ML19309C191
| ML19309C191 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/06/1980 |
| From: | Smith H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Kent S NRC OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS (OCA) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004080284 | |
| Download: ML19309C191 (6) | |
Text
_ - _ -
F6 -fJ T p4Fifo
,,..p.,
.L?]:.. \\ '
. -. 55 l WSMf77Q gp
~ c m m - -m WPd
~
s 5 4 w g,, 4 o p 2.
/
1 i
I i
4.
E
_ku6n
_ hoproval
' I File 4
_ he Roquested For Clearance 1 l Note and Retum
_ Circulate For Correction (Por Conversetson jPrepare Reply
[
_Mment For Your information ISee Me i
investigate
_Minetion Signature I1 1
RDWtKS
. Justify j
OCf t
=
(_ l e t - T o L s r D. '2 0 G, N/><lvJ ar~ f4S%)
\\
\\
% /s.d*+)
.1-Ar "A y 1%I m
^A2 h 2ag cjp, Q_
\\
wpA
\\
Achuun
. pes. k /w.o a%
M m & hed f 1%
a.re.
d DO NOT use this form 4 a RECORD of soprovels c s
\\
cleerences, and similar actions oncurrences, disposals,
\\
FitOM:(Name, org, symbol, Agency / Post)
~
l J4o.--Bldg.
=f,
)ly l Phone No.2.12/9 i
8081-102 DL $ t PG 1979-0 268 -44 7 335, OMIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76) i R MI g 201-l W
\\
i 1
8 004 080 $:
l
i DISTRIBUTION Docket DLZiemann NRC DPR R. Sillbe Local PDR
/
HSmith ORB Reading CJHE1temes, AE00 NRR READING ECase Nhh D
OCa (3)
G. Ertter (ED0-08186)
The Honorable Bob Davis JMullin United States House of VStello Representatives DEisenhut Washington, D. C.
20515 RVollmer BERkow/ Russell
Dear Congressman Davis:
GBrimes TJCarter By letters dated November 4,1979 and January 6,1980 Hs. JoAnn Bier and Ms. Shirley Johns submitted petitions to the NRC with copies to you. For your information I am enclosing an interim response which we have pre-pared for these petitions.
These petitions are being treated under 10 CFR 2.206 of the Comission's regulations as a request for an order to show cause why the operating license for Big Rock Point should not be suspended. We will mle on the request when our evaluation is conplete. Our evaluation of the concerns has progressed to the extent that we have concluded operation of the Big Rock Point facility can be continued safely pending the final disposition of the issues raised in the petition; therefore, innediate or emergency actions are not necessary. Our assessment in support of this conclusion
- s enclosed.
Sincerely.
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Regulation, i
Enclosure:
Safety Assessment I
l l
(3 ' ~ AlP811{
EOCA NRR: DIR l
//
OA g
HRDenton 2/ /80 2/ /80 g
o
\\
- f m
.#2. DOR [itTd138. #2.
. 00 R ;..QRB.. p2...0.El,p..
00
.DIR.
..NRR:. D/ D.I R.
l omcc).
j HSnr DLZiemann Yi tyy
., EG hut EGCase sunsws).RSi er i
oars >!. 2/I)/80
/[/80 2/ik80 2/4/80
/80 2/ /80 l,
uac ronu sie t, re sac, azaa c u.s. coveasucur paiurino orrice,1979-2e>-36,
DISTRIBUTION Docket DLZiemann NRC PDR RSilver EDO Reading HSmith NRR Reading CJHEltemes, AE00 ORB Reading ECAse OELD HDenton OCA (2)
G. Ertter (ED0-08186)
Jilullin The lionorable Carl Levin VStello United States Senate EDisenhut Washington, D. C.
20515 RVollmer Berkow/ Russell
Dear Senator Levin:
BGrimes TJCarter By letters dated Noventer 4,1979 and January 6,1980 Ms. JoAnn Bier and Ms. Shirley Johns submitted petitions to the NRC with copies to you. ' For your information I am enclosing an interim response which we have pre-pared for these petitions.
These petitions are being treated under 10 CFR 2.206 of the Comission's regulations as a request for an order to show cause why the operating license for Big Rock Point should not be suspended. We will rule on the request when our ovaluation is coglete. Our evaluation of the concerns has prtgressed to the extent that we have concluded operation of the Big Rock Point facility can.be continued safely pending the final disposition of the issues raised in the petition; therefore,1 mediate or emergency actions are not necessary. Our assessment in support of this conclusion it enclosed.
Sincerely.
Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Assessment I
a M
N Sb E0CA NRR: D/DIR f.Vol.4pM HRDenton 2/ /80 2/ /80
" []
ornicc).00
..#2.
DOR!
R.#2.
00R:. QRB..#2.
.0 ELD.MR.
. h
.DIR.
.NRR:. 0/DIR.
0 u t.
.EGCase -
. f(.Q(30.,
suaNaMe). RS
.H
.DLZiemann.
Oarc k 2/.Q89.
