ML19308C328

Requests Extension of Final Rept Due Date & Addl Funding for Contract NRC-04-79-209.Contract Pricing Proposals Encl

ML19308C328
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	10/05/1979
From:	Tina Malone ESSEX CORP.
To:	Mattia M NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
Shared Package
ML19308C329	List: ML19308C328
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8001220740
Download: ML19308C328 (8)

Text

'

I r

f t

jl k iW\\

ESSMX October 5,1979 Ms. Mary Jo Mattia Chief, Administrative Contract Branch Division of Contracts Office of Administration United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555

Dear Ms. Mattia:

The Essex Corporation has been under contract to the NRC for a human factors evaluation of control room design and operator performance at TMI (Contract Number NRC-04-79-209). This contract is for $96,236.

The purpose of this letter is to request an extension of the final report due date, and to request additional funding based on an enlarged contract scope. We are requesting that the duc date for the draf t report be changed from September 30, 1979 to October 22, 1979. We are further requesting additional funding at the level of $37,814 to cover costs incurred in an expanded effort. A DD-633 is attached to indicate the basis for this cost estimate.

The change in scope of the contract was essentially due to delays in receiving information from NRC which was essential to our effort. Since we were not receiving this information, and since we required it before progressing with the work, we were lef t with no option but to develop the information ourselves. This not only increased the scope of the contract but also resulted in the three week delay of production of the final report.

The specific items of information which were required and which were not provided in a timely manner are as follows:

w O,c1 m v.s TMI-2 control panel drawings and functional descriptions.

e h

46 G4 Met. Ed. documents describing operator training programs, the training e

4' 3 i

received by the operators, operator selection criteria, and operator qualifi-cation records.

er;' n d ro'd' Met. Ed. CR and human factors design analyses and reports on special e

p j;"c studies relating to the CR and human factors ~ considerations.

C 4

i No.<w/

A list of critical points of action / inaction in the event chronology which

(;nV<k[wfy e

contributed significantly to the source of the accident.

(dlu7a r< N f

Yin addition, problems and delays were encountered in:

b l M U,,)J m d d e Obtaining a complete set of reactor technology memoranda.

m.u T. c fi7

?e Obtaining out-of-print standards from ANS prior to 1975.

r\\/r r[Jmp __, o Developing the full-scale mockup of the control consoles in the absence of panel drawings and panel photographs from Met. Ed..

On-c7% JW [y wf glgy g S&/.

8 001220 hC f ICSSIBX CORPORKIMON + 333 North Fairfax Street, Alexandria. Virginia 22314. (703) S48-4500 A

i Evaluating control and display relationships without panel drawings.

e

/e Identif ying control and display functions in the absence of control-display f unctional descriptions, Identifying controls and displays to be evaluated in plants of the same e

vintage in the absence of control-display functional descriptions.

V,,Tc s )

g T* [" Scheduling meetings with operators, especially fo: purposes of having them e ' MOyMf[#

contribute to the completion of the time lines.

__ Finally, delays were experienced du4 changes in the assignment of a contract l

Q_echnical representative and due to t(flogng of 'NRC facilities which reduced the afilla6Ility ofNRC$ersonnel during the p 'iod when the staff was moved.

if you need additionalinformatio or clarification, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

,uj y j $ W L hi7 m n [A L$

W

)

1

v. se Fj "'

(gy,dh t.( gL a':

Thomas B. Malone, Ph.D.

V Senior Vice President and Director Behavioral Sciences Division RCF:ks i

)

Attachment:

DD-633 J

4 1

1 i

i I

.~

I

E p an e.T or :ErE~sE r.,

a, - -

CONTR ACT PRICWr. MCFCS AL Suase u.au3..

