ML19309A751

Environ Assessment & Responses to NRC Questions: Transportation of Reactor Pressure Vessel.

ML19309A751
Person / Time
Site:	Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date:	03/31/1980
From:	DAMES & MOORE
To:
Shared Package
ML19309A748	List: ML19309A747 ML19309A751
References
4490-057-12, 4490-57-12, NUDOCS 8004010250
Download: ML19309A751 (70)

Text

. - _ . -

REPORT ENVIRGNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSES TO NRC QUESTIONS

,1 TRANSPORTATION OF THE REACIOR PRESSURE VESSEL (RPV)

ALLENS CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION FOR HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY e

l 6 .

1 I 1

I i

1

• 1 Prepared By J DAMES & MOORE 4490-057-12 MARCH 1980 goo @l0950 l

_ . _ . . . . .- _. . . - . . . - - - . - -. - - - - - - -- - ---1

. REPORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND RESPONSES TO FRC QUESTIONS TRANSPORTATION OF THE REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL (RPV)

. ALLENS CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION FOR HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 I NT ROD U CT I ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1.1 PU R PO S E O F RE P0 RT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I

1.2 DESCRIPTION

OF PROJECT ELEMENTS..............- .......... I 1.3

SUMMARY

OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS...................... 2 2.0 BARGE OFFLOADING FACILITY..................................... 4 2.1 S IT E D E SC RI P T I ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2.2 BARGE SLIP CONSTRUCTION.................................. 6 2.3 0 F FLOADING PRO CED UR ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

+

2.4 DECOMMISSIONING.......................................... 10 2.5 IMPA CT EV ALU AT I ON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.0 OVERLAND R0UTE................................................ 15

3.1 DESCRIPTION

.............................................. 15

, 3.2 VARNE R CRE EK BRI DGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.2.1 Baseline Conditions............................... 16 3.2.2 Construction of Crossing.......................... 17 3.2.3 Impa c t Eva l ua t io n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.3 EVALUATION OF IMPACTS ALONG R0UTE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.0 A LT E RN AT I V E S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.1 BR AZOS RIV ER-EAST C0LUMBI A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4.2 BRAZOS RIVER-WALLIS...................................... 22 4.3 COLORADO RIVER........................................... 23 4.4 S AN B E RN A RD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

. 4.5

SUMMARY

.................................................. 26

. 5.0 PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND AGENCY C0NTAcrS....................... 27 5.1 A GEN CY C0 N TA CT S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 5.2 PE RM IT REQU IR EMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.0 NRC QUESTIONS AND RESP 0NSES................................... 30 L IT ER (TU RE C IT ED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3b

.s,..... ......5,~.._.._--.._.~~._... _ , . - - . . . . . . . . . .

LIST OF FIGURES

~

Alte rna tive RPV Transpo rtation Routes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 1 Proposed Barge Of floading Facility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 1 A ,

Proposed Ove rland Route - RPV Trans po rt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure IB Proposed Barge Of floading Facility and Vegetation Map. . . .. .. .. .. Figure 2 Bathymetric Profiles - Barge Offloading Facility................ Figure 3 Cons truction De tails - Barge Of floading Facility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figure 4 Varne r C r e ek Bypa s s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F igur e 5 Cons truction Details - Va rner Creek Bypa s s. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Figuce 6 Construction Schedule, Barge Offloading Facility and ,

Va rne r C re ek Bypa s s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Figu r e 7 Permitting Schedule, RPV Transport.............................. Figure 8 ,

O e

i 1

e W

, , . . , - . . . -- .. . ~. . ..

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PURPOSE OF REPORT

, This report was prepared in response to questions submitted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regarding potential environmental

. impacts associated with transporting of the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) from the San Bernard River to the Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station (ACNCS) site. Baseline descriptions of the proposed barge slip and over-land route were developed from literature supplemented by site surveys.

A sepa rate section has been devoted to an evaluation of alternative routes. The questions that served as the basis for this report are addressed in Chapter 6.0. Responses, for the most part, are contained in the text of the report; refarence to the location of responses can be found in Chapter 6.0.

1. 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ELEMENTS The RPV will be assembled at a construction yard in another state and transported via barge to the Freeport, Texas area, and hence up the San Bernard River to the proposed barge slip. The elements of this report are limited to the offloading site and overland transport to the ACNGS site.

The RPV will be mounted and shipped on a lifting and upending rig.

The total weight when mounted on the overland trailer will be approxi-mately 1,190 tons. The vessel head, with attached rip, will weigh about

, 105 tons; and, although it will be shipped on the barge, it will be transported to ACNGS on a lowboy, separate from the RPV.

The RPV-has a diameter of 22 feet; a vertical clearance of approxi-mately 30 feet will be required when mounted on the barge. The barge will draft about 8 feet when loaded. When the RPV and rig are mounted on ,

the overland transporter, a vertical clearance of 30 to 35 feet will be required during land travel, depending on the trailer selected. -

The offloading area will be located at River Mile 26 of the San Bernard River in Brazoria . County. The San Bernard River channel is ,

maintained by the Corps of Engineers up to River Mile 26. A barge slip will be excavated into an area of about 3.5 acres in an 8-acre strip of .

land situated between the river and Farm-to-Market Road (FM) 522. The RPV will be loaded onto two multi-tired pneumatic trailers, arranged in series, for transport to the ACNGS site.

Alternative RPV transportation routes are presented on Figure 1.

The proposed location for the offloading site and the route selected for overland transport are shown in more detail on Figures IA and IB, respectively.

1.3

SUMMARY

OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The proposed site for offloading the RPV and overland route were selected initially on the basis of technical feasibility and economic considerations. Environmental issues were also evaluated and no significant diffet s detected. -

The three river route alternatives, including the selected route

• on the San Bernard River, are located at the end of navigation projects.

The viable alternatives that were evaluated to allow selection of the preferred route each included river transport along only those stretches of the river (s) normally maintained by the Corps. The only ,

significant environmental impacts would be associated primarily with dredging required at each of the barge offloading sites. Therefore, a .

comparison of feasible alternatives indicates no substantive c*.* ?ference ,

in environmental issues between the routes evaluated.

Overland travel to the ACNGS site will require constructing a a

bypass at the Varner Creek bridge along Highway 36. Traffic impacts have been miminized by selecting a route that goes through as few towns as possible.

G e

O e

D 9

4 b

f I

e

.O 9

1 t

e lf I l

l'

.__ ....m.__ .._z.____ ...._m.. -, ._ .._ _ .- , .

2. 0 BARGE OFFLOADING FACILITY 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION The proposed barge offloading facility will he locateo on the -

east bank of the San Bernard River on an 8-acre tract between the river and FM 522 in Brazoria County, Texas (Figures 1A and 2). The site is in -

a fluvial woodland vegetative community within the Gulf Prairies and Marshes Land Resources Area of Texas. Three major land use categories occupy approximately 84 percent of the land surface in Brazoria County (total acreage approximately 962,000 acres); agricultural, rangeland/ tame pasture, and woodlands. The fluvial woodlands constitute approximately 173,200 acres, or 18 percent of the land area (Soil Conservation Service, 1979). They are characterized by water-tolerant hardwoods such as pecan, ,

hickory, hackberry, elm, and several oak species (McGowen, et al. ,1976).

Several houses and two mobile homes are located adjacent to FM 522 just north of the site. Several other houses have been constructed along the east bank of the San Bernard River southeast of the site. The town of Sweeny lies approximately 2.75 miles southwest of the site, while West Columbia is just over 3 miles northeast of the site.

The proposed barge slip will be constructed on soils classified as Asa silty clay loam. This soil type covers approximately 3.8 percent of the soil resources of Brazoria County. This is a nonraline, loamy soil on nearly level topography, or floodplains, and supports a native vege-tation of hardwoods. The soil has a high potential for cropland; but, due to its position on the floodplain, flooding can restrict the cropland .

potential of this soil (Soil Conservation Service, 1979). ,

t A site survey was conducted in February 1980 to characterize the ,

vegetation of the site. The proposed site is characteristic of the

( fluvial woodlands. The presence of pecan trees (Cuya illinoensis) l i

h indicates the site may have been a pecan grove at one time. This

• assumption is based on the regular spacing among trees.

Diversity increases toward the rivarbank, where beech (Fagus

. grandifolia), dogwood (Cornus florida), yaupon (Ilex vomitoria), beauty-berry (Callicarpa Americana), and especially palmetto (Sabal minor)

. become more common. The riverbanks are densely populated with trees, predominately sycamore (Plantaus occidentalis). Greenbriar (Smilax sp.)

and vines are common along the bank and in the upland area. The herb layer is sparsely populated with one or two species of grass. Wild garlic (Allium sp.) is common, especially in sandier areas.

The propoad site is characterized by varying topographic relief, featuring a central ridge with several associated shallow depressions (Figure 2). Palmetto occurs throughout the site but is more common in the depressions. Two shallow depres sions , with occasional standing water, are located on the property. Both appear to have been developed f rom man's activities and are dominated with sedges (Cyperus sp.) around the margins. The larger depression also is colonized by a stand of water parsley (Sium sp.).

Water in the smaller depression drains via a small channel into the larger depression, which in turn drains into the San Bernard River.

Drainage is through a ditch approximately 10 feet deep that ap pears to have been excavated recently. Other portions of the uplands have been cleared and partially graded w'. thin the past year.

. The area has a good potential to support a woodland type of wildlife habitat, such as deer, squir rel, turkey, armadillo, rabbit and raccoon.

3 No wildlife species or signs were observed during the February 1980 site

, survey. Because of the narrow shape and proximity of the site to FM 522, it is doubtful wildlife utilize the site to its f ullest potential.

l 1

...# _ _. . e _ __ _. . . _._ ._. a _.._.... ..._ ._.__ .. . .

The San Bernard River is a Corps of Engineers project and is dredged periodically. The Corps maintains the channel to a location immediately upstream of the barge slip location. Therefore, no dredging in addition to that directly at the barge slip will be required.

There is a paucity of fisheries data on the San Bernard River (Colby, 1979; Wilson and Ball, 1979, personal communications). There-

• fore, the potential of spawning or nursery grounds occurring within the proposed barge site cannot be assessed precisely. Some sport fishing may occur because of an unimproved boat launch on the southwest side of the FM 522 bridge. Sport fish most likely to occur in the area include catfish, sunfish, white bass and crappie. Gar and bowfin, generally considered rough fish, also could occur in the area.

A cultural resourcos survey of the site was conducted on November 20 and 21, 1979. No cultural resources were detected during the course of ,

the survey. One site in the area (the Sweeny Plantation) has been nominated for inclusion in the National Rt ;ister of Historic Places.

This site, however, is located on the west bank of the San Bernard River and will not be affected by the proposed project (Texas Archeological Survey, 1979).

2.2 BARGE SLIP CONSTRUCTION The proposed offloading facility will be a temporary f acility to dock and offload the RPV from the barge. The facility will consist of a barge slip, a work area, a storage area for excavated materials, and an access road (Figure 2). It will be constructed prior to arrival of tne -

barge, and will be removed and the land area restored af ter offloadinF 18 -

completed. -

Construction of the offloading facility will begin at least seven months prior to the scheduled date for equipment delivery at the plant

site. .lt will begin first by clearing and grubbing the approximately 3.5 e acres required for the facility.

Construction of the slip will in'. olve the excavation and dredging

, of approximately 15,000 cubic yards of clay and silty sand. The bulk of this excavation will take place in the " dry" behind the existing river-

. bank, which will be left temporarily as a construction dike. A backhoe, clamshell, dragline and suction dredge will be used at the contractor's option for this phase of the excavation. After excavation of the inland portion of the slip has been completed, the construction dike will be removed using a clamshell and possibly a suction dredge. A minor amount :

of dredging of the riverbed will also be required to connect the barge slip with the river channel. This will be accomplished using a clamshell and/or suction dredge working continuously to minimize the duration of

~

increased turbidity levels in the water.

The San Bernard River is a Corps of Engineers navigation project to a point just upstream from the proposed barge location. The channel is maintained at a depth of 9 feet for a width of 100 feet. The natural channel slopes to the dredged channel from the bank (Figure 3).

