ML19309F123

Socioeconomic Monitoring & Mitigation Rept, for Jan-June 1979

ML19309F123
Person / Time
Site:	Yellow Creek
Issue date:	03/31/1980
From:	TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML19309F121	List: ML19309F120 ML19309F123
References
YCNP-SMR-3, NUDOCS 8004280510
Download: ML19309F123 (31)

Text

_ ._ . . . _ _ . _ . . . . - _ _ . _ . . . . _ . _ _ . . . . . _ _ . - _ _ . . ~ . . _ _ - .

O' l;

! I I l 1

4 i

t .

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY j 1 i

i i ,

i 1

i t

i i  :

c

' YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANTS i SOCIDECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT i

t YCNP - SMR 3 i

JUNE 30, 1979 f

i f

l l

Knoxville, Tennessee

. March 1980 i

800428 % C-

j . .

CONTENTS

' Page 4

Background . . . ...... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I i

1

1. Monitoring Results . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions . . . . . . . . 5 II.

15

! . III. Summary of Mitigation Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

~

I l

Tables Table 1. Estimates of Population and Population Change for 4

Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi, and Hardin County, Tennessee, for Monitoring Secondary Socioeconomic Impacts of Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Construction June 30, 1977 - June 30, 1979 . . 6 l Table 2. TVA Education Mitigation Payments through June 30, 1979 . ... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . 8 l,

Table 3. Traffic Evaluation (January 1979 to June 1979) . . . 13 Growth of Employee Transportation 14 I Table 4. . . . . . . . . .

. Table 5. Summary of Mitigation Expenditures as of June 30, 1979 . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 15 l

1 l Appendixes Town of Current Residence . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

. Table A- 1.

l Table A- 2. Source and Location of Construction Employees . . 18

Table A- 3. "'stribution of Movers and Associated Population by County and Community . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Table A- 4. Comparison of Survey Results with Projections 20

!' and Selected Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Mover Summary . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Table A- 5.

22 1

Table A- 6. Alcorn - Employees Living Within the County . . .

Table A- 7. Tishomingo - Employees Living Within.the County . 27 i 24

Table A- 8. Hardin - Employees Living Within the County . . .

i Table A- 9. Corinth - Employees Living Within the City Limits . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . 25 i

Iuka - Employees Living Within the City Limits 26

! Table A-10. .

Table A-11. Savannah - Employees Living Within the City Limits . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 28

' Appendix B - Definition Level of Service D . . . .. . . . . . . . .

i .

EXHIBIT Figure 1. - Towns Containing Construction Employees . . . . . . . . . 29

,- y .- --- .,- ,yr

j . .

YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT SOCIOECONOMIC MONITORING AND MITIGATION REPORT 1

• JUNE 1979 i

BACKGROUND

! This is the third in a series of reports describing the monitoring and i

mitigation of socioeconomic impacts which result from the construction of the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant. This reporting period began i January 1, 1979, and ended June 30, 1979. These semiannual reports are prepared to fulfill a commitment made by TVA in the construction permits hearings. The impact area is defined as portions of Alcorn and Tisho-mingo Counties, Mississippi, and Hardin County, Tennessee. These areas were selected becaut- they were projected to receive significant movers.

Howeve', the impact area may be redefined if significant impacts are i identified in other areas.

I il I. Monitoring Results l In August 1979, TVA conducted a survey of all TVA employees at

! Yellow Creek as of June 30, 1979. The timelag between employment i

and survey gives the employees who moved an opportunity to make i

personal i .'.uerments and should provide a better view of employee 1

distribution, f amily characteristics, and housing choice. The

(

.- employment level was 2,145; and a total of 1,591 employees (74 i

percent) completed the survey form. Of those who respanded, 300, l

or 19 percent, said that they moved into the area to work at the l

l project (movers). Of the total 300, 175 said they located in the l

2 impact area. Local employees (nonmovers) commute to the project from a widespread area, but 38 percent of the total work force consists of local residents of the three impact counties. -

The statistics obtained with respect to the distribution of movers i

and nonmovers is contained in tables A-1 and A-2 as well as figure

1. Additionsl information on the distribution, f amily characteris-

tics, and housing choice of movers is contained in tables A-3 through A-ll. Table A-1 lists the towns of current residence of all employees. It is basically a " mailing address" location rather than a jurisdictional location, since all employees must provide a place name even though they may not live within any municipal limits. Figure 1 is based on this table.

At the county level and above, both the origin and location of all ,

employees, are contained in table A-2. The diagonal line of the "From-To" tabulation shows resident employees (nonmovers). For example, resident employees from Tishomingo County are found by locating Tishomingo County in the "From" column and going across

! ~ the table to the "To" column which also reads ~Tishomingo County.

In this survey 356 residents of Tishomingo County were employed at the end of June. Movers are shown by all other information in the table. For example, 13 employees moved from "Other Tennessee Counties" to Alcorn County, Mississippi. .

l I

, ._m _ . , . , . - _ _ . . _ _ . . , _ ,

l 3 I

Table A-3, however, provides'a mover's distribution which'is based on city limits for the three primary impact communities. ' The data on movers have been extrapolated to the total of 2,145 employees on a ratio basis. To compare the survey results with projections, selected parameters from the Socioeconomic Impacts section (revision 4, dated June 16, 1978, of the Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant Environ-mental Report) were applied to the number of employees surveyed.

The results of this comparison are found in table A-4. No mover rate was projected for early in the project, so the survey rate is used. However, the family characteristics, housing choice, and location pattern can be compared.

