ML19309E799
| ML19309E799 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 03/26/1980 |
| From: | Fay C WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| IEB-80-03, IEB-80-3, NUDOCS 8004240419 | |
| Download: ML19309E799 (2) | |
Text
.-.....
WISCONSIN Electnc powca coupasr 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MllWAUMEE WI 53201
., r, i
March 26, 1980 Mr. James G. Keppler Office of Inspection,and EnforcRegional Director Region III
- ement, 799 Roosevelt RoadU. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137
Dear Mr. K'3ppler:
_ DOCKET NOS.
_ RESPONSE TO IE BULLETIN NO.50-266 AN P_OINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT 80-03 of Charcoal from Standard Type IIThis is in response to IE Bulleti transmitted by your letter of Feb, 2 Inch, Tray Adsorber Cells",
- o. 80-03, " Loss charcoal adsorber cells are used at th ruary 6, 1980.
Plant:
e Point Beach NuclearThe following System Manufacturer Containment purge Barnebey-Cheney Company Farr Company Containment cleanup Farr CompanyNuclear Consulting Services Chemistry laboratory Auxiliary building Farr Company Control room Nuclear Consulting Services Barnebey-Cheney Company combined air ejector Nuclear Consulting Services Cryogenic Technology Inc.
(CTI)
Barnebey-Cheney:
Type II, FC Type Adsorber CTI :
filtration unit, Drawing No. D31044Fi Revision B Farr Company:
Type II, NPP-1 NUCON:
Type II, II-26 pq 2 b ',
41 1 8004240 5
. g e
d Mr. James G. Keppler March 26, 1980 The aforementioned charcoal adsorbers receive an ANSI N510-1975, Section 5, " Visual Inspection", and Section J2, "In-Place Leak Test, Adsorber Stage", test on an annual [ basis by Nuclear Consulting Services, Inc.
April 1979 test results show no cell damage to the subject charcoal adsorbers.
The charcoal adsorbers of the control room (F16),
containment purge (Fil) and spares in the warehouse were visually inspected for potential cell damage since some cells were changed since April 1979 and some spares may be used before April 1980.
One cell (manufactured by Barnebey-Cheney) in the containment purge system (lFilA) was found to have a partially separated strip which secures the screen to the frame.
The screen was i
flush with the frame and caused no loss of charcoal or had any potential for future charcoal loss.
The cell condition will be upgraded within thirty days of the inspection.
The 1980 inspection is presently scheduled for April.
If at that time the test results show cell damage in any other filtration system, these results will be forwarded to you and the damaged cells replaced according to the schedules in the Bulletin.
i Very truly yours, C
[ [L C. W. Fay, irector Nuclear Power Department Copy to:
Director, Division of Fuel Facility and Materials Safety Inspection Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i
i l
i l
l l.
n. w.w
~
_a...
y