ML19308B697
| ML19308B697 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane, Davis Besse |
| Issue date: | 02/09/1978 |
| From: | Dunn B BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. |
| To: | Taylor J BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-TF, TASK-TMR NUDOCS 8001160759 | |
| Download: ML19308B697 (2) | |
Text
_
.r..
~
' COCK L WILCOX COMPMlY
..-?
1.'.%.
.f S ERATION GROUP
.L v
" t- $.'; T. IT.L A N D C M ',.,w....
3..-
Z;$s
,,3 g.,g NR. A9.g.l.T.0.-
j Jim Taylor, Manager, Licensing
~
9 - iE
- ------ ~ 7- _- _~~~~/.
f en Tert M. Dunn, Manas;er. ECCS Analysis (2138) i.
/
~
m u..
ist.
. ~..
1 File h'o. M u-l
'Nv I
or Ref.
/\\)OV l,19'O bj.
m M
U.,
Date WW D N.N' Operater Interrue f on of Hi 86PT M M.
j y,.............................gh Pressure Infectics February 9, 1978 hThis ceno addresses a(serious concern Nthin ICCS Analysis abou:
Etential for operator action to terminate high pressure in'je' ction' follow '
the-po *.
- ing the initial stage of a LOCA.
t
. Successful ICCS operation during s=all breaks depends on :he acct =:ulated reactor coolant syste= inveitory as vell II an the ICCS injection rate.
~
As such, ;it is tandatory that full, injection-l flov be r.aintained frc= the point of emergency safety features actuation
- l 1
l
.systen (ESFAS) actuatica u=ril the high pressure injectica rate can fully l
cc=pensate for the reactor heat 1 cad.. As the injection rate depends en
.S
)
the reactor coolan:
syst'an pressure, the ti=e at which a co=pensating r..t.atch-up occurs is variable and cannot.be specified as a fixed ne=ber It is quite possible, for c a=ple, -that~he high pressure injection ay
-successfully =atch up vi:b all heat sources at ti=e :
3...:en pressurization be Ndequate at.se=e later time t and that due to sys-.
l 2*'
9,
. The. direct concern here rose out of the..
rece.n 1seident a;; Toledo._ During the acciden: the operator terminated high pressure injection due to an ap-l
. parent sys:e recevery indicated by high.. level v".-hin the pressuri:er.
..This actien vould haw been acceptable only af ter the pri=ary syste= had * -
^". '..
._been in a subcoeled state., Analysis of the data fron the transient cur-
{ rently indica es that the system vas in _a two-phase. state and as such did
..not contain ' sufficient capacity to. allow high pressure injection ter=ina-l
_ tion. This beca=e evident at
- -.i sene 20 to ~30 minutes 'follering termination
.R-of injection when the pressurizer level again collapsed and injection had
,to be reinitiated.
During the 20 to 30 ninutes of noninjection ficv.they
.. :. '. '.
'..,,.. r..:...
. ~.
~..
r-
- ,, t.
- r. ;.
?
.s...::
n
. ~.
1
~..
,.s..
.s..
m.w.
iih}
l i
1 l
i I
l
%~
e k
n i e
I l
r I
I I
I l
6 l
l l
N.:. _ _ - ',, - -
--