Surveyed employee characteristics are similar to those projected.

i Sixty percent were expected to bring their families, and this

, survey four.d that 72 percent did. The remaining 28 percent did not have families in the impact area. Projections indicated one school-age child per family and the survey results were the same as the projections. The average family size was larger than projected at 3.4 compared with the projected 3.0.

i The housing choice of movers is continuing to vary from projections, which were made only for peak employment. Fifty-five percent of the movers chose houses, and 29 percent chose mobile homes. The peak projections were that 35 percent would choose houses and 45 percent would choose mobile homes. 'The projections (20 percent) and sw rey results (16 percent) uere fairly close for those choosing i

e a v-

6 l

apartments, sleeping rooms,-and other accommodations. The "other" category includes tents, campers, and recreational vehicles.

i The largest and most significant variation from the projections is In the mover distribution to the Corinth area and to outside the j impact area. Some 50 percent of the movers were projected to locate in the Corinth area, but only 11 percent have located there.

In contrast, no movers were projected to locate outside the impact area, however, 42 percent have. While there la no real explanation for the Corinth result, the location of movers outside the impact area is not unexpected. Base / on past survey resul:s, about 20 to 30 percent of the movers were axpected to locate outside the f

impact area. Ilowever, in order to prepare for the worst case, the total influx was allocated to the impact area as basis for estima-ting impacts. Of the towns outside the expected impact area, ,

l Florence, Alabama, received the largest number of movers (23).

Florence has a population of about 36,000; so the additional movers l

would not create a significant adverse impact. The projections (40

, percent) and survey results (36 percent) were close for the Burnsville

! and luka areas of Tishomingo County, Mississippi. There is still a

! considerabic difference in the peak projections (40 percent) and survey results (10 percent) for liardin County, Tennessee (the Savannah and Counce areas).

i '

Detailed data-on family status and characteristics and housing i

choice of surveyed movers for the whole project are found in table A-5. The same information for the impact counties is found in

5 i

i tables A-6 through A-8, while tables A-9 through A-11 present the-information on movers within the city limits of the impact commu-nities.

II. Functional Area Impacts and Mitigation Actions Secondary Employment--Secondary employment impact is defined as a i

temporary increase in the trade- and service-related resident l population which can be attributed to the Yellow Creek project. If l the population increase in a county is greater than that arising i directly from the project or from other primary employment increases, we would conclude that the possibility of secondary employment

exists. Since the project began, only Hardin County has had an i

i increase in population (568) which is more than can be explained by i

i project-related influx and change in population associated with

. other primary employment (see table 1). Due to the small number of movers in Hardin County, it does not seem reasonable that this i

growth coulc result from project-related secondary enployment. It f

could result from normal error in the estimating process.

Education--TVA, the Mississippi and Tennessee Departments of Education, and the affected school districts are cooperating in

' efforts to ensure that the influx of project-related students will not impair the ability of local schools to maintain a quality l

educational environment. In October 1978 all school districts i

} *

{

l l

l

m Table 1 MiTIMATES CF POTULATIN AND PGULATION CHA10E FCR Alf0RN AND TISHNINGo COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI, AND HAPJ)IN C(UNIT TDOIE:kC.EE T@ MNIT@IIU SEONDARY SOCICECONWIC D4 PACTS & YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLAlrf COICTRUCTION JUNE 3o,1777 - JUNE 3o.1979 Remainder of Population Population Change in Change in Project Nonproject Related Change in Po3nlation Change in Estimate Estimate Population Estimate Related PoIulation Population as of Possible from Cther Population 6/3o/77 6/30/79 6/30/77 - 6/30/79 6/30/77 - 6/30/79 6/30/79 Primary EL-ployment Unexplained Alcorn County 29,900 31,231 1,331 164 1,167 1,776 o 1

Tishomingo County 16,500 17,67T 1,177 368 809 4,77o o Hardin County 20,700 21,673 973 156 817 2f+9 568 Sources: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-25 and P-26, " Population Estimates."

Consuunity Economics Projects Group.

Community Economics Projects Group 11/114/79 m

G k  % O 3  %

I 7

i approved formal agreements to accomplish this objective. Under the 4

agreement TVA is providing financial assistance to four local school districts in Mississippi and one in Tennessee for the acquisition of needed schoolbuses to serve the needs of inmoving I students. Additional Federal financial assistance is being pro-vided to local school districts to allow them to meet inmover 1 demands. Approximately $1.5 million will come from the U.S. Office J

of Education for appropriations under Public Law 81-815. This provides assistance to local school districts temporarily impacted by Federal programs for the building of classrooms needed to house

! children of Federal employees. Planning and other technical l assistance are provided by the appropriate State agencies. Local

, districts provide educational services to direct impact students on i

a comparable basis to regular enrollees. Public Law 81-874 assis-i l . tance is available to offset additional operating costs.

f

] Approximately $18,800 in TVA mitigation funds was used to acquire l

! one schoolbus for additional service capacity during the time i

i period January 1, 1979, through June 30, 1979. This bus was acquired for the Hardin County school system. The following table ,

lists TVA's education mitigation payments through June 30, 1979.

l l

4

- ,c. ~ , .

8 Table 2 TVA EDUCATION MITIGATION PAYMENTS Through June 30, 1979 Corinth $15,777 Iuka 16,551 l Alcorn 15,402 Hardin 18,800 1

Tishomingo 15,447 Total $81,977

1. Additional Federal financial assistance is being provided to local school districts under Public Laws81-815 and 81-874 to allow them to meet inmover demands.

l TVA's socioeconomic monitoring through worker questionnaires .

j reveals lower overall educational impact than projected. Actual impact figures by school districts are to be reported in December of each school year.

