ML19309H357

Contract: Workshop on Low Level Waste Mgt Licensing Rule, Awarded to Southern States Energy Board

ML19309H357
Person / Time
Issue date:	04/18/1980
From:	Mattia M NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM), SOUTHERN STATES ENERGY BOARD
To:
Shared Package
ML19309H352	List: ML19309H351 ML19309H357
References
CON-FIN-B-6944, CON-FIN-B-6944-0, CON-NRC-02-80-052, CON-NRC-2-80-52 NUDOCS 8005130093
Download: ML19309H357 (16)

Text

_

~

~%

~

8 005180c93

'~

{, *., 7 -. g T-

.7 Cf

.~. r,1 A P.D ARD F C RM I

1 PAGE T

f

26. JULY 1966

- AWARD / CONTRACT 1

crNissi uivices Aowsm.neN 4

ero noc. nio. mcen s.v io:

4. C!th0(Q,CR NAflCHAL D(Fgregg UNg,{t gg$A I, cCNTRAtf f Prw. i=8'. l/t*f / NO.

2. (PPICTfvt CATE

3. REQU.S T!ON/PUACMA&E P!OVISI/ PROJECT NO, REG. 2 AND/CR Ous af G. I*

fC4S-80-052 ure.

flRC-02-80-052 4/J8/80

s. issued av coot

6. Ao-s tuo av coorI

i. ecuv m U/*""'"" "*" "

0,'*E'f

i U.S. tiuclear Regulatory commission i

Division of Contracts g f,%",""

Washington DC 20555

,. o.secuN roa nc.ar rumi,.

s. ccmm. coa coor. ;

i f.4ciurv coot i NAME AND ADDAES$

Southern States Energy Board t

One Exchange Place, fe$'","l Na 2300 Peachford Road, Suite 1230

"""'1 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 i o 3 1,,Nyo. is u

,e,,,,

,,,a,N

/,,

sper, fed) To Aocatss sHoWN IN kCCC L

J t

n.sw w w.u rca com.

)

i2 rArutNT w:a u,. m av coorl U.S. Iluclear Regulatory Commission 4

U.S. fluclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Controller Division of Waste f4anagement Washington DC 20555 -

4 nashington DC 20555 Atnu_.EcbertJmDo.uga11 O io u s c. 22o4 iex i u res, ccee-Nr wAs O >=viate. 8 a rcon>xo. runu~' ro.

8., u s e. 252 M 3i.

4 l

14. ACCQUNiiNG ANo APPRCPRIAh0N DATA 50-19-03-02 B 6944-0

$9,769.00 i

16.

97.

18.

19.

2o.

33.

syPell[$/!(RV8(!$

Q U A NfiT V UNif UNff M'([

A M CUNT IIE M NQ t

"UORKSHOP Oil LOW-LEVEL WASTE MAllAGEPEilT LICEt! SING RULE"

~,..,,

1 1

h

~

ga;3( 4.g.;gg gs %g 3

(j CO N T :. sci t \\ G eMtil I; tr itJ. cwt r; i.l l I?Dn.R 1 0" .'6.H A l' PIX.1HL. 2. ff C;N ACTCTS tit 'oa'.AitD ACtttMhi (f.ste o.ror n rs gnio..! b. Q4 2 b. AW AC

• l ~"it

. a t' is k ~e vtP***td I* s.Ju tiene.!e.: *rs us. ) %.o eM as...!. ..a .!,ew., 3 aen,,,, i.. i a..., e,~.,. n.

e. s -~.,a N.., e e.

~,,,. se f. @ 4* J 4et... etl.eem s es pdoe.e o.t u.e ee...< e,.., f e-m at o'*iv*=.se e44bc.as se der;n mode ter yw =h ca e* us er the*0ee tra *** bth e U j .J.ad m a ss., ar d s **, twa s:.e* st.e** 53r t e.e i.ieu

• ser i re ***

ehe. it ae'ess a:cwei * 'e '-e tems I. :ve e:4.e **J ** na e s e*h ' 4 4 i'e*'s Ine e ; **

• J 4. ge e t of h ro.., e +h.e r ene.ac.= 34 t., i.e,. e a s w J ; >..

