ML19309B006

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments Recent A6 Accident,Published in 800212 Seattle Times.Accident Does Not Increase Risk of Crash at Facility Site Due to Military Nature of A6
ML19309B006
Person / Time
Site: Skagit
Issue date: 03/18/1980
From: Read J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Black R
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
Shared Package
ML19309A999 List:
References
NUDOCS 8004020474
Download: ML19309B006 (1)


Text

o 1

O

  1. p ** "8 coq'o, t

UNITED STATES

[

,.,,g',(

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION gg' t

WASHINGTON D. C. 20555 g

D 4

a j

MAR 1 8 ESO MEMORANDUM FOR:

ichard Black, Attorney, OELD THRU:

Hans Schierling, Acting Section Leader, AAB, DSE,,

FROM:

Jac Read, AAB, DSE

SUBJECT:

RECENT A6 ACCIDENT The Seattle Times article of February 12, 1980, is substantially correct, with only minor misleading p61nts. The quote "the accident reports are classified," for example, is not quite true. The loss of a multi-million dollar item is investigated to fix blame, and just as in civilian accidents the detailed reports are not released during this long process. The status of aircraft losses and acquisition are reported in the aviation trade liter-ature, and I was generally aware of the A6 crashes prior to reading the article.

The occurrence of strings of A6 losses is not unusual.

From December 1969, through March 1970, for example, six A6's were lost.

Carrier launch and recovery is several hundred times more hazardous than land-based operation, and the deployment of aircraft from U. S. training bases to combat readiness at sea greatly affects their loss rate.

Both the current, 1979-80, and the 1969-70 series of crashes noted above were dominated by carrier-based losses.

As noted in riur recent telephone conversation, the A6 is the only U. S. war plane which kas the range to reach Tehran from a deep-water carrier launch.

Since Novemb9r of 1979 the proportion of A6's deployed to the fleet has undoubtedly increased. This is the most obvious explanation of the recent A6 crashes, and does not, in my opinion, increase the risk of aircraft crash at the Skagit site.

The crash of October 10, 1978, on the Olympic Peninsula, which is listed in the Seattle Times article, is not classified as an in-flight accident by the Naval Safety Center, and hence is not a low-level training route accident.

,9 s g(

.a

N Jac R ad Accident Analysis Branch Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis s 0 04 0 20V71