Housing--A field survey was conducted in November in the three-1 i

county Yellow Creek impact area to assess the housing supply and i

demand situation. In general the supply of housing was reported to be good. The exception to this was Iuka, Mississippi, where a shortage of houses for sale and for rent was reported. Demand in '

the area was low because of high interest ratas, and to a lesser extent the lack of money to lend. Some banks reported having to

9 turn down applicants for loans because, with the 15 percent interest ceiling in Mississippi, they would lose money. Legislation has been proposed to lift this ceiling in early 1980. Some banks are still carrying houses for which they had made construction loans because some of the savings and loan associations do not have the long-term money to lend. In light of the current talk of slowing nuclear plant construction, concern was expressed by some of those interviewed that the housing industry has been or will be adversely af fected because of the fear that Yellow Creek might be included in this cutback.

There was a small change in the number of housing units reported in the area since January 1979. Alcorn County, which reported 11,746 units at the first of the year, now reports about 12,291. In

- Tishomingo County, which seems to have been affected the most by the interest ceiling, housing construction is at a virtual stand-still. The latest available data on Hardin County is for January 1, 1979. It indicates an increase of 252 units, going from 6,793 in January 1978 to 7,045 in January 1979. With the exception of Hardin County where 15 additional mobile homes were reported, there was no change in the number of mobile homes in the area.

There was a noticeable change in the number of livable, vacant

- houses in the area since the last count was taken in February and March. In Tishomingo County, 22 vacancies were reported as of October 1979, compared with 48 at the first of the year. However, vacancies in Alcorn County only changed by one, dropping from 85

10 to 84 over the same period. In Hardin County, particularly Savannah, the number of livable vacancies were estimated between 80 and 90, uompared with 91 at the first of the year.

The survey indicates that the tightness of the housing market that was reflected in the last survey still exists. High interest rates, and in some cases lack of money to lend, are still the main reasons for the lack of significant growth in the housing stock in the area.

Water and Sewer--Actual movers are continuing to locate for the most part in areas other than those projected, with a large percent-age locating outside of the impact atea. With the exception of Burnsville and luka, the impact area's existing water and sewer systems have not received the additional customers projected. TVA -

has provided $17,089 to the city of Burnsville to complete water and wastewater projects they now have underway. The towns, commu-nities, and utility districts in the impact counties are contacted periodically by the program coordinator to determine if the water supply and sewage treatment plants are adequate to handle the

odditional mobile home connections. Thus far it appears that the l

l treatment facilities throughout the impact area are adequate.

Recreation--Community recreation impacts were monitored through l

local contacts and field review. Technical assistance was pro-vided to several communities for site design and program development.

11 A contract was executed in May 1979 with Tishomingo County for

$35,000 to help implement a variety of recreation facility improve-ments, however, no recreation ~ mitigation payments ' have been made.

Requests for financial assistance were also submitted by the cities of Savannah, Tennessee, and Corinth, Mississippi, this period. No financial assistance has been given to Savannah or Corinth pending further evaluation of impacts and development potential of.the projects proposed.

Health and Medical Services--Possible health-service problems are monitored through-the employee questionnaire. More than 90 percent of the employees reported no need to-travel for health services.

Those problems requiring travel were for specialized services such as allergies, endodontics, eye operation, heart, orthodontic, and urology. Some may have chosen to travel to previous family doctors and dentists.

~

TVA has provided $4,800 this period to the Alcorn County, Mississippi, school syster for the services.of a school /public health nurse.

Some of- the routine services provided include blood pressure screenings and tuberculin skin testing for all teachers and students in both the city.and county school systems; periodic lice, scabies, and

-ringworm screenings and student, teacher, and parent education relating to their transmission and prevention; immunization boosters required for school; teaching first aid classes on Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the Heimlich maneuver; and physical . examination screenings for special placement of children with learning. disabilities.

.1

12 TVA is negotiating with Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi, concerning an integrated (fire, law enforcement, and civil defense) emergency response system. TVA is also negotiating with the Tishomingo County llospital for renovation of the emergency room Into a radiological emergency treatment center and for a school nurse. TVA is negotiating with the Mississippi Department of

Public IIcalth for a sanitation worker.

Traf fic--In December 1978, the Mississippi State liighway Department began supplying TVA with traf fic counts for eleven locations on a semiannual basis. With approximately 2,100 employees, a total of about 750 commuter vehicles is used in the transportation of the peak shift employees. Peak-hour volumes and hourly volumes during the peak TVA commuting hour for ten key highway segments are shown in table 3. The hourly volumes indicate IcVel of service D or ,

better operation is provided on all the key highway segments (see appendix B).

As indicated in table 3, the peak TVA commuting traffic occurs during an hour other than the peak hour for some of the highway segments being monitored. This can be attributed to the fact that the shifts are scheduled such that th'e majority of the TVA commuter traffic does not coincide with the current peak hours.

0 l _.

13 Table 3 TRAFFIC EVALUATION (January 1979 to June 1979)

Daily Hourly Volume Peak-Hourly During Peak TVA TVA Commuter Volume Shift Change Traffic Volume Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road North of Patrick Church Road 800 800 750 SR-25 North of U.S. 72 Junction 800* 780 450 Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road (Project 1001) between Patrick Church Road and SR-25 490 490 44)

U.S. 72 West of Alabama State Line 500* 400 283 SR-25 South of SR-365 Junction 530* 400 240 SR-25 South of Tennessee State Line 290 290 130 SR-365 Southwest of SR-25 Junction 150 150 110 SR-25 South of Iuka 320 320 70 U.S. 72 West of SR-365 Junction 600 600 50 SR-25 midway between Patrick Road and Iuka-Red Sulphur Springs Road 290* 250 60

• Daily peak-hour volume occurs at a time other than peak TVA shif t change.

