.

d.

Verified that the status of assemblies was indicated accurately by review of the nonfuel and fuel assemblies found in process and their associated records.

3.

Findings a.

Deviations None.

b.

Unresolved Items None.

E.

Control of Special Process 1.

Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that special processes are properly qualified and controlled in accordance with Criterion IX, Appendix B, 10 CFR 50 and the Quality Assurance Manual.

2.

Method of Accomolishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:

a.

Review of the Westinghouse N.F.D. Topical Report, WCAP-7800, Revision 4-A, dated March 1975, Section 8, which established the general requirements for control of special processes.

b.

Review of Quality Control Manual, Control of Special Processes, Section 9.1, Revision 3; Process Specifications, Zircaloy End Plugs to Zircaloy Tubes, NPA 595208, Revision 3, Inert-Gas

. Shielded-Arc Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steels, HPS 595215, Revision 6, which established the specific requirements.

c.

Review of Q.C.I.s Machined Components Weld Process Control Inspection, 932904, Revision 4, Qualification of Welding Procedures and Personnel, 000104, Revision 4, Fuel Assembly Inspection (Weld Sample Verification), 938301, Revision 5, which established additional specific requirements.

d.

Observation of welding of end plugs to fuel tubes, spider fingers and vanes to body, top nozzle to fuel assembly and review of welding procedures, Girth Welding of Fuel Rod Top End Plugs, 83-05-03, Revision A, Supplementary Operating Instruction R0258, Revision A, Assemble Fingers and Vanes to Body 17x17, 732110, Revision 2, Weld Top Nozzle to Assembly and Check Rod Gap, 730110, Revision 0.

e.

Verification for the above observation that welding was performed in accordance with above procedures.

Verification that the above welding was performed with qualified procedures and personnel by review the qualification records.

Verification that the above welding was consistent with qualification records and specifications.

3.

Findings a.

Deviations Welding of Spider Assembly R-136, and Fuel Assembly, 39A, were observed and in both cases electrode contact was noted by the inspector. The applicable specification, Inert-Gas Shielded-Arc Welding of Austen' tic Stainless Steels, 595215, Revision 6, dated April 25, 1978, Section 6.6.2 requires the work to be stopped, the electrode to be redressed, and the contact area to be ground to remove all electrode material.

In the above cases none of the above requirements of Section 6.6.2 were performed.

The procedures, Assemble Fingers and Vanes to Body 17x17, 732100, Revision 2 and Weld Top Nozzle to Assembly and Check Rod Gap, 730110, Revision 0, did not address the requirements found in Section 6.6.2.

During the review of the specification 595215 it was also noted that paragraph 6.3.2 was also not addressed in the procedures.

Paragraph 6.3.2 stated the requirements for handling inadvertent arc strikes.

. b.

Unresolved Items None.

F.

Exit Interview The inspector met with management representatives (denoted in paragraph A) at the conclusion of tt inspection on October 6, 1978.

The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection. The management representatives had no comment in response to each item discussed by the inspector. This Exit Interview was tape recorded by Westinghouse NFD.

.