ML19309F321

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
11/012019 Minutes: Ohio MRB Meeting May 16, 2019
ML19309F321
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/16/2019
From:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
To:
Johnson R
References
Download: ML19309F321 (4)


Text

MINUTES: MANAGEMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING OF OHIO MAY 16, 2019 THE MANAGEMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING ATTENDEES WERE AS FOLLOWS:

Management Review Board K. Steven West, MRB Chair, OEDO Ray Lorson, Region II Andrea Kock, MRB Member, NMSS Eva Nair, OAS Liaison, MD Mary Spencer, MRB Member, OGC IMPEP Team Monica Ford, Team Leader, Region IV Darren Piccirillo, Region III Farrah Gaskins, Region I Kenath Traegde, Massachusetts Jackie Cook, Team Lead in Training, Region IV Ronald Parsons, Tennessee Ohio Gene Phillips, OH Michael Snee, OH Staff Paul Michalak, NMSS/MSST Jack Giessner, Region III Lizette Roldan-Otero, NMSS/MSST Robert Johnson, NMSS/MSST Duncan White, NMSS/MSST Kathy Modes, NMSS/MSST TOPICS DISCUSSED DURING THE MEETING INCLUDED:

1. Convention. Mr. Robert Johnson convened the meeting at approximately 1:00 p.m.

(ET). He noted that this Management Review Board (MRB) meeting was open to the public. Introductions of the attendees were conducted.

2. Ohio IMPEP Review. Ms. Monica Ford led the presentation of the Ohio Integrated Materials Performance Evaluation Program (IMPEP) review results to the MRB. She summarized the review and the teams findings for the indicators reviewed. The on-site review was conducted by a team composed of technical staff members from the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the State of Tennessee, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts during the period of February 25 - March 1, 2019. A draft report was issued to Ohio for factual comment on March 29, 2019, and the responded with minor comment on April 18, 2019. Ms. Ford reported that the team found Ohios performance was satisfactory on all indicators reviewed.

3. Performance Indicators.

a) Mr. Darren Piccirillo reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Staffing and Training. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.1 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Ohio representatives briefly discussed the status of the staff hired during the review period and the impact of vacancies on the Agreement State Program.

The team found Ohios performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB unanimously agreed.

Ohio MRB Meeting Minutes Page 2 b) Ms. Jackie Cook, Team Leader in Training, reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Status of Materials Inspection Program. Her presentation corresponded to Section 3.2 of the proposed final IMPEP report.

The MRB, the team, and Ohio representatives briefly discussed inspection findings.

The team found Ohios performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB unanimously agreed.

c) Ms. Farrah Gaskins reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Materials Inspections. Her presentation corresponded to Section 3.3 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Ohio representatives briefly discussed the status of inspection actions.

The team found Ohios performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory: and the MRB unanimously agreed.

d) Mr. Kenath Traegde reviewed the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Licensing Actions. Mr. Traegde presented the teams findings. His presentation corresponded to Section 3.4 of the proposed final IMPEP report.

The MRB, the team, and Ohios representatives discussed the teams findings, as well as the actions the program had taken to address them.

The team found Ohios performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB unanimously agreed.

e) Ms. Monica Ford reviewed and presented the common performance indicator, Technical Quality of Incident and Allegation Activities. Her presentation corresponded to Section 3.5 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Ohio representatives discussed incidents of high risk and allegations identified during the review period.

The team found Ohios performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB unanimously agreed.

f) Ms. Jackie Cook reviewed and presented the non-common performance indicator, Compatibility Requirements. Her presentation corresponded to Section 4.1 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team, and Ohio representatives discussed the States regulations, and program elements, as well as the actions the program has taken to address them.

The team found Ohios performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB unanimously agreed.

g) Mr. Ronald Parsons reviewed and presented the non-common performance indicator, Sealed Source and Device Evaluation Program. His presentation

Ohio MRB Meeting Minutes Page 3 corresponded to Section 4.2 of the proposed final IMPEP report. The MRB, the team and Ohio representatives discussed the States Sealed Source and Device Evaluation Program in regards to Technical Staffing and Training, Technical Quality of the Product Evaluation Program and, Evaluation of Defects and Incidents.

The team found Ohios performance with respect to this indicator to be satisfactory and the MRB unanimously agreed.

4. MRB Consultation/Comments on Issuance of Report. The team recommended, and the MRB agreed, that the Ohio Agreement State Program be found adequate to protect public health and compatible with the NRC's program. The team recommended that the next IMPEP review take place in approximately 5 years with a periodic meeting in approximately 2.5 years. The final report may be found in the ADAMS using the Accession Number ML19141A224.
5. Precedents/Lessons Learned. None
6. Comments from Members of the Public. None
7. Adjournment. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 2:15 p.m. (ET)

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MAY 16, 2019 OHIO MRB MEETING ML19309F321 OFFICE MSST/SALB MSST/SALB NAME JParks RJohnson DATE 10/31/19 11/01/19 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY