ML19310A010
| ML19310A010 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 05/12/1980 |
| From: | Pappas H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8005210017 | |
| Download: ML19310A010 (2) | |
Text
7
'o UNITED STATES 8\\
A() : 1, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r
E REGION lli p
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
%.'.b#
o GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137 WAY 12 1980 MEMORA CdM FOR: Those on Attached List FROM:
Helen Pappas, Chief, Administrative Branch
SUBJECT:
IE BULLETIN NO. 80-11 The attached IE Bulletin No. 80-11 titled " Masonry Wall Design" was sent to the following licensees on May 8, 1980 for action and information:
ACTION American Electric Power Service Corporation Indiana and Michigan Power Company D. C. Cook 1, 2 (50-315, 50-316)
Commonwealth Edison Company Dresden 1, 2, 3 (50-10, 50-237, 50-249)
Quad-Cities 1, 2 (50-254, 50-265)
Zion 1, 2 (50-295, 50-304)
Consumers Power Company Big Rock Point (50-155)
Palisades (50-255)
Dairyland Power Cooperative LACBWR (50-409)
Iowa Electric Light & Power Company Duane Arnold (50-331)
Northern States Power Company Monticello (50-263)
Prairie Island 1, 2 (50-282, 50-306)
Toledo Edison Company Davis-Besse 1 (50-346)
Wisconsin Electric Power Company Point Beach 1, 2 (50-266, 50-301)
B005210011
O Those on Attached List.
Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Kewaunee (50-305)
INFORMATION Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Pe:ry 1, 2 (50-440, 50-441)
Commonwealth Edison Company Braidwood 1, 2 (50-456, 50-457)
Byron 1, 2 (50-454, 50-455)
La Salle 1, 2 (50-373, 50-374)
Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company Zimmer (50-358)
Consumers Power Company Midland 1, 2 (50-329, 50-330)
Detroit Edison Company Fermi 2 (50-341)
Illinois Power Company Clinton 1, 2 (50-461, 50-462)
Northern Indiana Public Service Company Bailly (50-367)
Public Service of Indiana Marble Hill 1, 2 (50-546, 50-547)
Union Electric Company Callaway 1, 2 (50-483, 50-486) yOfW
/
Helen Pappas, Chief Administrative Branch
Enclosure:
Addressees - Memorandum dated May 9, 1980 Central Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b i
l 1
\\
l
A-DUPLICATE DOCUMENT SSINS No.:
6820 Entire document previously entered into system under:
Accession No.:
TED STATES 7912190695 LATORY COMMISSION mo 79/2 /yoG7f CTION AND ENFORCEMENT C
N, D.C.
20555 N o.
of pages:
D y 8, 1980 IE Bulletin No. 80-11 MASONRY WALL DESIGN Description of Circumstances:
In the course of conducting inspections pursuant to IE Bulletin Nos. 79-02 and 79-14 at the Trojan Nuclear Plant, Portland General Electric Co. (PGE) identi-fied a problem with the structural integrity of concrete masonry walls with Seismic Category I piping attached to them.
This problem was briefly addressed in IE Information Notice No. 79-28, which was sent to all Construction Permit and Operating License holders on November 16, 1979 (Attachment 1).
The problem was that some walls were found which did not have adequate structural strength to sustain the required piping system support reactions.
These structural deficiencies were at that time reported to be attributable to two deficiencies:
1)
Apparent lack of a final check of certain pipe support locations and reactions to ensure that the supporting elements possessed adequate structural integrity to surtain the required loads.
2)
Non-conservative design criteria for the reactions from supports anchored into the face of concrete masonry walls; e.g., relying on the combined strength of double block walls without substantial positive connection between the two walls by means other than the bond pre /ided by a layer of mortar, grout or concrete between them.
Continued investigations into the deficiencies identified at the Trojan Nuclear Plant, engineered by Bechtel, confirmed the deficiencies to be attributable to error in engineering judgment, lack of procedures and procedural detail, and inadequate design criteria (details are in Trojan Nuclear Plant's LER No. 79-15, and supplements).
Because of this and the generic implications of similar deficiencies with other operating facilities, we have concerns with regard to the adequacy of design criteria used for the design of masonry walls and an apparent lack of design coordination between the structural and piping / equipment design groups.
IE Bulletin 79-02, Revision 2 issued on November 8, 1979 required a review of pipe supports attached to masonry walls using expansion anchor bolts.
For most pipe supports in this category, the expansion anchor bolts were replaced by bolting through the wall or the support was relocated to another structure.
Supports that are bolted through masonry walls are also to be considered in the review for this Bulletin.
SSINS No.:
6870 UNITED STATES Accession No.:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 7910250475 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.
20555 November 16, 1979 0k IE Information Notice No. 79-28 OVERLOADING OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS DUE TO PIPE SUPPORT LOADS Description of Circumstances:
Recently, the NRC was informed that, in the course of the inspections pursuant to IE Bulletin No. 79-02 and 79-14 by the Portland General Electric Co.
(PGE) at the Trojan Nuclear Plant, some walls were found which did not have adequate structural strength to sustain the required support reactions.
Bechtel Corporation was the Architect Engineer for the plant. These structural inadequacies were reported to be attributable to two deficiencies:
1)
Apparent lack of a final check of certain pipe support locations and reactions to ensure that the supporting structural elements possessed adequate structural integrity to sustain the required loads.
2)
Inadequate design criteria for the reactions from supports anchored into the face of concrete block walls; e.g., relying on the combined strength of double concrete block walls without positive connection between the two walls by means other than the bond provided by layer of grout between them.
The NRC is currently pursuing these issues in detail for the Trojan Nuclear Plant to determine the extnet of these deficiencies and the generic implications for other Bechtel facilities.
This Information Notice is provided as an early notification of a possible signis-icant matter.
It is expected that recipients will review the information for possible applicability to their facilities and the actins being performed under IE Bulletin No. 79-02.
Specific action is being requested relating to the adequacy of attachments to concrete block walls under IE Bulletin No. 79-02, Revision 2, item 5.c.
No specific actions are requested in response to this Information Notice.
If NRC evaluations so indicate, further licensee actions may be requested or required.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Director of the appropriate NRC Regional Office.
No written response to this IE Information Notice is required.