.at00 mESEA?cs AND DEVE:.ar4Exn b s far : :s for se wr:en ii) sei s n a n af co st sr picus data is ce V d 4 ? R.dCT I f ts {***C"

-e-mred uo fin su=st=non for,e CD 7:rm 633 is armn=ed tv :re centracum :f n=et.

f 1

1 sup=ucs.~o<om st = wic ts -o P E eva=u=Ec w.w(

,c.

t=on ESSEX COPPORATION Human Factors Evaluation of Centrol Room i

-c-ca ict.c:. c s.:n.w. ::P Caces Design and Operator Performance at 333 h. orth Fairfax Street TMI-2 Alexandria, Virginia 22314 08 * ' S* o ** 4 se e 's O. O c a

• t c %i sa e n. c g L wo m at I3 7 o a E F E H F C m ** C Q Tofas a nno u ce T GF P a o 8*o s a 6 aowT M L.C & T & T f C e.

as o.

Al exan d ri a, Virginia 537.814 Unsolicirnd DET AIL DE5C2]PTION CF C05T ELIMENT5 I

f R EF Er%

0 TOTAL C 5T COS T (#) EST coSTI #

ENCr.

i. :1R ECT W A Teal aL. ffsearse an Ez':f Mf A) i:.

a.

Pum Cw ast 0 e enTs l

l?i

!d 6.

su e co s.7 = ac T a m iT rws

{

[l

l$

c.

o Tw En. (J) e a n w a r g as at lJ iis (2) vova si a=cano ecuutact as it tus I

(J) i m i c a civi ss o au T = a n.sr c a s (As one.c :A., ceer)

Ni ii'iii i:l I TOTAL DIRrCT stA TERIAL i ;

. usTtm AL cvEnr*E ao 1 :s sa.

. x ! se e s s

[i.,_.... N'ijjl!

ESTtu AT ED R AT E/ I Est 3.

Oin ECT t. Aeon f3ncifrj reouns Houm l CesT (3)

?!l :

See Schedule A. Attached i

I l

5fi 55I l

1 t

lii l

l pi ror4L marcr :.uca g

!!!p Egii E!ii 14,4211 4

L*aCR oV E ntw E ao f!cecif e 8*rermans or coes c ons erJ J l

o.M. RATE 1 K 3 asE = IEST COST (3)IM El General I

81 */

l 14 6?1 i 11.681 Ifi ii!

I i

t E

11.681

orAr. usan ovEx>rran kii e EST CCST (J) Ji ll3

5. SPEC! AL T E STI NG (*.,elucin g If eld

• erk at o...r-::-ever insa nitaticwis)

~~e

n f

4 ii3 TOTAL $PECTAL Tr$~TNo Ei

!U

• I 6.

$ P

• Cf aL E CUIPwCNT (:l diress charg.) Glemis e on Ez2tibit A) i EST COST (J) bi T.

T it av t L (7f air cf c.9af a e) f ol's d ** *d f. cet acec3 g Sc3.<ste) 8

(??

fi?

T se a= spo n t a Tion I

ih h.

• E n os tw om su s sisT ENC E rorAL raavr:.

i.:

iiii i

. EST COST f 3) :

ill 1.

COMsub7am 73 (Idenurr pssee e. ret.)

if*.bb rorst. consut :m:s V

!Eii ni t j

i 4.000 t

s. oTwE=

iaECT 257sar..,..

ra.-sherA) i 30.102 a i

ro:AL c:nsc: cos: no avr?stAD

. 'c.

ti. c, E

• E n at wo a:wi=i5r a *TivE cxeE wSE fa...

14.2.

..s e 4.-=.n v x...

10

>J f 4.274 1 4

-O-it ao y a LT1E S d 134,376 el I

rorar. rsmArro cos:

12.

3,438

'4 7EE J.m agoFi?

To A L ES O A T rD C OS T A.'t D F

• r oR P4 GF ET 37,814 4

l

' t.

San propo s al is su:r at:ed for use un connecum mth and.n.wnse to (Dese,r be.REF. etc.)

