ML19309H230
| ML19309H230 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/14/1980 |
| From: | Agee J, Bennett A, Hunnicutt D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309H222 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900240 99900240-80-1, NUDOCS 8005090385 | |
| Download: ML19309H230 (7) | |
Text
.
800509USTS e
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 0FFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900240/80-01 Program No.
51400 l
Company: Westinghouse Electric Corporation Industry Systems Division 200 Beta Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15238 Inspection Conducted :
February 26-28, 1980 Inspectors
/8 cmuhd
/'F O
l J. R. Agee, Contractor Inspector
' Date ComponentsSection II
[I Vendor Inspection Branch i
0bserver:
hi')[<,wuhM S//9/' PC A. L. Bennett, Electrical Engineer
' Date OIE Headquarters Approved by:
' Nr md M 3
/.fC D. M. Ifunnicutt, Chief.
' Date ComponentsSection II i
Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on February 26-28, 1980 (99900240/80-01)
Areas Inspected:
Implementation of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 an( applicable codes and standards, including measuring and test equipment; de.31gn/qualifica-tion testing of Class 1E equipment, QA records, drawing control.
The inspection involved twenty-four (24) hours on site by one (1) NRC inspector.
Results:
In the four (5) areas inspected, no deviations or unresolved items were identified.
i
-m w
2 DETAILS SECTION A.
Persons Contacted
- D. L. Armstrong, Plant Manager J. F. Brozick, Contract Administrator
- J. H. Courcoulas, General Manager J. A. Davis, Quality Control Supervisor B. R. Dow, Manager Development Engineering C. R. Johnson, Reproduction Supervisor
- J. A. Pesavento, Product Assurance Manager
- Denotes those present at the exit interview.
B.
Measuring and Test Equipment 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
a.
A system has been established and is maintained to assure that tools, gages, instruments and other measuring devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated and adjusted at specified periods to maintain accuracy within specified limits.
b.
Calibration records are kept for each instrument and that these records include the following information:
(1) Purchase date and calibration history.
(2) Accuracy required and calibration results.
(3) Present calibration interval and date due.
(4) All maintenance and repair details.
(5) Persons or agency performing all calibration.
(6) Serial number or identification of each standard used to perform the calibration.
(7) Number or name of the calibration procedure.
(8) Environmental conditions used during calibration.
(9) Equipment recall schedules.
i l
3 2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of Section 12.0, Control of Measuring and Test Equipment of the Quality Assurance Program Manual.
b.
Review of Quality Assurance Procedures Manual, Technical Procedure (TP) 120, Section 7.0 Calibration.
c.
Inspection of Purchased Material Inspection (PMI) area control and calibration activities for measuring instruments maintained by that area.
d.
Inspection of electrical calibration laboratory control and calibration activities for plant electrical measuring instru-ments.
Inspection of mechanical calibration laboratory control and e.
calibration activities for plant mechanical measuring instru-ments.
f.
Inspection of several randomly selected instruments and verified these instruments were in the calibration recall system and had been calibrated within the required calibra-tion frequency.
Examples:
(1) Micrometer No. 23 (2) Calipers No. 20 (3) DVM Model 5900, S/N 113332 (4) Micro Derm, Model MD-3 (5) Coating Thickness Tester, Model 1000, S/N 5034 (6) Probe Pm 147, Model MB-3, S/N 45611 g.
Review of the Equipment Verification Audit log and verified that applicable instruments identified in this log had been calibrated monthly per requirements of TP 120, Section 7-9 Equipment Verification Audit Procedure.
3.
Findings j
Within the area of the inspection, no deviations or unresolved l
i items were identified.
I
4 C.
Design / Qualification Testing of Class IE Equipment 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to:
Verify that customer contracts had imposed adequate criteria a.
for design of instrumentation components for use in Class 1E applications.
b.
