ML19306H017
| ML19306H017 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1988 |
| From: | Jordan E NRC OFFICE FOR ANALYSIS & EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL DATA (AEOD) |
| To: | Martin J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8803100157 | |
| Download: ML19306H017 (9) | |
Text
_
MAR 0 B BSB MEMORANDUM FOR: John B. Martin Reaional Administrator, PV FROM:
Edward L. Jordan, Director Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data
SUBJECT:
EXPANDED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR PP0GPAM AT RANCH 0 SECO AE0D is currently workirg with the Pegions to monitor the performance of selected power plants as part of an Expanded Performance Indicator Program.
The purpose of this program is to provide additional information on these plants to senior management and enhance our ability to recognize areas of poor and/or declining safety performance. AE0D expects to compile these data periodically in special reports for use by senior NRC management.
To initiate this procram for Rancho Seco, J. Crews of Region V and S. Stern of AEOD met with J. Firlit of 3 MUD on December 10, 1987, to discuss tracking the performance of Rancho Seco Generatino Station. At that time, Mr. Firlit agreed to provide additional performance data on a monthly basis.
Subsequently, we understand that Mr. Crews of your staff has reviewed our suggestions for performance data with Mr. Firlit of Rancho Seco, who found them acceptable.
I am requesting that you forward our suggestions to the licensee.
I have enclosed a draft transmittal letter for your censideration.
Original smid ryi E L hrdan Edward L. Jordan, Director Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
V. Stello J. Taylor T. Murley Distribution:
DCS SStern ROAB R/F MWilliams EJordan f: Black JFeltemes JJohnson o
FSingh 8803100157 080308 Were roya_
AE0D R/F CF ADOCK 05000312 JPcienthal CF
- SEE FREV1005 CONCLPPENCES Q
1
.,D:DhAE0D DD(. D EJ
- ROAF,:DSP:AEOD *POAB:DSP:AE0D *ROAB:DSP:AEOD DS AE0D SStern:md RSingh JRosenthal VPenaroyabTNovak CHe temes Jorc an 3/ /88 3/ /88 3/ /88 3/)/88 3/h /88 3/h/88 3/f/88
)
2
MEMORANDUM FOR: John B. Martin Regional Administrator, RV FROM:
Edward L. Jordan, Director l
Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data
SUBJECT:
EYPANDED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR PROGRAM AT RANCHO SECO AE00 is currently working with the Regions to monitor the performance of selected power plants as part of an Expanded Performance Indicator Program.
The purpose of this program is to provide additional information on these plants to senior management and enhance our ability to recognize areas of poor and/or declining safety performance. AE0D expects to compile this data periodically in special reports for use by senior NRC management.
To initiate this progran for Rancho Seco, J. Crews of Region V and S. Stern of AE0D met with J. Firlit of SMUD on December 10, 1987, to discuss tracking the performance of Pancho Seco Generating Station. At that time. Mr. Firlit agreed to provide additional performance data on a monthly basis.
Subsequently, we understand that Mr. Crews of your staff has reviewed our suggestions for performance data with Mr. Firlit of Rancho Seco, who found them acceptable.
I am requesting that you formally forward our suggestions to the licensee.
I have enclosed a draft transmittal letter for your consideration.
f Edward. L. Jordan, Director Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data
Enclosure:
As stated 1
i cc:
V. Stello J. Taylor T. Murley i
Distribution:
'DCS 1 SStern ROAB R/F MWilliams EJordan KBlack JHeltemes JJohnson t
TNovak RSingh VBenaroya JRo,senthal 1
- SEE PREVIOUS CGNCURRENCF B:DSP:AE0D *R0AR:DSP:AE0D R0A DSP:AE0D DSP:AEOD D:DSP:AE0D DD:AE0D D:AE00 S ern:md PSingh JRosenthal VBenaroya TNovak CPeltemes EJordan k/88 3/ /88 3/Zj88 3/ /88 3/ /88 3/ /88 3/ /88
MEM0kANDUM FOR: John B. Martin Regional Administrator, RV FROM:
Edward L. Jordan, Director Offit.e for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data
SUBJECT:
' EXPANDED PERF0FMANCE IND;CATOR PROGPAM AT RANCHO SECO AE0D is currently working with the Regions to monitor the performance of selected power plants as part of an Expanded Performance Indicator Program.
