ML19308A478

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Recommends Revision of Section 6.8.2 of Tech Specs to Reflect Specific Language in Section 6.8.2 of STS Re Periodic Review of Facility Procedures
ML19308A478
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/02/1976
From: Sniezek J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Reid R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19308A477 List:
References
F14335H1-RIP-71, NUDOCS 7910220656
Download: ML19308A478 (1)


Text

o

(~~)

(")

L V

e Distributicn:

IE Files /

IE readinc Central Files TT 0

L D ge t

rane
4 :A,,..._ _.

se u.,..ncf uperatin;..acc srs m@

D p 3 n r\\r

.4.

1 A

i - vuu..a m. w g/ iL uhu a

T...

m.L-.5Le.a.su u.,I t i

.s.

m.t c e1 v

Curtro..a r:: cent ins:ection at tr.e subject facility, cur argicn I insm. r 1.. ni.i rlea a ciscrepancy concer. lint.. c;.Gic&l 2:2c1 M cati:n ( n,.)

r i r-i-r.df ats fOr pGriodiC POViCH Of facility proc' cur 03.

b :ct10a s. '.2. [ :...

e

ru ca.cr.
n-i :

.t-iicensee's TS states, "Eacn nuclear safat/-rciatau trative policy of d.3.1 atove, and caan;;es tnerucc, shall r r:vn.m the unit s-gerinte the plant operations review com.ittee anc accrovec b/

fcr:n in each cant prict to impleaantation and pericdically as na; te se:The licer:see i decurent."

citaer specify a review period or not specify cne at ais discrutica.

In contrast. Secticn 6.8.2 of the Standard Technical Seeci fications states that 'Eaca procedure and ace.inistrative policy of 6.0.1 abava ax changes thereto shall be reviewed by the (FRG) and avarovec Ly t.:e (Plant Superintendent) prior to irplementation and ravia'ed pariccically The licensee's ecsition also conflict; as set fortn in eacn document."

wi tn Scction 5.4 of.\\.iSI :il8.7, Adninistrative Contracts for..uclear i o..cc Plants - acca.ner ?0,1972, whicn states tnat "Each procacerc : hall a T.4e freq c..cj revie..'aa prior to initial use ano periodically :horcaftar.

of such revicws shall be specified.

T..a licensee auvisad our inspector that tacy to nc: pl u tc r nfau :c.

nuclear saf 2ty-relateo procecure or ad::inistrativa ar,licy i antifin n.

Sectica d.C.1 of the T5.

.le concur sita ti.e Tasicnal e;i.:ia.; trt a.-

Sectica c.c.i uf period shaculd be specifiec for all ;racedures coverec c3we recows.ac tnat itcti :n tae facility TS. T1erefert,to reflect une 3;eci fic bnew1 in O ct:co s,m._

.>ile Islanc T5 Le revise:

i.e uncerst:nc taat taa licenses oss teen rt.astac c :.:_

~

of tae STS.

575.

upgra:'ed T5 for Unit I which are in confurrance uiG t...:

3 -

. al.v c U2 tails concerning this raa: tar were d;;cussae Mt.._c, i-t staff and C. C..;21 son.

If you rec. airs c&i;ianal inferatim or wic; cr

' r. 2. r.

discuss tais :.atter fort:ier, pleasa ccat;ct 7.

v.

'yC l -

gg uns n

g. usa n.;

3i s.

s. j a -

F14335H1, RIF-719 L i - '.. a:2r eac:cr, rn.r:

,;ffica cf I:.S 'ec';ica

  • m.. t.. rc.

~'

E. J. Erunner, 2:I cc; RIP:LiiR 7..

1 1l 3

..... n on.

C.

RIM

c. C...a1sen, qE.;

f~d. Hol an. Cd, e,.. '5 l e'A A91:0220656 E. _ a raa e r _ I........_._..._..

- = -

n

._s.

_01,

. v. ;....

y

- wwu *

.c.

wI v.6L L.D6 61.. 2 J/75 u..

13 (3

V

,v ri 0 t SS j

?an.u n. 3aie ek, Jnief a

n[},D)

Li ut.iater riactcr Procrart; 3ranca D

s(fica of Ir.s;ection and Enforcarcer.:

u i av M)'9'IS I_

A Ti.IAL IaiSFECTIO.1 PROGPAi - T,iREE.;ILE I3L/uD, U::IT HO.1 J1.

._a Ir. accordance witn tne July 25, 1975 scoping dececent fc Ntne sb auct trial inspection program, an evaluatica of arogran status.ias cade in tha,:egica I office on Hay 20, 1975. The evaluation consisted of a revicu of in-office support dccutents and discussions witn l:essrs. A. C. Lavis and P. J. XcIlogg.

dasec on this evaluation, it appears tnat tne program is being irplamnted as cescribed in the July 25, 1975 scoping docu::ent.

Items of interest are as folic s:

1.

Inspection activities including distribution of inspection reports will be corpleted by late August 197c. As discussed in my January 30, 1976 report, this should not change the planned completion dato for the cost benefit analysis report.

)

1 2.

dased on canoc' er considerations, it appears that the inspaction program will consist of the 332 ba::ic inspection elements plus 35 alternates for a total of 367 elements.

