ML19308C898
| ML19308C898 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 06/28/1978 |
| From: | Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Gossick L NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| RTR-REGGD-01.068, RTR-REGGD-01.128, RTR-REGGD-01.129, RTR-REGGD-1.068, TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002070648 | |
| Download: ML19308C898 (2) | |
Text
?
/
UNITE 3 STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,E k
WASHING TON D. C. 20555 v
%g.....,/
l JUN 2 81978 1
c1Et1ChiDdt! FOR: Lee V. Gossick, c,xecutive Director for Operations FK11 L. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory Requirements Review Comittee SUhlfA'T.
- SUtitlAl'.Y OF REUIAIORY REQUIRFJiENTS REVIEW COMdITIEL MEEritJG 210. 76, JUNE 20, 1978 The Comittee reviewed:
1.
Proposeo R.G.1.1XX, "FUtCfIONAL SPECIFICATICN EUR 5AFE;rY-t<EIATED VALVE ASSEABLIES Id t40 CLEAR POWER PLA!(IS" dated Feoruary 13, 1970, ano returned it to the staff for rework and resutraittal with the following comments:
Auaitional guicance should te provided as to whicit valves the guide a.
applies. Whetner a specific list or a group catagorization of valves is provided is left to the staff. Tne assistance of DOR anc DSS l
snould oe requested in arriving at this guidance.
1 O.
Tne Ccanittee again adoresseo tne general concern it nas of the quality of value/ impact assessments and the lack of an evaluation of the safety significance of tnis guice witn the estimated impact.
Tne Comraittee recognizes the difficulties innerent in this question, but urged turtner consideration for this and all matters cor.r.iing cefore tne Comittee.
2.
Proposeo Revision 1 to R.G.1.128, "IUSTALIATIUN DESIGl Auc INSfALLATIuu 0F LAiOE LEAD STORAGE BATTERIES kOR NUCLEAR POWER PLAVTS" dated Marcn 3, 1978, and recomenced approval. The Comittee characterized this proposea revision as:
Category 1 - 3 8fiL__
3.
aevision 3 of R.G.1.29, " SEISMIC DESIGI CLASSIFICATICt1" dated 11 arch 6, 197d, and recommended approval suo]ect to the following comment:
ine changes proposed on Page 2 of tne Working Paper of the proposed l
i Revision.5 cated January 23, 1978 snould not be made ano tne original wording retaineo.
Tne Comittee characterized this proposea revision as:
Category 1 - tio backtit.
~
8002070
JUN 2 81978 fee V. dossick 4.
Request for RRhc Concurrence in Proposed Revisions to Standard Review Plan Sections 3.9.2 and 6.2.6, dated March 14, 1978, and concurred in tne assessment of the Director, Division of Systems Safety that the changes to these sections are not of a nature to require Comittee review.
5.
Proposed Hevision 2 to R.G.1.66, " INITIAL TEST P10GMMS EVR WATER-C00tio tRJCLEAR POWER PLAttrs" dated April 26, 1978, and recommended approval subject to the following coments:
a.
The Office of Standards Development ana the Division of Systems safety (W. Morrison and R. Dosnak) shoula review the provisions of this proposed revision and those of Standard Review Plan Section 3.9.2 to assure consistency.
Tne comittee cnaracterized this guide as:
Category 1 - No bacKfit, i
Su v
Cdson G. Case, Chairman Regulatory Requirements Review Comittee cc:
See next page l
i i