Unsolicited Proposal entitled " Human Factors Evaluation of Control Room Design and Operator Performance at TMI-2 "

uistrucuens to offer-ars and **ic fernote s whican foHow.

and :*fle ct s eut be st e surs at e s a s of in s d at e. in ac ca rdanc e nth.ne

[/

3, c u a 7 v=t:

t. c r:TL t Richard C.

Foote, Treasurer g,(

ma,

= a T c, s o. s,. o -

aw,l 'kiu\\l O

O m0

,..2,

., -o

'iW

@ _ hlN i h nh 5 October 1979 ESSEX CORPORATION IT o

s

,. n,

D D. ace, 00 3 ~ 4 masA nmem

-.s

I n r.,. -m e s s n - b c. m e :! c.-

e e. 3; D M:st? A su i'o r

.c scx E:Ut i ufv.

}

c5- ::s si

~ ::s - L.

=C. i

, Ew :ES: Rec

.see a

,.ss n i

4,00D i Materials and Trave!

l

^

e' f

I I

I I

I t

t l

I

i. -av E T

• E :E a RTw Ew T c e :E e E

• sE.

A Tio = =i. a E ue = = u tic 5 a = = $= ace 4 :=iwiS T = = Tic =. c a T-E

• T:w'C E a E Ro- ::

• WIS$nCN DERFCauEO*NY aEVIEe CF VCUR *CCOUNTS OR RECORO$ IN OONNECTION WI TM A N Y Q TM ER G QV E3N u CM CO8*T RaCT C R SUSCOss TR ACT elTHIN THE P=5T TiELVE MONTMST 0 no !! roa. ed=,dly telee.

Qe ets r EL U"=o a C amas w cin = siom Naus am o a ooa tas c e a twi cwi= s s e ric t (Incs,ee n p C,sej DCAA, 200 Stovall Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 703/325-4Un

16. cILL TOU RECulME THE USE CF ANY GOVERhuCMT PROPERTY IN TM L PERF C RW A NC E OF T His P 6C PCSEO CO fs TRACT!

[ vts

@ mo If yea, ed wittiy cet e eeperate ;=e*.

30 70U aE OusRE sovEawwEN T coNTitaCT FEM ANCING TO PERFCRes TMt3 **CPCSED CON TR ACT?

814.

@ v ts C wo if yes egentitet [ aov anc g e ayugnys [ e moc mts3 p avuswTs OR [ cu am aN T EED uo nMS

.ny mesp so.v.ct r tatwric *<t flR & DI Prat *cres F O R T H E S A n4 E O R 5t u n. A R w C R E IV DO v0U wC e ** 0 L 3

• N Y CO M T M AC T rer. co was it.

C A LLEO F C R SY tnt 3 peQPCSED CONT M ACT' D sts

& no !! Toe. Idarsattr OC E5 THIS COST S UW M A RY CON FORM elTM TH E COST PRtMC1PLES SET FOR TN tM N AS A PR, P A RT 15 fs e e J.dCN[c [.// f

@ v es C wo it r e nr a m en a se r= cese Pa e a

lH5TRUCTICH5 TO OFFER 0R5

1. De marpose of th.:s f arm is to provide a standard for-eat by 3.

Then attachment of supporting coat or prici.ng data to this which the efferer sub=its to *he Govemment a summary of in*

f:r-n is i= practicable, the data w D be speufically identified cu.:ed and estn=ated cons s nd attached swoortsna information) and desenbed (.vrth schedules as appropr:ste), and made suitabae sur detailed.e.aew -d analy sa. P scr to the award available to the contrac-ing officer or his representative uport of a centract resultseg from has proposal the offemt shall, requ e st.

under the condit2ons stated in N ASA PR 3.807 3. be required to ne femat for the " Cost Elements" is not intended as sut=nt a Cert.tricate of Cumat Cost or Fricing Datatsee NASAFR Arigid requ2.rements. nese =ay be presented in different 3.807-3(c) and 3.307-4).-

for-st with the prior approval of the contrac :ng officer a,f required for more effect2ve and effic2ent presentat2on. In all 1 As part of the specific infer-=ation required by this form, the otiser resoccts this for-n win be completed and submitted offerer =ust subeit with this form. and clearly identify as such, without change.