The purpose of this program is to provide additionel information on these plants to senior management and enhance our ability to recognize areas of poor and/or declining safety performance.
ecJetsisr11ayyTTn(H s
e indica-tof 4hi dat se ct to affiirtw41re-
~
ta t4 car-@e
~
tibn-w61i%behnt1'd%Cnterprshtaerf'aibus'e of (t>is-4ata, AEOD expects to' compile this data periodically in special reports for use by senior NRC manage' ment.
To initiate this program for R'ancho Seco, J. Crews of Region V and S. Stern of AE0D met with J. Firlit of SMUD 'on December 10, 1987, to discuss tracking the performance of Rancho Seco Generating Station. At that time, Mr. Firlit agreed to provide additional performance data on a monthly basis.
Subsequently, we understand that Mr. Crews of your staff has reviewed our suggestions for performance data with Mr. Firlit af Ranci,o Seco, who found them acceptable.
N I am requesting that you formally forward our suggestions to the licensee.
I have enclosed a draft transmittal letter for your consideration.
\\
,\\
Edward L.\\ Jordan, Director Office for Analysis anc Evaluation of Operational Data
~
\\
Enclosure:
As stated
'y cc:
V. Stello J. Taylor T. Murley s
Distribution:
DCS SStern ROAB R/F VWilliams EJordan KBlack JHeltemes JJohnson TNovak RSingh VBenaraya v
t R0 B:DSP:AEOD R
$5P:AE0D ROAB:DSP:AE0D DSP:AEOD D:DSP:AE0D DD:AE0D D:AEOD h
SStern:md RS' ngh JRosenthal VBenaroya TNovak CPeltemes EJordan i /1 /88 3 /) /88
/ /88
/ /88
/ /88
/ /88
/
/88
((
,\\
UNITED STATES y
)"e qf,g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
W? E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%/
6 Mr. J. Firlit Assistant General Manager for Nuclear Plant Production Pancho Seco Generating Station 14440 Twin Cities Road Herald, CA 95638-9799 Re: Performance Data on Rancho Seco
Dear Mr. Firlit:
Following up on your meeting of December 10, 1987 with Mr. Crews of Rcgion V and Mr. Stern of the Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data, we appreciate your willingness to provide additional data on Rancho Seco Station. As agreed during the meeting, we are providing guidance on the type of performance data we wish to receive in the enclosurr to this letter. We e
would like to collect this data for one full fuel cycle.
i The performance date elements listed in the enclosure were developed as a result of discussions with you and other licensees.
Please inform us of any data elements which you presently do not readily have, key performance elements you believe we have overlooked, or data elements which need definition, clarification or modification.
If you believe any of these data are of a proprietary nature, please so indicate.
Thank you for your continued cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely, John B. Martin Regional Administrator Region V
Enclosures:
As stated cc:
V. Stello J. Taylor T. Murley E. Jordan
~
Enclosure EXPANDED PI PROGRAM FOR RANCHO SECO Data requested on a monthly basis 1)
Automatic Scrams while Critical.
InitiatingSystem(s)andComponent(s) Involved.
l Causes.*
l 2)
Safety System Actuation.
InitiatingSystem(s)andComponent(s) Involved.
Causes.*
4
- 3). Safety System Failures.
Initiating System (s) and Component (s) Involved.
Causes.*
d j
4) grcedOutaces.
j InitiatingSystem(s)andComponent(s) Involved.
r Causes.*
Number of Fours.
l 5)
Monthly Operatino Status Summary.
[
Critical Hours.
Generator On-Line Heurs.
Forced Outage Pate.
l Planned Shutdowns (over next 6 months).
6)
Preventative Maintenance to Total Maintenance.**
Based upon both Manpower Expenditures and Ratio of Total Preventive 1
Work Orders to Total Work Orders.
7)
Corrective Maintenance.
See Attachment 1.
i i-8)
Repeat Maintenance.
