ML19309G274

Forwards Transcripts of Interviews Conducted by Met Ed with Operators on Duty at Initiation of TMI-2 Accident

ML19309G274
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	05/07/1979
From:	Trowbridge G SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To:	Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19309G275	List: ML19309G274 ML19309G278
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8005050495
Download: ML19309G274 (1)

Text

.

..(4

(')

P

,OL

/

b,n

~

SH Aw, P!TTM AN, PoTTs & TROWBRIDG E I,4 180 0 M ST R E ET. N. W.

WAS HIN GTO N, D. C. 2 0 03 6

m Tt=.= AN

'Ei:1". =:""

h%

G E C AG C F. *m Ow e asOG C JOHN Eh0 EL h FF w

smOWN

.G E.ft A. LQ =C.A JAMES.Op

,, O u... O.. &........ O M L... o S Tw,C.

. M A M L.N R. T t== C TM T M A NLON aCSERT C.1AMLER G E C # G C ed. A CG E R S. J a, asC M ARD E. G ALEN TELE" UCE w C WACMe L AymAn.FAmma D

~ * "

'5"^~'**

t.'A.. 's.", 0& " '"-

"."CTa?. '.1"'lli' a*"'

Rf C h a a 0 J.

• E h CALL JC M N M. O'N EILL.J R.

f CABLE"SMAwbAW" s.v..E. S. s S E m.G Ja.y A E,P STIE N f

A.A M.

C S S OTT, F

.~LN o.CMo G E O RG E D. C R Ow LEY.. A.

G E C 8 G C v. A.L L E N.,R.

sCNN M. SMamON w on. s e a : F C D mEthCLOS M eC M A E L D. ** AY S

• =**"*" *"

5"a

'"3 :.%'t.

",i

• o",Ac.f0N COUNSEb N AT M A m e C L e. e n E E D. J R.

STCvCN M. LUCAS sis Am e AUG Eh a tsCE R AND L ALLEN C E N E S T b S LA n g. J R.

A LA N J. w C B S B AR D CARLETCas S JCMES ws LLI AM P.SAAR T M C as A S A.

A R.TW EN

_ A M E S..SA.RT E.R J.LA NM N b C.S.P.. J..

GE

$ M E LO C #d of.*EI$EL PM BLIP J. M ARVET J CM as A. aseCWLLOUGM A AT L. NBCM M AN sa n* E S T M C es & S L g h. A nv May 7, 1979-t Mr. Edson G. Case Deputy Director, Office of f-Nuclear Reactcr Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Ed:

I am enclosing transcripts of interviews conducted by Metropolitan Edison with the TMI-2 operators on duty at the time of initiation of the TMI-2 accident.

The interviews were con-ducted on March 30, 1979, two days after the accident.

The transcripts were prepared from tapes of the interviews and have been reviewed by the interviewees.

The interviewees were first given the opportunity to review the initial transcripts of the tapes and to fill in garbled portions of the tapes and to clean up some of the language employed.

They were then offered a final opportunity to review the product.

It is my understanding that this review process did not involve substantive changes in the taped remarks.

Copies of the original tapes have been supplied to the NRC investigative team.

Sincerel Geor e F.

Trowbridge Enclosures

.