2{,,/,80 2/ff80, 2p(./
,Q/[.,/80
.2/ 180 N2C PORM 310 (9 76) NRCM 0240 D U.S.GOVcRNMcNT PRINTING OFFICE: 1979-289-369
DISTRIBUTION Docket RSilver NRC PDR HSmith EDO Reading CJHEltemes, AE05 NRR READING ECAse ORB READING HDenton OELD OCA(3)
G.Ertter(E00-08186)
JMullin The Honorable Donald Reigle VStello United States Senate EEisenhet Washington, D. C.
20515 o
r
Dear Senator Reigle:
TJCarter DLZiemann By letters dated Noverber 4,1979 and January 6,1980 Ms. JoAnn Bier and fis. Shirley Johns submitted petitions to the NRC with copies to you. For your information, I am enclosing an interim response which we have pre-pared for these petitions.
These petitions are being treated under 10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission's regulations as a request for an order to show cause why the operating license for Sig Rock Point should not be s'uspended. We will rule on the request when cor evaluation is conplete. Our evaluation of the concerns has progressed to the extent that we have concluded operation of the Big Rock Point facility can be continued safely pending the final disposition of the issues raised in the petition; therefore, fannediate or emergency actions are not necessary. Our assessment in support of this conclusion is enclosed.
Sincerely, Harold R. Denton, Directior Office of Nuclear Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Assessment 0CA NRR: DIR
,g g.
, g'
/
HRDenton tiYllft W/' 2/ /C0 2/ /80 W(
. DOR 4h"Rh.#2 00k:.0.RBJ2 DOR:
DIR NRR: D/DIR i
.[,OELD.,,
orrice).D 12.
HSmf.
-].."
.0Eibhffut,
.EQase.
th DLZiemann suaNaut).RS cc oarc >.2/.C'80 2/[3/80 2(.lf'80 2/gg0
,/80 2/ /80 NOC FORM 318 (9 76) N ACM 0240 DU.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1979 289 369
DISTRIBUTION Docket RSilver NRC PDR HSmith EDO Reading CHJeltemes, AE00 NRR Reading ECase ORBS Reading HDenton OELD OCA (3)
G.Ertter(ED0-08186)
JMullin VStello The Honorable Mitch Invin United States Senate Desienhut Washington, D. C.
20515 RVollmer BGrimes TJCarter
Dear Senator Irwin:
DLZiemann By letters dated Noventer 4,1979 and January 6,1980 Ms. JoAnn Bier and Ms. Shirley Johns submitted petitions to the NRC with copies to you. For your information, I am enclosing-an interim response which we have pre-pared for these petitions.
These petitions are being treated under 10 CFR 2.206 of the Comission's regulations as a request for an order to show cause why the operating license for Big Rock Point should not be suspended. We will~ rule on the request when our evaluation is complete. Our evaluation of the concerns has progressed to the extent that we have concluded operation of the Big Rock Point facility can be continued safely pending the final disposition of the issues raised in the petition; therefore, imediate or emergency actions are not necessary. Our assessment in support of this conclusion is enclosed.
Sincerely, Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Assessment 2e
- MfEf OCA NRR: DIR
^#N 2/ /80 2 o (/n B #2 DOR:p 72 DOR: URS #2 Ut.LU 00 A/DIR NRR: D/DIR OFFICE h, D ' M,,
. DE..
ut.
.Gcase.
,A Q,,.
suRNwE).RS.
.0Lziemann..
. r...cq.
oarE >;. 2/1780 2[,J/80 2/)3/80 2p(/80..
M./80 2/... /.80 NEC FORM 388 (9 76) NRCM J240 D U.S. GOVERNMCNT PRINTING OFFICE 1979 289 369
DISTRIBUTION Docket HSmith NRC 'PDR CJHeltemes, AE$
i ED0 Reading ECase i
NRR Reading HDenton ORB Reading Berkow/ Russell' OELD OCA (3)
G. Ertter (ED0-08136)
JMullin VStello' The Honorable Charles Varnum DEisenhut Michigan House of Representatives RVollmer Lansing, Michigan 48913 BGrimes TJCarter
Dear Mr. Varnum:
DLZiemann RSilver
_ By letters dated November 4,1979 and January 6,1980 Ms. JoAnn Bier and Ms. Shirley Johns submitted petitions to the NRC with copies to you. For your infornation, I am enclosing an interim response which we have pre-pared for these petitions.
These petitions are being treated under 10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission's regulations as a request for an order to show cause why the operating license for Big Rock Point should not be suspended. We will rule on the request when our evaluation is complete. Our evaluation of the concerns has progressed to the extent that we have concluded operation of the Big Rock Point facility can be continued safely pending the final disposition of the issues raised in the petition; therefore, irmnediate or emergency actions are not necessary. Our assessment in support of this conclusion is enclosed.
Sincerely, Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Replation
Enclosure:
Safety Assessment i
M u'OCA NRR: DIR HRDenton dg yf 2/ /80 n 2/ /80 y' f g
l or,,cE ) D B#0 00R: ORB #2 DOR: 0'RB #2
[d, fjl,/
OELD D0 6 /DIR NRR: D/DIR tk 0LZiemann h
nEi e Mt..
ECase RS e.: cc H
$URNAME 04rek.2/lV/80
{2/.J8.0..
2/}N/80
,2/p/80
. %/80 2/ /00 NAC PORM lla p-%$ NRCM J240 U u.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OF FICE: 1979-289 369
^
l