ML19308C848
| ML19308C848 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 09/04/1976 |
| From: | Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Gossick L NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| RTR-REGGD-08.008, RTR-REGGD-8.008, TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002070598 | |
| Download: ML19308C848 (2) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _
.a
[
4 UNITED STATES 44 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h
' W WASHINGTON, 3. C. 20655
)
f 7.
-l
\\
.* /
l September 14, 1976 Lee V. Gossick Executive Director for Operation REGULATORY REQUIREbENTS REVIEW C0bHITTEE FEETING NO. S2, AUGUST 18, 1976 The Comittee reviewed:
1.
Proposed Regulatory Guide 1.XXX, " LOOSE PARTS DETECTION PROGRAM FOR THE PRIMARY SYSTEM OF LIGHT-WATER-COOLED REACTORS" and 2.
Proposed Regulatory Guide 1.XXX, " INSERVICE MONITORING OF THE GROSS LATERAL MOTION OF THE CORE SUPPORT rARREL IN PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS VIA EXCORE NEUTRON FLUX MEASUREMENTS," and after considerable discussion referred both items back to the staff for additional work and resubmittal, taking into account the Committee's comments including:
a.
Additional justification is required supporting the need as constrasted to the desirability of issuing these proposed
[
- guides, b.
Additional discussion and justification is required as to whether or not these guides should apply to BWRs as well as PWRs.
c.
Additional justification will be required as to any reporting requirements included in the proposed guides rather than in the appropriate regulatory guides dealing with reporting requirements.
d.
Additional discussion, justification, and recommendations concerning backfit consideratioc.s will be required.
3.
Proposed Revision to Regulatory Guide 8.8, "INFORMATION RELEVANT TO ASSURING 111AT OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURES AT NUCLEAR l
POWER PLANTS UNDER REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION: AND OPERATING,"
and recommended approval subject to the following comments.
2.
The Implementation Section should utill:e the standard l
language concerning current practice and be effective I
at the usual date of 8 months after publication for comment.
8002070 598' A
{ b.
The Implementation Section should indicate the overall applicability to cps and the specific abbreviated applicability i
to OLs.
A separate recommendation concerning backfitting should c.
be prepared by the originator of this revision for use by the staff in the backfit consideration d.
The footnote on page 8.8-11 should be deleted.
e.
The last sentence on page 8.8-25 concerning the use of respirators should be clarified.
The Committee characteri:ed-this guide as Category 2 Further staff consideration of individual cases requirea in orcer Tu
.. _ determine _the need for backfitting.
4.
Request for RRRC consideration - Appendix A to Branch Technical Position APCSB 8.S-1, " GUIDELINES FOR FIRE PROTECTION FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS UNDER REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION: AND OPERATING,"
and recommended approval subject to the following comments:
(
a.
The Introduction should indicate that for applicable plants, the provisions of this appendix will be applied to the extent practicable and necessary.
b.
In the discussion on alternatives, the consideration of a
~
" dedicated" system for fire protection, not necessarily to seismic Category I requirements, should be included.
'W
/""
gh
~
Edson G. Case Chairman, Regulatory Requirements Review Committee cc:
B. Rusche cc:
H. Shapar S. Hanauer F. Schroeder H. Kouts S. Varga E. Volgenau T. Rehm l
T. Murley M. Grossman R. Minogue R. Cunningham j
J. Davis L. Rouse l
R. Boyd DRL ads R. Heineman SS ads V. Stello OR ads s
( ~
B. Grier