T w 4.t.J sest.c w s '%e son:eace =bch asu us st ** e ad a -ea ; he.*e es k 8 4 < the O w*eam *** e ic.ktv sa e=J yew eFor. eas stl ,*s e sr s u **. P.a e.a. i ha '*e 4.; a.q d.*.ee . t i. n s e.4.L :s. *< sn P.3, one.4u.t e.es 8 7 j saf ' w' +=4

• pre, s.a ns..e gaet e *** beat. s e t&ar.us. 4 3 we ss'm a u. $t k*e f aSee co9' 40 28 J ?ce**".s mese sti.,

e*e.* ' I 1* *a4 *r rs'en. 3 a t.*+cence **.*>* (.Ed hwe =Ps re i, %/ i..r.s., j q m m 2.'. L*e.*!j Sf a T[-f f A,*1! F* ",), 4 9 d' .2 N a.*. ( U.d !*.*E A CIO q k gt

• f.g',,s..._-.._.......,

t.f. 4.7. c.. ). s ~:,, n..: r.r., v s z.o a i,, e e ;,,, u :er,,s. a u,.-, e, aw.g...: w u, r,,.,

. ;.n w.u 68 M 'D lbry Jo tuttia l

_ G's-e b s.Z f g.G.. A,n.. /% n.v &.^M Ah. s f v-- 4..- r 7 .,m.. an -.. g-a-Ng. n ---,,-s,-.-.m.. v-

,@.+.. x , ib' Ap ..s - ...a ' 3, 4. .. s; ?l NRC-02-80-052 ( Page 2 of 4 ' ARTICLE I - STATEMEtlT OF WORK The Contractor shall conduct a workshop on April 21 and April 22, 1980, in Atlanta, Georgia, in accordance with the attached statement of work. ARTICLE II - PERIOD OF PERFORMAtlCE l The period of performance with respect to this contract shall commence on the date of execution of the contract and all work shall be completed 90 days from the date of the award. ARTICLE III - C0tl5I0 ERAT 10tl The Contractor shall be paid the firm fixed price of 3,169.00 for all expenses associated with the workshop with the exception of travel expenses as follows. Reimbursement of individuals (not to exceed 30 people) for travel expenses estimated in the amount of 6,600.00, in accordance with flRC regulations stated below. \\ a. Cost of air travel by most direct route. " Air Coach" or " Air. Tourist" accommodations constitutes the normal class of air travel which shall ~ be utilized. First-class acccmmodations may be used if (1) less than first-class is not available providing reservation was requested within 24 hours af ter the traveler had knowledge of the trip; (2) less than first class requires circuitous routing; (3) less than first-class requires travel to begin or end at unreasonable hours (i.e., if scheduled flight time is before 8:00 a.m. and scheduled arrival is after 9:00 p.m.; (4) less than first class.would result in additional direct costs which offset the transportation savings; (5) less than first class will not make ccnnections with other flights or transpor-tation fgr continuation of the journey which greatly increased the du duration of the flight; or (6) less than first-class would offer accommodations which are not reasonably adequ' ate for the physical or medical needs of the travele'r. ? b. Cost of rail travel by most direct route; first-class with lower berth or nearest equivalent. Travel by motor vehicle including rented automobile shall be reimbursed c. on a reasonable actual expense basis, or at the Contractor's o' tion or p a mileaga basis of ]S.5c per mile plus any toll or ferry charges. d. Private, vehicle mileage shill be reimbursed at 18.5c per mile. e. Per diem not to exceed $55.00 per day. l f. Receipts ara required for cc=cn carrier transportatica lodging, and miscallanacus for any ona itrn in excess of $15.C0. i e -w

