ML19308C876

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of Regulatory Review Committee 770413 Meeting 61 Re 770215 Proposed Reg Guide 2.X QA Program Requirements for Research Reactors, Revision to Reg Guide 1.44 & Revision 1,Reg Guide 1.118
ML19308C876
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/1977
From: Case E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Gossick L
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
RTR-REGGD-01.044, RTR-REGGD-01.118, RTR-REGGD-1.118, TASK-OS, TASK-RS-620-5, TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002070627
Download: ML19308C876 (2)


Text

.

,f UNITED STATES

? ',

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. c. 20655

/

April 26,1977 o

MDORANDUM EOR: Lee V. Gossick, Executive Director for Operations FROt!

E. G. Case, Chairman, Regulatory Requirements Review Comittee SUBJEOF

Sulf!ARY OF REGUIMORY REQUIREMCTfS REVIEW COffiITIEE MEETING NO. 61, APRIL 13, 1977 Tne Comittee reviewed:

1.

Proposed Regulatory Guide 2.X (RS 620-5) " QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR RESEARCH REACIORS", dated February 15, 1977, and recome. vied approval subject to the following coment:

The Inplementation.3ection should indicate that for operating a.

research reactors, the provisions of this guide will apply to applicable proposed licensing actions submitted to the Comission after issuance of this guide.

'Ihe Comittee characterized this guide as Category 1 - No backfit, except as modified above.

2.

Proposed Technical Position for RRRC Consideration on B12 Coolant Pressure Boundary Piping, dated February 22, 1977, and recomended approval of the proposed Branch Technical Position (BTP) with the following cmment:

a.

A revision to Regulatory Guide 1.44 should be prepared which incorporates the provisions of the Branch Technical Position.

'Ibe Comittee recomended that the provisions of this BTP be effective Jamediately for new construction-permit applications. For all other applications and for operating reactors, the Comittee characterized this BTP as Categopf Further staff consideration of individual cases required to determine the need for backfitting.

3oo2odM7

. 3.

Proposed Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.118, " PERIODIC TESTING OF ELECTRIC POWER AND PICTECTION SYSTEMS", dated Ebbruary 28, 1977, and recomended approval.

'Ihe Comittee recomended that the provisions of this proposed revision be applied to new construction permit applications docketed after the date of issuance of this revision. For all other applications and operating reactors, the Comittee characterized this guide as Category _1 - No backfit--of those provisions of the guide bey 6nd those requirements currMy' included in the Standard Technical Specifications.

Item 3 of the agenda was deferred to a later meeting.

'l%

E. G. Case, Chairman

(

Iegulatory Requirements Review Cmenittee ces:

See next page

-