(" int is, data wuich as vertfiable and fac.

cost or pricing data tual and otherwise a s defined in N 3.5 A PR 3.307-3(e)). !;. addition.

5.

By suh=ussion of this proposal,efferor. if selected for b3 cust subrut with this form any information reescnably requir-negotiation. pants to the centracts.ng officer. or his authot-ed to explain the offeror's estt=atint proces s, including:

iz ed repres enta tzve, the rignt to exacina, for the purpose of the Judgmental factors applaed and the cathe=atical verifytng the cost or pncing data sub=stted, thos e books.

a.

or other usethods used La the es== ate meludinC those recceds, documents and other st:pporting data which wiU used on projec ing from knewa da ta, and per=1t adequate evaluation of sucs cost or pncing data, aj:ng

h. the contmgencies used by offeror I.c has proposed with the computations and project 2ons used therets. Dia right may be exercised as connect 1:n with any negotiations E" " *

• pncr to contract award.

FOOTNOTE 3 1 Enter in this colu=;n those necessary and reescumble costs 3 indicate the rates used and provide an appropriate ewlans-Shere agewement has been reached enth Gover-mme rep-whsch ett the judgment of the o!!eror m!! property be inc:ared ts en.

m the effics ent perior=anc e of the corttract. When any of the resentativen on t.he use of forward pricing rates, desente the costs in thts colu=m ha ve already beest incurred (e.g., on a nature of the agreesnent. Provide the method of cc:putatson letter contract or chenge order). descnbe thecs on an at!xhed and apclicataan of your overhead emersse, includirtg cost str.vortseg sch e+.sle.

Idenaty s!! sales and transfers betwe<et breakdoms and showsng t: ends and 2 nudge *ary data as n ec e s-your plants. divisi:na or orgarucations under a cor::: son corr sary to provide a basss for eentuadon of the reasonableness tiol. which ere included at other than the lower of cost to the of picposed rates orgsnel trattelenst or current asarnet pnce.

!! the total roynasy cost wtered here is in excess of 2:50 4

2 Abe spec e in additient to that available in Exhibit A la provide on a sessarete page (or on DD Form ~83. Royalty required, attach separate pages as necessary and identify an Report) the followsng *nformation on each separate item of thse **Refermce" cole:nn the attachment sn whsch informatson royalty or licettae fee: name and address at licensor: date of scporting the w ecsfic co st ele:nent may be found. No stand-license agreernenti patent ns=bers, patent 4: plication serial ard for= at as prescn b-C however, the cost or pricing data : rust innters. or other basts on which be royalty is payable; brief be accurate, cer::3lete and current, and the judgment factors descnpuon. including any cart or model numbers of each con =

used sn prosectart fecm the data to the esamates must be stated tract ste:n or csn.-Scnes1t on which to royalty is payable; pet-sn su!!icsent detant to enable the contracting officer to evaluate ceuttsgo or da!!ar rate of royalty per unst: mst price of cornrect 6e proposal. For e ux-ple, proende the besu s us ed for pnc2ste itect nt= ber of unsts; m1d tctal dollar scount of royalties.

n addition. if specrfically request ed by the contracting offic er, mstenals such as bv eendor quotacons, shoo est::~ates, or sneoice pnc es; the te nson for use of overhead rates +hich de-a cmy of the current license agrestnent and identificasson of p ut ssgntficantly fro:n emenenc ed rates (:rouced volume, a applicable clar=ss of specific patents shall be prov1ded, plann ed m a r or t r arr an g em est t, e t c. ): or justificatscus for en irr crease in.*atcr rates (anticipated wage and salary increa ses.