• lt is presently planned for all excavated materials to be stored at the site adjacent to the barge slip. Dry materials excavated from above the water table will be used to form the walls of sediment ponds, which in turn will be used for storage of all saturated materials. Water removed from the slip area during con's truction or restoration will not be allowed to flow directly into the river, but will be pumped into a

, sediment pond. This sediment pond, incorporating an appropriate wier structure, will be used to achieve removal of most suspended solids.

It is planned that the sidewalls, endwalls, and the bottom of the slip will be lined with riprap aggregate to provide erosion protection.

Wall riprap will probably consist of stones placed over eitbre A pisstic

. . . . _ . . - . . . _ _ - _ _ . . . _ _ . ~ . . _ _ . . _ . . _ . _ - . . . . . _ . . _ . . _ . - .

filter sheet (designed for crosion control) or a 6-inch filter blanket of well graded gravel. Aggregate for the slip bottom will consist of approximately 12 inches of pea gravel ranging in size from 1/2-inch to 3/4-inch in diameter (Figure 4).

The woc area adjacent to the slip will have a surface of approxi-mately 12 inches of compacted gravel. It will be sloped slightly toward

• the barge slip for drainage purposes.

During the construction and operation of the facility, all con-tractors working on the site will be required to take precautionary measures to prevent any spilling of oil or other petroleum distilates.

Appropriate materials for cleaning up spills will be required to be stored at the site for immediate use should a spill occur. ,

Electrical service will be provided to the offloading site from ,

existing transmission circuits along FM 522. Power is presently avail-able to meet the expected needs of the barge f acility construction and operation. Several poles will be set within the site but will be removed during restoration operations.

2.3 0FFLOADING PROCEDURES Once the barge has been properly docked (stern end inland) and secured in the slip, the attached river tugs will be released. Ballast will then be added to the barge tanks allowing the barge to sink until it rests on the bottom of the slip. In order to provide the support and stability required during the offloading procedure, additional ballast

• l will be added until the barge tanks have been filled. After the ballast- .

ing operations have been completed, select gravel backfill will be '

compacted around the stern of the barge to provide a stable offloading .

ramp between the barge deck and the access road (Figure 4). Backfill material for the compacted ramp will consist of a well graded, aggregate material with no more than 5 percent fines (material passing through a

. 200 sieve). At the offloading contractor's option, a side access ramp may be constructed near the bow of the barge to connect the work area with the barge deck.

The major components to be offloaded include the RPV and the reactor

. vessel closure head. Other ancillary equipment may also be offloaded.

Lowboy trailers will be used to transport the reactor vessel closure head and other smaller pieces of equipment from the barge overland to the plant site. Two methods are being considered for offloading the head onto the lowboy. The first involves raising the head with hydraulic jacks and lowering it onto the lowboy after the lowboy has been posi-tioned under the head. The second entails using a large mobile crane to lift the head from the barge deck onto the lowboy. Offloading time and equipment availability will be major considerations in selecting the method to be used.

The RPV will be removed from the barge to the plant site on two multi-tired pneumatic trailers--one located under each end of the vessel.

It is planned that the RPV will be raised above the barge deck to a suf ficient height to allow the trailers to be driven under the load. The load will then be lowered onto the trailers which will subsequently be driven off the barge and overland to the site. In all probability, the method used for raising the RPV will involve the use of a large hydraulic jacking system. The particular system will be selected at a later date.

All work will be performed in compliance with the requirements of

, the ANSI N45.2.15 (proposed) and industrial safety requirements of the State of Texas.

Approximately 10 working days will be required to offload the vessel from the barge, and an additional 3 working days will be required -

for dismantling the rigging equipment and cleaning up.

) Another alternative being considered would involve the RPV being .

shipped on the barge already loaded on the trailers. This would elimi-nate the need for the large hydraulic jacking system, and would reduce ,

the required offloading time by several days.

Af ter the barge has been completely offloaded and cleanup operations involving the barge deck are finished, the aggregate ramps will be excavated using a backhoe, clamshell, or drag line, as required to release the barge. The barge will then be deballasted and removed from the barge slip by river tugs. The inside surface of the barge tanks will be painted with a primer and finish coats totaling 6 mils thickness. The surface will be a clean, smooth, dry, glossy finish. Any water taken on or discharged as ballast will be San Bernard River water. There will be no contamination during deballasting operations.

• 2.4 DECOMMISSIONING

• Restoration of the facility will commence within a few weeks af ter

• the equipment has been offloaded from the barge. It will be completed within three months after that date. "

The facility will be removed (including riprap aggregate four feet below the ordinary high water line), and the original bank restored.

This will be accomplished by first constructing a dike across the mouth .

of the slip using the stored excavation materials. Subsequently, the riprap on the walls of the ' barge slip vill be removed and the slip will .

be filled with the remaining stored excavation materials. Any water ,

removed by dewatering operations or water trapped behind the dike will not be allowed to flow directly into the river.

i I

1

The land area behind the bank will be compacted and graded to preexisting contours to the extent practicable, except that the access road or a portion of it may be left in place as a permanent improvement to the site. The land probably will be sold once the site has been

. reclaimed.

. 2.5 IMPACT EVALUATION The southern bald eagle (Haliaeetus I leucocephalus) and Arctic peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus tundrius) are two bird species listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that could occur at the proposed barge site. The American alligator (Alligator mississipiensis), a reptile, also could occur in the area. (Federal Register, January 17, 1979) During the site survey in February 1980, there were no sitings of the three listed species. No eagle nests were observed in the vicinity of the site. There was no indication of alligators on the 8-acre site.

Texas has an additional list of threatened (protected) nongame species) which lists two species that could probably occur and one species that could possibly occur in Brazoria County (Potter, 1980, personal communication). These include:

1. Louisiana Milk Snake (Lampropelti triangulum amaura)

2. Blue Sucker (Cycleptus elongatus)

3. River Darter (Hadropterus shumardi)

The project should not have any impact on species of threatened

, or endangered status from the federal list. There are no confirmed catches or sightings of the three state-lieted species for the site

. area. Therefore, it is anticipated the project would not have an impact on these species.

Construction of the barge offloading site will be initiated by clearing and grubbing approximately 3.5 acres of the 8-acre tract of

land. This clearing will accommodate the barge slip, access road, and dredge material stock piling area. Impacts to the vegetation from these activit!.es will be limited to removal of a few trees and palmettos.

The project will impact the Asa silty c}ay loam, which is classified -

as a prime farmland soil (Grenwelge, 1980, personal communication).

This soil comprises approximately 3.8 percent of the surface soil -

resources in Brazoria County (Soil Conservation Service,1979). The site is not currently used for agricultural production, and does not appear to have been used for agriculture. In any case, the 3.5-ac re area to be disturbed represents less than 0.01 percent of the Asa soil in Brazoria County.

A manmade depression and associated wetland occurs in the area that will be excavated for the of floading ramp. While this depression could contain water, it is not considered a natural wetland resource. Only a ,

small portion of the depression will be af fected.

The proposed barge slip site is located adjacent to the San Bernard River. The elevations on the site vary from approximately sea level (Elevation 0.0) at the water's surface to about Elevation 20 on the uppermost part of the proposed access road. The river at the site receives some minor tidal ef fects, and the ordinary high water is esti-mated at Elevation 0.0.

The construction of the barge slip and res to rat ion of this area i will cause a temporary localized increase in the turbidity of the San Bernard River at this loca tion. Some turbidity will occur during -

j dredging at the entrance of the barge slip, to a lesser degree during .

! construction of the slip, and later when the slip is restored by the

• replacement of fill soils. At the time of initial excavation, the .

duration of increased turbidity will be minimized by maintaining a dike at the riverbank, between onland excavation and the river. Increased turbidity in the river would only occur during the latter stages of excavation when the dike is removed and the channel is dredged between the barge slip and the ri"er channel.

+ Soils excavated for the ramp and barge slip will be stockpiled onsite for subsequent use in restoring the barge slip area. A sedimen-tation pond (identified on Figure 2 as " excavation material s to rage")

will be constructed to collect and retain runoff from saturated mate-rials. Saturated soils depcaited in the sedimentation pond will be allowed to evaporate and drsin. After sedimentation, surface water will be decanted and discharged over a weir to a lined ditch draining to the San Bernard River.

Because the excavated or dredged soils will be stockpiled for several months, the slopes will be seeded with grasses for stabilization as necessary to minimize the af fects of wind and water erosion. These measures, combined with the retention of water until significant sedimen-tation has occurred, will minimize the impacts associated with disposal of dredge material onsite.

After removal of the dike to complete excavation of the barge slip, some minor turbidity may also result from the final placement of riprap along the bottom of the barge slip and around the barge. As construction plans have yet to be finalized, however, it is possible that most of this riprap would be placed before the dike is excavated.

Some increased turbidity in the river will also occur during

- restoration of the barge slip; the impacts will be minimized, however,

, due to the methods of construction that are proposed. First, an earthen a dike will be placed between the tiver edge and the barge slip area.

. Prior to backfilling behind the dike, it will probably be necessary to dewater this area. This water would be conveyed to the sedimentation pond to allow most suspended solids to settle before discharging over the weir to the river. Only minor amounts of sediment are anticipated to reach the river. The area behind the dike would then be backfilled with soils stored onsite since excavation. No increased turbidity in the river would result from this operation.

As described above, the increases in river turbidity will be -

localized, short-term effects, and probably visible only for a sho rt distance downstream. No prolonged adverse effects are expected on -

downstream users of the San Bernard River.

The removal of soil from the barge slip area will not include selected segregation of soils by type. The soils, which are basically clay or sandy clay, will thus be mixed when used to backfill the barge slip. This change in in situ soils would probably not af fect the ground water recharge capabilities of the small barge slip area.

The site lies within the 100 year floodplain. However, it is not anticipated that the diked area for excavated soil sto rage will significantly af fect the higher magnitude flows (e.g., 100 year, 50 year floods) to an extent where the increase in flood levels before and af ter the dike can be quantified.

The area to be excavated for the barge slip is a zone of deposition.

Consequently, the combinat ion of deposited materials and reduced river current could make this a desirable habitat for spawning some fish and nursery for other juvenile fishes. A small portion of this habitat would be temporarily removed by dredging the barge channel to the existing navigation channel. The length of river directly af fected is expected to be about 200 to 300 feet on one side, or less than 0.10 percent of the .

estimated 50 to 75 miles of similar habitat. When compared to the total ,

habitat of the San Bernard River, the impact is considered insignificant. .

The area should rehabilitate naturally within 3 to 5 years af ter abandon- ,

ment.

. . . . . . . - . . .:, .. .. z .. ~ . _ . . - - . .z. ..

Based on the cultural resources survey, the project would not impact known archeological or historical sites. There would be no impact on the Sweeny Plantation because it is located on the west bank of the San Bernard River, several hundred yards away from the proposed project.

e G

9 4

1 e

e t

o O

4 e

l l

C 3.0 OVERLAND ROUTE

3.1 DESCRIPTION

The reactor pressure vessel (RPV) will be removed from the barge to ,

the plant site on two multi-tired pneumatic trailers, arranged in series, and two prime movers, one pushing and the other pulling the two trailers. ,

Af ter *.he reactor is loaded onto the transporter and hauled up the acces~s road ao FM 522, it will be transported approximately 52 miles over existing paved roads to the plant site. The maximum transporter speed will be approximately 3 miles per hour, and it is estimated that this overland journey will take approximately 12 to 15 working days. It is anticipated that travel will occur only during the daylight hours, except possibly on portions of the route which contain only few obstructions (i.e., culverts, overhead lines, branches, etc.). Rest stops will be planned at 10- to 15-mile intervals.

Delays in excess of one day may occur at a rest stop to allow for -

construction, or clearing of obs tacles. Rest stops will consist of a widened shoulder, private or public road, or other suitable place where -

the loaded transporter can be stored without obstructing traf fic. Eve ry attempt will be made to utilize existing sites which would requ're little .

or no upgrading for this purpose, but it is anticipated that several of the rest stop sites may have tc, be constructed. Appropriate traffic -

control devices (lights, flares, etc.) and personnel will be maintained during the overnight stops.

