ML19309G248
| ML19309G248 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1979 |
| From: | Trowbridge G SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309G249 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8005050468 | |
| Download: ML19309G248 (1) | |
Text
p 80}500VGy l
o a.
b,
..t.1 ' -
v-i I-k b
LC.tui--
S H Aw, PITTM AN, PoTTs & TROWBRIDG E e
isoo u Sraccr. u. w.
b h '**fh E b -
wAS HINGToN, D. C. 20036 T*
"'"1.'l.,t = "AN
'iifno"JCS"
h%
' ' " ' ~ ~ *
- ECmOC F. TecwenioG g JoMN gNGEL L
GEN ALO C A ** F F w
M CP SmOwN
"."#r "3,'. A.'*c;'"
n :,"i.",'" Um c
G E C m O E *e. a cG C m S. J a.
meCManD E.GALEN TELEE mVCC W C Um Mt L AWM A m. FAmma D tsi'mV,t^.".t&'"" '"-
",'C'T: n,01",'c"l* *n *
" *"'~ " * **"'
meC> A m c J. m EN D ALL J O M N M. O'N C sLL.J R.
CASLE S M AwLAW*
. Av E. S.S S E mG JAv A. EPSTeEN sam sa m A es. aC S SOTTI F m A N st LIN O. C ee y G E C
- G C W. A L L C N. s fL G EC mG C O. C mCwLEY..m.
sCNN M.SManON wea.enA FCao mETNOLDS usC M A EL O. M AY S F E Cm NCm SU AN C F Akm SON NAT= AN# EL a s e t t O. J a.
STCvC N M. LUCAS COUNSEL ed Ama AuGEN BLICm m AN D L. ALLE N E m N f S T L. 8 LA E C. J a.
ALAN J. w C BS S AmO CA n k&TC N LJCNES wsLLI Ase p. Same T s= C as A S A. S A R T E m A LA N m. TU S R E M..
. AM E S es. s w mG E R somn L. C Am m. J E S an t 6DC ae 4 w CI S C L PMcLIP J. M AnvCT s CM an A. *seCwkLOUGM m AT L. nlCMM AN sA M E S Y e C M A S L ENM ARY May 7, 1979' Mr. Edson G.
Case Deputy Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Ed:
I am enclosing transcripts of interviews ccaducted by Metropolitan Edison with the TMI-2 operators on duty at the time of initiation of the TMI-2 accident.
The interviews were con-ducted on March 30, 1979, two days after the accident.
The trtnscripts were prepared from tapes of the interviews and have been reviewed by the interviewees.
The interviewees were first given the opportunity to review the initial transcripts of the tapes and to fill in garbled portions of the tapes and to a
clean up some of the language employed.
They were then offered a final opportunity to review the product.
It is my understanding that this review process did not involve substantive changes in I
the taped remarks.
Copies of the original tapes have been supplied l
to the NRC investigative team.
l Sincerel Geor,e F.
Trowbridge Enclosures
.