I i

l L__

14 Employee Transportation--The van-bus pool program af. Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant experienced a 60-percent increase in ridership this period, while employment increased by 16 percent. raffic flow has been reduced approximately by 276 vehicles due to tie impact; of van .

and bus ridership. As of June 30, 1979, 23 percent of the sork force was riding TVA vans and buses. Indications are that partici-pation could reach 50 percent when the program is expanded. On June 30, 1979, there were five bus routes; by January 1, 1980, we expect to have 13 bus routes serving Alabama, Tennessee, and Mississippi. Employee response to ridesharing is favorable, and the demand for additional vehicles is high. Local response to the program appears to be positive with no anticipated problems in sight. The following table shows program growth.

Table 4 .

GROWTH OF EMPLOYEE TRANSPORTATION January 1, 1979' June 30, 1979 Total Ridership 151 374 l Total Day Shif t Employment 1,342 1,600 Percent of Workforce Participating 11 23 TVA's expenditures this period for employee transportation was .

$91,020.

2 r- -

I 15 l

Local Government Budgets--Measuring impacts of the project on local

, governments is an ongoing process handl ed by the program coordinator located in Iuka, Mississippi. Emergener response plans are being prepared locally for Alcorn and Tishomingo Counties. A contract l with the town of Iuka was executed for $30,500 to be used for personnel and equipment used in law enforcement. A contract for

$37,800 was executed with Tishomingo County, Mississippi, for law enforcement personnel and equipment and sanitation personnel.

) III. Summary of Mitigation Expenditures TVA's mitigation expenditures this period totaled $158,323. As noted in Table 4, the major expenditure this period was for employee

transportation.

. Table 5

SUMMARY

OF MITICATION EXPENDITURES AS OF

TJNE 30, 1979 Expenditures Expendit.ures This Period to >r ate Education $ 18,799 $ 81,977 i Employee Transportation 91,020 127,353 Health 4,800 4,800 Local Government Budgets 26,615 29,615 Local Recruitment and Training . -

42,500 Water and Sewer 17,089 17,089 TOTAL $158,323. $303,334 m- --y- ,

m r-- v g -r w

t i

4 k

I i <

t 4

l ,

i i

e 1

4 e

l t

t 1

j APPENDIXES 1

I- .

.f i

i S

4

17 TABLE A-1 FOLLOW UP $UprEY TOWN OF CURRiki RL5ICENCE RUN DAIE 09/07/79 YELLOW CREIK NUCLEAE PLANT EMPLOYtt5 RUN Tipt 144455 ACilvE EMPLOVEE5 06-3D-79 REPORT 2 FI'V t ) In ALNFADY IUW4 IJdN IN 10hN IUTAL F3PULATILv CHEkUKtf AL 3 46 54 le43%

fLONIN(t AL  !$ 171 l's 4 36.UDJ MUSCLE SHDAL5 AL 9 34 43 6 907 SHEFilit0 AL 7 Ja 4b 12. C: 0-TUSCUMilA AL in e8 104 2.M*P PURN5VILLE M5 7 42 tl 7f 4 (DRINTH M5 f3 e5 114 10,90L IUKA M5 130 244 344 2,3l w TISHOMihGO M5 6 42 4M 410 SAVAhNAH IA F5 121 14D 5.5T6 COUNCE Th 2 28 36 6CD SUBTUTAL 244 942 Ile6 AININ5 At 2 10 12 1". e 63 7 KILLEN AL  % 14 18 60.4 LL IGHIDP. AL 1 24 25 le231 LEEl>GTON AL 3 7 7 278 RfD RAT AL 1 6 7 2.4f 4 RUGE85%ILLE AL I e 9 9SD RU55fLLVILL! AL 3 19 22 7.814 '

TOWh CREE K AL 9 5 5 1,2(3 kAIEkt00 At U e t 202 bfLMLNT M5 2 9 11 1.237 BOONEVILLE M5 3 21 24 5.895 RIENZI M5 0 5 5 363 DENNIS MS 0 7 7 125 ADAM 5VILLE Th 2 12 14 1,344 MICHIE I f4 2 13 15 509 PAR 50N5 TN 1 5 6 2.167 RAMER IN O e 8 451 SELMER i t. 0 12 12 3,495 WAYkESPORD IN O 5 5 1.963 LUTT5 TN ta 7 7 200 5HIL DH TN U 10 10

$U810TAL 22 213 235 OTHER 14 136 170 TOTAL RESPONSE 5 330 1291 1 591 TCNP WOREFORCE TOTAL 2145 06 79 6

TABLE A-2 F OLLOW UP SURWEY SOURCE AND LDC ATIDM Of CONSTRUCTION EMPLOVEE5 RUN DATE 09/07/79 YELLOW CREEE NUCLEAR PLANT RUN T I 9E 144517 ACit VE EMPLLsEE5 36-3C-79 REPORT 4 DTHEA DIHER OTHER DINER

---

l M F A C T C LU h T I E S -- ----- REC. AEaBAMA MISS. TENA.

FEOM --- 10 aL( Ca N Tl5HOPIN00 HARDIN COUNilt5 (UUNTIES COUNTIES COUNilE5 OTHER 441 ALCORA til 94 3 2 100 TISH!iMIN00 til 3 356 2 4 16 5 HARDIN (1) i 159 3 2 165 OTHER RECRUITING COUN 821 5 30 8 104 1 2 75 6 OINER AL. COU4 TIE 5 133 7 le 3 22 5 1 56 OTHER MISS. COUNTIE S (38 2 19 2 4 4 1 32 DTHER TN. COU4 TIE S (31 13 25 13 IP 7 76 2