Traf fic control for the overland movement will be handled by each ,

of the affected county sherif f's departments working in conjunction with the Texas Department of Highways and ?ublic Transportation. Traffic ,

will . be detoured around the loaded trans porter using other state and county roads as detours. Over most of the route there are several

, good roads _ available for detouring light vehicles. Detour routes for i

heavier vehicles, i.e., semi-tractor trailers, will in some cases be

. longer, but will not be unreasonable in length. All detours will be clearly marked along the full length of the detour, and traf fic control personnel will be stationed as required at strategic points to effect proper use of the detours.

Contact has been made with highway officials concerning travel on state and county highways. Formal application for permits will be submitted approximately 8 months p.*io r to the scheduled date for PJ'V delivery at the plant site. Plans for traffic control will also be submitted at this time. All af fected county, city, and state officials will be contacted prior to the formal generation of these plans to determine their requirements and recommendations.

Traversing the overland portion of the route will involve crossing a numbe r of creeks. Most of the bridges or culverts which presently span these creeks can be matted and/or shored and ustd to support the loaded trans porte r. However, the concrete bridge on State Highway 36 which crosses Varner Creek cannot be satisfactorily shored and conse-quently must be bypassed. This will require the construction of a short, temporary bypass road and culvert beside the existing bridge.

3.2 VARNER CREEK BRIDGE 3.2.1 Baseline Conditions Transportation along Highway 36 will require bypassing the bridge that crosses Varner Creek north of West Columbia (see Figure 5). This is a small, turbid creek that flows from northwest to southeast, emptying into the Brazos River near West Cclumbia.

Varner Creek is surrounded by agricultural (crop and 1,a s ture) land and is characterized by a narrow band of hardwoods (predominately willows (Salix sp.) on both sides of the bridge. A small stand of cattail (Typha sp.) has colonized the creekbed on both sides of the .

bridge. A large live oak tree (Quercus virginiana) occurs approximately 25 feet f rom the road downstream of the bridge. The fill of the bridge approaches has been stabilized with grass by the highway department. ,

l Wildlife in the Varner Creek area should consist primarily of ,

small mammals, such as rabbit, raccoon, armadillo and assorted rodents.

Amphibians should include the more common frogs and toads, and some salmanders. No threatened or endangered vertebrates are expected in the area, including the American alligator. Because Varner Creek drains into the Brazos River, the fish species should be similar to those found in the Brazos. These include small fishes, such as mosquito fish, top-minnows, sunfish and tidewater silversides. A few larger roughfish, such as shad, carp and gar, could occur in the deeper pools in the creek. No threatened or endangered species of aquatic animals are expected to occur in the Varner Creek drainage area.

3.2.2. Construction of Crossing The bypass road will be constructed by removing undesirable load bearing materials and backfilling with compacted sand and gravel. .

Additional compacted fill will be placed as required for proper vertical aligncent of the bypass road and culvert with the existing roadway -

(Figures 5 and 6).

The culvert will consi< of two 48-inch-diameter, corrugated metal pipes. Prior to their i 2 .lation, the creekbed will be excavated to a ,

depth of approximately two feet and backfilled with a compacted, well graded granular material which will serve as a bedding for the culvert ,

pipes. After the corrugated pipes have been placed on the bedding, additional compacted gravel fill will be placed around and over them (Figure 6).

l l

The corrugated metal pipes are sized to accommodate ordinary creek

. flows. In order to insure that the culvert installation does not overly restrict creek flow during possible periods of high flow, the backfill around and over the pipes will be installed in two phases. The top of the first phase of backfilling will be limited to approximately three feet above the existing streambed. This work will be done at the time of

, the corrugated metal pipe installation. The second phase of the back-filling will take place a few days prior to the time when the bypass is to be used. During this phase, backfill will be added over the streambed as required to complete the bypass road.

Removal of the bypass installation will commence within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> af ter the RPV and transporter have traversed it. The corrugated metal pipes and all backfill above the level of the original streambed will be removed and the creek restored as nearly as is practicable to its original condition. Removal of second phase backfill over the creek area will be completed within a few days af ter the passage of the RPV and

• total restoration of the creek will be completed within two months af ter i that time. During the brief period of time when the second phase back-fill material, i.e., material over three feet above the original stream-bed, is in place , sufficient men and equipment (including 112 hts for a working at night) will be maintained near the bypass site as required to effect the timely removal of backfill from the streambed should high a water conditions arise. Restoration activities will also include seeding of all vegetated areas above the ordinary high water level which have been disturbed during the bypass installation. ,

l l

3.2.3. Impact Evaluation l l

The bypass required at the Verner Creek bridge on Highway 36 will result in a temporary disturbance i f approximately 0.9 acres of land. An additional area of approximately 0.4 acres may be disturbed as work space adjacent to the temporary road bed.

1 Construction of the bypass will require removal of one partly destroyed, live oak tree of considerable size. Two steel culverts will

• be installed at Varner Creek. Some sedimentation will cause a temporary increase in turbidity both during installation and removal of the cul-verts. This should not adversely af fect aqua tic habitat because fish .

will leave the turbid water and benthic organisms should recolonize in a short period. There will be no impact to threatened or endangered .

species.

The bypass will be constructed within an existing highway right-of-way. Fill material will be removed once the RPV has made the bypass.

The disturbed area will be reseeded with grass seeding mixtures utilized by the Highway Department.

3.3 EVALUATION OF IMPACTS ALONG ROUTE Based on a January 1980 visual s.urvey of the proposed overland route, it appears that, except for the Verncr Creek bypass, no trees will have to be removed to transport the RPV. The trimming of some trees will be necessary to provide a vertical clearance of approximately 30 to 35 feet. Trimming of trees, except perhaps very minor trimming, will occur only along the stretch of FM 522 between the of floading facility and State Hwy. 36. Here a number of large branches will have to be cut in order to allow passage of the RPV.

All trimming opera tions will be performed using chainsaws, tree saws, or other appropriate equipment which will ef fect a clean, smooth cut. All cuts will be coated with an appropriate mixture which will .

protect the trees against attack by insects and disease. ,

The methods for handling traf fic detours and coordinating with local ,

and state agencies were delineated in Section 3.1. General impacts associated with the disruption of traf fic will be temporary, and mini-

mized by the controls provided. The most impact on traffic would be i

i i

1

expected at those few locations where the vessel caravan crosses a major traf fic route. The duration of the crossing movement is expected to be appror.imately 10 to 20 minutes. Therefore, no significant impact on traffic movement is expected from the overland transportation of the

- RPV.

The power and telephone companies with service lines crossing the proposed route have indicated that if service lines to more populated areas, such as towns, must be temporarily removed to allow passage of the RPV, service to those areas can be provided by existing alternate circuits. Thus, more populated areas are not expected to experience any interruptions in electric or telephone service. The only users expected to experience service interruptions will be a few isolated residences or businesses in rural areas. These interruptions will be experienced as the transporter moves along its route, and are expected to last between 15 minutes to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. Significant preplanning will take place before transportation of the RPV begins. The movement of the RPV r

will be coordinated with the service companies to minimize service interruption.

Presently, the only railroad crossing which may require modification is the crossing at State Highway 36 and the ACNGS site. Such modifi-cation would consist of placing aggregate fill to provide ramps from Highway 36 up to the railroad, and from the railroad to the construction access road. The ramp fill will be removed af ter passage of the RPV.

The movement of the RPV across the railroad will be coordinated with the railroad company. However, the construction of the ramp fill and the passage of the RPV are not expected to interrupt railroad use.

4 e

4.0. ALTERNATIVES

'The selection of the transportation route for the RPV was performed in 1974 (American/ Marks). Initially, six route co:abinations we re con-sidered. The final route selection process resulted in the evalua tion .

of four routes (see Figure 1), including the selected route. Each of the final four routes requires a combination of water trans po rt to a .

designated officading area and overland transport to the ACNGS site.

The two routes initially rejected were entirely overland f rom Freeport, Texas. Each was eliminated on the basis of technical feasi-bility. One rJute required rail transport from Freeport to the site; however, the roadbed was not in condition to support the load, and vertical clearance was not sufficient to permit passage of the RPV.

Another method would have been to load the RPV onto highway transporters at Freeport and move entirely overland to the ACNGS site. The only facilities that exist for offloading the RPV at Freeport are on the east bank of the Brazos River. Because the ACNGS site is on the west side of the Brazos River, offloading at Freeport would req uire crossing the river. There are no bridges on the Brazos River that would support the locd. Therefore, movement overland (by highway or rail) from Freeport was rejected.

The remaining four routes were evaluated on the basis of: 1) suffi-cient water depth in the rivers; 2) movement upriver to a reasonable offloading site; 3) availability of land for construction of a barge slip; 4) the presence of overhead obstacles on the rivers; 5) minimizing land transport through populated areas; and, 6) limiting the number of .

stream crossings. An evaluation of these routes, and alternative ,

j combinations, is presented in the following sections. Each of these .

routes, including the two utilizing different offloading locations on ,

l the Brazos River, is shown on Figure 1.

4.1. BRAZOS RIVER-EAST COLUMBIA The Brazos River-East Columbia route, would require water transport to the Highway 35 bridge near East Columbia. This route is a Corps of

. Engineers ncvigation project with only two overhead bridges. Clearance beneath the bridges would be sufficient for travel during normal water

+ conditions; however, travel wou1Ld be prohibited under high water condi-tio ns . This route would require dredging a barge slip adjacent to the bridge in a manner similar to the construction currently being planned.

Impacts to water quality and aquatic habitat would be similar to those expected at the selected barga slip site on the San Bernard River.

Overland travel along this route would be approximately 50 miles, requiring movement through East Columbia, as well as the entire town of West Columbia. Numerous overhead obstacles (traffic lights and utility lines) would be encountered. Such traf fic impacts would be more severe than along the proposed overland route.

4.2 BRAZOS RIVER-WALLIS i .

The Brazos River-Wallis route would reduce the number of overland miles from 50 to 9. However, water depths are not as well defined in the Brazos River north of East Columbia (the Corps project ends at East Columbia). Sufficient water depth for the barge would only be available following periods of heavy rains. Under such conditions, however,

problems would then be ancountered with vertical clearances of 13 bridges along the route. The only way to assure sufficient water depth would bc

. to purchase water from upstream rese rvoirs . This approach would have necessitated control of river flows, which may not have been feasible,

. and could result in an inef ficient use cf water resources.

In addition, the Brazos River north of East Columbia contains some bends with small radii; this probably would require dredging to navigate l

some sections of the river. Such dredging would require disposal of the dredged material and would result in additional sediment load during dredging operations.

Construc; ion of a barge slip would be required near Wallis. Impact s are estimated to be similar to those at the selected site. -

Although a significant reduction in the length of the overland route would be achieved by selection of this alterna tive , the obs tacles to be overcome to , assure river transportation result in rejection of this alternative. Additional dredging in the river would probably be .

required, and river flows would have to be controlled.

4.3. COLORADO RIVER

• The Colorado River is a navigation project up to about six miles upstream of the Highway 521 bridge, or about eight miles southwest of Bay City, Texas. The navigation channel terminates in a turning basin at the wooden Celanese dock. Beyond this point, .he river becomes shallow and contains numerous snags, sand bars, and some small dams. Therefore, a barge slip would have to be dredged in the vicinity of the turn.ag basin for of floading on the east side of the river for overland transport. The ef fects of dredging the barge slip would be similar to those associated with the proposed route.

An alternative offloading point exists about one mile downstream of .

the Highway 521 bridge at the South Texas Project site. This offloading ,

dock is located on the west side of the river, however, requiring that .

the RPV be transported east over the river. Existing bridges were found .

to be inadequate.

l l

Impacts associcted with overland travel of 62 miles include more

. severe traffic tie-ups associated with moving through the more populous towns of East Bernard and Wharton, Texas.

Concrete bridges occur at the San Bernard and Middle Bernard hvers.

A bypass would be required at the San Bernard. The bypass would require the clearing of trees as well as installing culverts in the stream bed.

.f ,

Construction of the bypass would result in increased turbidity. Anot,her bypass would be required at the West Bernard River. Both the Middle and West Bernard Rivers have steep slopes, making construction of a bypass extremely dif ficult. A fourth bridge across Peach Creek could not be bypassed. - The bridge would have to be reinforced. The overpass on U.S.