3 Proesde a list of pnncipal items methsn each category ser s ec.). ldentify and eclain any contmgencies shich are included c'i=: sting known or anticipated sourc e quanerty, urut pesce.

uk De prcpose4 pnce, each as antic: pated costs of rejects and c encetstson obtained, and % sis of establishsng source mid dslet tsee notk. or antic;p ated tec::nsc s! ds!!itultie s.

re e ncan ablen es s o f cost.

SCHEDULE A - DIRECT LABOR Estimated Rate /

Estimated Direct Labor Hours Hour Cost Program Manager - Labor Category 1 88 24.50 2,156 TASK Leader - Labor Category 2 120 20.00 2,400 TASK Leader - Labor Category 4 140 16.50 2,310 TASK Leader - Labor Category 5 80 15.00 1,200 TASK Leader - Labor Category 8 100 9.25 925 Engineer - Labor Category 7 40 11.25 450 Research Scientist Labor Category 7 40 11.25 450 Research Associate Labor Category 9 360 7.75 2,790 Mockup Specialist Labor Category 9 40 7.75 310

. m.

Research Assistant Labor. Category 10 80 6.50 520 Technician Labor Categcry 10 80 6.50 520 Clerical - Labor Category 10 60 6.50 390

evaaruenr or :grens r.,

a,...

C::NTRACT PRIC*NG PRCPCSAL so.s., s,....v..

. arco (RESE ARCH AND D E VE:.C P'4E.'!T)

'o'

-ass for.n :s far us. =r:en (i) suemsssion :( :ss: 3e ;rsc ng saca 'see fd 45 4 / 0 ?.jc~.J):s g

recutreo anc fij) suosttNtaan for tse ";D Tar s $33 is autnors:ed 'sy t.':e snt:3ct:.ng :(Gee. ;

1 1

su posi t s.= ci c a s s= vec ss 7 : e s.vanns-s=

...e2.s,.c.ca ESSEX CORPORATION Human Factors Evaluation of Control Room oc c,. e :.coacss.:oe:. ::p ca..,

Design and Operator Performance at TMI-2 333 North Fairfax Street Alexandria, Virginia 22314 2i v,.o ~ n.~ o,.a c.. e

.u.., s

.a.. is t o a s, ca,o n c a vo r.= mov~r o r ao -c i.. i so v v m.cir

• ric~ -o.

Alexandria, Virginia Facility 353,221 Unsolicited CETAIL DESC11PTICN CF CO5T ELIMENT5

'OTAL 4 EF TA. I l

I l E37 OO37f8) f,Est C s74 CNc1 1 :tR Ec? te ATTMI AL !!temaze an Zandber A)

t. ::

f.ii.

. 84acw.stssames l

Ni

!?$

b.

suec0Mrm ac?t2 strus e.

O rwCR. (!) e se ar CMt 46 l

ri!

il (U.oum st a=c amo cce. cac1 A6 r tws l,

ii!

(J) IM r t= co ve stom at r g ames, CM s (Af. eft.f #teg g3ef) l f':

rcra!. :!RECr 'tA r? RIAL li?

iWii

!:I

~O~

t

" X#b esJ l '

1.

hs ATT.41 AL OV ER M C AO J fR are EsTIM AT ED A AT E/ l EST

(((,,,,,,

hours MCUR I Cos7 ft) Eij ::nn

'l 3.

ClREOr LAscm (speef/y)

^

See Schedule A. Attached I

I I

5 i

i l

i 10 si 1

l til i

tor.41. coezer t ason I!!

ii E!!

iisii iiiiiii 16,991 i 4

.2eca evcawe 4e (s,..irt s.

, =..e,.,.........,i s i e.x mart i x s As c rssy cost es)i:;

iii Gene ral i

81%

1 16.991i 13,763 !!!

ii!

