ML19309C835
| ML19309C835 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/14/1980 |
| From: | Hunter V, Whitesell D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309C830 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900266 NUDOCS 8004090310 | |
| Download: ML19309C835 (2) | |
Text
-
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0!efISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEffENT REGION IV Report No.
99900266/80-01 Program No.
51300 Company:
Rockwell International Corporation Energy Systems Group 8900 De Soto Avenue Canoga Park, California 91304 Inspection Conducted: January 28-31, 1980 Inspectors:
N'
/p d'
[-//-/-N/J V. H. Hunter, Contractor Inspector Date ComponentsSection II Vendor Inspection Branch n
Approved
((////@
. E. Whitesell, Chief
,f Date
/
ComponentsSection II
//
Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on January 28-31, 1980 (99900266/80-01) 1 Areas Inspected:
Implementation of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50 and applicable codes and standards, including design document control, manufacturing control and special process control. The inspection involved twenty-eight (28) inspector hours on site.
Results:
In the three (3) areas inspected, there were no apparent deviations or unresolved items identified.
a 0040903) O l
2 DETAILS SECTION A.
Principal Persons Contacted
- R. J. McDermott, Quality Assurance Director
- G. J. Hallinan, Project Engineering Manager
- D. N. Glass, QA Audits and Control Manager
- W. H. Knight, Inspection and Test Manager
- F. A. Hunter, General Fabrication Manager
- H. C. Rodgers, QA Engineer
- R. L. Jaseph, QA Staff-Audits
- E. K. Martin, Authorized Nuclear Inspector, State of California R. W. Alliston, Project Engineer R. D. Fandlik, Assistant Manager, Inspection and Tests
- Denotes those present at the Exit Meeting B.
Design Document Control 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to ascertain whether procedures had been developed and properly implemented to control the review, approval, release, and issuance of design documents in a manner consistent with NRC rules and regulations, ASME Code requirements, and the vendor's QA program commitments.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The objectives of this area of the inspection were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the ASME accepted QA Manual, Section 3, revision 4, to verify that the vendor had established procedures to prescribe a system for design document control.
b.
Reviewed Engineering Management Procedures Manual, Volumes 1 and 2, to verify that they had been prepared by the designated authority, approved by management, and reviewed by QA.
3 Review of applicable portions of the following documents:
c.
(1) Design Review Board Report No. N139DRR12001, Attachment A.
(2) Stress Report No. N139SR22006.
(3) Stress Report No. N139SR220012.
(4) Pipe Assembly Drawing No. N139000007.
(5) Design Specification No. L-2845.
(6) Design specification No. K-2862.
(7) Engineering Order No. 84492.'
(8) Design drawing No. N139LT006001, to verify that they provided for identification of personnel responsible for preparing, reviewing, approving, and issuing design documents; and that the review and approval of signif-icant changes were performed by the same personnel.
Also to ascertain whether minor changes to design documents, that do not require review and approval, are identified.
d.
Review of the current distribution list, to verify that the distribution was current and that the proper documents are identified, accessible, and are being used.
Interviewed personnel to verify whether they were knowledge-e.
able in the procedures applicable to design document control.
3.
Inspection Findings There were no apparent deviations or unresolved items identified.
1 l
l 1
l l
1
4 C.
Manufacturing Process Control 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to verify that the vendor's manufacturing processes were:
a.
Performed under a controlled system which meets the NRC rules and regulations, ASME Code requirements, the vendor's commitments in his ASME accepted Quality Assurance Program, and contract requirements.
b.
Effective in assuring product quality.
2.
Method of Accomplishment The objectives of this area of the inspection were accomplished by:
Review of the ASME accepted Quality Assurance Manual, Section a.
9, revision 4, titled " Control of Construction Process" to verify that procedures had been established which prescribes a control system of the manufacturing processes.
b.
Review of the projects inspection plan to verify that control check lists, are prepared which identifies the document numbers and revisions to which the process must conform. Also to verify that all processes and tests are to be performed by qualified personnel using qualified procedures.
Review of the shop traveler, or process control check lists, c.
to verify that spaces are provided for reporting the results of specific operations, or reference to other documents where the results are maintained. Also that it includes space for the signoff by the vendor, indicating the date on which the operation or tests was performed, and space for signoff and date, by the authorized nuclear inspector, to document his acceptance of activities that he has selected as mandatory hold points.
5 d.
Review of selected shop travelers; (1) N116000145-07 (2) N116000159-901 (3) 1005882 to verify their compliance with the above referenced pro-cedures, and the overall QA program documentation require-meats, including the establishment of mandatory hold points by the authorized nuclear inspector.
Interviews with personnel to verify they are knowledgeable e.
in the procedures applicable to manufacturing process control.
3.
Findings The inspector verified that the vendor's manufacturing 4.
processes are performed under a controlled system which is consistent with the NRC rules and regulations, the Code requirements, the Quality Assurance Program commitments, and that the system is effective in achieving the specified product quality, b.
Within this area of the inspection, no deviations or unresolved items were identified.
D.
Control of Special Processes 1.
Inspection Objectives The objectives of this inspection were to verify that special processes such as welding, and nondestructive testing are con-trolled and accomplished by qualified personnel using qualified procedures in accordance with applicable regulatory, code and contract requirements.
l l
6 2.
Objectives Accomplished By:
The preceeding objectives were accomplished by:
a.
Review of the ASME accepted QA Manual, Section 9 and 10 to verify that the vendor had established procedures for the control of special processes.
b.
Review of procedures titled " Control of Special Processes" and " Examinations, Tests, and Inspections" to verify that requirements have been established for identifying special processes, qualification of the implementing procedures, training and/or certification of personnel performing special processes, and documentation of work performance when special processes are used.
Review of both Welder and Nondestructive (NDE) testing c.
personnel qualifications.
d.
Observed in process welding of mechanical top assembly welds as identified on shop traveler No. N116000159-001.
Welding was performed in accordance with procedure No MW2-01005-000 as specified on drawing No. N116000158, revision A.
Observed the following in process NDE:
e.
(1) Liquid penetrant examination of Welds 3, 4, and 11 in accordance with procedure No. N070NDT-03, revision 0,as identified on shop traveler No. N116000159-901.
(2) Radiographic examination (including film review) of Weld No. 11 in accordance with procedure No. N010NDT-02 and technique sheet No. N1-0069-S as identified on shop traveler No. 1005881.
3.
Inspection Findings There were no apparent deviations or unresolved items identified.
7 E.
Exit Interview j
The inspector met with those individuals noted in paragraph A above at the conclusion of the inspection on January 31, 1980.
The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection. Management representatives acknowledged the inspector's cosuments regarding the scope and findings as presented.
i 1
1
. -