See Attachment 2.
- Categorize event causes au Licensed Operator Error, Other Personnel Error, Maintenance Problem, Design / Installation / Fabrication Problem, Administrative Control Problem, and Random Equipment Failure.
- Be consistent with INPO or utility performance indicator definitions.
I a
-r----
-m-
-,-.,u...
- - -....e,.,,,,wwe-%-ww.~
,+,wem,-wmw,,,-,-,r--,,.-,
-,,,ww,--w,-
g
EXPANDED PI PROGRAM FOR PANCHO SECO (CONT.)
Data requested on a monthly basis
- 9) Event Data on Downtime.
See Attachment 3.
- 10) Staffing Goals Critical Management Vacancies Goals vs. Actuals for Filling Vacancies.
Critical Staff Vacancies Goals vs. Actuals for Filling Vacancies.
Ratio of SMUD to Contractor Employees in Technical Positions at Rancho Seco.
Goals vs. Actuals for Ratio.
- 11) Employee Turnover and Overtime.
Licensed Operator Turnover Rate.
Other Operator Turnover Rate.
Engineering and Health Physics Turnover Rate.
Overtime for Licensed Operators, total and average per person.
Overtime for Other Operations, total and average per person.
Overtime for Maintenance, total and average per person.
- 12) Chemistry Hours Outside Guideline 1
- Cumuistive Hours Outside Owners Group Guidelines.
Fours Outside Utility Established Operating Limits.
Condensate Pump Discharge Dissolve Operating Limits.
Condenser Air In-leakage (SCFM).
Conductivity.
- 13) Collective Radiation Exposure.*
Total Pt.diation Exposure for Personnel (man-rem).
- 14) Other Utility /INP0 Performance Indicators.
- Be contistent with INP0 or utility performance indicator definitions.
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE Group non-outage Maintenance. Work Requests (MWRs)* into three categories by high, medium, and housekeeping type items.
MWRs OPEN MWRs OPENED MWRs CLOSED END OF MONTH DURING MONTH DURING MONTH HIGH PRIORITY MEDIUM PRIORITY HOUSE-KEEPING TYPE MWRs OPEN MWRs OPEN MWRs OPEN
>3 MONTHS
>6 MONTHS
>12 MONTHS HIGH PRIORITY MEDIUM PRIORITY HOUSE-KEEPING TYPE
- Be consistent with INPO definitions where possible, including definitions for high priority Maintenance Work Requests.
1
^
t l
e E
c M
n ID a
TE n
T e
TS t
SE n
AT i
L a
m e
v i
~
t c
E e
S r
U r
A o
C c
e n
o E
n C
a N
h N
2 A
t I
N A
t E
e R
n T
r T
e N
o m
I m
h A
c M
g a
n t
T i
t A
r A
E i
P u
M E
q E
R e
T r
S Y
t S
n e
n o
p mo c
P O
Bs T
y N
ra E
od N
O y0 P
t9 M
e O
fn C
ai sh t
yinw a
yy ft ii tv ni E
et T
dc A
Ia D
~
!4 4
, i;iii::'
.i!
1, I:Ii i:
l1 ti !i j,
!i i
.__m EVENT DATA ON DOWNTIMES l
l DATE & TIME DATE & TIME DOWNTIME FOR FAILURES & ERRORS ONLY TAKEN OUT RESTORED TO REASON CORRECTIVE FUNCTioW SYSTEM TRAIN COMPONENT OF SERVICE' SERVICE CODE' ACTION CAUSE NARRATIVE TIME SINCE LAST TEST I
I i
s t
I i
- DOWNTIME REASON CODES: C = CORRECTIVE ACTION.
1 P = PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE.
M = MODIFICAfl0N.
T = TEST (IF EQUIPMENT FAILS TEST).
F*= = FAILURE OR MALFUNCTION. TRAIN FAILS (OR IS UNAVAILA8LE) TO MEET ITS FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
E** = NUMAN ERROR.
O = OTHER.
1 hp S
i
. m...
..m.
- m..
m.m m.
...m--
--. +
.m..
..-