59, north of Wharton, Texas, is another obstacle. The vertical clearance of the overpass is only 16 feet, 9 inches, considerably less than the 30 to 35 feet required by the RPV.

The complications and attendant impacts associated with the overland portion of this route would be far more than those expected on the selected route. The areas af fected are more numerous and the nature of obstacles far more extensive.

4.4 SAN BERNARD

• The San Bernard River route includes two fixed highway bridges and

one swing railroad bridge across the river. Vertical clearance is adequate for passage. Dredging u barge slip on the east bank of the river will be required for of floading the RPV. Impacts associated with this activity for this selected . alternative are described in Section 2.4.

The overl'and distance to the ACNGS site is 52 miles. Overhead obstacles along the route, such as traffic lights and utility lines,

.will have to be moved to permit passage of the RPV. The amount of urban l

i r l l'

L l

i 1

area to be traversed and the number of obstacles are much less than on the other routes - except for the Brazos River-Wallis alternative. -

l i

Since the initial route selection was performed, a dock was constructed by the Phillips Oil Company on the west bank of the San , ,

Bernard River just south of the FM 522 concrete bridge. The overland route would have been the same as the one selected. However, use of the ,

existing facility would have necessitated reinforcing the concrete bridge over the San Berr.ard River. The Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation would not approve such action due to the extent of struc-tural reinforcement required (G. McLelland and John Moorman, personal communication).

An alternate means of using the existing dock on the west ..de of the river was investigated. Instc:d of reinforcing the exiscing FM 522 bridge, a temporary bridge could be constructed je:c downstream of the existing bridge and extend upgrade from just upstream of the Phillips dock across the river to intersect FM 522 just east of the present bridge. This alternative was not chosen because of the many uncer-tainties and complications associated with the possible acquisition of land, and the construction and removal of the bridge. Aquatic and terrestrial impacts of this alternative were not avaluated because the

• proposed methods of construction had not been formulated.

4.5

SUMMARY

Each of the four routes would require dredging a barge slip to offload the RPV. The greatest impacts to the environment would be ,

associated with dredging activities during construction of the barge slip. Such impacts appear to be of equal magnitude regardless of the ,

site selected.

In summary, the San Bernard-overland route was selected as a result of what were judged to be comparative deficiencies in the other routes:

4

1) The Brazos River-East Columbia route was considered less

• desirable because of the need to move through the more populous town of East Columbia. Water depth in the Brazos River is also less stable than in the San Bernard River.

2) The Brazos River-Wallis route would be more susceptible to

. uncontrolled changes in water levels in the river due to the distance traveled. Also, additional dredging in the river would probably be required.

3) Overland travel on the Colorado River route would present many more difficulties as more overhead obstacles exist, populous areas must be trave rsed , and several bridges would have to be bypassed.

4 9

4 s

5.0 PERM 1.T REQUIREMENTS AND AGENCY CONTACTS The following contains a list of permits or certificates that will be required, and agencies that were contacted and may be involved during the course of the project. Figure 7 provides proposed schedules for .

construction and restoration of the barge slip and Varner Creek bypass.

Figure 8 is a schedule for obtaining pe rmits and notifying agencies .

regarding water and overhead movement. The schedules are based on offloading the RPV at the ACNGS site at time "0".

5.1. AGENCY CONTACTS The following is a list of contacts made with various agencies concerning the proposed project.

PERSONNEL CONTACTED:

1. Norman Barbier, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Galveston.

Personal communication, April 26, 1979.

2. Hubert Berry, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Calveston.

Personal communication, April 26, 1979.

3. Mike Colby, Texas A & M University, Wildlife Department.

Personal communication, August 7,1979.

4. Jim Fisher, U.S. Geological Survey, Houston, Texas. Pe rsonal communication, March 12, 1980.

5. Ge rald Grenwelge, Soil Conservation Service, Rosenberg, Texas. Personal communication, March 7, 1980. .

6. Ed Hollis and John Balser, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, .

Galveston, Texas. Personal communication, January 25, 1980.

7. Bernie Massey, U.S. Geological Survey, Austin, Texas. Personal communication, March 12, 1980.

8. John Moorman, Texas Department of Highways and Public Trans-poration. Personal communication, March 13, 1980.

9. Beade Northcutt, Soil Conservation Service, Watershed Planning Section, Waco, Texas. Personal communication, Janua ry 25, 1980.

10. F. E. Potter, Jr., Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept., Austin, Texas. Personal communication, March 5, 7 and 12, 1980.

11. John Wilson and Becky Ball, Natural Resources Information System, Austin, Texas. Personal communication, August 7, 1979.

CORRESPONDENCE (Attached):

1. Blaschke, Byron C., Texas Department of Highways and Public Trans portation, letter to Mr. Bill McBride , American Rigging

& Construction, Inc. , dated June 20, 1978.

2. DeBerry, B. L., Texas Highway Department, letter to Mr. Paul Storm, American Rigging & Construction, Inc., dated August 30, 1974.

3. De Le Rosa, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, letter to Mr. Gerald McLelland, American Rigging & Construction, Inc., dated June 20, 1978.

4. Fleming, Robe rt G., Texas Water Quality Board, letter to Mr.

Paul Storm, American Rigging & Construction, Inc., da ted July 10, 1974.

5. Latimer, Truett, Texas Historical Commission, letter to Mr.

. W. F. McGuire, Houston Lighting & Power Company, dated March 19, 1980.

. 6. McGehee, E. D., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, letter to

~

American Rigging & Construction, Inc., dated June 21, 1978.

7. McGehee, E. D., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, letter to Mr. Paul Storm, American Rigging & Construction Company, dated August 30, 1974.

1 1

8. Pate, Jr., J. E., U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, letter to Mr. Paul Storm, dated September 18, 1974. .

9. Potter, Jr., Floyd E. , Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, letter to Dr. Al-Smith, Dames & Moore, dated March 7, 1980.

10. Sharp, C. E., Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, letter ,

to Mr. Paul Storm, American Rigging & Construction, Inc.,

dated June 27, 1974. .

5.2. PERMIT REQUIREMENTS PERMITS: The following permits are required to unload and transport the Reactor Pressure Vessel:

1. Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation - Permit to transport load overland on State and Farm-to-Market roads.

This permit is for an indefinite period of time.

2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - Permit to dredge barge slip on the San Bernard River. A permit also will probably be taquired for the Varner Creek bridge bypass.

CERTIFICATES: In addition to the above permits, the following certi-ficates are required:

1. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) approval of the Corps of Engineers' permit to dredge on any inland river.

2. fr.xa s Department of Water Resources issues a certificate in cwo11ance with the Corps of Engineers permit.

4 e

t.

.. ._- . . - .m-.__...,. .

COORDINATION: Coordination will be required with the following agencies and private corporations:

1. Fort Bend County Sherif f Department l

• 2. Brazoria County Sheriff Department

3. Austin County Sheriff Department

4. Wharton County Sherif f Department

5. U.S. Coast Cuard, Freeport, Texas  ;

6. Santa Fe Railroad i

7. Southern Pacific Transportation Company

8. Missouri Pacific Railroad

9. Garrison Telephone Company

10. Fort Bend County Telephone Company

11. General Telephone C~ spany of the Southwest

12. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company

, 13. Community Public Service Company j 14. Houston Lighting and Power Company

15. Texas Department of Water Resources

16. Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation e

4 8

4 l  !

6.0 NRC QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES NRC STAFF QUESTIONS - ALLENS CREEK BARGE LANDING SLIP AND OVERLAND TRANSPORTATION OF THE REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL Each question is answered below. In most cases, the text of the report is referred to by section number for a more complete res ponse. -

Figures, as appropriate, are also referenced.

BARGE LANDING SLIP Ql. Provide a general description of the current land use, vege-tation, and wildlife habitat for the site and its surroundings, based on county statistics, Soil Conservation Service data, and other sources of existing information.

Response

The descriptions are orovided in Section 2.1.

Q2. Provide a detailed description of the current land use, vegetation, and wildlife habitat present on the eight-acre site. Indi- -

cate the source of the information given.

Response .

The site description is presented in Section 2.1. A field survey conducted in February 1980 formed the basis of the description. '

Q3. Provide maps or figures of the 8 acre site, showing the location of all activities associated with the construction and operation of the barge unloading facility. Maps should show topographic features and vegetation types. ,

Response

The vegetation types and topographic features are illustrated .

in Figure 2.

Q4. Describe the proposed barge slip. Use the same type of

. descriptive approach that would be used to describe the presently existing barge slip immediately across the river from the proposed slip.

Using reasonable detailed maps and/or sketches, describe the locations of areas to be dredged and provide ba thyme tric (depth and cross-section) data for the barge slip area. Identify and describe any service such as ,

' power lines that will be provided for the project.

Response

A preliminary' description of the proposed barge slip construction is presented in Section 2.2. Figures 2 through 4, which supplement the text, are preliminary and not intended as final construction drawings.

QS. Describe the plans for disposal of dredge spoil, including but not limited to: 1) location of the disposal site (s); 2) present land use, vegetation, and wildlife habitat of the proposed disposal site; 3) acreage of the disposal site; 4) alternative disposal sites considered; and, 5) reclamation of the disposal site af ter the project is completed.

Response

Dredged material will be stockpiled on land adjacent to the barge slip and will be used to fill the slip once the RPV has been unloaded.

Land use , vegetation and wildlife habitat descriptions are provided in Section 2.1. Decommis sioning, or restoration of the barge slip is addressed in Section 2.4.

Q6. List the Federal, State and local permits or approvals required for the barge slip and overland transportation of the reactor pressure vessel, (e.g., pe rmits needed for dredging and dredge spoil disposal),

discuss the information needed to obtain these permits, oc.d provide a schedule for obtaining the permits.

Response

Permits are discussed in Section 5.2; the proposed permitting scheduling is illustrated on Figure 8.

l t

. . . ..-- . . - .. .~ ..

l Q7. Describe plans for determining if the dredge spoil contains  ;

any toxic substance that might cause the spoil to be classified as hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976. .

Provide any existing information related to the poten*isal content of toxic substances in the dredge spoil.

Response

Borings will be drilled at the site to evaluate the engineering characteristics of the soil. Samples will be collected from the . cores ,

and examined. Chemical analyses may be performed pending discussions with the Corp of Engineers (Galveston District).

Q8. Provide a schedule of construction activities related to the barge slip. This should include the anticipated startup and completion dates, the number of workers required, and identification of any anti-cipated impact on nearby community services and facilities.

Response -

A generic schedule is presented in Section 5.2, and on Figures 7 and 8, using the date for unloading the RPV at the ACNGS site as time zero.

Other activities are backdated from time zero. The engineering has not

• been completed and a contractor has not been selected. Therefore, manpower estimates are unavailable. Due to the short duration of the -

project, construction workers probably will commute from nearby towns, so there would be only minimal impact on nearby community services.

• Q9. Provide an analysis of the impact of construction and use of the proposed facility on: 1) state and federally listed endangered, threatened, or rare species; 2) prime and unique farmland; 3) flood-plains and wetlands; 4) other important or unique ecological or land use teatures associated with the site; 5) water quality, downstream water users and groundwater; and, 6) important fish species (use the definition of 'important' as given in Regulatory Guide 4.2), fish habitats, and

• spawning areas. Include impacts due to disposal of dredge spoils.

Identify and describe any service such as power lines which will be provided for the project, and discuss the impacts associated with pro-

• viding these services.

Response

Anticipated impacts related to each part of the question are provided in Section 2.5.

Q10. Provide an analysis of any anticipated impact s to the Sweeny

.- Plantation that might result from the construction, use, or future disposition of the barge landing site.

Response

. The Sweeny Plantation is located on the west bank of the San Bernard River. The Texas Archeological Survey conducted a field investigation of

• the. site and concluded the project would not impact the Sweenf Planta-tion (Texas Archeological Survey, 1979). The Texas Historical Commission has subsequently issued a letter e no objection (Texas Historical Commission,1980), attached.

Qll. Describe the options available to you for final ' disposition of the barge slip. Indicate your decision or preference. Describe the current and probable future ownership of the 8-acre site.

Response

. Abandonment and res to ra tion of the proposed barge slip site is discussed in Section 2.4; the impacts associated with restoration are addressed in Section 2.5.

