ML19308C837
| ML19308C837 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 03/29/1976 |
| From: | Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Gossick L NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| References | |
| RTR-REGGD-09.002, RTR-REGGD-9.002, TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8002070588 | |
| Download: ML19308C837 (2) | |
Text
.
C UNITED STATES g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISslON s
o WASHINGTON, D. C. 20553 E
%,...../
MAR 2 91976 Lee V. Gossick Executive Director for Operations REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING N0. 45, FEBRUARY 27, 1976 The Comittee r'eviewed:
1.
Regulatory Guide 9.2, Proposed Revision 1, INFORMATION NEEDED BY THE NRC STAFF IN CONNECTION WITH ITS ANTITRUST REVIEW 0F CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, and recommended approval subject to the following comments:
An implementation section should be added indicating that a.
the guide is effective on the date of issuance.
b.
In Section A, Introduction, wording should be added to better characterize the nature of the information needed by the staff as set forth in the guide, as related to that required in Appendix L of 10 CFR Part 50 for the Attorney General.
This guide was characterized by the Committee as Category 1-No Backfit.
2.
WORKING PAPER ON PROPOSED REGULATORY GUIDE ON FUEL DENSIFICATION, and referred it back to the staff with the following comments:
The Committee concurred with the technical content of the a.
WORKING PAPER and suggested that this issue be resubmitted to the Committee either as a Branch Technical Position (BTP) or as a regulatory guide.
b.
Whether in the form of a guide or a BTP, an implementation section and an impact assessment should be provided with the next submittal.
i The draft report THE ANALYSIS OF FUEL DENSIFICATION appended c.
to the WORKING PAPER should be separated from the proposed guide (or proposed BTP) and, if desired, published as a separate technical report by the staff, standing on its own merits.
\\
8002070 N 8 fl
.O w
Lee V. Gossick MAR 2 S 1976 3.
AMENDMENT TO 10 CFR PART 50 TO REQUIRE PERIODIC UPDATIt!G OF FSAR'S, and after considerable discussion with the staff referred it back to the staff for rework and resubmittal, taking into account the Committee's comments concerning additional clarification and de-finition where they appeared to be required.
Item 4 of the agenda had been withdrawn by the originato. I
)
q, u_
_ ~
7 Edson G. Case u
~~ Chairman,. Regulatory Requirements Review Committee cc:
B. Rusche S. Hanauer H. Kouts D. Knuth R. Minogue J. Davis R. Boyd R. Heineman V. Stello H. Denton H. Shapar F. Schroeder S. Varga T. Rehm M. Grossman R. Cunningham L.' Rouse PM AD's SS AD's OR AD's SS&EA AD's i.