ML19309F052
| ML19309F052 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 04/21/1980 |
| From: | Peoples D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19276H800 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004280410 | |
| Download: ML19309F052 (2) | |
Text
-
e *-
e
. Commonwealth Edison MN
/
~ ) on; First National Plata. Chicago. Illinors
(
Addrlss R; ply 12 Post Offica Box 767 N
Chicago, Illinois 60690 April 21, 1980 Mr. B.
Joe Youngblood, Chief Licensing Projects Branch No. 1 Division of Project Management U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374 Reference (a):
O. O.
Parr letter to B. Lee, Jr. dated August 22, 1979.
Dear Mr. Youngblood:
Reference (a) provided then current guidance on the the basis for preparing radiological effluent technical specifications (NUREG-0473 Rev. 2).
Commonwealth Edison has reviewed that and earlier NRC guidance on this topic, and encloses for your review materials applicable to LaSalle County Station.
Specifically, two I
(2) copies of a draf t of the Radiological Ef fluent Technical Specifications, and two (2) copies of a draft of the Onsite Dose I
Calculation Manual are enclosed.
l In the case of the technical specifications, the draft materials submitted are in the Standard Technical Specification format and are in the hand edited form previously suggested by your staff for initial specification submittal.
In the case of the offsite dose calculation manual, the Commonwealth Edison program from which the LaSalle County manual was developed is based on NRC guidance contained in NUREG-0133 (October, 1978), Regulatory Guide 1.109 (October 1977), and Regulatory Guide 1.111 (July, 1977).
In addition, this manual has been revised to reflect guidance received by Commonwealth Edison from NRC in the i
review of manuals submitted on our operating plant dockets (Dresden, Quad Cities, and Zion).
In that regard, we strongly urge that the Commonwealth Edison Appendix I materials specific to LaSalle be reviewed in conjunction with the ongoing operating plant review.
Significant expenditures of resources by this utility and the NRC Staff hav gf(
already been made to resolve issues of a generic nature in the operating plant review.
From the standpoint of conservation of g $/
S0 04
- s-a Commonw:alth Edison Mr. B.
Joe Youngblood, Chief April 21, 1980 Page 2 resources, it would be.in our interest as well as that of your staff to merge the LaSalle County review with that of our operating plants.
Such an approach will promote uniformity of application of Appendix I requirements at our seven operating units and two near term operating license units at LaSalle County.
Furthermore, continuation of this approach, with the inclusion of LaSalle in the now ongoing review, has the potential for resolving this issue for LaSalle County in the shortest possible time.
If you have any questions on the materials submitted, or the approach suggested for the review of these materials, please direct them to this office.
Very truly yours, D. L.
Peoplus I
Director o' Nuclear Licensing Enclosure 3184A i
l 1
.