ML19309E416

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Info Notice 80-14, Safety Suggestions from Employees. No Action Required
ML19309E416
Person / Time
Site: Framatome ANP Richland
Issue date: 04/02/1980
From: Engelken R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Nilson R
SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER
References
NUDOCS 8004220013
Download: ML19309E416 (1)


Text

/ p uas,'o UNITED STATES

[ y)%s., ( ** g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

34's s

REGION V 4

0, "[b l '

'[

1990 N. CALIFORNI A BOULEVARD

%, ' b"

,d

SulTE 202, WALNUT CREEK PLAZA

  • e.,*

WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94596 April 2,1980 Docket No. 70-1257 Exxon Nuclear Company 2101 Horn Rapids Road Richland, Washington 99352 Attention: Dr. R. Nilson, Manager i

Quality Assurance & Licensing i

Genti,1 men:

The enclosed Information Notice provides information regarding the practices to be followed by NRC inspectors when they receive expressions of concern related to safety from plant employees.

Sincerely, f.

C> C R. H. Engelken Director Enclosures :

1.

IE Information Notice No. 80-14 2.

List of IE Information Notices Recently Issued 8

8004z zo o l3

I SSINS No.: 6870 UNITED STATES Accession No.:

NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0fHISSI0il 8002280649 l

l OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.

20555 i

April 2, 1980 IE Information Notice No. 80-14 SAFETY SUGGESTIONS FROM EMPLOYEES On February 29, 1980, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued an instruction to NRC inspectors on the handling of safety suggestions received from licensee employees during inspections. A copy of the instruction, Temporary Instruction No.1210/1, is enclosed.

The purpose of this instruction is to reaffirm to inspectors that they must be sensitive to the safety concerns of employees. We encourage employees to attempt resolution of their safety concerns through the normal communication channels te i.neir supervisors and managers. Nevertheless, there are instances where an employee apparently feels more comfortable expressing his or her safety concerns to an NRC inspector.

In these cases, the inspector will follow the practices described in the enclosed instruction.

We suggest that licensees post this Information Notice and the enclosed instruction in an area where employees can read them.

Enclocurc:

IE Temporary Instruction No. 1210/1

TI 1210/1 Issue Date: 2/29/80 SAFETY SUGGESTIONS RECEIVED DURING INSPECTIONS During inspections, inspectors may receive safety suggestions relating to plant conditions or operations from licensee employees.

Inspectors must be receptive to such suggestions and should attempt to resolve or deal with each one received.

Even in those cases where the suggestion would require a licensee to do more than is required by NRC regulations, license conditions, or technical specifications, the inspector should discuss the suggestion with the employee and provide, to the best of the inspector's ability, the options that are available.

Depending upon the nature of the suggestion, some possible courses of action are as follows:

t 1.

Encourage the employee to fonvard the suggestion in writing to plant management and, if appropriate, to the NRC.

2.

For matters clearly under the jurisdiction of another Federal agency, or a state or local agency, encourage the employee to contact the appropriate agency, or offer to bring the information to the attention of the proper official.

3.

Inform the employee that the matter will be evaluated and, if appropriate, brought to the attention of flRC management.

It is important that an employee profferring a suggestion related to safety be made aware that the flRC is interested in such suggestions and they will be pursued. t t

l i

o IE Information Notice No. 80-14 Enclosure i

April 2, 1980 RECENTLY ISSUED IE INFORMATI0fl NOTICES Information Subject Date Issued To Notice flo.

Issued 80-13 General Electric Type SBM 4/2/80 All light water reactor Control Swiches - Defective facilities holding power Cam Followers reactor OLs or cps 80-12 Instrument Failure Causes 3/31/80 All holders of power Opening of FORV and Block reactor OLs and cps Valve 80-11 General Problems with ASCO 3/14/80 All holders of Reactor Valves in fluclear Application OL, CP, fuel fabrica-Including Fire Protection tion and processing Systems facilities 80-10 Partial Loss of Non-fluclear 3/7/80 All power reactor 4

Instrument System Power facilities holding Supply During Operation OLs and cps 80-09 Possible Occupational 3/7/80 All holders of Health Ha::ard Associated power reactor OLs with Closed Cooling Systems and near term cps 80-08 The States Company Sliding 3/7/80 All power reacter Link Electrical Terminal facilities with an OL Block or a CP i

80-07 Pump Shaft Fatigue Cracking 2/29/80 All Light Water Reactor Facilities holder power reactor OLs and cps 80-06 flotification of Significant 2/27/80 All holders of Reactor i

Events OLs and to near term OL applicants 80-05 Chloride Contamination 2/8/80 All licensees of nuclear of Safety Related Piping power reactor facilities and applicants and holders of nuclear power reactor cps

.80-04 BWR Fuel Exposure in 2/4/80 All BWR's holding a Excess of Lim.its power reactor OL or CP