ML19309G323

Forwards Transcript of 790330 Interview Conducted by Met Ed W/Facility Operator on Duty at Time of Initiation of Accident

ML19309G323
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	05/07/1979
From:	Trowbridge G SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:	Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19309G324	List: ML19309G323 ML19309G329
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8005050550
Download: ML19309G323 (1)

Text

____

w 4

SHAw, PITTM AN, PoTTs & TROWBRIDGE ik-18 0 0 M STR E ET, N. W.

b I'*fh Ch.

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036 m AM S A, s. mCTTs ST EvCN L. M ELYa tiit

• r.

8804 33'-*800 ST E J ART L PsTT M AN DC AN D. AULIC K W

GECeGC F. Tm;w emeDGE JCMN ENGEL E

C N FF W N M DN QWN

.M # AL. 2.A J AM E S.. M..MuN e..

D ST..C.

,,on....C... u...o.o R. Ts ** CT** T M A N LON RCSEm? C.1AMLE A G EC 4G C et. ACG E N S. J A.

AIC M A A D C. G ALEN T'E UCE w C U N C M c LL AURAn.FemRA D t.'A.",'e i"d"& " ""-

"a?. 01",'a'.in '

a>'*"^*'****"'

C AICha n c J. m E NC ALk JO M N M. O'N C s LL. J R.

CASLE'SMAWLAW*

.AT E. S.s S E RG J AT A. E PSTIE N gas ta n A es. mC S SOTTl F R AN E LIN D. CMU G C C eG E v. AL L E N. J R.

G ECmG E D. C RCWLEY. JR.

JCMN M. S M ARON wea. See:;FC AD M ETNOLDS MsCM AS L D. M ATS E3 Ce en C R SU AM D F AL A SON N AT e= A se t EL e. s m E E D. J R.

STEVEN M. LUCAS COUNSEL MAS 4 A UG E N s LICE R AN D L. ALLE N ws L LIA me p..S S AR D ALA N J. W El C A M E ST L S LAn t. J R.

ASA CAnkETC N 1-JCN E S T **C as A S A. S A RT E R ALAN A. TUS PEM

. AM C S an. S wmGER JC M M L. CAR R. J 4.

SMELDCN 4 wEtSEL PM 8 LIP J. e= A nv C T JCM ee A. eseCJLLouGM m AT k. m CMMAN J A M E S TMC es A S LEhM ART May 7, 1979-Mr. Edson G.

Case Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 7

Dear Ed:

I am enclosing transcripts of interviews conducted by Metropolitan Edison with the TMI-2 operators on duty at the time of initiation of the TMI-2 accident.

The interviews were con-ducted on March 30, 1979, two days after the accident.

The transcripts were prepared from tapes of the interviews and have been reviewed by the interviewees.

The interviewees were first given the opportunity to review the initial transcripts of the tapes and to fill in garbled portions of the tapes and to clean up some of the language employed.

They were then offered a final opportunity to review the product.

It is my understanding that this review process did not involve substantive changes in the taped remarks.

Copies of the original tapes have been suoplied to the NRC investigative team.

Sincerel' l

Geor e F. Trowbridge Enclosures s

O