.o g .NRC-02-80-052 Page 3 of 4 [ 1 ARTICLE IV - OBLIGATIONS The amount presently obligated by NRC with respect to this contract is I $9,769.00. ARTICLE V - PAY!!ENT C' Payment shall be made in accordance with Clause 2 of the General Provisions entitled " Payment" as soon as practi.caole after completion and acceptance j of all work, upon submission by the Contractor of voucher (s) in a form i satisfactory to the Contracting Officer; provided, however, that said g 4 payment (s) shall not be deemed to prejudice any rights which the Government t may have by law or under other provisions of this contract. i ARTICLE VI - SPECIAL PROVISIO:IS 1 VI. 1 CottTRACTING OFFICER'S AUTHORIZED REPRESEitTATIVE (C0AR) i Performance ^ of the wor % hereunder shall be subject.to the technical [. 1 instructions issued by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The technical instructions shall be signed by the C0AR. The C0AR is responsible for: 1. monitoring the Contractor's technical progress, including the surveillance and assessthent of performance and recommending to the Contracting Officer changes in requirement; 2. interpreting the statement of work; I i I 3. performing technical evaluation as required; u .t' 4. performing the technical inspections and a'cceptances required by this contract; and i 5. assisting the Contractor in 'the res'lution of technical o j problems encountered during performance. I ~ Within the purview of'this authority, the COAR is authori::ed to approve { 4 payment vcuchers for supplies / services requirad under the contract. j The Centracting Officer is responsible for directing or negotiating , any changes in terms, conditions, or amounts cited in the centracc. ,o Fce guidance frcm the CDAR to the Contractor to-be valid, it must: II 1. be consistent with the description of work set forth in this jj contr "*-

I 2.

not ccnstitute new assignmant of work or channe of the e:Gressed terms, conditions, or specifications incorporited into-this contract;. t .i i. f .. _. ~. _ _

~' c. FIRC-02-80-052 Page 4 of 4 = 3. not constitute a basis for an extension to the period of performance or contract delivery schedule; and 4. not constitute a basis for any increase in the contract price. VI.2 KEY PERSON"El For the purpose of Clause 26 of the General Provisions Dr. Gerald R. Hill is identified as being escential to the work being performed hereunder. VI.3 INSPECTIO:t AND ACCEPTANCE Acceptance of the services and reports to be delivered herein will be made by the C0AR. VI.4 DISSEMINATION OF CONTRACT INFOR:iATION The Contractor shall not publish,' permit to be published or distribute for public consumption any information, oral or written conceraing the results or conclusions made pursuant to the performance of this contract without the prior written. consent of the Contracting Officer. (Two copies of any material proposed to be published or distributed shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer. ARTICLE VII - GENERAL PROVISIONS This contract is subject to the Fixed Price Research and Development Contracts ~ under $10,000 General. Pro'isions dated November 14, 1977 which incorporated the FPR Changes and Additions and NRC Additions, attached hereto and made a part hereof. Clause 14 " Patent Rights" is deleted in its entirety.

,7 .c r. j j WORKSHOP ON LOW-LEVEL WASTE MAf!AGEMENT LICEllSIfiG RULE l SOUTHERN STATES EllERGY BOARD w B&R: 50-19-03-02 FIN: B-6944-0 ~ i c l.0 Backaround ~ t. The U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (flRC) is developing a regulation, } i 10CFR61, that will set our licensing procedures, performance objectives, a and technical criteria for land disposal of low-level radioactive wastes. U As it is now organized, the rule will consist of several procedural sections including a subpart on state government participation in flRC licensing, several sections setting forth license conditions and requirements for i i recordkeeping, inspection and enforcement, and physical security, a section on technical requirements, and concluding sections establishing requirements i for physical security, waste processors, and the disposal of low-activity ~ bulk solid wastes. 2.0 Work Recuired Within 30 days after award of th'is contract, tile contractor will host and conduct a ucekshop composed of a sufficient numbar. of state, industry and i public interest groups'_ members to examine the marits of and concerns 1 arising frca the draf t versf an of 10CFR$1. The workshop will be held in Atl aata, Gecrgia. In addition, the contractor will provide meeting space, I ahiniste:tiva and secretarial servicas, as wall. as rec.3, beard, and travel-reimbursaient fer the p,articipants as reglired. The contractor shall i arrar.32 for _a.represant 2tive greep consistin:; of Governces' energy policy l staf f, state radiation health program officials, legislators fand other appespriate state ra;. cante.tvac of the states as wall as industry and public interact-graups. An invi:atica must be se:t to a represantative of the Agra2.mt' State pregram l feci a2ch Agr.nr.Mt-State ',ithin ti:a ragier., and to th S:ne liaisca of f f:er .i a II f:- ev.i kate u'ihin tM rec'c,. /. Iis:: !s attachel. e,