AERAN545 1 1 2

GEORGIA 1 1 5

C. CARCLlh4 3 1 1 OTHE R STATES 6 8 6 10 2 32 TOTAL 130 470 195 T71 6 6 10 3 1591 NOTE: DATA Dh DIAG 0hAL INDICATE 5 NONMOVERS, WITH THE E ECE Pil0N OF MOVE 5 WITHIN A COUNTY (Il RECRUITIN G COUhiY (2) ALAB AMA C OUNTIE S: COLBERI, CULLMA4, FPANRLIN, LAUDERDALE, LAWRENCE, LINESIONE, MARION MI55I55 tP PI COUNT IE S: PE4T34 DE50TA, IIAWAMBA, L AF AYETTE , LE E , M AR$ HALL, PONIOTOC, PREST 155. TIPPAN, UNION TENNESSEE COUNTIES: CHESTER, DECATUR, FAYETTE, SILES. HARDEMAN HAYWOOD, HEND E R SON ,

L AW RE NCE , LEWIS, MADISON, MCNAIRY, PERRY, 5HELEY, WAYNE (3) ALL COUNT IES IN ALABAMA, 4IS$155tPPI, AND TENNES5EE OTHER TH AN R ECRUIT ING C OUNT IE S (41 =0THER= I AC LUDE S 40N-4 E SPDNSE S OR ERRJ4EDUS RESPO45E5 FOR CURRENT ADDRESS.

e 6 e o e

19 Table A-3 YELIDW CREEK NUCLEAR PIANT DISTRIBUTION OF MOVERS AND ASSOCIATED POPUIATION BY COUNTY AND COtC4 UNITY

. JUNE 30,1979 Number y 2

Percent of Population Influx County of Movers Movers School Age Total Alcorn, MS 12 50 40 164 Tishomingo, MS 40 162 80 368 Hardin, TN 12 49 40 156 Other Counties 35 143 120 425 Total 100 404 280 1,113 1

Community 3 Corinth, MS 3 11 3 28

'Iuka, MS 10 42 16 92 Savannah, TN 4 15 8 42 Total 17 ~ 68 27 162

1. Numbers extrapolated.

2. Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.

3 Within municipal limits.

5 9

9

20 Table A-4 YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT -

C(MPARISON OF SURVEY RESULTS WITH PR0kJECTIONS FOR SELECTED PARAMETERS EMPLOYMENT LEVEL - 2,145 ,

MOVER LEVEL - 404 Projected Surveyed Percent Number Percent Number Movers with Families 60 242 72 292 Movers without Families 40 162 28 n2 School-Age Children - 242 - 280 School-Age Children per Family - 1 - 1 Total Population Influx - 888 - 1,n3 Percent Number Percent Number Housing Choice Houses 35 141 55 224 .

Mobile Homes 45 182 29 n6 Apartments, Sleeping Rooms, and Other 20 81 16 64 Total 100 404 100 404 Percent Number Percent Number Distribution by County Alcorn, MS - Corinth Area 50 202 11  %

Tishemingo, MS - Iuka and Burnsville Areas 40 162 36 147 Hardin, TN - Savannah and Counce Areas 10 40 11 W Other Areas 0 0 42 169 Total 100 404 100 404

1. Numbers extrapolated. -

2. Percentages may not add to 100 because of rounding.

i

l

• . l l

21

)

I TABLE A-5 f l'L L uif UP SURVEY WOREER5 WHO MOVED INTO Vf LLOW CREEK hutLE AR PLAMI AttA PAGE DIO bun DAll 09/07/79 M0f f e SU4M AR Y FLp3Ri If A(il%( (PFLHVtl5 06-30-79 kuh ilME 14444t blTH IDTAL (HILDEif N CHILDAIN MDtt e 5 Chit t'E t t N L'M B t h I P: IN M3Vik!

blTH IN I!F OEADL H10H WilH3JT ILt1 AL FAMILY 5t h t'b t (HILDFIN S CliOOL SCHCUL FAMILY Mf>Vf R 5 ANh04L iMFlufff5 HOU$t DuhtD b3 k9 99 43 13 4 67 HOU5E KfhlED 9 2 6 4 1  ? 1.

APARTMfMI RENI(D 7 2 7 3 2 13 20 MDFILt HOME SENTf D 2 0 1 0 0 3  %

MOSILL HLME UdAEC 7 4 11 5 3 b 15 SLitPIAL R30M i 0 0 0 0 1 i' MOTEL OTHER 1 1 1 0 1 2 3 TOTAL 40 ?f 125 55 20 36 124 HOUPLY E MPL OY!! 5 HUUSE CWhtD 40 27 63 'e 11 i 42 HUU51 kENTED 39 25 t! i t' e E 4S APARTMENT RINilD 2 0 1 ('. 0 7  %

MOBILL HLME Ri f4I t D 13 7 17 9 S 12 2S MOBILE HOME DdNED 30 15 38 23 3 11 41 SLEE PING R00M 1 0 0 0 0 4 S M0f f L 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 2 0 D U 0 t 6 TOTAL 127 74 184 108 25 49 176 ALL EMPLOVEE5 HOUSE OWNED 103 56 162 HI 24 6 109 HOUSE RENTED 48 27 71 42 9 5 57 APARTMENT RENTED 9 2 8 3 2 20 29 MOSILE HOME RENit0 15 7 18 9 . 3 15 30 MOSILE HOME OWNED 37 19 49 28 6 19 56 5LEEPING ROOM 2 0 0 0 0 5 7 MOTEL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 DIHER 3 1 1 0 1 b 11 TOTAL 217 112 309 163 45 83 300

22 TABLE A-6 .

FULLUs UP SURVEY WORRER5 WHO MOVED INTO YELLOW CREER EUCLE AR PLANT A4EA PAGE GJ4 .

aLCusN RUN C#TE 09/07/79 EMFtHYEE5 LIVan; kilHlh THL ClublY 10TAL REPORT le ACTIVt f MFLOYt f 5 06-30-1, RUN TIME 144440 blTH IUI8L CHIID6f1 (HitDkiN MOVERS C H IL DR i g NLMbfR IN IN MOVIR5 bilH IN UF GRADE HIGH WITtCJT It Tat FAPILY 5tH00L CH ILD6t h 3 CI:ULL SCHOLL FAMILV MuvfB5 AhNUAL EMPLOYtf5 huh 51 UWNID 17 8 34 11 5 0 17 H005t S t Nit 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I

