ML19309B241

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Info Re Util 800222 Survey of Files of Intervenor, City of Roseville,Ca.Survey Was Done to Verify Document Discovery Re Comprehensive Performance of Ncpa.Omissions Discovered
ML19309B241
Person / Time
Site: 05000564
Issue date: 02/29/1980
From: Meiss R
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Adragna J
SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID
References
PROJECT-564M NUDOCS 8004030317
Download: ML19309B241 (2)


Text

__

P.A.C I F I C GAS AND ELECTR,IC C O M PANY 26W3 77 sEALE STREtt. 3 t$f FLOOR. SAN FR AN CISCO, C ALIFO R NI A 941:6 (415) 781 4211 waLcoLu

.pua. usa

...,.,.,..,y,;.......

,g...,,=..=.,.7,,

...................,..m g.,,....;g,

gg,;.,.g.,,,,

n n.. ::::::

a.

.,a-u.,e-

igg g.
.;.:...;.,,,,,j:. :y. i!.:.:

.................. m a-..u..,,

.::::v=::~-

. :::.::::u.-

-.w

.....~.....

. :.:.u -

-. ~......,.

=:.. ::: -
=: ::=n a.-~.

.....~

c:.u ::.....

=:..::--

..,-u.

u.-. w.......

3Hr.cgi:c:

my;ny.E
."

.~.s........u.

~..u.......~

.v:=::. ::.....

February 29, 1980

.::1.1::~.....

-..........a

.:~.',.=.:n..

c....'::n......

72.,.....,

John Michael Adragna 01

.h

. 'd.

Spiegel and McDiarmid 4\\

2600 Virginia Avenue NW COCKET" Washington, DC 20037 t.'e..Z..,

..r Re:

Pacific Gas and Electric Company C

MAR 31980 > O Stanislaus Nuclear Project Unit #1 C"

C::!c3 f th Srnbri NRC Docket No. P-564 A c: M i:: & tr.ic: ; ',

Er:W1 A "'

pj.y3A '.

&.,,Qg /

'N

Dear Mr. Adragna:

On February 22, 1980, representatives of PGandE surveyed the files of intervenor City of Roseville.

As you will recall, the purpose of this survey was to verify that the document discovery that the NCPA performed on its own is as comprehensive as the discovery that PGandE would have performed pursuant to the so-called " green dot" process.

In Roseville we surveyed the files of the City Clerk, which you represented contained the bulk of the files relating to Roseville's electric business.

The survey itself consisted of two parts.

Part one was a close reading of the files that you and your associates had reviewed fc. documents responsive to our document request.

The second par

-f the survey was a review of the files that you and your assocs..ces determined contained no relevant material.

As you know, we discovered some omissions from discovery.

I expressed our concern to you that the omitted documents seemed to fall into certain categories.

Among these categories are the following:

.p 4

I b

^

s '.

/

V l

}

I l

i 8004030 8

. - - -