I i

ti!

]3.763 '

rorAL. ABOR oVERHEAn kii

+

4

s. se tz:su ssisna caesuanns n.cs ===.e c...mr..et in.e.a aan >

o esi ::sr in !

iH ii!

rorat errc ar. rrs-no E!!

iii i

\\

s. se ecs au 1:uiru nn: at sn,.as es,s.> as. ass..n ransen A)

? i 137 : s7 (2)i:i

. T = Av c. at :1,.cr ca.,s.J f ol. 4.<.n. aa en.ca.4 sea.e=t.)

li!

=

.. v =.a s.c a t irr e I[5 i#

s.

• t a s eu c a su s sisi tw e t i@

-0 i

rorat rR.avrt.

es c : sr /s) :

s. :: u su u r s n s ria.an:,.,a,...

. r.a.)

Technical Editor - 80 hrs @ 10/hr

i r ~". "- !

l Research Assistant-(M Malone) 120 @ 8/hr.crat censur.raars

}:;

nen ;u 1,160 9,853

s. orwe4 :in ec := s;s as......

z,3,a., 2) so.

n:Ar. :tRect cos~ A.vo avrRusso a42,367 i it. we en ab a=c acwi is;narivc exeexse rau.

14.2

..,.....i.x...

10

)3 ! 6,016 e 1 it ao.attiss a l

1

'3.

rcrAt.12 :stArro cos?

l48,383

.s O 10%

4,838 a.

n t = = *.c irit rorat. Es: varro ces; <.so.rtz cn rnort? 53,221 l

s.

LSik'oYTE'iYeif Ef0f!5'8a'f' UIft'ftfES"'lMmN Ncifr71*v'aTu30"o"n#*d"Co'n'$rol Room Design and Operator Performance at TMI-2" and ret'.ects sur wet esti-a.tes as of ?.as date. Un acesrdance with.e :nstracticas to :(ferees anc y femjnotes vhsca failow.

'.t=**e*=a.irst sa a m a ru m s e

s Richard C.

Foote, Treasurer j

j

.e s a, sve-i nsic a

... e a,..

ESSEX CORPORATION

% n @ 0f\\0 la p 29 October 1979 m

m fVyg Mu@uLNWL D 0 J.".".s 633 - 4 n..s. umc,

• XHilti A. '.U P o C R'wG $ CH EDUL C lb ec:!v. !!.,a re sc ace is n ecced. ne b; ae sr.e-sst

r. we c iT:w :Esenip-Cu z:se emne n i

Es :Os?.'s; I

4 1 1 Mnnthe k'arehouse Rental for Nockur Sternce G HCO.00 I

' per Tnnth i

$ 3,570 l

1 i

0,283 r

i Mat erials and Travel

{

i I

l l

I I

i i

l i

i i

i i

I i

i t.

• • A V E

• w t ga a e Tugg y g r E e EN sE. M A tic ae ak a EPC N AUT'CS a n o $P aC E a CMt wis? m a TIC N. O n % E A TC ue C EN ERG' OO M-titssiO M *EM eC RuCD Auv AEvaEw GF ' CUM aO OWNT5 cm aECOROS IN COMMCCTICM el *M a M Y O TM E R G O V ERM M EN T P RIM E C08*TftaCT OR 3bSCON TR ACT etTMIM TME PtsT T1rtt.vE MCMTM57

{ vts s} no !! yee. Idenety betem IEbf#"C"' " 8'*E^IE"****

• aut an.o m ac a t a s c e m &vl C98 MG G e P'C E CncJwee J"JP Cace>

DCAA, 200 Stovall Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 703/325-4320 ll-Eh 'Cu aEOul4E THE UsE QF ANY GCVERNMENT PWCPERTT IN TME PERPCRMANCE OF I f9 BI d 'P3 PC sEU EO N I N A CII C ves 1 ~o it r.a. no.nsur en e e o.eeue paee.

li t.