AP AR TME NI R ENI ED 3 1 5 2 0 I 4 MOBILf HOME RENilD PU8ILE HUpt UWhED 0 0 t, G 0 1 I 5LifPILG 600M M0ffL DTHf t IDIAL 10 9 39 13 5 a 23 bObRLY E MPLOYE E 5 HOUSE DWhtJ 4 1 4 1 1 1 5 HOU5F RENTED 3 2 5 1 0 0 3

• AP ARIMINT R E NI ED MOBILt HOME RENTED MOSILE HOME OdNED 3 3 7 7 0 1 4 SLf E PlhG RDOM MUTEL OTHt h n 0 0 0 0 2 2 TOTAL 10 6 16 11 1 4 14 ALL EMPLOYEIS HOUSE UWNED 21 9 38 12 6 1 22 HOUSE RENTfD 3 2 5 3 0 1 4 AP ARTMENT R ENI ED 3 1 5 2 0 1 4 MOOILE HOME RENTED MOSILE HOME OWNED 3 3 7 7 0 2 5 5LffPIhG ROOM MOTEL OT HE R 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 TOTAL 30 15 55 24 6 7 37

23 TABLE A-7

• FULL 0d UP SURVEY 40R(IR5 WHO MOVED INTO ?!LLOW CRLtk qu(LEAR PLANI A4fA PALt 305 f l 5H t.M i n 60 #UN 041! 39/f 7/79 f MPLOYt ti L IVIP.; el1Hik THE C '. U N I T 10TAL AEPOR1 IP ACTibt EPPLUYLE5 0 6 - 4C-19 *UN TIME 1*4446 kl1H lil8L C Hit DRt 4 OflLCRIN MOVE R S CUILDRI1 N LMi lR IN IN 43Vf L 5-WITH IN PT ( 6' A D t Hl(H k illf o J T IllAt FArlLY $(P0ut f H I L D i t ic Sti uUt SCh00L FAPiti Mi.V t e s AhhuAL E MPL OY!E 5

, HOL'5 E L'Wht 0 11 7 18 9 4 i 19 HOUSE kINit 0 1 1 2 2 0 1

• APAklM1NI 4ENilD 2 0 0 0 0 4 t-MOPILt HCME RENTED / 0 1 0 0 1 :s M0bitt H0r[ pdhtD 3 2 o 2 1 7 10 Slit Pit 4 600M I C ( 0 6 L I M0i[L DihtR TOTAL 28 10 27 13 7  !! 43 HOURLY FMP10VfE5

, HOU5L DWhtD 9 7 11  ? 2 1 10 HOU5E RENifD 12 6 16 10 2 4 16 APARTMtNT RENTLD 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 MOBILE H0ME NfNTED 8 L P 4_ 1 b It MOBILt HOME OWNED 15 6 17 6 1 10 25 5 LEE PihG ROOM 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 MOTE L 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 DTHER 2 0 0 0 C t' 2 10TAL 46 23 52 31 P 31 77 ALL EMPLDYtES HOUSE OWNED 26 14 29 18 6 ^> ?9 HOUSE RENTE D 15 7 18 12 2 S 20 AP ARTMENT RE NitD 2 0 0 0 0 F 10 MOBILE HDME RENTED 10 4 9 4 1 9 19 MOPILE HOME DdNED 18 8 23 10 6 17 35 SLEE PING ROOM 1 0 0 0 0 3 4 N01E L 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 OTHER 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 74 33 T9 44 15 46 120 9

24 TABLE A-8 EOLLos ue suavEv

• WOR (ERS WHO MOVED INID YELLOW CREEK NUCLE AR PLANT AaF A PPGt 006 1A8 DIN AUN DATE 09/07/79

( MPL'Ivi t 5 L IVING WiiHIf THE CLUhTV f riT A L kEPORT 18 A;11VE EMPLuYEF5 06-?G-79 6UN TIME 144440 bilH TOIAL CHillskf 4 (HILDkli!

'Dwt d 5 CHILDarg NLP8tR IN IN MOVI E 5 b l i et IN l'f OkADE HIGH hl1PLJT Tuf Al family 5(H00L CH ILDPE H SCh00L SCHUDL FAMILV Movip5 ANNU4L IMFLUYf E 5 HOU5f PWhtD 14 5 22 7 3 0 14 H005f 6f Nit D APARTMfhi aENIlb D 0 D U U I 1 MCSILE HOME RENitD 0 0 D 0 0 I I MDPILE HONE UdNfD 2 2 4 3 0 0 2 5 Lit PIhL 800M MOTEL DTHER TOTAL 16 7 26 10 3 2 le HOURLY EMPLOYE E S HOUSE OWNIO 6 4 11 6 3 0 6 HOU$t Pf NIf D 5 3 6 5 0 D 5 APARTMfhi aENilD D 0 0 0 0 I 1 MOBILt HUME R i t.i t 0 4 2 5 1 2 1 5 MOBILt HOPE UdNfD 1 0 0 0 0 L I SLEE PING R30M MDIEL OTHIR TOTAL 16 9 22 12 5 2 18 ALL E MPLutE E S HOUSE DWNED 20 9 33 13 6 0 20 HOUSE RENTED 5 3 6 5 0 0 5 APARTMENT RENTED 0 D 0 0 0 2 2 MOBILE HOME RENTED 4 2 5 1 2 2 6 MDBILE HOME DdNED 3 2 4 3 0 0 3 SLEEPING RDDM MUTEL OTHER TOTAL 32 16 48 22 8 4 36

