ML19309G265
| ML19309G265 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1979 |
| From: | Trowbridge G SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309G266 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8005050486 | |
| Download: ML19309G265 (1) | |
Text
.
e 4 %, 1&f- - - - -
g-a,,'
y,,
O r
T k
S H Aw, PITTM AN, PoTTs & TROWB RI DG E c.A,i
j*
- b inh $b.
WASHINGTO Ne D. C. 2003 6 l.
Mas
- SAT 3..Q TT S STEVCN L. MELT 2tm f 202) 338*4aOO ST E J ART L. FITTM AN DCAN Q. AuLOC R G E C RG C F. *Now s RIDG C JCMN ENGEL
' L F
wN M P
SROWN
.G E.R A L..D C.A
.,0,,....C...u....T..
se L..
=. o S T.eCR
.,4 E S.. M.so u N AP. TeesCTa7 M AseLON ROS CRT C.1 AsekC R G E C e G C *e. ROC E N S. J R.
NaC M AR D C. C ALEN s CMos S. R Mese E L AN DE R ROBERTe RoemeNS TELEE G NUC C w. Ca y RCMcLL Layman.rARRAND es AR I se
.E LL ICT Rea. PE aN rec > AR O J. m E N DALL JOM N M. Cfeg E lLL, g R.
CA BLE 'See AwkAW'
,Av C.S.SS**G J AT A. C PSTIC N mARBARA es. NC S SOTTI F R AN N Le N D. CmW
~
G E C e G C V. A L L E N. s m.
G EORG C D. CROWLET JR.
some N M. SM ANON was. a R 4 0 F C R D A CYNOLOS pa sC M A EL D. se AT S r
Om en E R SW AN ALaSON
- p. Af e= A N e E L p.
m R E E D. J R.
ST Cv C N M. LWC AS COUNSEL es A& e avg E N e LICR M A N D L. AL L C es E R N E S T ' S LA # C. JR.
AL AN J. W CIS S ARD cARLETCM S.JCmES weLua se P. S AR R T eeC =s A S A. 3 A RT E R ALAN R. YW S PCN
. Aw E S M.
SwmGER JC M M L. C AR R. J R.
See ELDC es # mEISCL PMcLIP J. M ARvtf
.;O M es A. oneC sLLouGee st AT L. e aCNM AN sa w C S ?ce C as A S L E N ee A RT May 7, 1979' Mr. Edson G.
Case Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Ed:
I am enclosing transcripts of interviews conducted by Metropolitan Edison with the TMI-2 operators on duty at the time of initiation of the TMI-2 accident.
The interviews were con-ducted on March 30, 1979, two days after the accident.
The transcripts were prepared from tapes of the interviews and have been reviewed by the interviewees.
The interview,es were first given the opportunity to review the initial tranceripts of the tapes and to fill in garbled portions of the tapes and to clean up some of the language employed.
They were then offered a final opportunity to review the product.
It is my understanding that this review process did not involve substantive changes in i
the taped remarks.
Copies of the original tapes have been supplied r
to the NRC investigative team.
]
l Sincerel Geor e F. Trowbridge Enclosures e
e
.