Verify that procedures had been implemented for adequate design control, drawing control and records storage and retention.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
Review of the customer purchase order 546-GIG-236591 dated a.
October 19, 1976, and Equipment Specification (E-Specification) 953156 for a Four (4)-loop Instrumentation and Control (I&C)
System including Process I&C cabinets.
Verifed the principal codes and standards referenced in the E-Specification were IEEE Standards:
-323 (1974), -344 (1971), -279 (1971), -308 (1974), -338 (1971), and -379 (1972).
b.
Review of Product Assurance Manual, TP 124, Development Procedures, Design Control Manual, Section 2.0 Design Specifica-tion, and verified that the compilation, format, review and approsal of the following documents are in compliance with the d< sign specification, example:
W CID Process Control System for a Nuclear Power Plant-System, Temperature and Seismic Test Report, HC-25243.
Review of TP 124, Design Control Manual, Section 2.2 Equipment c.
Performance Specification (EPS) and engineering documentation of the two (2) following components which had been developed in compliance with this EPS, examples:
(1) NPL Timer Module 2839A49 (2) NLL Lead Log Amplifier 2837A18.
d.
Verified that four (4) microfilm copies of the final approved drawings of the NPL and NLL components were made, distributed and filed in compliance with the records storage and retention requirements for nuclear safety related products.
5 3.
Findinre Within this area of the inspection, no deviations or unresolved items were identified.
D.
QA Records i
1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that:
QA procedures had been implemented for the storage and a.
retention of records.
b.
Permanent records include, as a minimum, such records as the following:
(1)
Inspection and test records (2) Design drawings and changes thereto (3) Qualification and verification reports (4) Data packages c.
Records are identifiable and retrievable.
d.
Records are consistent with applicable regulatory requirements concerning record retention, duration, location and assigned responsibility.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the Product Assurance Manual, TP 122, Section 1-12 Records Management.
b.
Review of customer QA requirements per customer specification QPS-320-1, Revision 1, for Shop Order No. 320.
c.
Review of QA Data Package, Quality Release No. QRN 48307, Revision 0, P.O. No. 180504.
Applicable engineering documents included E-Specification No. 953316 and drawing No. 8817031. The QA package contained I
data for eight (8) process instrumentation and controls cabinets containing fifty-four (54) printed circuit cards.
The QA documents included:
6 Certificate of conformance, final inspection log, final inspection checklist, process record tags, and PC card serial numbers and revisions.
3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, no deviations or unresolved items were identified.
e.
Drawing Control 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that procedures had been implemented to maintain control over approved drawings.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of QA Procedures Manual, TP 130, Reproduction Services, Drawing Control Procedures Manual, Sections:
(1)
- 2. New drawing Processing Procedure (2)
- 3. Revised Drawing Processing Procedure (3)
- 4. Drawing Control Proci'.ure b.
Verifying that the following drawings had been submitted to Reproduction Services as final approved drawings, er.tered into the drawing control system, microfilmed and distributed in compliance with the procedures listed above.
Those drawings include:
(1) 240C228, Revision 4, 10/26 (2) 1825D81 (3) 7387D30 (4) 7853A07 (5) 8794D01, Revision 5, 2/6/79 (6) 1660D01, Revision 7, 2/5/80 c.
Verified that the current aperture card in the reproduction area files for the drawings listed above, agreed with the latest revision of the original tracing, that the obsoleted aperture cards for the reproduction area had been removed from the files and that the latest revised aperture card had been distributed to drafting, quality assurance and'to the Records Center in compliance with the applicable procedure, item a.(2) referenced above.
I 1
7 3.
Findings Within this area of the inspection, no deviations or unresolved items were identified.
F.
Exit Meeting The inspector met with management representatives, noted in paragraph A above, at the conclusion of the inspection on February 28, 1980.
The inspector summarized the scope of the inspection.
The management repre-sentatives acknowledged inspector's comments regarding the inspection.
l l
2 l
4 h
.__