Q12. Provide documentation of your contacts with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Soil Conservation Service, and other federal and state agencies that were related to the barge landing slip.

Response

A list of agency contacts is provided in Section 5.1. Copics of formal correspondence are attached at the back of this report.

. REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL OVERLAND TRANSPORTATION

- Q1. For the bridge on State Highway 36 crossing East Varner Creek:

1) describe plans for bypassing the creek; 2) provide a map or figure

-showing the route that will be used to bypass the creek; 3) describe the type of vegetation, the wildlife habitat, and the aquatic habitat w _ ...

that will be af fected by this bypas s; and, 4) describe plans for reclamation of the bypass area. .

Response

The descriptions are provided in Section 3.2.

Q2. Describe plans for removal of trees or trimming of branches ,

along those portions of the route where large trees extend over the roadway. Describe mitigation plans associated with the removal or trimming of the several to many old trees along sections of FM Road 522 southwest of West Columbia and along FM Road 360 in Needville.

Response

These plans are described in Section 3.3.

Desc ribe plans for crossing railroads which are at elevated grades relative to the transporation route. In particular, the railroad

~

crossing between State Highway 36 and the Allens Creek site is quite steep, and appears to represent a potential problem. What modifications

• to the crossings, if any, will be needed, and how long will use of the railroad be disrupted?

Response -

Preliminary plans and impacts related to the railroad crossing are discussed in Section 3.3. ,

Q4. Staff observations of the proposed route suggest that quite a few telephone and power lines would be affected by reactor pressure vessel transportation. 1) Provide a detailed schedule rela ted to the movement of the reactor pressure vessel; 2) estimate the number of line users who may be af fected by the movement, and the length of service ,

interruption; 3) discuss what mitigative measures are being considered I

and how users will be notified of the interruption, especially as the .

move is related to towns through which the vessel will pass; 4) estimate ,

, the number of lines that will be raised prior to movement of the pressure l vessel; 5) discuss what measures will be taken to lessen traf fic impacts .

l .along the route, describe arrangements being made with highway and law l enforcement officials, and identify the officials contacted; and, 6) pro-vide an estimate of anticipated traffic impacts and their location and duration.

Response

1) The schedule is provided on Figure 7.

2) The disruption of power and phone service is addressed in Section 3.3.

3) Interruption and movement through towns will be coordi-

. nated with local agencies as discussed in Sections 3.1 and 3.3.

4) The number of lines will be surveyed'just prior to movement of the vessel.

5) and 6) Traf fic movement and impacts are addressed in Sections 3.1 and 3.3.

~

i QS. Describe alternative plans that have been considered for transporting the reactor pressure vessel to the Allens Creek site, and

. present the rationale, including consideration of environmental impact, that was used to select the proposed plan.

Response

, Alternative plans and routes considered for transporting the RPV are discussed in Section 4.0.

D-e e

r

. . - .:. . . a . . - .a. - . - .. .:.. . .: : . .....u.... . . ,

i l

l LITERATURE CITED

1. American/ Marks 1974, Feasibility Study for Transporting a Nuclear Reactor Vessel to Houston Lighting & Power Company, Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Wallis, Texas. Vols. I, IIA and IV. '

2. Federal Register, January 17, 1979, List of Endangered and Threatened ~

Wildlife and Plants. 44(12):3636-3654.

3. Fede ral Register, January 31, 1978, Part 657 - Prime and Unique Farmlands. Vol. 43(21):4030-4033.

4. McGowen, J ~. H . , L.F. Brown, Jr., T. J. Evans, W. L. Fisher, and C. G. Groat, 1976, Environmental Geologic Atlas of the Texas Coastal .

Zone - Bay City - Freeport Area. Bur. Econ. Geol., Austin, Texas.

5. Soil Conservation Service, 1979, Interim Report - Soil Survey ,

of Brazoria County, Texas.

6. Texas Archeological Survey, 1979. An Archeological Survey of a Proposed Barge Off-Loading Facility, Brazoria County, Texas. Univer-sity of Texas at Austin.

7. Texas Historical Commission, March 1980.

+

I l

t I

'~

$h ~. j- ) ,. .

() , h'h ~

Y

- , 1

[ ~ k '.,[ 7  ! '

g iY ,g h

- (,. , _

2- , . " - .

i.

!- ti m. -=

l .,,,

/

H-

~ .=

• s '

-. -- W,', -, -

~

&v n .

., ~ , ,. : ,

,-.up^

m y~i~.c_n

~ _

~~ .i G*'

+ v .- '

ve n --g' ' ,,. 9 y

a n , ., .

,, s

[;, / -

4 - ' - t'? - '

/f,

' /_y'i j , h$,

' ~ ~ '

,,i,. __

! 3

./ N ,

g' N  :, -H ry.

4

^

%. b =

f. :, f _

Q '

f3)i-l" / - e' ..'- .3 .~

'.Y"" . .'2

'/- , /~- .~~ ---

- ,BEAZOSRIVER-WALLIS-e ROUTE N

'e ' ' -

j,,

4. .

3 P-\

MM (yiS.as

' - 4. ,<, n

%- ;j7

-^s't/

+  : ___ N

'-, s/ . ,> -m i n; ;.r. i - -

,L, ;

L L;ar >/,

-f - .r 3g =7 f .'

, c r.

, _A;'. J -

WV J.:'[ .y t

' Y ^  : '* . r A- ~,Y

. K. y '

Q.

n t

.. [ + y. ;zw ,,,1.y _,

v ~ u.~-

hJ,.

~I f/U , '. ,

. . . . _ ' ' ' ~. \.

e -,

'/ ,EdAZOS RIVER { -

l

~ r . -

( ':e EAST COLUMBIA- .

N.. . ' s$

.3 .  !

.I

• y -433 - .i A. ,-

• ~

ROUTE ' 5 ! ',. ;.T*' 6 'I

.d '

I +, \ . ', , ,e  ; ' _.y -

r"~ !O Ieq kV ~

b h l4 COLORADO RIVER '

U/; '.' *i "' NM $

g

,j ROUTE ' L I- b.d f ,, ' ;i - _v, 9-- .1

' \ ,M, p i

1. 'l '

i PROPOSED EARGE g lU g'd * 'P h - g'], _ N j.1 \',-i[c/[qs'.

1

'fM.,Q

. u.-~/ '

~'

- 4 7__ g 3- , , . . i0FFLOADING ,' . ,.

G%r:

', a , -

ek" FACILITY - ,-t

.s

]< ;pr^

1.

'Q A  ;

'A {, !a 9;x j. g y i ~

y y;- .

, ., y , e n, . . -r  ;  ; ,9 R _ y . ) ' f- ( _

~

' y v, m \'

~

y  : s<

f. ,

3 \' y 'h. ' _h

-- 6- 4:

')- --e 2

" p: , ' ,. g, 1

._>.< %y Q '-

s ._ . ,

^~. ,. g ,. :=-;; l ,

q .)3

-u .Q' rT[i A }_3, _ Y [,.

1 DE

~

.

• f, . ,.

.% _ *h s, ,

"d

. e s -  : ." - ', .- s - . i. i J n -

'..)

6 1 1j  %,,/~. s a c .> 7 p.. .y .:.y . SAN EERNARD RIVER g

?,%,

~ i

[ .-) ,,,TyL- 4

• ROUTE / <

x , ' .f ci_ e,.,; i _ 7f 6

r q 'g '

. ., . .J. u,f -

.- a ,.t , . 1 g : : .'

, ~

_',,'t ~

J

' Y L_._[ 'l ;' ,, , _

Ly '

2

.wq' i "~ -- Q f ,; .

s. .o (

. ;;c f e'x ,f' 6

w e 'i c

.:' ' Q,

..] . fN L ' A.- - -l~ r,. .

'  %~'  %% j l- ,e... v ..

( y-

[y .p t

'N'.[ ; }i': .

,1

, [,e,. T N ,~ e/.4 ,

., L,&---],1 '

75  : . F l ' W " i-

~

f,

. ' Nh }.; 3.Ll -

,fl [ M

~

,=

} -

p

.' y', f i f, jy f

~

= suu m nas

.;,,.) .; :s s w l

_ j, . ,,

- o ,

. -q -

tp .s y - - - -

~

, Y_

.n ,

N i ,

HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY

/ ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station P

. .- - ALTERNATIVE RPV Unit 1 TRANSPORTATION ROUTES FIGURE 1

c _. ;. -

' T=;g. ) /

i P *

\, h V /' '%___ _ _ *-----_ . - *-

..:Q _

~ . = %ia=}l- ' '3s (; .

30

" (*

1a i = _ i - z.'

1 .

~f l; / '

s es .33 ~f '

'" .g: s y

. ~ ' > _ _ - _;

l e s y, ,-

t

~ p/ /

, x- N y

/

t

. ..  %,y**,.  ;,,/ .?e w ,

. .- 7/ oJ 4e

$,j 4

. / ,

/ , Q *c fi

, t ./ ,/  % ~

e s' '

/

/  %

8M 32

/

/ .

s

- +

% ./

j 9- *

, ',/ ,

x ..' t-

/ F

,1

/ *

• g* ',. .se (g ,

, s, (( 7 ,

.. .. =

.'- .,, /, .. . ,L.

33 , y on <K

\ c ., ._____

y. 7 - -

r

/ / ..

~

/ / i '. /

/ s' .

c. <

,/,/ Ln., o i

i > q

.// . ~ '

) g4 [

/

'h ) E

~' '

ll J_

l . ' '

Q .

.3,

, ,,; j

%,// _/llj, .,

~

._[_  %

~

.i i i s

4.

r m ,*

I /! /- ._ 30 /

l%% ,

^

QQfhf~=====----

. '%g 7 .. ,, ,/

f, 'Milson Point Ch

_g;j'g*

D- /~. -

._m-_____

'Qs,, (

g '? 7 ~,) PROPOSED AREA FOR BARGE

' N 5 0FFLOADING FACILITY

\ \ , , ~_ _ \,- ' ;(REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL) x i -

y\ '

• 1

~zo Y ,

\- ' \

/ ,

'g-

• 2r 3 -

m

's 3 N

>[ k '

)

w o

j 'j

~ ~ ' ~ ' 34 . l$

q 9

',,' Q y j/ p

"("

• ^

~

- - /js' ,/ .

y.

[ ..

l . . t ,

23 ,y

, L* { '

k .-

g 's '-

-w 4:# 4 ,/

p I

\. U d 4 .

N s, ,f

./ ,}^

.2 P l 5 - l

• l g 0 1 MILE 3- __ _ _ f. _% _ -. -- ----

--4 4

1000 0 1X0 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET 'o.

g:m . - . - - . . - - -

---u. AJ 1 5 0 1 ulLCMETRE ,,-

. s f0 - e c _, _.x m_. - , - - - - - - - -j= a .

D 9: D D TTc h HO,USTON n ,,, c,,, UG,H,TlHG , o . . , G 8, ., POWER

,,,, 5,,,,,, COMPANY fj '

j' Lj MJ n,A J

= u.i. i PROPOSED BARGE OFFLOADING

REFERENCE:

U.S.G.S. QUAD MAP FOR SWEENY, TEX., FACILITY DATED 1952, PHOTOREVISED 1972. FIGURE 1A )

l

SEAL 1

• m I NOUSTON u

7 IEkGI -@ <..

SITE ,,

1. W *

.aui ,

I J

.j.,

, Sh -

ase.c ES

.u ..

g MC i,

I ffDvlLLg PROPOSEO OVERLAND

., '/ , ~ " * ' ' ROUTE v(u 5 n e -

\

% ,, e,,,,

P ei ces ,.i.

, g bd d Swithy'  ;

,.a&2ee t. *- j N ,s 5 r-s.

(

r ,

' g_.,.iens tass f')

sy,+

W,

• s so scar en netes ( ,,,,,,..

g aat HOUSTON LIGHTlHG & power COMPANY

$ p.o An... c,. 6 wut... G........, s,...,.  !

.- **- u.., i  !