c. The contractor shall prepare and siihnit to NRC a report that summarizes 'the consensus, and identifies significant' unresolved views of the participants on as many topics and issues as the participants may wish to address i regarding NRC's 10CFp,61 regulation, but specifically including selected issues from the three categories below. A list of specific topics and issues shall be provided to the participants at least two weeks. prior to the meeting along with a copy of 10CFR61. The list of topics and issues shall be prepared in consultation with the PRC project manager.. To the 4 extent the participants desire.and are able to provi.de additional detailed comm.ents (e.g., a marked-up draf t of 10CFR61), 'such' comr.ents shall also be included as attachments to the report. Following submission of the report to MRC, the SSER shall submit j the report to its Poard of Directors for the pur;:ose of ascertaining a j uhether the report, in the Board's view, adequately reflects the views of 1 the states in the rsgion. a - :-.r..

c-..,

a Catecory I - Institutional Arrancements (Land Ounership,. Post-Goerational 3cr/eiliance and Fonitorina. Financial) Backnrcnnd Altbeugh present Icu'is silent on burial site c: mar: hip, existing regulations - req :f ra fe?aral or stata n enarship o' land us+f foe t.Uf disposal. The~ I draf t o' proposed 10cfMI' would require, fe'er'l or stata cunership o'.lami 1 with provir,if.n for the transfe.e-of stde-cuac;f.lan.i to the fcdaral govern anr at site closure. Authnr!:ing. legislation. uould be required to give states this opticq to tra.1sfer. Under both existing 3mi.draf t proposad requ? atienc, private land cun.trship c' the site would be hechi'aitaf; gcverac nt cwner: hip - i . l ...m. m.

s__ r~., _. is required to assure'long-term control, surveillance, and monitoring of~ l 4 i 'the site. The draft Part 61 provides for a maximum of 100 years upon which such controls can be relied upon after site closure; and with respect to financial assurance, an applicant would be required to provid.e sufficient t i financial information to: / - denonstrate the financial qualifications of the applicant E' carry out o in accordance with Part 61 the activities for which a license is sought; a - provide assurance that adequate funds will be available to carry out decon.nissioning and closure of the site; and i - collcct a fund sufficient to cover 100 years of, post-operational surveillance-and monitoring. 1 4 Issues { 1. Who should own land used for disposal of LLW7 (, federal goverrulent, state governtaant, local government, private) Why? 2. What are the instances wh'cra private land.ownarship vculd be acceptable? 3. If the 1and is owned by an organization 'o'ther than the federal governser,t, ~ should there be provision for federal goverraaent as.sunption of land - ownership!at site closure? Why or why not? Uc0ld it be useful for the statas.to have an tiend e.n to fadaral lau gleing than an optica to-4 i retain o':ncrship after closura er trinsfer c marship to the federal. gevarniwat? Uhy or why not? 4. Vno should assurae and carry out-responsibilitics fer decenat'ssioning, ~ - final sita closura, and stabilization?. Post-operational surveillance and'monitorinc? Pest-cparational care and 'ecreactiva action;? Why? i o 1 4

. 5. Hou long and to what extent can institutional controls be relied upon to keep people frora inadvertently intruding into the disposal site; to nonitor and assess site performance; and to carry out site surveillance and conitoring activitici (e.g.,100 years? 200 years?) What is the rationale for the interval chosen? 6. Are the proposed requirements for financial assurance adequate? What changes should be considered and why? Should there be a standard, specified nethod of calculating these costs? If so, what is the rationale? C3tecorv II - Organizational Pelationshirs (State, Federal. Industrv, Public) B <.-L o rc und Subpart C of draft 10CFR61 contains requirements for infonning states about applications submitted to MRC and state participation in the licensing process. This subpart also contains provisions for MP.C technical assistance to Agreement States relardir.g LLW disposal. Issuis 1. Should the provisions for state pirticipation be.lef t in general terns, or should they be refined to specify heu and phen states sh:uld be involved? Ho.4 can states nos effectively pa.-ticipate in the licensing process incluiing develo,,nent of envirec ental impact statc9 ants and other analyses and ass 2ssnects? Should statcs be requ're.i to participate? If not, hou can th2y be?' be encaurac ti to pa-tici.u te early in th-! pr ;e rr.c? S::nlJ the be so enccuragc::? Ucu can * ? r::::. :ia tha l i k.l i c.ect.' that a state cight entar ths precess in its final stages, p15;i5iy bei.Pjing disrt.;'tica and M ay?

