ML19309E570

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on NRC Approach Re Contaminated Waste Disposal from Tmi.No Wastes Should Be Released Into Susquehanna River Until Completion & Review of Eis.Nrc Must Consult W/State Officials Re Any Activities Taken Prior to EIS Review
ML19309E570
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 03/20/1980
From: Sarbanes P
SENATE
To:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
NUDOCS 8004220659
Download: ML19309E570 (2)


Text

,.

t

.[

.f pg g

.k

  • ' ' ~ ~ ' ^

.kll h $ > h &*t WO.hY

$OO G s

A$ Yhhf(bf,Pg,:h.'A >

q w. - -

V.

"i k. h di

+

4'u f

.x ' ~

"5

+ w.!

k. ~ %,.M....

e' W

4 yc

N^,

>. Mom the ONice of.y + =@g, *QQ.w>.v..,*r <.y aKQj,. :d,L,.m. y,,. Z] f,

4Qp

,i h

. a.4w,}. e.

r 1

s g4 i.

-g,'

,. #1.. Q. w.

m

1

.. M,g7.@ W, M,f..Senatcr PaulSarbanes W....;,.

s

}o o

k 2.%_,%,,

f i

s

a n

' ~

a. y.

y.

1 J,u,,.,;;,,

eg x -

..,y, 4

a,..-

r

. ~ /... mr.:, %'.? G., ) ; s 3,, o, m > ~i, y -

c.

-_3

% y'f'~.7{s%.y

..c,.,-

_f l

- ' Q +.

.; f y ;

M. d i ' M Statement of Senatee Paul S. Sat +=nes' Nuclear Tegulatory Omniss gig flyk

+ds L.7" ~ n - 1 f

4

=""

QM[s -

lJ A. ' mvirturental Dpmet Statsnmtmree Nile Island thaclear Plant.

P 9.'

Qw; 0

,;. c.

.e -

4M

- t:

A.L '

e4 f March 20,1990 i

s wm O,f.

+

a <

, 'A e

~ ' ' * ~ ~. s,... ? x. n m

. Ml,i

L;.d

i I agraciata this orpcettnity to sutsait 'a'statenent eJenessing.-

)

,-~..-.-

pi,;>~

~mm..,

}

my cxntiming cmcern abtut the manner in which the plaar Ikgulatory

.y

.d Ozmissicn is appe-A the dispositicn of etntaminated wastes fran

' j E,I the are Mile Island rwlaar power plant. It has been my resiticn.in

]

wir.h the NFC that to steps should be taken to ret-Aspaa W ccntacts

^ ^ ' '

  • w f'

e:.q,.

,s il after the cxn-M i

I N[T2

,;[7

',any mntmainated wastes into the Susqa.hanna River int.

r%.;t

. 9 9-

.. ',g*

pleticn and review of a full Dwircrrental Dpact Statment cn this

' :m,

w k

critical isste.

-I h

i

. 01 January 15, 1980 I wrote to NT Caimn John F. A ecrne urg ng of radioactive wastes frtrn that tN NBC s!culd not permit the releass a

tree Mile Island "before it has te tenefit of *.re & tailed aralysis I

and public review cryi ccrrent that a carpletal envircrantal rpact statcr1ont is dr sigyd to provi&." I am correirmd tMt a cimrly i

i' stated policy acnins. pemitting waste disear Jes until an EIS is em-pleted is the Nat ev to insure that the Wree Mile Islam clean-ep r

is carried out "in the Mst interast of tM pxh: health a-d safety."

4 c

r~ ure v. EIF cn tie docen-

"'c !N Mr alrut/ sta%i :

.nt v.:

f tanunaticn and dispcaa'. c f c.?

r '* _ - t h 131?r.d and w rk on tre i

~

stattrent is row beim dcne. I th r ? ra caff. wry ctr.wmxl by tM

11 meit nst u

!.'c's td. m n en 2 w _ _~.

.r-tC '+

ildC'" irgtd " T;.C:" C * ~ " ? !f. "_10r.

' ;! Ell.

We NIC has stated that it muid perm LM inter;;: rc12ase of

- ~ _ -

Release WOuld be permitted if W1stes Unir tWO Sets Of circtEStandeS.

0_"..ines t' at S* d action WDuld be in "the MSt interest Of the NPC M*:

the CtIDliC M31tl1 r.d saf W r f " 'Ir~r.tof 5 *!.Dr?4"'n's "rrierrienc=f f

rtr7 7"C.*EP*S d.lT* Tc". t'M WOd anC1 Sitti.it El'.3. " I l'C*lle* U t.Y ~ *?

em ee uc - m w. :2tue = :-

=n: e - t.

is Crttical fCr."aI*jland's ;s lic Of fiOlah 2n.3 i*fi Ot t2 ?a" r

  • O < N%'

exactly What the h"C has in nind with resmet tr dr.tcrir actm.

nirthemcre, it is essent:a1 *Mt tM rc c:mit tan ::

~r.~.it fully and ccntinmc. sly cta arrrrtre stata acd local ;ffu.a3 4

a t-car.23r % :nq :ns r r c r-cxnec@ rc/ ac* int: - ;.

if pleticn and mvicw cf tN Er.

t i

IDP^D D

fD

' V 4

I

~ c' I of 1$

a 220659 t c 4

/

h rkrmh wana- - -. %,a.

,f Y'h $fki h'

h$ f5kk l

h

1.,

Nf f

d gh$

pdf y

,.f.:.. g.4 p g/ M d M 'V % 4,g.h l.f d.g;. g ' Q;, 3 } P T 0 p i p %:.g g.pg,g 9,.. j[(.3$.,3. g;%yj;s :L%M

.A Y:.T.?,6

+$.,1737 / 4 "a d g

7 4., p

,:.y.... ;. e

. : :g'..?

y,w, 9.n.:

? gf4;g,33

.y.

.g

.x.

g

.,- y c,;

s z,... ;.;,w

. m, g.,;c.,,w.,, -,

~ z n

.s,,.

,;. w. -

~, g-: ~ a..c,,y.y r ::.

y;e,,s.p. g_3

,~., p n.

p-

,~

,- 9

,c

('

, 'g;(,..,

r

.' q ' 3. m y. ;~.

2_ _

s.

. f..

. -f.

-...p-

.x t.:

w

. g-

, -.: ~

s.

e o

- -., +,

, c a.

q,1 s

e 3,

Short of a critical tmforeseen' emergency requiring imrediate ft

@y 4

s

~

,.m p _,

gg acticn, I strongly hold the position that the public ' interest is.,

.g

%c-r *

"Bt e

best protected by the extensive analysis' and public review provirlarl e-t by the EIS preparaticn process. When vital envirorsnental interests

G;-

9 a

\\,

p.

are at stake - as they are here - public safety mandstes prudence Q

.9 and thorough review as provided for in the EIS process. '1hus, I again

' _ l '. '. -pg 4

o.

urge tin NRC to adopt as its policy the view that - short of a y

d carefully defined critical emergency ascertained after close consul-t i'

taticn with state officials - no discharge of wastes be permitted prior to the cmpletion and review of the full environmental upact statment.

.