ML19309E983

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises of Intention Not to Respond to Aamodt 800407 Request for Further Extension of Time Re State of PA Deposition, Unless Advised to Contrary.Aslb 800229 Memorandum Disposes of Matter
ML19309E983
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/24/1980
From: Swanson D
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Jordan W, Little L, Smith I
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
References
NUDOCS 8004280249
Download: ML19309E983 (1)


Text

-

ps> *n %,

[g UNITED STATES g.

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMT.11SSION

{

f.~, f 3., [&. C WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

%, ' '*". *+f' }

o.,

/

April 24, 1980 Ivan W. Smith, Esq., Chairman Dr. Linda W. Little Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 5000 liermitage Drive i

U.S. Nucicar Regulatory Commission Raleigh, NC 27612 Washington. DC 20555 1

Dr. Walter 11. Joraan 881 W. Outer Drive Oak Ridge, TN 37830 In the Matter of Metropolitan Edison Company, et al.

(Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1)

Docket No. 50-289 Members of the Board:

4 I wish to inform the Board that the Staff does not intend to respond to "Aamodt Request For Further Extension of Time Relative to Deposition of Cormnonwealth of Pennsylvania" dated April 7,1980 unless requested to do so by the Board.

The Aamodt Request apparently had not-Leen received by tht3 Board prior to the issuance of the Board's " Memorandum on Aamodt's Discovery of Commonwealth" dated April 8, 1980, which disposed of Mrs.

Aamodt's first request for an extension of time.

llowever, the Board there determined that since the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania was responding volun-tarily to Mrs. Aamodt's discovery and that it would be willing to continue doing so at least until May 15, there was no need for the Board to rule on Mrs. Aamodt's earlier request for an extension of time for the taking of a deposition of the Commonwealth.

Furthermore, the Board ruled on its Memo-randum that it was not amending the overall tentative and informal prehearing scheduling set forth in the Fourth Special Prehearing Conference Order dated February 29, 1980.

Since Mrs. Aamodt advances no additional cause in her current request for extending the deadline for conducting discovery, the Staf f assumes that the Board's Memorandum is dispositive of this matter.

Sincerely, N[c l

A wn Daniel T. Swanson Counsel for NRC Staff cc:

Service list 4

I 2Y G

soonsd