30 YCU AE GUIR E 3CV ERNMEN T CONTitaCT FIM ANC!NG TQ PER FC RM TMf 5 **CPCsE3 CON TM ACT?

T v ts I wo 14 wee. adentifer 89 aovancspavmstmTS ?[ eeoc atss p avutNTs OR.] cu aat AMr tes Lc Ams iv. 30 'OU woe =CL3 any O w* m aCT ree, as w ne., any,neer.ne,rs r sweis ne rlit

• 0; pe,esrep #C M TM E $AME CR $4MILA A WO RK CAL'.10 FC e av Twas aeCPC5E3 CON TR ACT' E vts O ~o it re.. na etr NRC-04-79-209 l v.

CEs mis C s? suMMAav C:w Casa vi M TwE :57 PRINCIPt.ES SET FORTM IN USA *R.**a? Wsee J.dCN/en)/ '

s v t2 u no 11 no. *wann en e eeperone pene.

INSTRUCTICNS TO CF FEROR5

1. De ;mrpose of this form is to provide a standard for=.at by

3. Men attac: =sent of supporttag cost or pric:.g data to cas wrtien $e efferor succiits to the Covem=ent a su= mary of in*

!=nn as i=procticable, the data wt!3 be ?pec:.fically ident:fied

. cur ed and estimesed :oss e.nd attxhed secocrnnd enformation) and desenbed (with schecules as a; cropr: ate), and made suztabas :vr detailed....ew -d a::aly s s.

Paw to the award available to the contract:.ng officer or has representatave upon 8.'ie o deror shell.

requ e st.

of a contrsci resultang from *has propsss undsr the condit2ons stated in N GA PP 3 c7-3 be required te I

suomat a Cartficate of C;m nt Cast or abscasg Ontatsee NASAPR 4 ne f:rmat for the " Cost Ele =ents" is not istended as 3.30.3(s) ase 3.307-4).

rigid requ:rements. Sese may be pr-sented to different format with the pnor app oval of the contrsct:sc ofScar if

2. As part of the spec:Sc 1:siermanon -equired by this form. the tw2: sed for mor, effecure and effie:ent ;resentauon. In all other respects this form will be cornpleted and sub=atted e(feror must subcat with this form, and clearly idectify as such.

wtc tzt change.

cost ce prscing data (Sat is, data wnich.s vertfiable and fac.

s! cad atherwsse as defined :.a N U A P9 3.80 -3te)).;s ansitica.

5.

By subenssion of mis proposal,offe-er. if selec*ed for he must submat etth 22s form any information reasonably requar-negotzat2on gracts to tue contracnag officer. =r his author-sd ta ez;1can the offeror's est:.:nating process, ischdisc

. zed representative, the ngst to examine, for the purpose of

c. the judp= ental factors a ppl.1ed and 'he mathematical verifytng the cost or pnc:.sg data submitted, dos e books.

or other cethods used in the esumate including dose records, docamettts and other support:sg data Mitch will used La projecu.=g f:os k: sown data, asd per=At adequate evaluation of such cost or prse:sg data, alceg

b. *he continge-sc2es used by offeror is his proposed with the computatiocs and proncuens used cereus. Bis right =sy be exercised in consecuca ws:5 assy segot:atscas l

nce.

pnor to contract award.

4 FOOTNOTES 1

! Entsr in this colue:ss those necessary and reasonable costs 3 lndleste the rates used and provste an appropnate ex:stans=

which sn :he judgment of :he o!!aror at!! properly be incurred tion. 3here agreement has been reached with Goverr: ment rep =

m the silics ent perksmance of the ccatract. When any of the resentattres on the use of forward pnczng rates, describe the

' costs an this a:clus.a have already been tacurred (e.g., on a nature of the strennent. Proesde :he method of coc:putatson letter con::act or c'tande order), desc:sbe thern on an attached and anslicat2on at your overhead expense, sneludirtt cost sm:.>oning sche-:ule. Ident:ty all sales and transfers between breakdowss and s.howsag trends and tasdge*sry data na neces-I L.rour plants, d.insions, or orgarttzatione under a coe=non con-sary to prossde a bests for evaluation ci the rsanonableness i ::ol. wtLich are naciuded at other :han the lower of cost to the of prtxsosed rates angsnal tranalerror or current mariret ynca.