• • • ,,p g '. ~' PROPOSED OVERLAND ROUTE I '#' -

RPV TRANSPORT FIGURE 18

N I

/ F M S22

\ ^

l Nr Ni - ' , , ,

-~,; 7 ,,, ,

% ,/ $

A 0 )'+D,A o . ,k jk

\ A i

A ATER 6

h h p p , 's

^

3 "M

% qg y, N, 4

% 4 e WORK f' N AREA M

/

' l ss ^

/

/, '

PALMETTO I

. ~=

e

. d e

f A N

O E R I*

\

, x t)

Llil%D tAlifl% f]Pf.lLPHY Pflf#USED CfMSTFJCT13N j 3 i:4 . _ . - 2* --

.; '. -- 7 ' ' '

3 I '

/

I

. ;t 6. j

_I I

- Q_1 1 1  ; / ,

4 ,4 U~ e______-

s , b

+

~

h

'f' N '

xm  ;. - l R r v' i

}

w ,-

/

p /y -

~

~

' -- - PERIMETER W A T E R /

/ -

f g- E xC AVATIO N oiTCH M ATERI AL g

'a

.,j i4 GTORAGE , ic . 2 ?.1 l

M, w ~ -.', Y /. '{/

A

- A wETL. AND g p/ ,g ;4_ .,n e " ddbb ,,,-- x/

c, v 4 \ -  :

fvv .

\ -

r

'I i ,-

f ... . s .t.

r , ',i a" l y0^9' tu i /

f,cP,-

r%..',

V, ,- j

,/,f7s, y'/ m .. f h- f >% s _ . _

/

,i/, i

. ,2 c vg,/

? /

/ ,t}i v \ fos,I o

/ ,/

ce ?'

/

ll [4

- .,. t

\_

\

\

U.N! ~~J % L' 2 ; h.

~

/. s \, k

, q DARGE S P AND 'g 5

\ / ACCES8 ROAD p 'g

,e \ C ,\

' I.

l .\ s naim q uo a F i

1. ir.unt 4 i-g g

\

\ \

i, i,  %

\, * (($ [ldNA '

\ /

• / 5215$$Y" E

• 1 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY '

Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station Unit I

PROPOSED BARGE OFFLOADING

" "" I O M 100 1% 200 FACILITY AND VEGETATION MAP I

- ~

[

FIGURE 2

( -__ - _ _ - - - - --

o * .

m

- m ~

e

\

/

W

mu__s __- -

/ ~

l P

YF=Ilt@ isunitit.-;jj=-l u==vt !=7/i=ilf=llN/ ?

1 SECTION l

l i

l o

a

o. o. o.

e m m o HMey'. ~w-g -~- w-- - _

h / ,C v,

'//,=ityjjg;jjgJth-)lkJ/ftQ f

SECTIO %

\

e

l

..O cn cn s m

-WATER DEPTHS (FEET)

J41/59iEf//-~

rjigjajj g/sjin//r=h A

SCALE IN FEET 0 30 60 L._ .

ALL HORIZONTAL DISTANCES ESTIMATED l 9 m oc o l C & di d WATERDEPTHS(FEET) iSh/NikV/kJiA=///

,a e*

-nrd*

I B HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 BATHYMETRIC PROFILES BARGE OFFLOADING FACILITY FIGURE 3

k B0W BALLASTED BARGES 0.H.W. s D

RIVER BED g,g jp -- - - - -- - - - - -

- - j - - -- - '

' ~

PEA GRAVEL SLIP BOTTOM, EL. -10.0t3" E

CONSTRUCTION AFTER UPLAND 10:t BEEN EXCAVATI UPLAND E)

EXISTING RIVER BANK PRIOR TO W- RIVER BED j

/k'1/k5(14:1/ H/2/w/Awm/m tE11AET/PUIEV/A='//3

"/fMI/P' e,

s i

8 SECTION O 0

k

EL. 4.5' EL. 4.7' P.V.C.

STA. 0+00 STA. 0+22.0 1

i ACCESS ROAD SURFACE STERN (COMPACTED GRAVEL) 7 l

, ,;,.y . 7,. . * :e ' _ WZWMM'WA 1

,..o*'., _

'ICJIMil i

V*

l '

CONTROLLED BACKFILL TO BE INSTALLED

< .y ,

. 5WV-

,s.

hh  ;

l 9 e

...g*.

o, .

. . . . . . _ . . . - . . . - . - . . . - . . . . . , ..y e.: l

h.Yr'. \

?,k if bs l

x. 1

b* i 1

k. .) l August 30, 1974 D-18M  ;

American Rigging and Construction, Inc.

P. O. Box 47007 Brook Hollow Station Dallas, Texas 75247 ,

Attention: Mr. Paul Storm .

(

Dear Sir:

Reference is made to your letters of June 24, July 22, August 5 and  !

/- August 27, 1974, requesting a permit to move a 1000 ton nuclear re-l'

/' act.or vessel, on multi-rubber-tired vehicles, in the greater Houston -

aren.

This of fice has requested our District Office in Houston to conduct

{* ,

a detalled study of your proposed route, to study methods of traffic control, and prepare a cost estimate per mile for damaged roads.

These studies have now been completed.

The District and this office have studied and consiGered your request, and it has been determined that a permit to move this load cen be is;ued on the following basis:

(

j.., l

., 1. That the movement will be made using the multi-rubber-tired M

vehicles described in your original request. i .'?*--

.,p." l

2. That a representative of American Rigging and the Highway Department drive the route before the proposed mov6 to in- ,

spect the roads in order to determine the "premove" condi- g,t.

tion of all roads. -

.y? y-.y

. us-

3. 4,..

That representatives of decision making authority the.,,.>. from

. . route while the load is being moved to observe any damagF'Esh4, hlj',,' '

I it occurs in order to agree on the extent of damage as it Y '

happens.

b 4. Any culvert or structure which has a span of 7' or more will be matted in both directions with 6" timbers.  ;

i

'5.

The base of all roads must be dry. '

.. .w .

! 'L, l

. . ' ,s .:.a . )

'~' '

'1,,~~"'

., , . _ , , _ . 7 ~~"_*T~"~"'~~

' ~ ' ' '

I

w gig . '.

• E5'

$' Americ n Rigging cnd Construction, Inc.

Attention: Mr. Paul Stote. '

August 30, 1974

^

Page 2

{-

6. Once this move has begun it should not stop until it has reached its destination, unless the roadway base starts to become saturated from rain while the move is under way. The extent of saturation will be determined by the Highway De-partment. Since the occurrence of rain during the move is a definite possibility, numerous points along the route should be selected prior to the move es emergency parking locations.

~

7. Macrican Rigging must rupply the Auntin Office, before the mnve, with proof of innurance in the amount of'$1,000,000.00 to cover possible damnge to the highway facilities. '

(. B. The method of handling traffic during the r.ove shall be the renponsibility of American Rigging; however, this method "

shall be approved by the righway Department,before the move begins. With a move of this magnitude, it in suggested that American Rigging contoct the Sheriff's Office of each county along the route. It is ponsible that the Department of Public Sefety might'also assist with traffic control.

{' ,

9. That the tire sire of wheels be at least 10:00 X 15.

30. Before the permit is inoued, American Rigging must present to our District Office in Ho*uston a comprehensive and de- .;.s.

tailed presentation of the type of equipment to be used to move this load. ' J.Y:

If this office may be of further service, please. advise. ,

.c Sincarely yours - , ,

B. L. DeBerry State Highway Engineer , ' ,.

i By: ,

,' .l%.

u. c...,

$A Archie J. Sherroil, Chief Engineer'1;

- of Maintenance Operations 'f'@g

',,3 fn

! JMM: mea

(*

• 3,

..p .

.n

---

L..a.y'y-s . . . .. .... - . ... ..

, , ~--e , - , .

RECEIVED l l SEP 51974 l

AMERICAN RIGGING & CONST. IflC.

COMMISSION stars useawar anoissan RE AG AN HOUSTON. Cuaenua. EXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT

• DEWIT7 C. GREER l97m AND 3RA2OS CH ARLES E. SIMONS A U ST8 N. TERAS 787O9 3

August 30, 1974

• IN REPLY REFEF. TO FILE NO. D-18M American Rigging and Construction, Inc.

P. O. Box 47007 Brook Hollow Station Dallas, Texas 75247 Attention: Mr. Paul Storm

Dear Sir:

Reference is made to your letters of June 24, July 22, August 5 and August 27, 1974., requesting a permit to move a 1000 ton nuclear re-actor vessel, on multi-rubber-tired vehicles, in the greater Houston area.

This office has requested our District Office in Houston to conduct a detailed study of your proposed route, to study methods of traffic control, and prepare a cost estimate per mile for damaged roads.

These studies have now been completed.

The District and this office have studied and considered your request,

, and it has been determined that a permit to move this load can be issued on the following basis:

1

1. That the movement will be made using the multi-rubber-tired l vehicles described in your original request.

l'

2. That a representative of American Rigging and the Highway Department drive the route before the proposed move to in-spect the roads in order to determine the "premove" condi-tion of all roads.

. 3. That representatives of decision making authority from both the Highway Department and American Rigging should drive the route while the load is being moved to observe any damage as it occurs in order to agree on the extent of damage as it happens.

, 4. Any culvert or structure which has a span of 7' or more will be matted in both directions with 6" timbers.

l 5. The base of all roads must be dry.

I

American Rigging and Construction, Inc.

Attention: Mr. Paul Storm August 30, 1974 Page 2

6. Once thisImove has be_ gun it should not stop until it has reached its destination, unless the roadway base starts to become saturated from rain while the move is under way. The L extent of saturation will be determined by the Highway De-l

, partment. Since the occurrence of rain during the move is a definite possibility, numerous points along the route should be selected prior to the move as emergency parking locations.

7. American Rigging must supply the Austin Office, before the

'nove, with proof of insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 to cover possible damage to the highway facilities.

8. The method of handling traffic during the move shall be the responsibility of American Rigging; however, this method

. shall be approved by the Highway Department before the move  !

begins. With a move of this magnitude, it is suggested that American Rigging contact the Sheriff's Office of each county along the route. It is possible that the Department of Public

, Safety might also assist with traffic control.

9. That the tire size of wheels be at least 10:00 X 15.

J

10. Before the permit is issued, American Rigging must present I to our District Office in Houston a comprehensive and de-tailed presentation of the type of equipment to be used to move this load.

If this office may be of further service, please advise.

Sincerely yours B. L. DeBerry n 'neer State ' hway By-

. Archie J. Sherrod, hief Engineer of Maintenance Operations JMM: mea j .

I i

i . . _ . . - ..-, .-

e

' g',- DEPARTMEN1 0F THE ARMY C4tV[$10N DISTRICT. CORP 5 0F ENGINEER $

I r.0.s0 1229 g j satvt$10N. 1[143 77553 QS r.t , to <

C . n ,-, o o,.

SVCCO-RP 20 June 1978 Mr. Gerald R. McLelland American Rigging 6 Construction, Inc.

P. O. Box 47007 Dallas, Texas 75247

/

Dear Mr. McLelland:

This is in reference to your letter dated 16 June 1978 concerning a proposed dock f aellity for unloading a nucicar reactor vessel in the San Bernard

{ River near Wallis, Texas.

We no longer have our file copy of the 18 September 1974 letter to you frnm Mr. J. E. Pate nor do we have any information from you describing the dock facility. Hnwever, even with this information we could not gua rante e j that a permit would be issued. From past experience docking facilities are usually acceptabic and do not present undo environmental problems. j F6r Edditionni information, please contact Mr. Jim' Jones at 713-763-1211, ext 382.

Sincerely yours,

-) .,

j. .' &. fd..

i .c

(. MARCOS DE IA ROSA Chief, Permit Branch

,4  ;

.,.s.'.- ,

i, , *' I * , . ; . .

,',l*. .

%0 * $."

(

• fe ,

. .q :(l.h.

. . %,d,r,.;.r,s..

D% ><;--

"i

%,W u.a.

p ..;!,h.P.;-"'A sm n

> 3 .g 3.l y c -

% _.' i.* : h *

.I e

41

. .. -..tr.3 jig-

't.*p. .

. s . . . + ,><...u.s -. - a. .. a . , ,.a., , ,

f.l.423 TfMll.E JIM C. LAN2 DON un4AN

,,,,,, TEXAS WATER QUALITY BOARD CLYDE JOHNSON rfu glR \l 4N v P. RURLEIGH e. HU H . Y ANTIS. JR.