25 TABLE A-9

. FOLL0d UP SURVEY WOR (f D5 WHO MOVED INTO TELLOW (BEER NUCLEAR PLANT AREA PAGE 001

URih19 auk DATE 39/07/79 fMPLflTff5 Ll%IhG W i lH il. THL ( 11 Y L Ihl15 kEPORT 1A ACityt f:MPLUYi f 5 06-39-79 NUN TIME 1*4460 WIIM 101AL LHILOREN CHILDRih 90 VERS CHILDRit N L'M P I R IN IN MOVf R5 WlIH lil 1:7 GkADE HIGH bliH0JT TUIAL FAMILY SCH00L C H ILD Wi t4 S C e>00 L SCH00L FAMILY 9fVIR5 ANhuAL E MPLOY!E 5 H0 pit OW P.f D 2 1 s. 1 0 0 2 HOL'5[ RE hlt D AP Ah TMihi al Nl t D 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 MDPILE HOME RENTfD M081Lt HOPE Ddhto o C D 0 0 1 1 SLEfPIAG PDLP M01tt OlHt e j TOTAL J 1 6 1 0 1 4 HOURLY EMPLOV!f 5 HOU5E IWNfD 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 HOU51 hi hil D 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 APARIMthi EE NilD MOBILE HOME RENilD MOBILE HOME OdNED I I i 1 0 1 2 SLEE PING 800M MDIEL UIHEF 10TAL 2 1 2 1 0 2 4 ALL EMILOYE!5 HOU5L DWhtD 2 1 4 I O 1 3 N0051 RENTfD 1 0 1 0 0 D 1 APARTMENT R(NIED 1 0 2 0 0 D 1 MOBILE HOME WENTED MOBILE HOME OWNED 1 1 1 1 0 2 3 SLftpthG ROOM M01EL 01HER TOTAL 5 2 8 2 0 3 P L

L.

26 TABLE A-10 -

ICLLOW UP SUR VE Y -

WOR 4EB5 WHb MOVID thTO YELLOW CREER NUCLE AR PLANI A4EA PAGE 30? ,

lukA NUN DATE 09/07/79

• PLovi E 5 L IVis<G al1Hih THE CITY L IMIT5

. 8:FP041 1A ACTIb[ FPPLUTIE! 06-30-79 WUN TIMI 144440 ki1H ILIAL LHILDRE) (HILDREN Pu dE R $ CHILD 6L4 NLM6fR IN Ife MD%fk5 elTH 11. f,f CRADE HIGH WITFDJT TOTAL f&MilV $(HOUL CH ILD NE N SCHOOL SCHOUL FAMllf MUVfD5 AhWUAL fMPLOT!ES HOU5t OwntD 9 3 e 4 2 0 9 HOU5t RENTf D 1 f, 0 0 0 L 1 APARIMLNT REhf(0 1 0 0 0 4 4  %

MOSILE HLPE RfhifD I O 1 0 0 0 1 MOBILE HOPE tishfD 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 StifPlhG WOOM MOTEL OTHER TOIAL 13 3 10 4 2 5 IF HOUBLT EMFLD)EE5 HOU56 DWAID 1 1 I I O L 1 HOU51 RE NTE D 0 0 t 0 0 1 1 APARIPINI 4ENIED J U 0 0 0 i /

M0 BILE HUME RENitu o 0 C t 0 3 3 MU51LE H0rt OdhfD 3 7 9 3 2 1 4 SLEEPING ROOM C 0 0 0 0 2 2 MOTEL 01HER TOTAL 4  ? 10 4 2 9 13 ALL EMPLUVEE!

HOUSE DWhtD 10 4 9 5 2 0 10 HOUSE RENTED 1 0 0 0 0 3 J AP ARTMfRT Rf hT ED I C O O O L 7 MOSILE HLPE hENTfD I O 1 0 0 3 4 MOSILE HOME DsNED 4 2 10 3 2 2 6 5LEEPIBG B00M 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 MOTEL OTHE R TOTAL 17 6 20 8 4 14 31

27 TABLE A-ll FOLLOW UP SURVEY WOB4tR5 WHO Mute D thin VE LLCW CBEEn NUCLE AR PLANT AREA PAGI 003 5A%AMN4H pun DATE 39/07/79 EMPLOYE ES LIVIN5 bl1HIN T HE C ITY L IP115 REP 0kl la ACil)E EMPLOYE15 06-30-11 EUN TIME 144440 b l i'i 101AL (H I L Ch t *4 CHILOREN Mt eE R S CHILDktV NUMPER IN IN M3Wtt5 alTH lh UE GkADE HIGIl Wife 0JT ILIAL FA91LY 5(H00L CHILO$t N SCHOOL SCHOUL FAMILV MtVIR5 AhhUAL EMPLOYEE 5 HOUSE DWNED 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 HOUSE RE hit D APARTMEhi RENilD 0 0 0 0 0 1 I MOBILE HUMt RfhifL 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 D 3 1 M0 PILI HUME Ddhf t- 1 1 5LifPIhG R30M MOTEL OlHER 4 S I O / 6 101AL 1 HOURLY EMPLOVE E 5 HOUSE l'WhED 1 1 4 3 0 0 1 HOUSE pihitD 2 2 3 2 0 0 2

' APARIMiki RINilD 0 0 L' O O I J MOBILE HOME REhTED 1 0 0 0 0 D 1 MOBILL HOME OdhlD SLEE PING ROOM MOTEL OTHER TOTAL 4 3 7 5 0 I $

ALL EMPLOTEE5 4 1 7 3 0 L 4 HOUSE OWhED 2 3 2 0 0 2 H00$f RE NTE D 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 APARTMENT RENIED 0 0 0 0 1 2 MOBILE HUME RENTED 1 M081LE HDME DWNED 1 1 2 1 0 0 I

$LEEPjhG ROOM MuiEL OTHER TOTAL 8 4 12 6 0 3  !!