4 !! the total royanty cost wtered hers !s in excess of ZMO 2 When scac e sa additiews to that available in Szhibit A is provide on a swarete page (or on DD Form ~83, Royalty tsq2 ired, attach separete pages es necessary and identify in Report) the followsnt snformation on each scoarate Item of

, t. hts "Refermce" column the attachtnent in whsch mictmation royalty or license fee: name and address of licensor: date of su::corting the mecsfic,:ost element say be found. No stan&

license agreement; patent ns=ncers, patent splicatson senal aid forc-ct is presenbod however, the cost or pricsng data must numbers, or other bests on which :he royalty as payable; brs el bs accurtte. com: lete and current. and :he judgment factors descrsptson, sncluding any part or mooel nurnbers at each corr-assd n pros ectsng from :he data to :he esumates ::-ust be stated tract : tens or cornponent on whsch :he ;oyalty is payable; per=

sa sutlic:ent deras! :o enable the contractsng atticer to evaluate cmtage or dollar rate of royalty per unit:. met pesce of corrtract th3 proposal. For ess esle, provsde the basts us ed for pnc2r:g stees nu=sber al uruts; msd total ::allar s:ount of royalties.

utsntis such as be vendor cuotations, shoo estsmates. or ln xditson. il spec:licsily requested by the contrec: sng otticer.

savoics pnces; he reason for use of overhead rates atuch te-a c:vy of the current license agre-a:ent and icenttile2 tion ci c

i pcss stintlicantly from expenenced rates (reduced volume, a applicable clauna of spectiic patents snall be provsded.

} picnned mztor rearrars gemast. etc.) or ustificauca for an irr-l

rtoss in laoor rates fantic:pacect ange and salary sncreases.

P-ovsde a list of pnncipal items we thsn each category sn-l c i c. ).

. dent 2fy and esplasn any contingencies which areitscluded dicating known or antscipated sourcs quannty urut prsce.

L:n :hs proposed prsce. such as antsc: pated coats at rejects and cx::etstion obtasned msd basss of establishsng source and

) atiectsvo morir, or entse2cated technses! tstfiendties.

jemas:necipss of cost.

SCHEDULE A. - DIRECT LABOR D

W E/

EST M ED DIRECT LABOR HOURS HOUR COST Program Manager - Labor Category 1 (g (

U 80

$24.50

$ 1,960 TASK Leader - Labor Category.2 igo M

67 21.75 1,457 TASK Leader - Labor Category 4

\\Qo

/)

228 16.50 3,762 TASK Leader - Labor Category 4 N

/D 170 16.50 2',805 TASK Leader - Labor Category 6 80 13.25 1,060 f

r aa

/_7

Engineer - Labor Category 7 9-g f'

110 11.25 1,238

/,

Research Associate - Labor Category 10 100 6.25 625 YO 5

i,

%c 60 6.25 375 ResearchAssociate-LaborCategory[r0 A., a

(;

Research Assistant -- Labor Category 10 M'

/'

40 6.25 250 771,ch y> )

c, l-0

. Technician;ps'c.

5

- Labor Category 10 Po 100 6.25 625 y

Administrative Assistant - Labor Category 9 30 7.75 233-Word Processing - Labor' Category 9 142 7.75 1,101 p

240 6.25 1.500-Word Processing - Labor Category 10 o ",

7 //-

bd 1 -

TOTAL 1,447

$16,991 m -