3.

.Jossrs. Davis and :<ellogg plan to reet with licensee canage::ent ano catain their views regarding tne OSIP and to discuss tne shift to the 2515 inspectica prograu. The tr.eting is tentatively scneduled for late A: gust or early Septe.cer 1976.

I plan to attend this resting as th4; infor:^aticn octainec shculd provid gocc input for the ccst ' enafit analysis.

c Ep.ul Sg.....,,

I* ). tid 2.1 F. J. :iolan cc:

J. 6. uavis, IE Distribution:

6..;. Grier, IE ulE Files L. I. Ccco, IE IE Reading J. F. L'.icilly, R:I Central Files RIP Reading
c. e. o rur.no r,

.: 1 a vi 2, LWRPB 2590.2 n.

P. J.

allecg, s: I b ' 2' U(93

i. i". Tisnin,
ar 3 r RIP: LWR._..[

a

,c.

t FJ Nolan cd

.v. m.

6/

,_/76..i _

o.ro.

Forza EC.333 Gev. 9-53) AECM 0 40 2 w. e. movannessmv remtma orrters te74.sas. nee

m s

t ia x

CistricLtien-IE Files d'fi 0 t *."S6 raad1:

~..

r.

'+

ih. h ! **;,

D r3

'g 011 d f,., C rd!1. ;.

4 c Le rk a.: $ c,

a.

--e

~~ % ~

,i

~.1 i%i

.to.

L

~

r
.

1., t. - t.

s.

4. :

recJnt insiCCtIO3 dt I.;e 5J..'Cct f001II Ey, Cur Yiita I IDS eCH I h2Cir1C3tl0M (!q) renfirC' Cchcernin'; IcCrnlC31 W C CI'en 6.U.2 C l L;e

.A r l h., u tw,0iflLc 3 LibCr3;.anCf Of idCilitf Acedru3.

,Jats far GT10Gic reli5m sclear sar;ty-rai ated ;isc2d';ra an;' '..-i ci s-licc6s aa's' T.', s;;tn. ' ~ ;c'.:

50all M r0VIC - 2.<

t ra t.i vd JOliCf C f d. ".1 avCVd, Gad Cnaal.ds tW r2'C.

ri r. ten -

tr.e plar. c,:eraticns reviw comittee ar.c a.7rovce U:

intar?rets tne sores wa; t,e ' te zera t h iu i

eitaer s;.ecifj a revi.w sericc cr not ;reci ?; cf.e ac nis viscret x.

cccuc. cat. "

Tae licensa:

( T3)

In centrast, Section 6.3.2 of the Stancarc Tecnnical Saecificaticas i

states that "Eaca grocedure and administrative policy of C.C.1 al.:w a (FRG) and a';r. roved cy t9e changes tnereto shall be revieuec by the (Plaat Superintendent) prior to inglerantation and revie3ed p The licensee's ;,asition also conflici.3 as set forth in eacn eccument.

for ;iucl:ar Pooer

,;itn 5cctica 5.4 of LSI :418.7, Mainistrative Contracts The frc:uencj reviewed price tu initial use and ;,ericcically t:'.ereaft:r.

of seen revic.4s shall ce s;.eci fiec."

7.a licer.seo advinc car inspector that tacf co not pian to revies ex.

i cntifi-c in crocNerc or adninistrTrive eclic:

tre.'.aicual c;ini;a tL;t a r:vi f a ch.ar safaty-relata

,,a ecccor..i t :

R coivi, c.. 1 cf :.ne 72.

for all : r.: cedars covw. ; icctica....l o f L.c T.cla veriae s.tacuic ce speci fiet,Lercfere, se recorn nc t:ut Sectica n.e.2 01D:ctic;. i....'

..e facilitj T;.Isi;nd TS Le revisW to reflaci. tne saaci Tic 1.'.n:ea= i4 vi t..a ET3.

.a encarst'.m t..u. t..a licabsee :c. ', re. : L.e s.

..ile

.77:.

in :.nf;r~arce v.ita. :

.: grab. T5 for :' i i,.ica c rs at' Or titis mattar.<ere ci;custsc mten.. J.x r.".: ira aNi:iuna

.: tails ccacerntr:.213co.

If e

n

/

afi enc C. ;'.

F.

o.

.l a.. e r hi s e m tai 3...atur f urther, ci;.se cthi.:c;

,/NI.

CJidc2! *ie d lr; M. usa

. a l i m :,

C.,- J n s.;

.. a. a,

.....I, u..r,]q Li n Oter

.9 ac t:: P i ri. "*

. C.

=;

.a

.u s. u,, u,

.m,,....i......

.s

.rurner,.:I l

cc.

4

, 4

- :< + l,.. E q e r. II.

RIP:L M -

RIP:LW.;

r-

_.,, clan cd en Snw. zes

'.e 1 s ca u.

N

\\

-i

,to

} of..

.. /,j o...ity 4,./7e-

. C l s,...,

.-~~

a.

l

  1. # s. oovuwz t ramvin emes ven.=re.,e, n-e*

i rinau_'te, %m McM c;.0