28 Appendix B THAFFIC LEVEL DEFINED Level of Service D Level of service D approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating ,

speeds being maint..aned though considerably affected by changes in operating conditions. Fluctuations in volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds. Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low, but conditions can be tolerated for short periods of time.

Source: liighway Capacity Manual, Highway Research Board Special Report 87, 1965 e

e . .

V ---l

'w -

";n-y u ..;... ) -- . ~ .

_. ,i y

/

v L.ym.a Q/

~

g/;- -  ; -'.

m. y

/: M.q yhg/:M-wJ ON 1,

f-# W

b. $' <.~ h* y. @ S7 C ~N s/ y

~ \g -~.

~~ / )  %

co}uy5}, p pgz_~,  %-

V fI ,

T . ' n a

N "J -*--

y/ 4 k., =.-/-/* ' (n)-. { 'N v ._- f,,- -J'1, t%aw ~ M, ep L-f ~1)

$et .._.

^

--5,.3.

( l- . . c\ j ,,

"F ,q [

. . ' ,7.

J H r s(t y Asy{l.-... - .- - -

..L;,,jg3 ,

p; ,f 3

-- R

r g,+ ,

- s l ;,,, i

/'~ g. / } saeit>rvaN. Nw-.

~. 4*7

_ ;d . , ~

m ..

p' s t ..

I l ,

~-.

e%

- Pn. ' e:- f; _, .i #'

s 1,, ,yg M. '

N .~_q.<c' s

]

> y. .:.LTH /G.L =.._.f.[~bj6, ._

v..~

i, ,

C" M >c -

. -i, T C

., t, %r._

. TM, ,T _s 3 L l . n p

(% ~%, i

{

/- l

- - ~ ~

• * ' * ' ^

k. - % .....

, - w" " , . .

f

]~

]

l

, /i <y.

w-vi

, 4 A .m . ,

r A y .r .

f n4gg i ,

'q,(("h ( Y,~..

l

[

I t.- .ac.med n , ~ ..., w,

[ w({f

-~~

i

, ,I _. ...

- y m . -_.

l ,,, , .. l , i. 1=

~

1 ,.....

~~~~ //j -

ww- yw Y

j

~7 ~ ~,

- n,.a b,

g \,

! p"A i

$ j-5

. ,9 . f/

.E

~ ' A'N

\m:gP Q .,..QfU%w % w. &

f/ ".;a%

NN., g I.

j j .

.. 4 L 1- . . N ,. ; . -

} ,".j _ -. ts ce waA/ ...,

., 4 r' 4f - ...L.;t l

.y _f- ,..

l ... ~  ; . -.

sNg J ~.

(3 connth a c,. c en. .xu an m

' g "

>c, . - -

l x.. n ,,"" .?- Nl-.

ee N ,

sg ,, ,,, [- y ..

,s. g. _ ; y p -w~q t v::

,, --- l

~.. - {)-

, 7, ... ..

r- ._,i

~~' , .x' g., { g,, \ I*, u1 )

x 1

-- .\ .a

'of ' -- ( Ns

,L 9 ~~f--

- E g-C  ! 'l /s .,* c e f

l

. .~

. ~.--

L ~ 'l ,4 3.

(-=+: .,s%

,, lL =A-;

!wn.y.; .. .../3 .. d B@l/- 3

~

n.' A ."

gg, .-s-- -

l' A ', . jFLO.h,".m

y R ENCE .g,,r ...... , j ,,g -

/ / 43 T v -- . .-*

k~,i ,

,7 A~.2 -E---@:u21. _ . _bh L.M@dJ.A R. ....d .Mll'.Q(.yZW ,,,. 9 . $. 3P h$ //j g' A i  % ... .

Js f y J .fl.J s. we! 4~y d  ;

a %'e -

--- l .

/ t x -

J s s A i w3-p-~. %p -. . 1 - / _

q; .g I;.  % w. A< q'1y.-~ .# - ."l #{ :

..i ,1 .) , "

V p p ff,. ,

• -~~ \ . _ _ _ _

.j.

DECATTJRl t

~f,Q.f p,k[*j .-*.1

f. j 3 ~- ;l ~ ~ _ , t

~~a e.,,2 .v. Q+>c. -g ,',' _ -~f ,.

' r~~~ N .j

, A ,n\ y..m5 ..

u.- m .nr (- ..- .y~ ., .

nj ~ ... w .  ; q - ,/  : 7- <

f- . - - . . s ,

j .N N.,-

,. d yl c d).y '. -_

e 8

. .f ~-. -*he. r' , *'*T,s \- ' w --- 7 s ".. d, h.p g.j @ C.,.I'%.

- ~

. n y;~.?' '~ - 3 <

~ - - '

i s _+ I f / 4 h-. FIGURE I J .d2 - - u. -

-^/ /

I . -< / [.l n*

g(,1,',#'. L; T r n ' \- *~ l l' YELLOW CREEK NUCLEAR PLANT v.^.."g^

T 5g N

• A"V***"

f A- \,,,g TOWNS CONTAINING CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES f'I T ...f.r7

~.se.. 1 g a.

- ' . "***"g ,-- - 4j., V'4" PNIC !C (

.w..,

. c,1__\ . A PLANT SITE

.\ .aa: ate'* . ;;..$ "--* p e

%/~ 3n/ -

JUNE 1979

'-s/' .

~

j O 15 30 f(.,{4_,'Nk\ I . a.7[& ~~ .

. ~ ~- m

-]

6', -

f 'i

• SCALE OF MILES f' .

.-.i t! - p / 2

_~ _

NOTE: TOWNS UNDERLINED CONTAIN EMPLOYEES