ML19308C949

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses B&W Hot Channel Thermal Hydraulic Analysis for Steam Line Break Accident.Concludes Resulting Doses Acceptable.Recommends Investigation of Steam Line Break for B&W Rodded Plants to Ensure Fuel Failure Doses Acceptable
ML19308C949
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/25/1978
From: Check P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Novak T
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19308C948 List:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002110688
Download: ML19308C949 (1)


Text

we - a.. 3.u. e~ua.

u..-.sa... -a 4 o,to mu m-6> siir soros om j-

  • uve 4...

.n.

4 3.u.

JAN 2 5 E'3 O

7 MEMORANDUM FOR:

T. Novak, Chief, Reactor Systems Branch,, DSS _

FROM:

F.

Check, Chief, Core Ferformance Branch, DSS

SUBJECT:

STIAM LINE _ BREAK ANALYSIS FO,R B&W RODDED, PLANTS Previous B&W hot channel thermal hydraulic analyses for the steam line break accident,had'in'di, cat'af) hat ap p rozi,'n'a't e ly ' '" L"] ~

~

~~

15% of the core would experience DNE.

This_is, based,on the,_

assumption that a radial-local peak of 1.61 would, correspond._

to an MDMBR of 1.30.

B&W has reevaluated the use of the original peaking distribution for the(dateruination of t'h a,, ' _

percent of the core in DNB for, the, TNI,- 2 stean line break,

analysis and found it to be extr,emely conservative for TMI-2, because the distributions were based _upon,a rodded plant, whereas TMI-2 is a bleed-feed core with rods nearly [g dis-,,

fully withdrawn.

The reevalma' tion', of ~t6a,'prid[cj:e'd ye'akid tribution indicates that there are no more than 5 fuel p'

~~

assemblies with predicted 'ia (' radial' ~i' local)' peaking

~ ' ~ ~~~

~

factors greater than 1.60 incfuding the 5% 'nu~ clear hot pin ascertainty factor.

These 5' fmal asse'abife's ' rep'r~e~ sed 2. 8%" ' ~~

~

' ' ~

of the fuel in the core and it:horefore fasathan 3%'of thf

~ ~ ~'

core is now predicted to be 'in 'DHf"(MDNBR<1.3)~during th'e~

~~'

MSLR transient.

The AAR_ find's",the resultiin'g 'doie's'sec'ep[" tai >1e '

~

new for this situation.

~~

~ ~ ~~~~

~

~ ~ ~ ^ ~

However, based on the previous analytical results it appears SL3 f or existing ro'ddid"p1'an'es sEo'u'fd "be',inv~estigated tha t the to assure that fuel failures _(fudi,, expefiancing','D[UBJ _s'ti1,1

~~

~~

result in acceptabla doses.

~

Faul S. Check, Chief Core Performance Branch

[_,

Division of Systens Safety cc:

D. Fieno L. Kopp J. Watt

,,,fENTRAL FILES JRR..RDG FILE R.

Meyer M.

Tokar

'~

CPB RDG FILE l

l l

w..

LK j

Fie P

\\ ' _,,,,...,. _ 1/25_/78 1/mg 7 8 1%_/78 l

N 1!ru. a. eovs==maar reenvu.e orr. css i..e-eaa-eme,

'MAC roRM 31s (Me) N1cM 0244 8002110

.