(, .s ~ j__ _ _. 5 i t Are the provisions for technical assistance to Agreement States adequate? ^ 2 i What changes should be considered? I i 3. Should Imc have a statutory mandate to require uniformity in the regulations and procedures used by NRC and the Agreement States in h l licenring LLU disposal sites? Why or why not? Should Agreement States i l have to assure compliance with minimun federal standards? Should they { adopt standard environmental reviest procedures? Why or why not? i l 4. Should there be federal funding and/or technial assistance to non-Agreement 1 States to help them with the organizational and institutional aspects of LLU disposal, including participation in the ffRC licensing process a and the development of plans for site closure, stabilization, an'd/or post-operational monitoring? Why or why not? Should states have i federal funding and/or technical assistance for activities related to i the developrant of additional oisposal capacity, such as site selection? 4 Why or why not? Catecnrv III - Technical Considerations '. a::w.. ' ~ :.:~., l Bachcround Section 61.94 sets out the performance objectives to be achiave:i in the disposal of LLW. The objectives include provisions to protect the general pcpulation and maximally exposed ir.dividuals, ar.d to eliminate the need i for active engoing site maintenance aftse site closure. The recent te porary closure c;f Aurial si.tes.and curtailment in disposal' capacity has further i 1 ? t i e f 4~ ~..v.-- y-g,

.. = .g 4 highlighted the need for disposal sites with the capa5ility, to handle the uide spectrun o' LL9 Of particular interest is the need for a "de-minimus" ' level at which waste would not be considered radioactive vaste for disposal purposes. Issues 1. Are there additional performance objec'tives which E!PC should consider? Are any o# the objectives neu in the draf t unnecessary? Why? 2. Should MRC establish "de-mininus" levels for LLW below which UP,C would not regulate disposal? Why or why not? Phere and how should ~ this level be set, and what' is the rationale for setting it there? Should such "de-ninimus" wastes be disposed of at local sanitary landfills? How do the states view the establishnent of such localized sites? 3.0 Final Pennrts Within 20 da"s after the conclusion of the meeting describeii in 2.0.~ahove, the centractor will provide 12 copies c' the report sumcarizing the major ccccr: ens and points of concens1s and disagreament aman] the participants in the discussien green specifically including raspcns?; to is~ sues identified in cercultation wi'h the projec.t manr:er. In addition, the centrcctcr vill at:artair the position of the P. card c' Directces c' the S. ", as to whether it cancrs with the conceq:::s vi:us e" the p PticipM3 in th: grec., as ezaras:ei in the letter report. In a secen:t letter reprt, the centractor will provih[information on the rotri's vic.es, incictirm an; changes in the discuss!cn crcup letter re crt to reflect the position of the Par:1. The second letter rep,et on the 9. carl's 70;i'.isn on ICCF%! wi!I be due within 61 days of t:-a conclusion o' the : niimj describei in ?.1 ahave.

ur '... a ' ( .i

• 7 -

1 3.1 the'.i n ts The contractor will host two ' full days of participant discussion at a meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. 4.0 tRC-Furnished l'aterial The !!RC project manager will prcvide copies of the tlovember 5,1979, draft of 10CFR61 to the contractor in advance of the meeting for distribution to-the discussion group participants. It is also anticipated that NRC staff involved in the development of the draft rule will be made available to brief discussion group partic'ipants at the meeting'and will remain available during the discussion for assistance at the request of the. participants. I 1 e ga., i s

~ $P: i . j. - Ig}l& ; i,. w _-- j E(=k!)E"' - r RADIOLOGICAL, HEALTH DIRECTORS

i- ?

