ML19308C960

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notifies That Task Force on Operational Data Analysis & Evaluation Established on 790424.Task Force Expanded Charter & Schedule of Activities Encl
ML19308C960
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 05/04/1979
From: Gossick L
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Jennifer Davis, Harold Denton, Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE), NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19308C957 List:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002110700
Download: ML19308C960 (4)


Text

.

t,f. >

(~s f

UNITED 5TATES.

y y,,,,,, -',

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslCN 2..

W ASHING TON, D. C. 20555 QA c

g, w,/.

May 4, 1979 MEMORAtlDUM FOR: Harold R. Denton, Director, t1RR William J. Dircks, Director,fiMSS John G. Davis, Acting Director, IE Saul Levine, Director, RES Robert B. Minogue, Director, SD Norman Haller, Director, MPA FROM:

Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

TASK FORCE Oil 0PERATI0flAL DATA AtlALYSIS AND EVALUATION On April 24, 1979, I established a Task Fcrce on Operational Data Analysis and Evaluation. As a first step the Task Force has developed, and I have approved, the enclo' sed expanded charter and schedule of activities.

Y. %D Lee V. Gossick Executive Director for Operations e

e a

s.ooS11'7

,1

,o o

  • L i

I

-l TASK FORCE ON OPERATIONAL SAFETY DATA ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION CHARTER:

Examine NRC analysis and evaluation activities associated with operational data and recommend actions which will permit NRC to best use existing operational data base and data systems to promptly identify potential safety concerns.

The primary focus is on operating power reactors, although recommendations for evaluation of operational data from other types of facilities will be considered.

' Specific Objectives:

l 1.

Define prompt actions that will establish a structured evaluation. process to identify potential safety concerns or trends from power reactor operational or empirical data. This process should utilize the existing organizational capabilities of NRC.

e 2.

Assure that the process for review and evaluation of operational data emphasizes the importance of prompt regulatory actions prior to complete evaluation of potential safety concerns.

i 3.

Recommend a division of responsibilities within the NRC l

l offices with regard to generic compilation, verification, l

review, analysis and evaluation of operational data.

.s

~

f.

e

.l 4.

Recommend appropriate level of efforts to assure potential safety concern ; in the data are promptly identified, resolved, and documented.

~

5.

Recommend longer term at tions to further improve the NRC's review and evaluation of power reactor opera,,

tional-data.

6.

Consider analagous actions for operational data from non-power reactors, fuel cycle plants and material licensees.

8 e

e e

n a

L It I

l i

b

g.

3-

_ Task Force Comsosition D. Davis, Chairman, NRR R. Budnitz, RES D. Crutc"hfield, NRit I

R. Hartfield, MPA M. Medeiros, SD W. Nixon,flMSS D. Thcmpson, IE Detailed Schedule':

1.

Detaiiedcharterandschedule-April 30 2.

Define review and evaluation processes and resource needs -

1 May 2 3.

Determine responsibilities within NRC for review and evaluation of operational data - May 2 4.

Sumarize sources and quantities of operational data - May 4 5.

Sumarize status of relevant NRC activities - May 4 6.

Define imediate actions required to establish the reccmmended 1

e review and evaluation process - May 7 l

7.

Recommend longer term actions to further improve the NRC's review and evaluation of power reactor operational data - May 7 8.

Task Force Report with recommendations submitted to E00 and NRC Office Directors. May 11 l

l

-,. -. -