T. C A R Rl40N { f PH. (Sill 41b2ASt 3 700 NORTH CONGR F.AR AVF. 74708

~) P. O. 90 % 1.12 4 4 C APITOl. 4T % TION 747 8 8

,. Al:MTIN. TFN AM July 10, 1974 Mr. Paul Storm American Rigging & Construction, Inc.

P. O. Box 47007 Brook Hollow Station Dallas, Texas 75247

Dear Mr. Storm:

Thank you for your letter dated July 3, 1974 seeking this agency's comments on your proposed dredging of either the Brazos or San Bernard River.

A certification from the appropriate state agency is a requirement for a Corps of Engineers' permi t.. Our agency does not have a speci-fic application form for this type of activity. If you would please transmit a copy of the Corps of Engineers' application and appropriate location maps to the attention of Bob Galindo, NPDES Section, here at our of fice, then certification proceedings will be initiated for your application.

If we can be of further assistance to you, please feel free to contact us. ,

Very truly yours, -

$obertLl! FleG.M (s ud ng, P.* E.

, Director, Central Operations RAG:mkV

. t I.

IO

_ _ . _ , , . . . - - e .a -m ,

r

j 'f

, a.s m

. _ p............r.,.....m m2h a..

.q.....(...,,.._....,,,..,,c3. N )

1 (h ((h TRUETT L% TIMER P. O. B OX I:276

-N l} AMTIN TEX.% 7Mit

. EXECLTIVE DIRECTOR , ,, ,. -gt '7 ; _ J

!N l IEL'P' T-hi[

• Harch 19, 1980 I

Mr. W. F. McGuire Principal Engineer j Houston Lighting & Power l Company Electric Tower l j l P.O. Box 1700 I Houston, Texas 77001 i l l 1

l Re: Proposed barge offeloading ,

facility site - Brazoria Co. '

l

Dear Sir:

l  :

)

I l- We are in receipt of the archeological evaluation concerning the above-referenced l ,

undertaking. After a review of the findings, we conclude that, as described, the  ;

, proposal should not affect sites on the National Register of Historic Places, nor l- any site presently in the process of submission to the National Register. The j  ;

j survey of sites in the area which may be eligible for inclusion within the National ,

i 1

Register, however, has not been completed. Therefore, should cultural resources 1 be encountered during construction, work will cease and the State Historic Preser- l vation Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation will be afforded I the opportunity to comment in accordance with the Procedurcs for the Protection of Historic and Cultural Propertiec (36 C.F.R., Part 800).

Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the review process in our common j goal of providing the future with a past. If we may be of further service, please { j advise. l l

. f Sincerely, (

I Truett Latimer State Historic Preservation Officer  !

'l l

by I Alton K. Briggs y". ,~>' ' [' ' fjj','.l . , l i '

Director .

Cultural Resource Management .

i U.AR 2 i 980  ;

J l AKB/1ft ie.'. P.1 31E W. 097.

I i

cc: Ed Baxter- E!:'!lr".

g, ",". ;t , f,., , ,J.,

l

]Ae Y/O J$f sngor 3/$sforWherr a/&m

!l l

,e DEPARiutNT OF THE ARMT p% satutstoa oestRict.coars or t:CIN((Rs N ['.[ i r.o.so 1229 satvision, trias 17553 C =::

SWGCO-M 21 June 1978 American Riggin5 and Construction Company  ; . . L , , c.

P. O. Box 47007 Dallas, Texas 752h7 -

3' -

-.- 1. .E.~.:P : . 4 - U.;..), g,; .(

Gentlemen:

This is in response to an oral request by your Mr. Gerald McLelland con-cerning navigation on the San Bernard River Channel.

The information furnished you in my letter of 30 Augus+.197h, copy attached,

- e is valid with the following exception. The controllihg depth is now 7 feet j below mean low tide datum and occurs at the junction of the San Bernard -

River Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. I anticipate that this area vill be dredged during calendar year 1979, subject to the availability

(,' of funds.

I am inclosing a copy of our Hydrographie Bulletin to provide you additional information concerning the prevailing conditions on the San Bernard River -

Channel. Additionally, your organization has been placed on our tr. ailing -

list to keep you abreast of channel conditions as they are reported. c-Please feel free to call on us if we can be of further service to you.

(.' Sincerely yours, *+>-

,,.3 2 Incl E. D. McGEHEE ' + ^ ~-

As stated Chief, Construction- g . .- ,.

, Operations Division , , ' H.;.

.  ; 6;'..$...;

l* '

i. f '*

.) .vy k > .*

• y.idi}Qt.,

.p r

(: -

l

'...W*. i .

l U; ':, e f '

. .. . . . . . ... _ . .a.-.4---

. . . , . _ - __-...___f

..3 e

, q D E P A itT i..C NT OF THE ARMY 7 'g c a L va.9 s tm tis'. s s.s t.T. cuses**. of c N G s N c f.6eb

• • . u s.o.esoxi w.

c.ai.v e .vou. vi. y as nsso Of .~l *y ,

.. $y~ '. ~,.g?' ..

s

' 30 August 1974 SWCCO

/ Hr. Paul Storm

• American Rigging and Construction Co.mpany P. O. Box 47007 Dallas, Texas 75247

Dear Mr.' Storm:

.s..

1974

,This is in furtherance to our telephone conversation of 26 August concerning navigation on the San Bernard River Channel.

Inclosed is a drawing that shows the authorized Federal project. As noted on the drawing the 9 by 200-foot project is being maintained to about Mile 27. ThisWe is a very reliabic channel in that it has a very have not had to dredge during the past five

,elow shoaling rate. .

< years. .

The reported controlling depth is 8 feet.bclow mean low tide between Mile 20.5 and 25.2. Ilowever, the water surface in thisthus reach is k

normally about two feet above the mean low tide datum, the usable depth of water in the reach is aboi:t 10 feet.

Picase feel free to call if I can be of further service to you.

Sincerely yours, f

• ia:

':i, x .

' /C7*7 E. D. McGEllEE%<$LJ  ! -

, . .u 1 Inci Acting Chief ....

Project map Construction-Operations Division <;:yg.g;:

, j t.4 .

~O.M.-iGl..

' 'tNNNh./ .

.Ss. i:.i'i, ., . . n.

.i..

c.. .

( ,-.

6 k

g 8 a' e1 6 e gp .P. N .

._ -----^%-

..g _ _ 1 am e.L a., 4 k . . . . ' . - .....--- -' -

-' p'!

., DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 6

G ALVESTON DISTRICT. CORPS OF ENGINEERS d.K

), P. O. BO X 3 2 2 9

',4*

catvCSTON. TEX - ' 77550

,.s SWGCO-R 18 September 1974 1

Mr. Paul Storm

. Box 47007 Brook Hollow Station Dallas, Texas 75247

Dear Mr. Storm:

This is in reply to your letter of 12 August 1974 From the standpoint of navigation, your proposed dock facility for unloading

, a nuclear reactbr vessel in the San Bernard River would appear to be acceptable.

It also appears that your proposal would not involve undue environmenta 1 prob-lems. However, final judgment on both these aspects will only be possible

, af ter public notice and receipt of comments.

. I must emphasize that we are unable to make a final judgment until coments are received via the public notice route.

. Sincerely yours,

.r.

pJ.E.PATE,JR.9 9-

. Chief, Permit Branch e

e w

I h

- - - ~ . - -=  %.----m -

TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT e COMMISSIONERS g COMMISSION ERS PERRY R.8 ASS ,

, "i JOE K. FULTON Chairman, Fort Worth ....

Lubbock JAMES R.PAXTON EDWIN L.COX,JR.

Vice-Chairman, Palestine Dallas PE ARCE JOHNSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR W. B. OSBOR N, JR.

Austin Santa Elena 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 March 7, 1980 s

Dr. Al Smith Dames and Moore Suite 200 4321 Director's Row Houston, Texas 77092

Dear Dr. Smith:

This is in response to your recent request for information regarding endangered and/or nongame species.

. Enclosed are state lists, annotated as to the estimated chances of encountering specific animal taxa in Brazoria County. Although these lists should prove useful to you as background material and for general planning purposes, they are not intended as substitutes for comprehen-sive onsite evaluations made by competent biologists. Determination of the actual presence of a species in a given project area depends on a number of variables such as seasonal and daily activity cycles, environmental activity cues, preferred habitat, transiency, and popula-tion density (both wildlife and human). Absence of a species can be demonstrated only with great difficulty and then only with repeated  ;

negative observations taking into account all of the variable factors l l

contributing to the lack of observability. 1 l l Information regarding protected or rare plant species is summarized  ;

on an attached advisory sheet. l

. 1 Please let us know if we may be of further help.  !

Sincerely,

$- Ofd fFloyd E. Potter, Jr.

s l Wildlife Biologist FEP:W100 1

Enclosures '

1

_ ._ . . _ . . . . . . . , . - . ~ . - .

REG ULATIONS F O R TAKIN G, POSSESSING, TR ANSPORTIN G, EXPO RTIN G, PROCESSING, SELLING OR OFFERING FOR SALE, OR SHIPPING ENDANGERED SPECIES 12730.09.001 .006 As Amended July 1977 The following rules are promulgated under the authority of .004. Penalties. Any person who violates any provisions of these Sections 43.021 through 43.030, Sections 67.001 through 67.005,and rules is guilty of a misdemeanor: (a) On first conviction, he is Sections 68.001 through 68.021. Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, punishable by a fine of not less than $100 (One Hundred Dollars) nor more than $200 (Two Hundred Dollars).

.001. Definition. " Person" means any individual, firm, corpora- (b) On second conviction, he is punishable by a fine of not tiin, association. or partnership. less than $200 (Two Hundred Dollars) nor more than $500 (Five Hundred Dollars), or confinement in county jail for not less than 30

.002. Permits to Tal e Certain Fish or Wildiife. No person may (thirty) days nor more than 90 (ninety) days, or both fine and

• take, possess, or transport fish or wildlife classified as endangered confinement in jail.

species and named in this rule for soological gardens or scientific (c) On conviction of a third or subsequent violation, he is purposes, to take or transport fish or wildlife classified as endangered punishable by a fine of not less than $500 (Five Hundred Dollars! aor species, as specified in this rule, from the wild, or from their natural more than $2,000 (Two Thousand Dollars),and confinement in county habitat, for propagation for commercial purposes, unless he has jail for not less than 6 (six) months nor more than 1 (one) year.

obtained a valid permit from the Department as required by Sections 43.021 through 43.030 of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Cods. .005. Amendments. Upon finding that need exists, the Com-mission may, at any meeting. amend, revoke, or modify any of these

.003. Closed Seasons. Except as provided by Rule .002 above,it rules in compliance with Sections 68.001 through 68.021, Texas Parks shall be unlawful for any person to take, possess, transport, export, and Wildlife Code.

process, sell or offer for safe, or ship any species of fish or wildlife within this State listed below; and no person shall possess, transport, .006. Effective Date. T5ese rules shall become effective twenty export, process, sell or offer for sale goods made from the fish and days after the filing of two certified copies in the office of the wildlife listed below not born and raised in captivity. Secretary of State.