ex ~ SSEB: x-OTFICE PHONE C0!4MENTS STATE !!AME AND ADDRESS j i AL Aubrey V. Godwin (205) 832-5992 A,S,M j_ ' ~. - Director ~ Div. of Radiological Health Environmental Health Admin. AL Dept. of Public Health State Office Building Montgomery, AL 36130 l AR E. Frank Wilson (501) 661-2301 A,5,M 4 Director ) Div. of Environmental Health - Protection Radiological Health Section AR Dept. of Health ~ j 4815 West Markham Street i. Little Rock, AR 72201 F'l Ulray Clark (954)457-1004 A,5,i,4 ~ Administrator ~ Radiological Health Services ~ Dept. of Health and Rehabili-4 tative Services 1309 Winewood Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32301 1 GA William F. Cline _(Bill) (404) 656-6905 A,5 Manager-Envircncental Health Prograr.' Dept. of Human Resources State Office Bldg. ... -..,,c, .os., 47 Trinity Avenue, SW Atlanta, GA_ 30334 KY Phillip D. Cabb 1(502) 564-5700. A,5 l% nager Radiation Control-Branch j l - Dept. of Human Resources i 275 Ea:t Pain i l Frankfort, KY 40521 1 LA C. Jir. Porter '(Jir.:) (504) 925-451S A,5,M ? Ada.i n,i s t ra t or 1 lutlcar Energy Divisicr. i Off. of Envirbn. ental Affairs l P. 0. Box 145 90 Bator. Roups, LA 7C5DE i CC./.ENT - CODE : A - 1J.' Agrseder.t 5:Ett i j . S SE.: Me-ter M - Me.-ters cf Ccr.fe. tsce of F.2dia:io. Ecr.:r:1 Prc;rar. Circcters - i v-r1 3 qr -s-r m g- -e v- .n+ w

(~ ( . e <... - ' 2 -s RAD 10'.0G1 CAL HEALTH DIRECTORS SSES: (cont) \\ STATE NAME AND ADDRESS OFFICE PHON _E_ COMMENTS MD Robert E. Corcoran (301) 383-2744 A,M Chief t Div. of Radiological Health Dept. of Hith L Mental Hygiene 201 West Preston Street j Baltinare, MD 21201 1 M3 ~Kenneth V. Miller (314) 751-2713 5,M l Director Bureau of Radiation Division of Heal.th ~~ Dept. of Social Services .P. O. Box 570 l Jefferson City, MO 65102 MS Eddie S. Fuente (601) 932-2861 A,S,M Director Div. of Radiological Health l State Bcard of Health _P. O. Box 1700 Jackson, MS 39205 i I NC Dayne H. Brown (919) 733-4283 A,5,M Chie f Radiation Protection Section Dept. of Humar. Resources P. O. Box 12200 i .Raleigh, LC' 27605 t OK J. Dale McHard' (405);52s-7324-5,M Chiei

• • v.

~- Occupational & Rad-Hith Division State Dept. of Health P. O. Eox 53551 I Oklahoma City, 0K 73152 .i PR David Saldcna (809) 767-3563 M Dirac r l Fadicic;fcai Mcalth Progra: Dept. of Haalt.h P. O. Ecx 10427 -Caparra Heights Station hio Piecrat. PR 00922 1 i SC Hey,eard G.-Shealy -(303)7$3-554S A,5,F D . Cnie f i 'Eura u cf Radicic;fc21 Heai;5 i

Dep t.. o f Hi;r. S ' E'reircr.Taraa'. Ccr.t r:1 2630 Eull Street ~

'l 1Coluntia, SCL 2920i j CC'*XINT CODEt A --NR: Agreeterit !Stais. 5 --SE:.:-Mc-ber- .F.- Mr..teg. cf CO:.fe ?n:p c' RifiL'.i:t Ccr.;r-l_i :7-r'Ei ,4 5 i LI