MAMMALS REPTILES A' Blue whate Balaenoptera musculus Speckled racer Drymobius m. margaritiferus VFinback whale Balaenoptero physalus Harter's water snake Natrix harteri 4 Right whale Eubalaena spp. (all species) W&pAtlantic ridley turtle : lepidochelys Aempli KSperm whale Physeter catodon 4r Hawksbill turtle l' Eretmothelysimbrica:o Black footed ferret Mustela n! ripes pr$ Leatherback turtle In Dermochelys coriacea Jaguar Panthers onca .,0creer American alligator F Alligator mississipiensis

, 4Jaguarundi Felis yagouaroundicocomitti Matgay Felis wiedii C Ocelat Felispardalis Red wolf Canis rufus AMPHlBlqNS Gray wolf Canis lupus monstrobilis , f Mexican wolf Canislupus baileyi Cascade Cavern salamander 10$uryceolaritans West Indian manatee Trichechus monstus Tenas blind salamander Typhlomotge rathbuni Bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis Houston toad Bufo houstonensis

. BIRDS FISHES tediky *>?sifdEYe} \

WP t Brown pelican I Peh>canus occidentalis d f 'olyodon spathula MGM Southern bafd eagle Haliatetus t. leucocephalus Paddlefish l* P American peregrine falcon Falco peregrinusanatum Shovelnose sturgeon Scaphithynchusplatorynchus VM t' Arctic peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus tundrius Amistad gambusia Gambusia smistadensis sin:Q Antwater's greater prairie chicken Tympanuchus cupido artwateri San Marcos gambusia Gambusia georgei

1. Whoopingcrane Grus americana Cig Bend gambusia Gambusia gaipei k Eskimo curlew & Numenius borealis Clear Creek gambusia Gambusis heterochir

, g4rpe interior least tern Sterna albifrons athalanos Pecos gambusia Gambusia nobilis Ivory-billed woodpecker Campephilusprincipalis Comanche 5prings pupfish Cyprinodon alegans Red-cockaded woodpecker Dendrocopos borealis Leon Springs pupfish Cyprinodon bovinus i Bachman's warbler Vermivors bachmanii Fountain datter Etheostoma fonticola l VpsyjQ Bluntnose shiner Notropis simus rwa teane: 7000-2 WfY bWC r f%cfNk bv>sh March 1978 pg gr (Q yg g

REGULATIONS FOR TAKING, POSSESSING, AND TRANSPORTING PROTECTED NONG AME SPECIES 127.70.12.001 008

• :~ e'G GM The following rufes are promulgated under the authority of REPTILES Sections 43 021 through 43.030 and Sections 67.001 through 67.005, Texas Parks and Wildlife Code.

O Wgr (Loggerhead, Atlantic Caretra c. caretta

.001. Definition. Person" means any individual, firm, corpora- Gopherus berlandieri Tortoise Texas t,on, i association, or partnership. jr" X F Turtle, Atlantic green Chelonia m. mydas Turtle, Big Bend mud Kinosternon hittipes murrayi

.002. Closed Seasons. Except as provided by Rules.004. 005,or Gecko, Big Bend Coleonyx reticulatus

.006, no person may take, possess, transport, export, sett or ofter for Lizard, Big Bend canyon Sceloporus merriamiannulatus

. safe, or ship any species of fish or wildlife within this State listed as Liiard, Presidio canyon Sceloporus merriamilong/punctatus protected nongame; or possess, transport, export, seff, or offer for safe Lizard, reticulate collared Crotaphytus reticulatus goods made from the fish and wildlife of this State listed as protected e5fyr Lizard, Texas horned Phrynosoma cornutum

• • "9'*** Lizard, mountain short-horned Phrynosoma douglassihernandesi Copperhead, Trans Pecos Agkistrodon contortrix pictigaster

.003. Protected Nongame Species. The following species are Kingsnake, gray-banded Lampropeltis mexicana alterna hereby designated as Protected Nongame Species: Rattlesnake, rock Crotaluslepidus Snake, bf ack striped Coniophanes i. imperialis Snake, northern cat-eyed Leptodeira s. septentrionalis MAMMALS Snake, Texas indigo Drymarchon corais erebennus Snake, Texas Iyre Trimorphodon biscutatus vilkinsoni Snake, Big Bend milk Lampropeltis triangulum celaenops

. Snake, centrat pfains milk Lampropeltis triangulum gentilis Bat, tesser yellow lasiu us ega xanthinus W Snake, Louisiana milk Lampropettis triangulum amaura Bat, Rafinesque's bigtared Plecotus rafinesquii Snake, Mexican milk Lampropeltis triangulum annulata Bat, southeastern Myotis austroriparius mumfordi Snake, Louisiana pine Pituophis melanoleucusruthveni Bat, spotted Euderma maculatum snake, Baird's tat Etaphe obsolera bairdi

• Dolphin, bridled Stenella frontalis Snake, Trans-Pecos rat Elaphe subocularis

& Dolphin, rough-toothed Steno bredanensis F Dolphin, spotted Stenella plagiodon Mouse, Paf o Duro Peromyscus comanche AMPHIBIANS Rat Texas kangaroo Cipodomys elator

1. Whale, dwarf sperm Kopia simus g WWhale, false kifter Pseudorca crassidens \

. $ Whale, goose beaked Ziphius cavirostris Ftog. Mexican clif f \

• Syrrhophusguttilatus C?Whafe, Gulf Stream beaked Mesoplodon europaeus Frog, Mexican tree Smilista boudini  ;

QU

+ Whafe, kil\er Orcinus orca Frog, Rio Grande h Syrrhophus cystignathoides carroi l

-9' Wha'e, short finned pilot Globicephala mactorhyncha Frog, white-lipped Leptodactyluslabialis f Whale, pygmy killer Feresa attenuata Newt bfack spotted Notophthalmus m. meridionalis <

@Whate, pygmy sprm Kogia breviceps Satamander, Fern Bank Eurycea neotenespterophila j Salamander, Honey Creek Eurycea tridentifera Salamander, mote Ambystoma talpoideum Saf amander, San Marcos Euryces nana BIRDS Safamander,Valdina Farms Eurycea troglodytes Siren Rio Grande Siren intermedia texana

(., ,g ,,;? ,. d ) Toad. gian, Toad, Mexican burrowing Buio ma,inu, Rhinophrynus dorsalis 4D0 Egret, reddish f Dichromanassa$ r. rufescens Fatcon, aplomada Falco femoralis septentrionalis Hawk,bfack Buteogallus a. anthracinus FlSHES i Hawk, gray Buteo nitidus maximus WV Hawk, white-tailed Buteo albicaudatus hypospodius \

Hawk, tane-1 ailed Putea albonotatus I -MD ibis, white-faced Plegadis chihi Blindcat, toothfess Troglogianispattersoni MO Kite, swallow-tailed Elanoides f. forficatus Blindcat. widemouth Satan eurystomus \

+ 9rO Osprey Pandion haliaetus carolinensis Chub, Rio Grande Gila pandora l t Owl. ferruginous i Glaucidium brasilianum cactorum Darter, Rio Grande Etheostomo grahami l VMMStork, wood Mycteria americana MDarter, river Hadropterus shumardi 1 4VC M Tern,least Sterna albifrons antillarum Darter, western sand Ammocrypts clara Carbler, golden <heeked Dendroica chrysoparia Gambusia bfotched Gambusia senilis r pevdW M CH e O t~ k. Lor % . 0c)hbe

. + n. J ca n.,e (o mt-)

o 4

COMMENT ON PROTECTED NATIVE FLORA 0F TEXAS

. February,1980 While the State of Texas has not adopted an official listing of endangered or threatened plant taxa, nor currently is there state endangered species legislation for flora of concern, there are several references which may be used for guidance in environmental planning. -

. Approximately 110 Texas plant species were proposed in 1976 for federal listing as endangered or threatened (41 FR 24523-72) but have now been withdrawn (44 FR 70796-7). However ~ withdrawn spe-cies remain under " Notice of7eview" (40 FR 27823). Notice of Review species "should be considered in eiivironmental planning" R ,70796) .

(44 ,F_R The first Texas plant species listed for federal protection as endangered is Texas wildrice (Zizania texana), 43 FR 17910-17916.

Others have now been added as either endangered or'~ threatened (see attached material).

One of the most entensive listings of Texas plant species of con-cern is that which is available from the Texas Organization for Endangered Species (T.0.E.S.), Post Office Box 12773, Austin, Texas 78711. For additional infonnation, please contact:

Steve Talbot Endangered Species Specialist U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (505)766-3972 or David H. Riskind -

Resource Management Section Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (512) 475-4848 None of YAe 2vb>e pM Y y e=ks occ u r- k %2ck Coumf g  ?

O

_ . . . . . _ _ . . _ _  :.~. _ ._.--- ....... ..__ . . -

e 4

e LISTED SOUTHWESTERN CACTI TEXAS Ancistrocactus tobuschii (Endangered: j]t44(217): 64736-64738)

(Tobusch fishook cactus)

1. Western Kerr County (Mountain Home to Ingram, Texas) and northern Bandera County.

2. Low limestone ridges or gravel bars near streams (upper Medina River and tributaries, upper Sabinal River and tributaries, and some tributaries of upper Guadalupe River).

Coryphantha minima (Endangered: ))t44(217): 64738-64740)

(Nelly Cory cactus)

1. Northern Brewster County, Texas.

2. Outcrops of noviculite on hilltops.

Coryphantha'sneedii var. sneedii (Endangered: j]t 44 (217): 64741-64743)

(Sneed pincushion cactus)

1. Southeastern Dona Ana County, NM. and northwestern El Paao County, Tx.

2. Southern Organ Mountains, Bishop's Cap, and Franklin Moun tains.

. Elevation: 1300 - 1650 m.

Coryphantha ramillosa (Threatened: ))[44(216) 64247-64249)

. (Bunched Cory cactus)

1. Extreme southern and southeast'ern Brewster County and extreme

. southwestern Terrell County, extending into adjacent Coahuilla,

,, Mexico.

2. Very steep calcareous canyon sides and in adjacent summits.

e-Echinocereus lloydii (Endangered: j]t44(209): 61916-61917)

(Lloyd's hedgehog cactus)

1. Northeast Pecos County (east of Fort Stockton).

2. Variable- gentle slopes to tops of mesas.

, Echinocereus reichenbachii var. albertii (Endangered: j]t44(209):

61918-61920)

(Black lace cactus)

1. Extreme southern Jim Wells County, Northern Kleberg County and possible discontinuous occurrence in Refugio County.

2. Transition between coastal plain and rolling interior.

. Echinocereus viridiflorus var. davisii (Endangered: ))t44(217):

64738-64740)

. (Davis' green pitaya)

.. . 1. Northern Brewster County (near Marathon, Texas).

l 2. Noviculite outcrops on hilltops at about 1200 m.

Neolloydia mariposensis (Threatened: ))t44(216): 64247-64249)

(Lloyd's Mariposa cactus)

1. Extreme southwestern Brewster County and possibly Presidio County.

2 Limestone gravel on hills on lower slopes of mesas.

I e

l l l g .,...;- . -_- -.

TEXAS I T

' PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT

• CoMMISSloNERS lutS$t0NE RS I E .

so8 suRLESON

( R. STONE Temple j hairsnan, Welle JOHN M. GREEN

1. C. FULToN sesumont I co-Chair *9an, LubtHpck CLAYTON T. GARRISON LoulS H. STUMBERG RCE JOHNSON San Antonio usthe EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

, JOHN H. REAGAN BUILDING AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701

~

June 27, 1974 Mr. Paul Storm American Rigging and Construction, Inc.

Box 47007, Brook Hollow Station Dallas, Texas 75247

Dear Mr. Storm:

i

• This is to acknowledge receipt of yout letter of June 24, 1974.

Your inquiry as to the possibility of obtaining a permit to dredge l

some high sand bars and build a slip on the Brazos leads to many questions. In reply to yours, permits are being granted at the J* present time for dredging and construction of slips on the Brazos.

However, it cannot be said that all applicants are granted permits.

l' It is necessary for the applicant to specify the location of the work, the area to be dredged, the deposition of the dredged material, the depth of the dredging and the reason for the project on the application. Then, our field biologist determines the effect the project will have on the fish and wildlife habitat. The public and environmental groups are offered an opportunity to comment on the project at a public hearing. After considering the evidence presented at the hearing and its effect on the fish and wildlife habitat, the economy of the area, and navigation, the Hearing Officer makes a recommendation for approval or denial of the permit on the merits of each application.

l

!. Under the present rules, it appears that in all probability the project would be approved. However, as we stated when you were here,

• the rules may change by the time your project is ready to start. All

' permits granted are for one year only and must be reconsidered at a public hearing.

t

(

...i__....____.._._= _ _ . .._ _ . _ _. , _ .

l ,

I

'Mr. Paul Storm

• June 27, 1974 Page 2 l )-

I realize that this does not give you a definite answer, but I am not

, able to say what changes may happen in the future.

Sincerely, m

C.- . S1 P N ] 31 6

.- an , Shel and Crave;l rogram Leader CES:1bb i

1 l

9 D

O e

l l

e 4

e e 1

l r

!8 t

N