( . s, ',. 3 pA310 LOGICAL HEALTH DIRECTORS SSEB: (cont) ST ATE liA,'E A!;D ADDRESS OFFICE PHC:;E COM.E t;T S Tt; ' J. A. Graham (Bill) (615) 741-7612 A,5,t Director Div. of Radiological Health C2-212, Cordell Hull Bldg. i;ashville, Tt; 37219 IX David K. Lacker (512) 453-7341 A,5,M Director Div. of Occupational Health and Radiation Control Dept. of Heelth 1100 West 49th Street Austin, TX 78756 VA Charles R. Price (804) 780-5932 M Di rector Bureau of Radiological Health Dept. of Health 109 Govern 6r Street Richmond, VA 23219 KV William H. Aarce (304) 348-3526 M Diiector Bureau of Industrial Hygiene Radiological Health Program 151 11th Ave. Scuth Charleston, UV 25303 ,c' C":':E:;T CC:.E : A - tp.. A:recstr.t S t a d. 5 - SEF.: t'ene r l'. - l'.e:-!: 2 rt c f Cc r.fe rc.r.cc c f Eadi a : ' c-Ec,: 2 f rc _ 2.- Di r-: :-s

_ ;7 ~_ ~ (

*.~ r,

• f e.

f' 9 1 GOVERNORS' REPRESENTATIVES ON THE REGIONIsL ENERGY ADVISORY DOARD OF THE SOUTHERN STATES 9 1 Texas Technical Coordinator Mr. Edwr rd O. Vetter (Chairman) Dr. Gerald R. Hill, Director. Executi/e Director Technology Programs Texas Energy and Natural Southern States Energy Board ?, Resources Advisory Council One Exchange Place, #1230 4 s 5 411 West 13th Street-Room 800 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 } Austin, Texas 78701 MEMBERS Georcia Alabama i Mr. Mark Zwecker, Director Representative Pete B Turnham-i Office of Energy Resources i Houcc of Representatives 270 Washington Street, S.W. Post Office Box 1592 Auburn, Alabama 3683) Atlanta, Georgia 30334 Mr. Edwin G. Hudspeth K'entucky Staff.u rector t Mr. David Drake hnergy Management Board 3734 Atlanta Highway Deputy Secretary Department of Energy Montgomery, Alabama 36130 ~ Third Floor-Capital Plaza Tower Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Arkansas Louisi'ana Dr. Paul Levy, Director Departcant of Energy Mr. Raymond T.' Sutton Plaza West Building. Commissioner of Conservation McEinley at Lee Office of' Conservation Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Post Of fice Box 44275 Baton Rouge, Lo'uisiana 70804 Delaware Marvland Mr. David Prc:e Ascirtant to the Governor on Enerav' Affairs Mr. Gecrge Liebmann Offi'cc of the Governor c/c Se rctary of State Sta'e Houce-To.:nzend Building Dover, Dila. tare 19301 Annapolis, Maryland 21404 t Mississinoi Florida Mr. Lex Hes ter, Directcr . M . Pe te Walley, Dirceter Stato Energy Of fic3_ _Of fice of Encrg; 301 Bryant Buildine - Depart =c::t of N:.tural Resource: Tallahassee, Flori5s 322Cl Post Office EC:- 10556 Mississi:9i 39209'

Jackson, l

. ~ -,. _.

( ( ~ b ,s. Missouri Virginia Ms. Carolyn Ashford Mr. George Jones, Coordinator Energy Advicor to the Governor Office of Emergency and Energy Office of the Governor Services State Capitol 310 Turner Road Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Richmond, Virginia 23225 NortS Carolina Virgin Islands Mr. J. Paul Essex Dr. Frank Prince, Director Special Assistant to the Governor Energy Office Office of the Governor Post Office Box 2996 State Capitol St. Thomas, Virgin Islands 00801 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611 Wort Virginia Oklahona Mr. Sam Hammons, Director 'Mr.' James Maddy Assistant to the Director Department of Eneroy 4400'N. Lincoln Boulevard, #251 Office of Economic & Community Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 Development State Capitol - Room 151 Charleston, Wcst Virginia 25305 {gerto Rico Mr. Eduardo Lop'ez-Ballori Director Office of Energy Pos t Of fice Bo:- 41039 Minillas Stc. tion Santurce, PuOrto Rico 00940 South Caroling. 1 Dr. Lamar E. Priester, Jr. Executive Director State of South Carolina Division of Energy Resourcas SCN Centcr - llth F10er 1122 L7df Street Colurli :., South Carolina 2.1231 Tennacree Mr. McSle; Jchnccn, Director Tenneca?e Energy Authority 226 Car.itol Eculevard E.ilding Suite 707 Nachville, Tc:.:.e s a c-e 37219 .}}